Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

How much faster can a nicer bike make you?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

How much faster can a nicer bike make you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-14, 01:14 PM
  #101  
Senior Member
 
zvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2014 Cervelo R5 Dura Ace,2014 Specialized S-Works Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'll never race, I'm starting late in cycling, but I absolutely love to compare my times over the same routes on strava to see an improvement in speed. Don't know for sure, but I'm guessing the bulk of people riding road bikes as opposed to hybrids etc. Are interested in the speed. If just riding for riding why bother with a road bike at all and the trade-offs entailed?


Originally Posted by Dunbar
I've never understood the logic that "slow" riders (and a 280W+ FTP doesn't sound slow) should celebrate small power savings. Because if you're slow you are going to lose races. If you don't race than who cares?
zvez is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 02:17 PM
  #102  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by zvez
I'll never race, I'm starting late in cycling, but I absolutely love to compare my times over the same routes on strava to see an improvement in speed. Don't know for sure, but I'm guessing the bulk of people riding road bikes as opposed to hybrids etc. Are interested in the speed. If just riding for riding why bother with a road bike at all and the trade-offs entailed?
All well and good, but does it really make you or anyone else feel better to buy a little speed instead of making greater gains through training?
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 02:54 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
 
zvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2014 Cervelo R5 Dura Ace,2014 Specialized S-Works Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
and why can't you do both(ie buying speed and making training gains) and be equally satisfied? Additionally, at least for me, throwing a leg over a really nice bike (which is far superior to any ability I'll ever have) encourages me to put more miles on. That's just me and can't speak for anyone else on this.


Originally Posted by Dan333SP
All well and good, but does it really make you or anyone else feel better to buy a little speed instead of making greater gains through training?
zvez is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 03:05 PM
  #104  
bill nyecycles
 
the sci guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 3,328
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times in 190 Posts
i cycle for fun, the joy of being outsoors and getting around, and partly for fitness. even on my cross-check my average speed on my routes is about 13.5-14.5mph depending on how windy it is here in flat Houston. but it's also a result of that fact that i am not a huge muscular person. i'm 5'5", i weigh about 130, and i don't have strong legs and never will. i may over time get my legs to endure longer rides, but i'll never be able to bulk up to the point where i could power speed for a long way. and that's fine with me. i have no interest in racing.

i have a garmin edge 200 gps (the base model gps) and while i don't compare my times on each ride, my goal is to make it 30 miles in 2 hours. that's about all I go for.

my cross-check is new and while i have seen an improvement in my time and speed on it, it's not a huge margin over my old steel, heavy as a battleship, mid 90's hardtail MTB
__________________
Twitter@theSurlyBiker
Instagram @yankee.velo.foxtrot
the sci guy is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 03:31 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4233 Post(s)
Liked 2,948 Times in 1,807 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
You're late. Orange is the new black
Originally Posted by zymphad
Because it's easier to see orange?
Nah, because no one messes with you if you've got crazy eyes.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 03:35 PM
  #106  
Not actually Tmonk
 
TMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,126

Bikes: road, track, mtb

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2632 Post(s)
Liked 3,148 Times in 1,657 Posts
can't wait for season 2
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
TMonk is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 03:38 PM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,597

Bikes: 2017 Cannondale CAAD12 105, 2014 Giant Escape City

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 820 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I'm digging this thread, especially all of the people saying an expensive bike won't make you faster.

I have nothing but cheap bikes, and have always though that someday I would buy an expensive bike. Now I have to wonder -- why? If it won't make me go much faster, why spend $5,000 on a bicycle? Are there other benefits that justify the expense?
memebag is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 03:49 PM
  #108  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 358
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by memebag
I'm digging this thread, especially all of the people saying an expensive bike won't make you faster.

I have nothing but cheap bikes, and have always though that someday I would buy an expensive bike. Now I have to wonder -- why? If it won't make me go much faster, why spend $5,000 on a bicycle? Are there other benefits that justify the expense?
As an owner of a perfectly fine 2011 Giant Defy (Aluminum with 105), I can only tell you that I didn't need a new bike. That was until I bought my TCR Advanced SL4. Now the Defy sits in the corner of the apartment, and I'm about to convert it to a grocery getter. The improvement in handling, comfort, precision operation (Ultegra 6700) has increased my enjoyment in training, both on AND off the bike. Even if I had paid full retail (as opposed to half price), I feel like this would have been a good investment.
fried bake is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 04:06 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
Herbie53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by memebag
...why spend $5,000 on a bicycle?
Because you cannot afford more?
Herbie53 is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 04:56 PM
  #110  
Senior Member
 
Pakiwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 367
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have always ridden used bikes. Now those bikes have always been good quality components and frames, but I just have never bought a new road bike. After a long hiatus from cycling due to family, I decided I needed to get back on the bike. For fitness and for stress relief. I rode my 30 year old steel framed bike. It's a frame made in the Colnago factory with Shimano 600 components. We did several centuries together and my plan was to get back on the bike and ride one this year. I came across a 2008 James Xenith pro frame and built it up with ultegra components. It is a carbon frame and I have to say is more comfortable than the steel bike and the frame is way more stiff in the bottom bracket. The new bike feels completely different and it does show on my times. But if times were exactly the same I would say the CF is way more comfortable.
So in my car a new old bike has made a difference. Though I won't be getting rid of my Steel frame though I will upgrade to 9 speed.
Allan
Pakiwi is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 06:02 PM
  #111  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
All well and good, but does it really make you or anyone else feel better to buy a little speed instead of making greater gains through training?
Man, I'm so with you. All these people having fun and enjoying their hobby - ugh, it drives me crazy! Don't they realize that they could have less fun and do it your way instead? What idiots!
grolby is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 10:33 PM
  #112  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
Man, I'm so with you. All these people having fun and enjoying their hobby - ugh, it drives me crazy! Don't they realize that they could have less fun and do it your way instead? What idiots!
Not misinterpreting me at all there. If a new bike makes you happy and makes you ride more, great. My opinion that I offered was that it's more satisfying to see gains through training, but if it makes you happy to buy speed that's fine and if someone gave me a pair of 404s or a Venge, I wouldn't turn them down but I also wouldn't feel particularly proud of myself for a personal best on a ride that was due to the gear rather than hard work.
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 01-04-14, 10:34 PM
  #113  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
Man, I'm so with you. All these people having fun and enjoying their hobby - ugh, it drives me crazy! Don't they realize that they could have less fun and do it your way instead? What idiots!
The way I see it, he is trying to appeal to peoples' common sense, where as you are trying to be funny with nonsense.
abdul10000 is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 02:44 AM
  #114  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 42

Bikes: Prorace Calisto

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by TMonk
nice posts Machin.

also (if you don't mind sharing), how heavy are you? you humbly mention that you're not fast, but if you're on the lighter side, a 280w 60min puts you well in the middle range of competitive amateur cyclists.
Hi, thanks!

I'm 76kg and 6 foot 2 inches... not ideal for a racer, and I hardly ever ride "on the drops".
Machin is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 03:16 AM
  #115  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 42

Bikes: Prorace Calisto

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
This is all so asinine. "2 minutes over bla bla bla distance" and such... Why do you care? Are you doing time trials on your road bike and losing by a few seconds? If so, train harder. If you're racing or riding in a pack, the drafting will effectively eliminate any advantages
The reason for creating my program was to allow you to quantitatively asses the benefits of X versus Y... which might be training vs. a new bike; both are covered on the program.

Interestingly three of the biggest improvements come at very low cost; riding on the drops (free), riding on Aerobars (£40 / $60?) and interval training (free, although it isn't "instant" like the other two).

I personally see the program being used in two ways: some people will look at it and see that X improves their time by 2 minutes over 20 miles and think "excellent, now I know it'll save me 2 minutes I'll buy that" whilst others will think "Now I know it will only save me 2 minutes in an hour there's no point in me buying that". Both are valid conclusions depending on your point of view and I'm not here to judge which applies to anybody, just to present the data so that you can make your own mind up.



Are there any scenario's I've not covered that people would like me to look into?
Machin is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 04:16 AM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dayton, Oh
Posts: 516

Bikes: Salsa Vaya, Specialized Roubaix Team Saxo, Fisher HiFi29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
Not misinterpreting me at all there. If a new bike makes you happy and makes you ride more, great. My opinion that I offered was that it's more satisfying to see gains through training, but if it makes you happy to buy speed that's fine and if someone gave me a pair of 404s or a Venge, I wouldn't turn them down but I also wouldn't feel particularly proud of myself for a personal best on a ride that was due to the gear rather than hard work.
Are you proud of your personal best on your current bike over your personal best on say a hybrid? You know that the time difference between the two is equipment related and not your hard work? Why not get a beach cruiser and just train harder? I am sure there is the guy out there on the Walmart cruiser saying if someone gave him your bike, he would take it but wouldn't be proud of a personal best time on it.

I am a couple miles an hour faster on my carbon road bike versus my steel touring bike. obviously I get no personal satisfaction out of those gains. However it is a fact that the carbon road bike makes me faster.

why do we ride the bikes that we do? My guess is budget, intent, seriousness and common sense.

Last edited by Terry66; 01-05-14 at 04:43 AM.
Terry66 is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 08:37 AM
  #117  
Senior Member
 
Herbie53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have two nice carbon road bikes. I have not totaled up costs on both, but the fancier one probably costs about 2 to 3x the less fancy one.

The more expensive one is couple pounds lighter, I'm told measurably stiffer, made of better stuff and has better components. I suppose one could do some inter web based power/speed prediction analysis and find that "it" is some fraction faster than the other one. For me though that is not the thing. Riding it just feels better and it makes the ride more fun. I could try and quantify that with the sort of BS you see in magazine reviews, but bottom line is it just feels better.

