Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Aluminum or Carbon? First Road bike.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Aluminum or Carbon? First Road bike.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-11, 10:54 PM
  #1  
Boricua Newb Roadie
Thread Starter
 
Shuagster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 336

Bikes: CAAD10 5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aluminum or Carbon? First Road bike.

Hello, I've already made a thread about my current dilemma but it died already and this is about a whole new dilemma... I was considering getting an entry level carbon frame for my first road bike, but a reply someone made to one of my posts got me thinking. Maybe it would be better to Get a good aluminum frame now, ride the hell out of it, and then later on get a good CF frame. So, so you think it would be a good idea to get alu or go one-up and get CF?
Shuagster is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 11:06 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal T.O.
Posts: 2,172

Bikes: CAAD9-6, 13' Dawes Haymaker 1500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
First bike aluminum. Then see if cycling is the sport for you. Then drop the big $$$ on a carbon.
If you already know that you like cycling and want to get an aluminum bike check out the CAAD9.
CAAD10 is newer, but more expensive.

I got a CAAD9 as my first bike and I am loving it so far. I am already collecting money to get a carbon frame by next year or maybe a little earlier.
fishymamba is offline  
Old 04-17-11, 11:51 PM
  #3  
Recusant Iconoclast
 
mpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tsawwassen, BC
Posts: 2,560

Bikes: Look 695, Wilier Izoard

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by fishymamba
First bike aluminum. Then see if cycling is the sport for you. Then drop the big $$$ on a carbon.
If you already know that you like cycling and want to get an aluminum bike check out the CAAD9.
CAAD10 is newer, but more expensive.

I got a CAAD9 as my first bike and I am loving it so far. I am already collecting money to get a carbon frame by next year or maybe a little earlier.
+1. Don't get into a carbon frame just for the sake of it.

In my case, when I decided to get back into the sport, I went with the Specialized Allez to make sure I'd like what I was getting back into, but didn't want to spend a whole wad of $$. I've since gotten a good carbon bike, and use the Allez as my winter / trainer bike.
mpath is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 05:23 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
peazweag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: albany,oregon
Posts: 350

Bikes: 1973 RALEIGH SUPER COURSE,85 FUI ALLEGRO

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
just get an aluminum frame,unless your going to race,don't really need a carbon bike.even a good reynolds steel frame is good .I would get a decent aluminum frame and upgrade components as you go
peazweag is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 05:46 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 247

Bikes: Colnago CX-1 Record 11sp. Carbon Epic expert 29er, Claud Butler Dalesman. Proflex X-px Works, Cougar 653. KHS Montana Pro, Hercules Alassio. Ammoco Monte Carlo F/SS. Corratec Superbow Fun 29er. Claud Butler Midas. Kenisis T2. Peugeot Perthus.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
+1 for a steel frame. IMHO steel is more user friendly & will have done it's depreciating if you decide the sport is not for you.
jezmellors is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:11 AM
  #6  
½ Throttle
 
dspaff088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellicott City Md
Posts: 378

Bikes: 2006 Tirreno Razza 3.0, 2007 Schwinn DH 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Get an aluminum and a nice carbon form, will dampen alot of road vibration and yield a better ride
dspaff088 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:24 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Do you have any hobbies? Seriously - if you have experienced upgrade-itis in other areas, you'll likely end up spending more money in the long run if you get an aluminum bike now and want to move to a carbon frame within the year.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:31 AM
  #8  
z90
Senior Member
 
z90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Path to Fredvana
Posts: 909

Bikes: Long Haul Trucker 2010 , Felt Z90 2008, Rans Rocket 2001, Specialized Hardrock 1989

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Unless you've got lots of money, get an aluminum bike. Don't over-inflate your tires. They do a much more effective job of absorbing shock than any frame will, if you let them.
See this article
https://www.bikequarterly.com/images/TireDrop.pdf
z90 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:38 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
jbholcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 186

Bikes: 2011 Gaint Defy 1, 1997 GT Rebound

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had the same dilemma with my first road bike (as an adult). I went with aluminum and I feel I made the right choice at the time.

