Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

2011 Sram Force Groupset

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

2011 Sram Force Groupset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-11, 08:45 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2011 Sram Force Groupset

I have a few questions concerning the groupset.

First is, with the trimming being moved to the big ring, is it possible to use the big ring with the largest cog?

How can I tell the difference between the 2011 and 2010 model? (physically and the manufacturing package)

Is it worth it if I can get the Shifters, crankset(BB30), derailleurs, and ceramic bearings for $700?
MNX1024 is offline  
Old 05-05-11, 09:00 PM
  #2  
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
pdedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
big big and small small are no no's.
pdedes is offline  
Old 05-05-11, 09:35 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,457

Bikes: Cervelo R3 (Force)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2010 force is the same as 2011

I can hit the entire range of my coges 50-34/11-25 without having to use trim. Big-big & small-small are just fine.
Val23708 is offline  
Old 05-05-11, 09:42 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have Apex, but it has trim on the big ring too. BIG-BIG is fine, although there's a little more friction than with a straight chain. It's perfectly acceptable if you just need to get over a small hill and don't want to go to the small chainring. If I'm on any of the 2-3 largest cogs while in the big chainring, I'll use the trim to get rid of the small amount of front derailleur rub.

I haven't been able to use SMALL-SMALL because the chain starts to rub too much against the side of the big chainring, as well as the derailleur (I think). That said, BIG-BIG is a lot more useful and practical than SMALL-SMALL.
Kind of Blued is offline  
Old 05-05-11, 09:56 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kind of Blued
I have Apex, but it has trim on the big ring too. BIG-BIG is fine, although there's a little more friction than with a straight chain. It's perfectly acceptable if you just need to get over a small hill and don't want to go to the small chainring. If I'm on any of the 2-3 largest cogs while in the big chainring, I'll use the trim to get rid of the small amount of front derailleur rub.

I haven't been able to use SMALL-SMALL because the chain starts to rub too much against the side of the big chainring, as well as the derailleur (I think). That said, BIG-BIG is a lot more useful and practical than SMALL-SMALL.
This.
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 05-05-11, 10:07 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the info. I only use the BIG - BIG, definitely not the SMALL - SMALL.

Now I just need to figure out how to tell the difference between the 2011 and 2010 model. Don't care if there's no changes between the two. Just need to know how to identify the year of the model.

And finally, who thinks the price I'm being offered is worth the money?
MNX1024 is offline  
Old 05-05-11, 10:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190

Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
That seems like a good deal to me.
ilovecycling is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 12:41 AM
  #8  
The "Mechanic"
 
giantdefy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: East Bay
Posts: 555

Bikes: 2013 Tarmac SL4 Pro; 2011 Lynskey Cooper, 2015 BH Quartz Disc, 2014 Yeti SB75

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2010 and 2011 are identical except for the redesigned bottom bracket. Shell is different with a redesigned seal. I paid $850 otd for my 11' group (shifters, brakes, crank, standard BB, FD, RD, cassette, and chain.

looks like your missing the cassette, brakes, and chain.
giantdefy is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 02:05 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 369 Times in 206 Posts
Brand new for $700? If so, decent deal. If it's used, I'd say its $100 overpriced.
Elvo is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 04:42 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
deepakvrao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bangalore India
Posts: 2,387
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Kind of Blued
I haven't been able to use SMALL-SMALL because the chain starts to rub too much against the side of the big chainring, as well as the derailleur (I think). That said, BIG-BIG is a lot more useful and practical than SMALL-SMALL.
^^^yes, small - small and the chain rubs the big chain ring. Big - big I use pretty often for short durations.
deepakvrao is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 08:58 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anyway, is there a way to tell if the part is 2011 or 2010? Does it say on the part itself and/or the retail packaging?

