Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Can a shorter male ride a WSD bike?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Can a shorter male ride a WSD bike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-10, 08:31 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Can a shorter male ride a WSD bike?

Hi, I am a shorter male 5'4"-5'5" male, who weighs 185 pounds (stocky, muscular build), who is trying very hard to find a good used bike. I found a good deal on a WSD bike (Fuji Supreme RC). The size looks like it would work, but am worried if a man should buy a women's bike, especially given my weight. Even in good shape, I still weigh in the 165-170 lbs range. Thanks.
Hoby is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 08:38 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pennsville NJ
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am about the same height and I've thought about it, if you can live with the colors I dont see any reason not to
a_thomasmr23 is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 08:39 PM
  #3  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As long as youre muscular its cool.

Besides being called a fred by some and mocked by other, I dont see a reason why you couldnt. If it fits and makes you wanting to go ride, do it! Weight will come off if you start to ride a lot.
stateskool is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 08:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Quel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,653
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think yes. But it's kind of like using womens golf clubs. No problems, but if your buddies ever find out the truth you are in trouble.
Quel is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 08:53 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Jinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa,ON
Posts: 642

Bikes: Univega Via Montega, Nashbar Aluminum frame/105 roadbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Many 'women's specific' road bikes share the exact same geometry with the men's frames. Changes will usually be:

1)Saddle
2)Narrower handlebars
3)Reduced reach brake levers

For some manufacturers, for example Trek with their 'WSD' frames, they shorten the toptube and stem length to account for the fact that women *generally* have shorter torsos and reach than men with the same leg length. IE: with the same standover height, a woman will generally need a shorter cockpit than a man.

So, if you're going to replace the saddle, and the bike otherwise fits, go for it.

As for the narrower handlebar issue, if you're a muscular/stocky 5'5" you will almost certainly want a wider set of handlebars than average. Probably 44 or 46cm instead of the 38-42cm that will usually be fitted to a women's bike.

Figure $50 for a saddle (unless you can find a 'take off' in the parts bin at the LBS) and ~$30 for some inexpensive handlebars.
Jinker is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 08:54 PM
  #6  
LET'S ROLL
 
1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NEW YORK, NY - USA
Posts: 4,782

Bikes: 2014 BMC Gran Fondo, 2013 Brompton S6L-X

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 306 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 33 Posts
If the fit is good, I think you should go for it.
1nterceptor is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 09:32 PM
  #7  
Iconoclast
 
rat fink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,176

Bikes: Colnago Super, Fuji Opus III, Specialized Rockhopper, Specialized Sirrus (road)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
They don't make WSD bikes in my size, but if they did, or I was small enough, I wouldn't hesitate to ride one. Especially, if I got a deal on it.
rat fink is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 09:32 PM
  #8  
Hey let's ride.
 
pathdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,002

Bikes: Torelli road bike, Tsunami tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm also 5feet 5 inches with a 30 inch inseam. I usually ride a 48cm-50cm depending on the make. If it fits go for it. Its hard enough finding a good fitting frame so don't throw any out due to marketing. I agree you'll probably prefer a 44 or 46cm handlebar.
pathdoc is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 09:37 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,768

Bikes: Trek Mountaineer modified with a NuVinci; Montegue Paratrooper folding mountain bike; Greenspeed recumbent; Surly Big Dummy with Stokemonkey

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
By a 'woman's bike' you mean a step-through frame?
Elkhound is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 10:26 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern NY...Brownville
Posts: 2,568

Bikes: Specialized Aethos, Specialized Diverge Comp E5

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 263 Posts
No, he means a "women's specific frame"...quite different from the step-through.
It it fits and you like it ride it...
Handlebars, stems and saddles are generally the most replaced parts on a new bike buy anyway.
I'm 5'5" and ride a 48cm frame...only a 28cm inseam...
Kai Winters is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 10:38 PM
  #11  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Wife is 5'4 and rides a WSD. Not sure if one could tell if it's a Woman's bike or not.

Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 10:54 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Boulder
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek's WSDs are specifically supposed to have a shorter TT, unlike the womens versions other brands may have.
recon455 is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 11:07 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
As others have said, check the geomtry as the top tube might be shorter, narrower bars, different saddle and short reach shifters. Personally I usually swap out the stock bars and saddle on any bike for my current favorites, so I can't see it being a big deal. The top tube should be the only part that concerns you. If you have relatively long legs for your height, then a WSD may even fit better than a standard bike.
intence is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 11:16 PM
  #14  
Oh Snap, not again...
 
atmdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Cardiff, Ca
Posts: 606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As long as you tuck before you get on.





Just kidding, you guys are slipping on the joke potential.

If the frame fits, feels good, and doesn't have butterflies*, go for it, nobody will know if it is proportional to your body. From your self description possibly look into wider handle bars and it should be fine.

*Unless you're into butterfly paint schemes, rock it.

Last edited by atmdad; 04-16-10 at 11:19 PM.
atmdad is offline  
Old 04-16-10, 11:43 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 719
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And while you're at it, why don't you pick up some women's underwear.

I mean, as long as they fit and they're a good deal, there's no reason you shouldn't wear panties... no one would see them and they'd probably feel great.
baribari is offline  
Old 04-17-10, 05:22 AM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for th advice. I am going to look at it today. Geometry wise it should work. It doesn't have the shorter top tube (53.5 cm). It has Sram Rival components, so that will be a change for me. I have only test rode shimano equipped bikes.
Hoby is offline  
Old 04-17-10, 11:04 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Buy it if fits. Short guys shouldn't worry about buying a a bike that fits them. If the graphics bother you, cover them up or have the bike repainted. No one will care it was a women's model unless you tell them!
NormanF is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mombutt
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
07-16-19 02:00 PM
jazzlocross
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
11
09-20-14 08:43 PM
dtretv100
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
25
02-07-14 06:01 PM
Kate N
Mountain Biking
6
08-11-11 08:06 PM
dave28210
Utility Cycling
8
04-17-11 08:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.