It is just unfortunate it costs so damn much that I do not want to do all of my racing / riding on it.
Herbie53 is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 09:02 AM
  #118  
gc3
Falls Downalot
 
gc3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,103

Bikes: Now I Got Two

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Herbie53
Because you cannot afford more?
pretty much nailed it!
gc3 is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 09:05 AM
  #119  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,597

Bikes: 2017 Cannondale CAAD12 105, 2014 Giant Escape City

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 820 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Herbie53
Because you cannot afford more?
So far I haven't been able to afford $5,000. From this thread it sounds like I shouldn't bother trying.
memebag is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 09:10 AM
  #120  
Senior Member
 
Herbie53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by memebag
So far I haven't been able to afford $5,000. From this thread it sounds like I shouldn't bother trying.
Ride what ever works for you.
Herbie53 is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 10:13 AM
  #121  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I thought I'd chime in here with a personal experience. I have a buddy who just got into cycling…guy is in great shape and works out often (imagine a well built, muscular fella). He got into cycling late June and busted out a 13 year old steel Bianchi he bought new years ago (I believe it has a carbon fork). At our recommendation, he replaced the saddle, chain, grip tape, tires and got a general tune up at a LBS…and that's it.

…then he proceeded to bust his ass and landed up handing us ours. That dude flat out flies. From July up until today he has laid down 3700 miles (take in mind that before July…he didn't ride at all), set a ton of KOMs on Strava (at times beating some seriously talented riders in our area), slimmed down considerably (LOL…something I warned him about) and all around proved that the bike doses not make the rider.

New bikes are fun…upgrading is fun…but it won't make you faster.
Smokehouse is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 10:25 AM
  #122  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Terry66
Are you proud of your personal best on your current bike over your personal best on say a hybrid? You know that the time difference between the two is equipment related and not your hard work? Why not get a beach cruiser and just train harder? I am sure there is the guy out there on the Walmart cruiser saying if someone gave him your bike, he would take it but wouldn't be proud of a personal best time on it.

I am a couple miles an hour faster on my carbon road bike versus my steel touring bike. obviously I get no personal satisfaction out of those gains. However it is a fact that the carbon road bike makes me faster.

why do we ride the bikes that we do? My guess is budget, intent, seriousness and common sense.
I am not proud of time gains because of equipment. I don't own a hybrid or an MTB, only two road bikes (one old aluminum, one new carbon race bike). My times on the same routes between the two bikes are within a variance I can attribute to weather/day to day differences in performance, so it is negligible. If I didn't race, I would probably be perfectly content to have a hybrid and train hard for fitness' sake and enjoy my improvements. However, I got involved in cycling because I wanted to compete, so I have a race bike and the related equipment needed to get me to a basic level of parity with the people I'm racing against. I agree with you on why we ride the bikes we do. I'm only saying that, for me, there is a different satisfaction that comes with improving because I work hard versus riding something faster. I objectively appreciate the aerodynamic and rolling resistance advantages of road bikes, but I wouldn't use the word "proud" to describe any performance difference because of those advantages. I care about my performance relative to myself over time and relative to those that I compete against. All satisfaction I derive from the sport comes from those two comparisons.
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 10:30 AM
  #123  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Machin
The reason for creating my program was to allow you to quantitatively asses the benefits of X versus Y... which might be training vs. a new bike; both are covered on the program.

Interestingly three of the biggest improvements come at very low cost; riding on the drops (free), riding on Aerobars (£40 / $60?) and interval training (free, although it isn't "instant" like the other two).

I personally see the program being used in two ways: some people will look at it and see that X improves their time by 2 minutes over 20 miles and think "excellent, now I know it'll save me 2 minutes I'll buy that" whilst others will think "Now I know it will only save me 2 minutes in an hour there's no point in me buying that". Both are valid conclusions depending on your point of view and I'm not here to judge which applies to anybody, just to present the data so that you can make your own mind up.



Are there any scenario's I've not covered that people would like me to look into?
Your program is interesting and I appreciate it, I wasn't criticizing you and it does highlight some things that are lost on some cyclists- why buy deep carbon aero rims if you never ride in the drops? People can feel however they want about cycling, I was just expressing my personal viewpoint that buying bits to improve speed in a non-competitive environment or in lieu of personal fitness gains is a waste of money, but if it makes that person happy then good for them.
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 10:37 AM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
buying bits to improve speed in a non-competitive environment or in lieu of personal fitness gains is a waste of money
I think that's where many people are in error. It's not in lieu of personal gains, it's in addition to personal gains. Buying a new bike can jumpstart your cycling, pushing you to go faster, longer, harder in order to justify the bike or simply because it's more fun to ride a new bike.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 01-05-14, 10:53 AM
  #125  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
I think that's where many people are in error. It's not in lieu of personal gains, it's in addition to personal gains. Buying a new bike can jumpstart your cycling, pushing you to go faster, longer, harder in order to justify the bike or simply because it's more fun to ride a new bike.
Right, and that's great when new bits inspire someone to ride more and try harder. To be honest, I could have started racing a year before I actually did and achieved the same results, but it took the gift of my carbon bike from my fiancée to finally convince me that I was ready. My point is aimed at someone who changes nothing in terms of training but brags that his Zipps knocked 5 seconds off of a strava segment. Congratulations to your wheels, sir.
Dan333SP is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.