Powertap and periphals
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,212
Bikes: Lemond Alpe d'Huez 2005
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Powertap and periphals
I currently have a garmin EDGE 305 with HR and CAD. I am buying an EDGE 705. If i get the PowerTap PRO+ Wheel Only will i still need the cadence sensor or will the cadence be picked up from the powertap?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The PT will send cadence data. It estimates it by sensing the pedal stroke through power surges. It does a pretty good job, but sometimes the display will lag behind a couple seconds if you are making a jump or changing cadence quickly. Not great if you are trying to do cadence drills and need to see absolutely real-time data or analyzing what was going on in a sprint second by second. I don't bother with my cadence sensor since getting the PT.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When my cadence sensor went out, my PT Pro+ did send my 705 my cadence. It was quite spotty, however, and it wasn't very steady. I would be pedaling at a pretty steady cadence and the readings would bounce around +-10 rpm.
I went and bought another speed/cadence sensor.
I went and bought another speed/cadence sensor.
#4
These Guys Eat Oreos
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 3,432
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just keep it. No reason to remove it if you already have it. If you had a Quarq or a crank based powermeter, you wouldn't need it because it's basically the same thing as it reads the cadence as part of the equation for calculating the power. But the Powertap doesn't do that, it is only an estimation.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I still use my cadence sensor because i was not satisfied with the cadence readings from my PT. It's not bad, but its not perfect like the garmin speed/cadence sensor.
#6
grilled cheesus
the PT "real time" CAD number is very erratic. while the average it recorded seemed fine the high and low were not correct. this is due to the estimation of CAD of course. later.
__________________
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just keep it. No reason to remove it if you already have it. If you had a Quarq or a crank based powermeter, you wouldn't need it because it's basically the same thing as it reads the cadence as part of the equation for calculating the power. But the Powertap doesn't do that, it is only an estimation.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Just one thing to be aware of with the Garmin GSC-10 cadence/speed sensor: it tops out at a max cadence of 180 rpm. It simply won't read more than that. If you can reach those RPMs, and care about the exact numbers, you'll need another sensor, because at those RPMs the PowerTap isn't accurate, either.
#9
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
Not exactly an estimation, more of an extrapolation. It senses the change in torque in your pedal stroke, and calculates cadence from that.
I found cadence with the powertap to be reasonably accurate when you were putting out a fair amount of power. At lowe r power levels it tended to skip around a lot. So doing fast pedals (high cadence, easy gear) it wasn't so good for. Otherwise it was reasonably acurate.
I found cadence with the powertap to be reasonably accurate when you were putting out a fair amount of power. At lowe r power levels it tended to skip around a lot. So doing fast pedals (high cadence, easy gear) it wasn't so good for. Otherwise it was reasonably acurate.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.