Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

soul 4.0 hub failure..

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

soul 4.0 hub failure..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-10, 08:07 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Steve90068's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,334

Bikes: Road - Lynskey. Mountain - Trek Fuel EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
Of course the hub showed signs of oxidation. That's why it failed. Had you picked a more suited alloy in the first place this wouldn't have happened.

For a very quick look at why 2000 series isn't appropriate. go here.

The most pointed excerpt:

"2000 series are alloyed with copper, can be precipitation hardened to strengths comparable to steel. Formerly referred to as duralumin, they were once the most common aerospace alloys, but were susceptible to stress corrosion cracking and are increasingly replaced by 7000 series in new designs."

I'm not sure who you materials engineer is, or if you have any actual background in the subject, but normal cleaning wouldn't have done little if anything to prevent the corrosion. While the OP's riding in the rain no doubt greatly accelerated the corrosion, I'd hardly call riding in the rain "neglect", but it does help set up a galvanic cell when in contact with a steel spoke.

It's apparent that you went for light over durable, had issues, and moved to a different alloy. That's great. But persisting in asserting that cleaning somehow trumps electron transfer is just nutty.

Let's not cloud a business decision which you are well within your rights to make with engineering quackery.
This is why products evolve over time. The aluminum used on the previous hub was inferior to the quality of aluminum used on the new hubs, however it's not like the old hub was made out of chicken wire and bubble gum. That's how manufacturing, research and development work. I'm sure the next hub Soul puts out will be even better than the current one.

The quality of carbon used on frames 3 years ago is inferior to the quality of carbon used on frames today.

Does that mean that every company should give out free frames using the current material? No obviously not because that would be F%#$ing ridiculous.

I'd take Sean up on his generous offer to sell you a hub at a great price and move on. Next time buy a new product with a non-expired warranty.

Last edited by Steve90068; 07-09-10 at 08:11 AM.
Steve90068 is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 08:50 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
Georgebowen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A good friend I ride with just bought some Dura Ace wheels used on ebay. The inside bearing race was completely corroded and would not spin smooth. They were also outside of warranty. BUT Shimano replaced the rear hub after some negotiations becaseu they felt that it should not have corroded as fast. The wheel had also been rebuilt by first owner and sealed with non shimano seal. This changed my perspective on shimano as a company as that is above and beyond to take care of a customer.
Georgebowen is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 08:53 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 644

Bikes: Scott scale 29er, Gary fisher Rig SS 29er, Fuji Cross pro, Novara Randonee, Scattante TI custom build, Fuji Team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sean owes you nothing. I think the $80 hub offer is what he SHOULD do, but not even required.

the further arguments are reCOCKulous. please keep them going.
milnerpt is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 08:53 AM
  #54  
Carpe Diem
 
bdcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Shimano is far larger than Soul.

Something to consider before we start comparing brands.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:09 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by bdcheung
Shimano is far larger than Soul.

Something to consider before we start comparing brands.
I love my Soul fishing rod & reel...
WhyFi is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:10 AM
  #56  
Medicinal Cyclist
 
Daytrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mohawk Valley/Adks, NYS
Posts: 2,807

Bikes: 2003 Klein Q Carbon Race; 2009 Giant OCR-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This thread is interesting and for some reason, brings up several contradictory issues.

First off, I'm with the "The warranty on the second-hand product is expired, Dude. Man up."

That said, it's tempting to enthusiastically harass a business owner who uses what's supposed to be a non-commercial discussion forum to announce new products and otherwise shill his product line. And he gets away with it. Psimet sets a much better example of how to do that, IMO.

On the other hand, I think it's refreshing and very enlightening to have Sean come on here and give his side of the story. That's one way that message boards like this one can improve the customer/manufacturer relationship.

Finally, my experience with Shimano on warranty issues has been outstanding. I get the impression they really care about improving their products and making bad things right.

Last edited by Daytrip; 07-09-10 at 09:13 AM.
Daytrip is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:15 AM
  #57  
Carpe Diem
 
bdcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Whereas I'm in the school of "don't make bad things in the first place"
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:22 AM
  #58  
Medicinal Cyclist
 
Daytrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mohawk Valley/Adks, NYS
Posts: 2,807

Bikes: 2003 Klein Q Carbon Race; 2009 Giant OCR-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well shucks, BD, nobody's perfect.
Daytrip is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:24 AM
  #59  
Carpe Diem
 
bdcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post


disagrees.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:26 AM
  #60  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Daytrip
This thread is interesting and for some reason, brings up several contradictory issues.

First off, I'm with the "The warranty on the second-hand product is expired, Dude. Man up."


That said, it's tempting to enthusiastically harass a business owner who uses what's supposed to be a non-commercial discussion forum to announce new products and otherwise shill his product line. And he gets away with it. Psimet sets a much better example of how to do that, IMO.

On the other hand, I think it's refreshing and very enlightening to have Sean come on here and give his side of the story. That's one way that message boards like this one can improve the customer/manufacturer relationship.