Go with aluminum. First, there is not a big weight difference between carbon and aluminum frames. Weight weenies will argue this point, but you won't be able to tell the difference on the road. Second, carbon frames have the advantage of being stiffer. Again you probably won't be able to tell the difference between the two frame types as a novice rider anyway. Finally, carbon frames require a little more care. A crack in the frame and you are probably SOL. With aluminum, probably not.

All that said, save a little money and get an aluminum frame with decent components. As far as brands go, don't listen to the hype. Most brands are very similar. Go find a good LBS and ride several of their bikes until you find the one you want for the money you are willing to pay. It's as simple as that.

Have fun!
jbholcom is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:42 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
A lot of opinions being expressed here with a lot of nonsense thrown in here and there.

There really isn't really much of a price gap between carbon and aluminum these days. I'm not sure what you mean by "entry level", but you can get great frames made of either material that are affordable. A $500 aluminum frame isn't necessarily a better frame than a $500 carbon frame. Nor does the material completely determine how the frame rides. I would focus more on how the frame fits and rides and less on construction materials.

Last edited by mihlbach; 04-18-11 at 07:48 AM.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:43 AM
  #11  
½ Throttle
 
dspaff088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellicott City Md
Posts: 378

Bikes: 2006 Tirreno Razza 3.0, 2007 Schwinn DH 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Also saving a couple hundred bucks now will be good. If you are new to cycling there is alot of gear you will need to buy and it can get pretty expensive
dspaff088 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 07:48 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by jbholcom
Finally, carbon frames require a little more care. A crack in the frame and you are probably SOL. With aluminum, probably not.
Oh my. The wrongness - it is staggering.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 08:04 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you get carbon, make sure you add a fire extinguisher to your budget to keep in your garage in case it spontaneously asplodes.
ScoJo is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 08:04 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
cardoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'll echo what has already been said. I went with a specialized allez (aluminum) to see if the sport would be for me. So far, I'm content with the allez. I honestly wouldn't go carbon for another 2-3 years , if at all. The thing with cycling is the bike is just the beginning: pedals, shoes, computer, cages, bottles, jerseys, shorts, helmet, car rack etc...
cardoodle is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 08:23 AM
  #15  
Retired USAF, C-130 Guy
 
M_Wales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cape Carteret, NC.
Posts: 867

Bikes: Shopping

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I was going through the same thing a little over a month ago after being off a bike for more than 20 years. I test rode a lot of aluminum and carbon bikes and I liked the feel and ride of the carbons a lot more, so I ended buying a sweet Team Raleigh bike and couldn't be happier.

Maybe more than I need, but I wont be upgrading anytime soon.
M_Wales is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 08:36 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,570
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 430 Posts
Things to consider:

1. Carbon will have a better resale value should you decide you don't like cycling.
2. Entry level carbon is more durable than many modern aluminum frames - Carbon doesn't crack that easily, but thin walled aluminum frames dent, and those dents lead to cracks, which makes your aluminum frame worthless.
3. Yes, Carbon is more comfortable over long rides
4. Buy the one you enjoy riding more.
5. If you still can't decide, go with whichever comes in the color you like better.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 09:41 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by topflightpro
1. Carbon will have a better resale value should you decide you don't like cycling.
Really? I would have thought the opposite, but I don't spend a lot of time trolling ebay so I wouldn't really know.

However, I would guess that steel frames (and possibly ti) would have better resale value than either carbon or aluminum.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 09:46 AM
  #18  
z90
Senior Member
 
z90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Path to Fredvana
Posts: 909

Bikes: Long Haul Trucker 2010 , Felt Z90 2008, Rans Rocket 2001, Specialized Hardrock 1989

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
This thread makes me wonder... whats the cheapest carbon bike out there that comes from a major manufacturer? When I went looking two years ago, there was nothing near the price point of my aluminum felt ($780). I'm not talking about super deals, just relative place in the lines of major manufacturers.
z90 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 09:48 AM
  #19  
½ Throttle
 
dspaff088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellicott City Md
Posts: 378

Bikes: 2006 Tirreno Razza 3.0, 2007 Schwinn DH 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by mihlbach
Really? I would have thought the opposite, but I don't spend a lot of time trolling ebay so I wouldn't really know.

