Zinn: Tall bikes handle poorly
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 443
Bikes: 2009 Caad9-5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's one we prepared earlier....
#52
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
Here's one we prepared earlier....
#53
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The bigger you are, the 'wrong-er' they get. Mainstream companies try to squeeze as many people as they can on 5 sizes, and even for me at 6ft 3ins, there's not really any stock bike whose geometry I like. The majors just don't care about you.
The biggest issues from my perspective are -
a) Chainstays are too short - your seat goes up and back, and the stays don't. How dumb is that?
b) Steering speed and weighting should be the same, but they're not. You can't just steepen the HTA and expect roses!
c) Fit is fit - the majors as I said don't care about you, but they're also scared of what the big boys really need in terms of top tube lengths - don't have the tubes, or don't want to spend on the tooling for carbon.
d) Tube diameters need to go up if the tubes get longer, or the bike will handle bad and feel bad.
Everything in proportion.....and......don't be scared to throw out the book if the book is wrong!
ps: I really, REALLY want someone to do 31" wheels. Hello Kirk Pacenti?
Last edited by Thylacine; 08-16-10 at 08:06 PM.
#54
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The interesting thing is, these properly-designed tall frames just make the wheels look small and the head tube look skinny. On the other hand, other tall bikes that come to mind (like NBA stars Bill Walton's roadie and Yao Ming's Gunnar) look crazy, with the saddle almost directly above the rear axle.
#55
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
Putting 90% of the weight on the rear wheel isn't the right thing to do?
I like the way you think.
I have very long legs out of proportion to my height.
I've found I need to always buy the biggest frame I can find, and then use a zero-setback seatpost just to compensate for the lousy design of the large frames.
My current roadbike is a secondhand custom Litespeed, for which I had to have a custom CF fork made with less rake than standard in order to get rid of the highspeed shimmy.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 124
Bikes: Custom Zinn Dolomite Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's one we prepared earlier....
You can see that my bike shares some design philosophies...
https://www.dropbox.com/photos/Zinn/#/
Last edited by Sassonian; 08-23-10 at 03:34 AM.
#58
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
All my bikes except for my Moots compact have hi-speed shimmy. I attribute the fact that the moots is compact frame and therefor a bit tighter to why it doesn't shimmy. But I don't really know.
BTW to those of you who experience it, simply clench your knees to the top tube and the shimmy will stop. When I descend now I always have a knee on the TT just from experience.
BTW to those of you who experience it, simply clench your knees to the top tube and the shimmy will stop. When I descend now I always have a knee on the TT just from experience.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
There is no excuse for high-speed shimmy in a properly-designed frame.
The problem is the dumb practice of putting steeper head tubes on tall frames, which reduces trail, thereby reducing stability.
A fork with less rake restores the trail.
Google "Dave Moulton" to find his articles on steering geometry.
The problem is the dumb practice of putting steeper head tubes on tall frames, which reduces trail, thereby reducing stability.
A fork with less rake restores the trail.
Google "Dave Moulton" to find his articles on steering geometry.
#60
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's more than just trail. Trail was figured out decades ago - there's only really a handful of acceptable HTA/Rake/Trail combos that work in the real world.
The factors that other companies don't factor in, is front end weight distribution, and the amount of effort required to initiate a turn. You need to take into account bar design and width, and stem length because it all adds up to steering geometry that at the end of the day will either work or it won't.
No bike of any size should shimmy. I've never, ever made nor had myself a bike that shimmies. In fact, the faster you go, the better they handle. At 80kph it should feel like you're standing still.
The factors that other companies don't factor in, is front end weight distribution, and the amount of effort required to initiate a turn. You need to take into account bar design and width, and stem length because it all adds up to steering geometry that at the end of the day will either work or it won't.
No bike of any size should shimmy. I've never, ever made nor had myself a bike that shimmies. In fact, the faster you go, the better they handle. At 80kph it should feel like you're standing still.
#61
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 443
Bikes: 2009 Caad9-5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So at what point would you say that a bike needs to let go of the trying to imitate the regular geometry of a smaller sized bike? (eg once you reach a 20cm head tube, or 60cm top tube)
#62
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have no idea. We design bikes to fit people, so I have almost no idea what constitutes 'normal' or what 'regular geometry' really is.....short of the historical mean 405mm chainstays, 73º/73 angles, 43mm rake fork.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChicagoWinter98
General Cycling Discussion
176
03-21-22 07:05 PM
dash of chutmeg
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
07-29-10 09:39 AM