Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

A good, Fast, 25c tire?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

A good, Fast, 25c tire?

Old 08-25-10, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
infinitemass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 37

Bikes: Trek 2100, Gavin Acele

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A good, Fast, 25c tire?

I tried a set of 25c and really liked the ride quality but they seemed sluggish. Is there such a thing as a fast 25c tire?
infinitemass is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 09:46 AM
  #2  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Any overinflated 25c will roll well, but there goes the ride. All 25c tires are heavier than if they were the same design in a 23c, so they'll feel sluggish when you're swinging the bike around.

Of course everyone else on BF can "feel" that kind of weight difference when riding normally, even though the physics doesn't add up to a perceptible difference.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 09:47 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Conti GP4000s work for me.
achoo is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 10:02 AM
  #4  
Chasing the horizon.
 
DArthurBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 500

Bikes: 2016 Felt F75, 2008 Mercier Corvus Steel, 2006 Trek 4300, 1985 Trek 620 (modernized)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Any overinflated 25c will roll well, but there goes the ride. All 25c tires are heavier than if they were the same design in a 23c, so they'll feel sluggish when you're swinging the bike around.

Of course everyone else on BF can "feel" that kind of weight difference when riding normally, even though the physics doesn't add up to a perceptible difference.
+1
People are more influenced by marketing than they let on. With tires inflated to similar pressures, there's no perceptible difference in energy efficiency/performance.

If you're looking for good all-purpose tires, Michelin tires seem to do very well. The continentals I've had are great for carving apart corners, but they seem to wear much faster than every other brand I've tried.
DArthurBrown is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 10:05 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
infinitemass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 37

Bikes: Trek 2100, Gavin Acele

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here`s where I`m at now. Loved the Michelin 25c tires that came on my new wheels but they were like magnets for stones and got cut too easily. I have conti ultra sports now. They dont pick up stone,glass,etc.. but I swear its like riding with a brake pad dragging.
infinitemass is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 10:09 AM
  #6  
Chasing the horizon.
 
DArthurBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 500

Bikes: 2016 Felt F75, 2008 Mercier Corvus Steel, 2006 Trek 4300, 1985 Trek 620 (modernized)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Under normal riding conditions on reasonably smooth, straight roads, you shouldn't notice any difference. Unless, of course, the recommended inflations are different. The contis are probably recommended for 100-120 psi. I usually run my tires just over recommended inflation by 2-3 psi, and inflate my tires every couple few rides.
DArthurBrown is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 10:27 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
jr59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: the 904, Jax fl
Posts: 2,310
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
ribmo's
jr59 is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 12:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In general a 25mm tire will have lower rolling resistance than a 23mm tire. The reason is the contact patch is not as "long" and therefore the tire deforms less.

The Continentals are probably a significantly worse rolling tire than your Michelins. Most continental tires tested with fairly high rolling resistance prior to Conti using black chili, now they are more middle of the line. If you look at the chart I linked to below, the 23 version of the Ultra Sports is about 5 watts slower rolling than GP4000s and Michelin Pro Race 3s PER tire. Which is definitely something a person could feel.

I find Bontrager's lower end tires roll fairly well without being prone to flatting and come in 25 widths.

Here is a very comprehensive set of rolling resistance data, look to the column of crr - which means coefficient of rolling resistance, lower is better. (Also, keep in mind the person collecting the data is doing so for the purposes of time trialing mostly, but also as a service to people and companies. So while a .00300 tire may seem like a "high" rolling resistance, it's quite reasonable for a day in day out training tire) :

https://www.biketechreview.com/tires_...sting_rev9.pdf

Al, who does the above testing, is a very competent tester of tires. He uses a powermeter which he checks calibration on, accounts for changes in temperature and pumps them up to the same pressure every time.
Triguy is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 01:01 PM
  #9  
Chases Dogs for Sport
 
FlashBazbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,288
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 983 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 94 Posts
Originally Posted by infinitemass
I tried a set of 25c and really liked the ride quality but they seemed sluggish. Is there such a thing as a fast 25c tire?
I have been very impressed with Michelin's Pro Optimums. Best balance of ride, stability, traction, and speed that I've found.
FlashBazbo is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 01:11 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I like the Conti GP4000 in 25mm. I have a set on my FG and they have a nice feel.
caloso is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 01:26 PM
  #11  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Triguy
In general a 25mm tire will have lower rolling resistance than a 23mm tire. The reason is the contact patch is not as "long" and therefore the tire deforms less.

