Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Sram Red gruppo or Ultegra 6700??

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Sram Red gruppo or Ultegra 6700??

Old 02-16-10, 05:51 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sram Red gruppo or Ultegra 6700??

I just wanted to get some opinions on something a friend of mine mentioned recently.

He said that he would rather have Ultegra 6700 instead of Sram Red. I was a little surprised by the comment thinking that is a little crazy IMO.

Is there anybody that agrees with Ultegra 6700 being better than Sram Red?

If so, please explain.
bikr13 is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 05:52 PM
  #2  
Señor Member
 
kimconyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,744

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
No, but I'd rather have '09+ Rival over 6700; there, I said it.

"Give me Di2 or give me death." - Bike Weenie
kimconyc is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 05:53 PM
  #3  
Señor Member
 
kimconyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,744

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
I haven't tried out 6700, only 7900 but I assume 7900 is better.
kimconyc is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 05:54 PM
  #4  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,027

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22571 Post(s)
Liked 8,918 Times in 4,152 Posts
I don't get that.

But it's a free country.
datlas is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 05:54 PM
  #5  
Señor Member
 
kimconyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,744

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Or you can do what I did and go SRAMano; SRAM Red with 7900 crank.

You will receive hate from both sides. Actually, the Campy guys will hate no matter what...
kimconyc is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's just kind of silly. I'm sure 6700 is fine, but Red is usually compared favorably to 7900 and SR11
foresthill is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:07 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow is pcad your dad or did you really just ask if 6700 is better than red?

there's a reason most of the pro peloton rides on sram red you know...
thegunner is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:12 PM
  #8  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,027

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22571 Post(s)
Liked 8,918 Times in 4,152 Posts
Originally Posted by thegunner
wow is pcad your dad or did you really just ask if 6700 is better than red?

there's a reason most of the pro peloton rides on sram red you know...
logic fail.

For the most part, the pro peloton rides what the sponsor tells them to ride.
datlas is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:16 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
logic fail.

For the most part, the pro peloton rides what the sponsor tells them to ride.
and their primary sponsors are going to put them substandard gear if they get paid for it? come on, their primary interest is in winning. otherwise, why would the shimano people be running 7900 and not 6700?
thegunner is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:41 PM
  #10  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,027

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22571 Post(s)
Liked 8,918 Times in 4,152 Posts
Originally Posted by thegunner
and their primary sponsors are going to put them substandard gear if they get paid for it? come on, their primary interest is in winning. otherwise, why would the shimano people be running 7900 and not 6700?
My recollection is that in the recent past, plenty of pro teams used (and likely still use) ultegra on their backup bikes. I am not saying 6700 is better than 7900 (although didn't PCAD, in his wisdom, choose 6700 for his new build??), but rather pointing out that just because the pro's use a certain manufacturer or product line doesn't necessarily mean that one is "better" or "the best."
datlas is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:44 PM
  #11  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by kimconyc
I haven't tried out 6700, only 7900 but I assume 7900 is better.
Incorrect. I have both. 6700 is more refined than 7900. My LBS agrees. He thinks the idiots @ Shimano used 7900 as a Beta Version of 6700.

So it goes.

Don't get me wrong, 7900 is fine, but I have been VERY impressed with 6700 over my first 60 miles on it (plenty of hills to try it out). VERY nice, solid, technically advanced group for $800 or whatever it is they're selling it for. On the other hand Red is much lighter and the Red fanatics love it. The new Ultegra braking is just OUTstanding, as is the 7900, by FAR the best bicycle calipers I've ever used.
patentcad is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:47 PM
  #12  
SLO-1
 
Yaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,691

Bikes: '09 BMC Road Racer SL01

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow is sloth not here yet?!?
Yaniel is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:49 PM
  #13  
Señor Member
 
kimconyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,744

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by thegunner
and their primary sponsors are going to put them substandard gear if they get paid for it? come on, their primary interest is in winning. otherwise, why would the shimano people be running 7900 and not 6700?
Up until this year, Cervelo Test Team was on 7800; AFAIK, they are using SRAM for 2010.

Last year in the TdF, most of the Agritubel squad was running SRAM Force.

Boonen was running regular Record in Qatar (https://velonews.competitor.com/2010/...kx-bike_104808). Are you seriously saying he would have defended had he been on SR11? Was it the Merckx (Pinarello)? Was it the "substandard" wheels with only DT Swiss 240s hubs?
kimconyc is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:50 PM
  #14  
Señor Member
 
kimconyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,744

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R380 Ti | 2011 Hampsten Travelissimo Gran Paradiso Ti | 2001 De Rosa Neo Primato - Batik Del Monte, Genius | 1991 Eddy Merckx - Motorola, TSX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Yaniel
wow is sloth not here yet?!?
I think he's a SRAM rep.

Too bad I switched to SRAM pre-Lance.
kimconyc is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 06:52 PM
  #15  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 2,170 Times in 1,462 Posts
Originally Posted by thegunner
and their primary sponsors are going to put them substandard gear if they get paid for it? come on, their primary interest is in winning. otherwise, why would the shimano people be running 7900 and not 6700?
Record, Dura Ace, and Red are all excellent as well as the lower equivalents. They switch gears and brake. The pro's ride what their team says to ride and the choice makes absolutely no difference in their performance.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 07:14 PM
  #16  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by kimconyc
I think he's a SRAM rep.

