Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Zinn: Tall bikes handle poorly

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Zinn: Tall bikes handle poorly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-10, 05:57 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Waves77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 443

Bikes: 2009 Caad9-5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thylacine
Here's one we prepared earlier....
So what'd you think about the article? Is it really necessary for us tall guys to have a different design than "regular" frames?
Waves77 is offline  
Old 08-16-10, 06:08 PM
  #52  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Thylacine
Here's one we prepared earlier....
The interesting thing is, these properly-designed tall frames just make the wheels look small and the head tube look skinny. On the other hand, other tall bikes that come to mind (like NBA stars Bill Walton's roadie and Yao Ming's Gunnar) look crazy, with the saddle almost directly above the rear axle.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 08-16-10, 08:03 PM
  #53  
Industry Maven
 
Thylacine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936

Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Waves77
So what'd you think about the article? Is it really necessary for us tall guys to have a different design than "regular" frames?
Absolutely. One of the key motivators to me starting a custom bike company was just how bad bikes are for almost anyone over 6ft.

The bigger you are, the 'wrong-er' they get. Mainstream companies try to squeeze as many people as they can on 5 sizes, and even for me at 6ft 3ins, there's not really any stock bike whose geometry I like. The majors just don't care about you.

The biggest issues from my perspective are -

a) Chainstays are too short - your seat goes up and back, and the stays don't. How dumb is that?
b) Steering speed and weighting should be the same, but they're not. You can't just steepen the HTA and expect roses!
c) Fit is fit - the majors as I said don't care about you, but they're also scared of what the big boys really need in terms of top tube lengths - don't have the tubes, or don't want to spend on the tooling for carbon.
d) Tube diameters need to go up if the tubes get longer, or the bike will handle bad and feel bad.

Everything in proportion.....and......don't be scared to throw out the book if the book is wrong!



ps: I really, REALLY want someone to do 31" wheels. Hello Kirk Pacenti?

Last edited by Thylacine; 08-16-10 at 08:06 PM.
Thylacine is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 07:18 PM
  #54  
Industry Maven
 
Thylacine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936

Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
The interesting thing is, these properly-designed tall frames just make the wheels look small and the head tube look skinny. On the other hand, other tall bikes that come to mind (like NBA stars Bill Walton's roadie and Yao Ming's Gunnar) look crazy, with the saddle almost directly above the rear axle.
Neither of those are properly designed. In fact, they're exactly what not to do.
Thylacine is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 08:06 PM
  #55  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Thylacine
Neither of those are properly designed. In fact, they're exactly what not to do.
By "these", I was referring to Thylacine's frames, which I quoted.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 08:17 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times in 2,856 Posts
Originally Posted by Thylacine
Neither of those are properly designed. In fact, they're exactly what not to do.
What?
Putting 90% of the weight on the rear wheel isn't the right thing to do?

I like the way you think.
I have very long legs out of proportion to my height.
I've found I need to always buy the biggest frame I can find, and then use a zero-setback seatpost just to compensate for the lousy design of the large frames.
My current roadbike is a secondhand custom Litespeed, for which I had to have a custom CF fork made with less rake than standard in order to get rid of the highspeed shimmy.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 08-23-10, 03:09 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 124

Bikes: Custom Zinn Dolomite Ti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thylacine
Here's one we prepared earlier....
Beautiful looking bikes Thylacine!

You can see that my bike shares some design philosophies...

https://www.dropbox.com/photos/Zinn/#/

Last edited by Sassonian; 08-23-10 at 03:34 AM.
Sassonian is offline  
Old 08-23-10, 06:57 AM
  #58  
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
 
jfmckenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The edge of b#
Posts: 5,475

Bikes: A whole bunch-a bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 460 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 76 Posts
All my bikes except for my Moots compact have hi-speed shimmy. I attribute the fact that the moots is compact frame and therefor a bit tighter to why it doesn't shimmy. But I don't really know.

BTW to those of you who experience it, simply clench your knees to the top tube and the shimmy will stop. When I descend now I always have a knee on the TT just from experience.
jfmckenna is offline  
Old 08-23-10, 07:30 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times in 2,856 Posts
There is no excuse for high-speed shimmy in a properly-designed frame.
The problem is the dumb practice of putting steeper head tubes on tall frames, which reduces trail, thereby reducing stability.
A fork with less rake restores the trail.
Google "Dave Moulton" to find his articles on steering geometry.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 08-30-10, 03:29 AM
  #60  
Industry Maven
 
Thylacine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936

Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's more than just trail. Trail was figured out decades ago - there's only really a handful of acceptable HTA/Rake/Trail combos that work in the real world.

The factors that other companies don't factor in, is front end weight distribution, and the amount of effort required to initiate a turn. You need to take into account bar design and width, and stem length because it all adds up to steering geometry that at the end of the day will either work or it won't.

No bike of any size should shimmy. I've never, ever made nor had myself a bike that shimmies. In fact, the faster you go, the better they handle. At 80kph it should feel like you're standing still.
Thylacine is offline  
Old 08-30-10, 09:21 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Waves77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 443

Bikes: 2009 Caad9-5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So at what point would you say that a bike needs to let go of the trying to imitate the regular geometry of a smaller sized bike? (eg once you reach a 20cm head tube, or 60cm top tube)
Waves77 is offline  
Old 09-06-10, 02:22 AM
  #62  
Industry Maven
 
Thylacine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936

Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have no idea. We design bikes to fit people, so I have almost no idea what constitutes 'normal' or what 'regular geometry' really is.....short of the historical mean 405mm chainstays, 73º/73 angles, 43mm rake fork.
Thylacine is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChicagoWinter98
General Cycling Discussion
176
03-21-22 07:05 PM
Chiasson
Fitting Your Bike
3
08-15-19 02:52 PM
jefnvk
Touring
6
08-08-16 05:54 PM
TheDazed
Touring
29
01-31-11 03:23 PM
dash of chutmeg
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
07-29-10 09:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.