However, I would guess that steel frames (and possibly ti) would have better resale value than either carbon or aluminum.
Well I think he's trying to say that carbon is more valuable because alot of people want to ride carbon just to ride carbon. I have a carbon tail and fork, saved some money and Ian little step up from your basic alum intro level bike. Put some extra cash in the groupo
dspaff088 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 10:06 AM
  #20  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 38

Bikes: Felt F85 and Giant Boulder SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For your first road bike I would go with an aluminum frame, 105 or rival components, and then spend a little bit on the wheels and get the Mavic kysrium elite or the reynolds solitudes.
kutipper is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 10:29 AM
  #21  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbus GA
Posts: 55

Bikes: '09 Orbea Orca

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I myself just went through the same thing. I set a budget for starters...STICK TO THAT BUDGET!

I know myself as a hobbiest I tend to upgrade quickly and know that I will keep spending money to compete with others to get better, so i set my budget higher with components in mind.

Do your research, shop with friends. talk to your LBS, see what fits you and test ride some aluminum, carbon, and aluminum carbon bikes...see what you like.

If you want a good bike with good components for less then buy used.

If you want a new bike and are ok with spending more on upgrading later, buy new. Your LBS will appreciate that as well and help you along the way as you upgrade.

If you buy used and decide to go with carbon make sure you know what to ask and look for. I'd rather have am aluminum bike with high mileage than a carbon bike with high mileage IMO.

I got a steal on my bike off craigslist...beware..because there are tons of scams on there. Im happy with my choice and I know I wont be spending tons of money on my bike in the next year and if the bike is too much for me I still got a steal and can sell it for at least what I paid if not more.
beerob81 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 10:32 AM
  #22  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 32

Bikes: 2011 Giant Defy 1, 1986 Raleigh Racing USA

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kutipper
For your first road bike I would go with an aluminum frame, 105 or rival components, and then spend a little bit on the wheels and get the Mavic kysrium elite or the reynolds solitudes.
This is almost exactly the set up I'm going with. I'm being measured for a Giant Defy 1 tonight. If all goes well, I'll take it home. It's got a aluminum frame with a carbon fork & seat post and has 105 components.

I would have a hard time justifying a carbon bike at this point as I don't know how much biking I'll do over the next 12 months. I have goals to do a 1/2 century next fall and a full century next spring. (I've been riding most every day on my 25 year old steel bike and building up stamina, etc.) But with 3 young kids at home, my free time is scarce.

The aluminum bike will hold me over until I get a better sense to how committed I'll be to this sport. If I upgrade to carbon some day, I doubt I'll think purchasing a aluminum will be a mistake. But that's just me.
ghughes20 is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 11:10 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by mihlbach
A lot of opinions being expressed here with a lot of nonsense thrown in here and there.

There really isn't really much of a price gap between carbon and aluminum these days. I'm not sure what you mean by "entry level", but you can get great frames made of either material that are affordable. A $500 aluminum frame isn't necessarily a better frame than a $500 carbon frame. Nor does the material completely determine how the frame rides. I would focus more on how the frame fits and rides and less on construction materials.
How would you put together a $700 carbon bike, and what will it be like? I'm not trying to be argumentative here ... actually I wouldn't mind replacing my commuter.

Originally Posted by jbholcom
Finally, carbon frames require a little more care. A crack in the frame and you are probably SOL. With aluminum, probably not.
A crack showed up in my carbon frame. All it meant is that I got a new carbon frame (for free).
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 11:48 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Fox Farm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,751

Bikes: Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Ritchey Outback,Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
Test ride!
Fox Farm is offline  
Old 04-18-11, 12:07 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
How would you put together a $700 carbon bike, and what will it be like? I'm not trying to be argumentative here ... actually I wouldn't mind replacing my commuter.

A crack showed up in my carbon frame. All it meant is that I got a new carbon frame (for free).
I wouldn't put together a $700 carbon bike. I'd buy a complete bike if that were my budget.
mihlbach is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.