Too bad I switched to SRAM pre-Lance.
If Sloth is actually an Sram rep, and I was his boss, and I learned of his conduct on this public forum, I would fire him on the spot. I can't really think of a more unprofessional thing to do than slam the competition in such a sophomoric fashion on the web. That's pathetic.

That kid should STFU and GTFU (Grow the F Up).
patentcad is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 07:29 PM
  #17  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Incorrect. I have both. 6700 is more refined than 7900. My LBS agrees. He thinks the idiots @ Shimano used 7900 as a Beta Version of 6700.

So it goes.

Don't get me wrong, 7900 is fine, but I have been VERY impressed with 6700 over my first 60 miles on it (plenty of hills to try it out). VERY nice, solid, technically advanced group for $800 or whatever it is they're selling it for. On the other hand Red is much lighter and the Red fanatics love it. The new Ultegra braking is just OUTstanding, as is the 7900, by FAR the best bicycle calipers I've ever used.
This sounds familiar because I said it already. 7900 was rushed out to because Shimano was losing a lot of the market share to Sram. And they FINALLY decided to hide the cables, I wonder why?

The main complaint about 7900 and 6700 is sloppy shifting and with the shifters being the most operated part of the component group by the rider, it should be the best part of a group. 7900 is WAY TOO expensive to not be the best shifting group. My 7800 is super smooth and there ain't a reviewer out there professional or average user that doesn't say this.

I am not saying it is horrible but Sram Rival let alone Force and RED, is lighter and cheaper than Shimano's offerings.In fact, Rival is Ultegra's direct competition and beats it on most categories if not all. Sram Force is even better and Red is untouchable from a performance to weight perspective.

I will premptively say that this IS a cycling forum to have such debates and you can criticize me all you want personally, but I offer my informed opinion which is only validated by Sram's revenues. Shimano better up their game.
slothlike is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 07:47 PM
  #18  
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
Originally Posted by slothlike
This sounds familiar because I said it already. 7900 was rushed out to because Shimano was losing a lot of the market share to Sram. And they FINALLY decided to hide the cables, I wonder why?

The main complaint about 7900 and 6700 is sloppy shifting and with the shifters being the most operated part of the component group by the rider, it should be the best part of a group. 7900 is WAY TOO expensive to not be the best shifting group. My 7800 is super smooth and there ain't a reviewer out there professional or average user that doesn't say this.

I am not saying it is horrible but Sram Rival let alone Force and RED, is lighter and cheaper than Shimano's offerings.In fact, Rival is Ultegra's direct competition and beats it on most categories if not all. Sram Force is even better and Red is untouchable from a performance to weight perspective.

I will premptively say that this IS a cycling forum to have such debates and you can criticize me all you want personally, but I offer my informed opinion which is only validated by Sram's revenues. Shimano better up their game.
Not getting into the SRAM versus Shimano debate, but I totally agree with this part.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 07:48 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ok, that settles is.






someone give me a Red gruppo. I'll have it installed and I'll tell you which is best.
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 07:58 PM
  #20  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerdavid
ok, that settles is.






someone give me a Red gruppo. I'll have it installed and I'll tell you which is best.
My Sram stuff is more "mechanical" feeling than my 7800 but the Sram shifts faster, more accurate and requires less adjustment. Plus, it is lighter which is the main objective in all of cycling equipment production. Plus the ergonomics are better for me with Sram. My 7800 hoods are a little uncomfortable. I liked my 7700 9 speed hoods much better back in the day. I prefer Double Tap as well, it just feels more natural a movement.
slothlike is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:02 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pennsville NJ
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think that group price may factor in pro choice. You know that getting 10-15 groups for the team 100-200 bucks is going to make a big difference if there isn't all that much performance difference.
a_thomasmr23 is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:09 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,802

Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 118 Posts
I'm pretty impressed by the 6700 so far. That's all I can really say. It is flawless and smooth (unless you wear huge gloves and eff up the shift). I had the option of a Force/Red groupset at the same price and primarily went 6700 because I didn't like thumb shifters, but I may try it someday.
Chandne is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:16 PM
  #23  
Lost
 
AngryScientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nutley, nj
Posts: 4,600
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 113 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Chandne
I'm pretty impressed by the 6700 so far. That's all I can really say. It is flawless and smooth (unless you wear huge gloves and eff up the shift). I had the option of a Force/Red groupset at the same price and primarily went 6700 because I didn't like thumb shifters, but I may try it someday.
thumbshifters?
AngryScientist is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:20 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,802

Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 118 Posts
Goddammit, that was Campy. WTF was I thinking?
Chandne is offline  
Old 02-16-10, 08:21 PM
  #25  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 294
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
If Sloth is actually an Sram rep, and I was his boss, and I learned of his conduct on this public forum, I would fire him on the spot. I can't really think of a more unprofessional thing to do than slam the competition in such a sophomoric fashion on the web. That's pathetic.

That kid should STFU and GTFU (Grow the F Up).
Well, I am not a Sram rep and I am not "slamming the competition" in any way just because I am debating on a cycling forum the differences between groupos. I see my posts as more informative with the potential of actually learning something rather than most of your narcicistic, histrionic, attention ***** seeking posts. 37,130 posts with 37,129 of them about how great you are and how perfect all of your gear is, and I am the one that needs to grow up?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Attention-*****_Beach.jpg (27.4 KB, 48 views)
slothlike is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.