Trek 1000 geometry?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: illadelph, PA
Posts: 150
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek 1000 geometry?
Yes, I've searched...and I can't find it anywhere on Trek's site. Does anyone know where I can see the geometry chart for a 2007 Trek 1000? Specifically the 54cm frame.
#3
It's ALL base...
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,716
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Does this help? https://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Arch.../msg02124.html
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 186
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Head Angle: 72.5
Seat Angle: 74.5
ETT: 54.6
Chain Stay: 41.7
Bottom Bracket: 26.6
Offset: 4.7
Wheelbase: 100.2
Trail: 5.8
Standover: 77.0
Seat Tube: 54.0
Head Tube: 10.5
Seat Angle: 74.5
ETT: 54.6
Chain Stay: 41.7
Bottom Bracket: 26.6
Offset: 4.7
Wheelbase: 100.2
Trail: 5.8
Standover: 77.0
Seat Tube: 54.0
Head Tube: 10.5
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: illadelph, PA
Posts: 150
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks makeitso5005. Why is the head tube so small compared to the newer models like the 1.2? Conventional vs. integrated headset?