The Continentals are probably a significantly worse rolling tire than your Michelins. Most continental tires tested with fairly high rolling resistance prior to Conti using black chili, now they are more middle of the line. If you look at the chart I linked to below, the 23 version of the Ultra Sports is about 5 watts slower rolling than GP4000s and Michelin Pro Race 3s PER tire. Which is definitely something a person could feel.

I find Bontrager's lower end tires roll fairly well without being prone to flatting and come in 25 widths.

Here is a very comprehensive set of rolling resistance data, look to the column of crr - which means coefficient of rolling resistance, lower is better. (Also, keep in mind the person collecting the data is doing so for the purposes of time trialing mostly, but also as a service to people and companies. So while a .00300 tire may seem like a "high" rolling resistance, it's quite reasonable for a day in day out training tire) :

https://www.biketechreview.com/tires_...sting_rev9.pdf

Al, who does the above testing, is a very competent tester of tires. He uses a powermeter which he checks calibration on, accounts for changes in temperature and
pumps them up to the same pressure every time.
Well, that's the key there. 25s are rated at a lower psi than 23s. When you inflate to a given tire's max/recommended psi, the 23s are usually a touch lower crr. That makes a difference because a 25 will blow off the rim before a 23 at higher pressures because of the increased surface area straining against the same bead contact area/hook strength.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 08-25-10, 01:28 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I thought that was the point of fatter tires. I'll pump my 25s to 85-95 and it's like a Town Car in comparison to 23s at 120.
caloso is offline  
Old 08-26-10, 03:41 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Well, that's the key there. 25s are rated at a lower psi than 23s. When you inflate to a given tire's max/recommended psi, the 23s are usually a touch lower crr. That makes a difference because a 25 will blow off the rim before a 23 at higher pressures because of the increased surface area straining against the same bead contact area/hook strength.
I think this is an instance of looking at the trees not the forest.

So, there are two ways you can increase rolling resistance:

The first, is to run a pressure so low which allows for additional hysteresis in between the tube, tire and road.

The second, and more consequential form of rolling resistance, is the speed lost to surface irregularities with a tire pressure which can not deform to road surface changes. By running too high of a tire pressure, you are in effect "bouncing" over the road and not letting the tires do their job of shock absorption.

Typically for a perfect balance between the two forms of rolling resistance you should be nowhere near a tire's max PSI. For many riders, you should be in the 100-110psi range. Such that your tire can deform to road irregularities but that you don't have a significant loss of hysteresis between the tube/tire/road interface.

Most rolling resistance data shows that a wider tire rolls faster even in a laboratory sense. And additionally, most on road tire testing shows that above 120psi a person sees significant loss on any road that is less than ideal.

It is counter intuitive that 25mm tires pumped to a moderate pressure roll faster than 20mm tires pumped to their gills, but it's not opinion. It's data.
Triguy is offline  
Old 08-26-10, 04:01 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Triguy
It is counter intuitive that 25mm tires pumped to a moderate pressure roll faster than 20mm tires pumped to their gills, but it's not opinion. It's data.
Where's that data? Even the link you posted suggests otherwise.
stedalus is offline  
Old 08-26-10, 04:03 PM
  #15  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by infinitemass
I tried a set of 25c and really liked the ride quality but they seemed sluggish. Is there such a thing as a fast 25c tire?
Wider tyres roll better but are, obviously, heavier and less aerodynamic. However, unless your "feel" is much more sensitive than mine, I defy you to find a 25 conti 4000 or schwalbe ultremo "sluggish".
chasm54 is offline  
Old 08-26-10, 05:22 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stedalus
Where's that data? Even the link you posted suggests otherwise.
Well the data I've linked to is for the first type of rolling resistance, hysteresis losses between tube/tire/road. And yes, higher pressure yields lower crr on rollers.

What the link doesn't address is losses from varied surfaces.

Below you'll see a graph from some testing, though not completely dispositive of the issue, it shows the trend I've seen in the past:
https://www.slowtwitch.com/articles/i...ium_tires3.jpg
Triguy is offline  
Old 08-26-10, 05:25 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Also, I believe Schwalbe used to have on road data. Members over at biketechreview.com have done some testing. Al(collector of first data set) tried working with a "bumpy" roller but it never seemed to work the way he wanted.
Triguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dramiscram
Commuting
63
10-04-16 09:18 AM
pinoyz
Road Cycling
4
09-23-14 02:51 PM
knoxtnhorn
Road Cycling
34
08-30-13 05:03 PM
Reeses
Bicycle Mechanics
39
03-17-12 01:20 PM
chico1st
Bicycle Mechanics
56
02-02-10 09:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.