Finally, my experience with Shimano on warranty issues has been outstanding. I get the impression they really care about improving their products and making bad things right.
correct.
botto is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 09:42 AM
  #61  
Medicinal Cyclist
 
Daytrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mohawk Valley/Adks, NYS
Posts: 2,807

Bikes: 2003 Klein Q Carbon Race; 2009 Giant OCR-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Whew! Dude, I thought you were going to give me another triple facepalm.
Daytrip is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:37 AM
  #62  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by bdcheung
Shimano is far larger than Soul.

Something to consider before we start comparing brands.
You should have quit at "wash your bike". Not only are you ignorant of material engineering, but economics seems to have escaped you also.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:43 AM
  #63  
Medicinal Cyclist
 
Daytrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mohawk Valley/Adks, NYS
Posts: 2,807

Bikes: 2003 Klein Q Carbon Race; 2009 Giant OCR-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdcheung


disagrees.
+1

I couldn't stand her when I was a kid but once I grew up, I realized how hot she really is. I've been a bad, bad boy, Miss Poppins.
Daytrip is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:52 AM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 314

Bikes: BMC RM01

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daytrip
+1

I couldn't stand her when I was a kid but once I grew up, I realized how hot she really is. I've been a bad, bad boy, Miss Poppins.
How can this thread go there???
phee is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:53 AM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 145 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
How can this thread go there???
This is BF...nuff sed!
tagaproject6 is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:53 AM
  #66  
Dopers suck
 
Cinqovitto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There seems to be a bunch of false logic propagated here. So, if an inferior product has excessive failure outside of warranty then the company has no obligation to recall that product? Sorry, but if the 2nd owner had crashed due to inferior materials and engineering of a product then guess who carries the liability - Just ask the big auto manufacturers.
The real question is whether neglect/ rider use caused the failure? or material choice and design. The manufacturer's obligation can not be questioned until the first answer is determined.
Cinqovitto is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:57 AM
  #67  
.
 
Namenda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: "The Woo", MA
Posts: 4,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cinqovitto
There seems to be a bunch of false logic propagated here. So, if an inferior product has excessive failure outside of warranty then the company has no obligation to recall that product? Sorry, but if the 2nd owner had crashed due to inferior materials and engineering of a product then guess who carries the liability - Just ask the big auto manufacturers.
The real question is whether neglect/ rider use caused the failure? or material choice and design. The manufacturer's obligation can not be questioned until the first answer is determined.
Have there been "excessive" failures of these particular hubs? I've only heard of one, including this one. If these things are failing all over the place, and putting people at risk of injury, then obviously the manufacturer would be responsible, and likely would have issued a recall to reduce their future liability. As far as I can tell, Bike Soul doesn't manufacture anything. They assemble parts into wheelsets, put a logo on, and sell them.
Namenda is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 10:59 AM
  #68  
Medicinal Cyclist
 
Daytrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mohawk Valley/Adks, NYS
Posts: 2,807

Bikes: 2003 Klein Q Carbon Race; 2009 Giant OCR-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
How can this thread go there???
It was starting to get nasty again.
Daytrip is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:03 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 145 Posts
Originally Posted by Daytrip
It was starting to get nasty again.
Nasty? Just wait until helmets and wearing team jerseys come into play
tagaproject6 is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:23 AM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cinqovitto
There seems to be a bunch of false logic propagated here. So, if an inferior product has excessive failure outside of warranty then the company has no obligation to recall that product? Sorry, but if the 2nd owner had crashed due to inferior materials and engineering of a product then guess who carries the liability - Just ask the big auto manufacturers
.
You can't compare the liability of a specialty manufacturer with the "big auto manufacturers", who, by the way, do a great job of avoiding responsibility and reparations (recall) until they are financially appealing. There are exceptions, but it's not the rule.

Back in the 80's Campagnolo made a bunch of Super Record bottom brackets. The titanium spindle didn't hold up well and would break. Their reparation was to give you a steel one. So what if it cost 1/4 of what the titanium one did. Too bad. That's the price of technology.

$80 for a new hub is reasonable since you bought the wheels on eBay and really have no idea how they were treated before you bought them.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:31 AM
  #71  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
this is basically the same hub, minus the custom anodizing and soul label.
https://www.bdopcycling.com/Hubs-Road.asp
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:36 AM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 358

Bikes: Giant Defy2, Soul Faith

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm loving all the armchair metallurgists in this thread. Let me go read a wiki article about something and pass myself off as an expert in it real quick... BRB!
PurpleFender is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:40 AM
  #73  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by shovelhd
You can't compare the liability of a specialty manufacturer with the "big auto manufacturers",
You can compare them if they produce like products, but you don't need to because:

Soul or Shimano's liability in the case of product failure is the same, a user of the product is eligible for the same legal remedy that their jurisdiction allows. subject to the same caveats provided within the law.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:42 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Quel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,653
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by PurpleFender
I'm loving all the armchair metallurgists in this thread. Let me go read a wiki article about something and pass myself off as an expert in it real quick... BRB!
There didn't seem to be any whiffs of "armchair" analysis from the two people that actually commented about materials and stress failures. It sounds like they actual know what they are talking about.
Quel is offline  
Old 07-09-10, 11:46 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^

I am not an attorney, maybe you are. You are making a point strictly by the law, and you would be correct. The liability is the same. How a specialty manufacturer and a huge conglomerate are expected to deal with it in the eyes of a jury should be different. That's the point I was trying to make.
shovelhd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.