Yea, $700 brand new. I opted out on the chain, brakes, and cassette because I have my own. I guess there's no change since I'm using the BB30 version, I'd assume.
MNX1024 is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 09:06 AM
  #12  
Boyd Cycling owner
 
coachboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 412
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Skip the ceramic bearings and get the new chain, cassette, and brakes. There's a huge price difference between the ceramic and non ceramic bottom brackets. . .and going ceramic is definitely not worth paying extra.
coachboyd is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 09:21 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by coachboyd
Skip the ceramic bearings and get the new chain, cassette, and brakes. There's a huge price difference between the ceramic and non ceramic bottom brackets. . .and going ceramic is definitely not worth paying extra.
You mean I should skip the ceramic bearings for the bottom bracket? Well, If I do, can't really think of what else I can get because I already have a new chain, cassette, and brakes lying around.
Ok, let's just say I decide not to purchase the ceramic bearings, how much do you think I should ask to take off the $700 from my LBS?
MNX1024 is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 09:34 AM
  #14  
Boyd Cycling owner
 
coachboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 412
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Well, full retail price the ceramic bottom bracket goes for $195 and the regular force bottom bracket is $35. It's crazy how much they charge for a ceramic bottom bracket especially when there is no real gains to be made.
coachboyd is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 10:08 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Val23708
Big-big & small-small are just fine.


Originally Posted by pdedes
big big and small small are no no's.


Typical BF consistency...........
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 10:24 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 448
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by coachboyd
Well, full retail price the ceramic bottom bracket goes for $195 and the regular force bottom bracket is $35. It's crazy how much they charge for a ceramic bottom bracket especially when there is no real gains to be made.
Especially when the wholesale price on the ceramic bearings is about $20 each vs. $5 for standard. That's a $30 difference to the manufacturer.

To the OP, you have gotten some solid advice to not get the ceramic BB. The extra money is better spent elsewhere.

Last edited by Painful Chafe; 05-06-11 at 10:28 AM.
Painful Chafe is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 11:21 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
whether your chain rubs on the big chainring in small-small is going to depend on your chainline and how long your chainstay is.
foresthill is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 11:30 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do you guys think it's fair to ask for $200 off the original price of $700 if I decide not to purchase the ceramic beaings?

Actually I've been using big - big on my current 105/600 and I have no issue at all. It helps a lot when I'm climbing hills that doesn't have such a high incline where I don't even need to use the small ring at all. Because the Force groupset that I've test rided is an older version, there's no trim at all and I've read that Sram use to have trimming on the small ring. This is why I was asking if the trimming allows me to use the big - big.
P.S. the big-big is such a life saver when I'm going out to get some light grocery, lol.

Last edited by MNX1024; 05-06-11 at 11:34 AM.
MNX1024 is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 11:53 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MNX1024
Do you guys think it's fair to ask for $200 off the original price of $700 if I decide not to purchase the ceramic beaings?

Actually I've been using big - big on my current 105/600 and I have no issue at all. It helps a lot when I'm climbing hills that doesn't have such a high incline where I don't even need to use the small ring at all. Because the Force groupset that I've test rided is an older version, there's no trim at all and I've read that Sram use to have trimming on the small ring. This is why I was asking if the trimming allows me to use the big - big.
P.S. the big-big is such a life saver when I'm going out to get some light grocery, lol.
All SRAM groupsets have trim. The first version of force had it in the small ring. 2009 and later have it in the big ring. However, if the cable tension is set up wrong, you can lose the trim altogether.

I would say $100 is a reasonable deduction for the BB. If you try, you can usually find the ceramic BB for around that price online.
foresthill is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 12:02 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by foresthill
All SRAM groupsets have trim. The first version of force had it in the small ring. 2009 and later have it in the big ring. However, if the cable tension is set up wrong, you can lose the trim altogether.

I would say $100 is a reasonable deduction for the BB. If you try, you can usually find the ceramic BB for around that price online.
Yeah, the bike I test ridden wasn't really tuned up. It was just to test if I like the hood and how it changes gears. The mechanic told me there is no trim for some reason. No wonder I was somehow able to get it to trim on the big ring. Don't ask me how, but it some how did trim once, but me and the mechanic can't seem to get it to work again after I shifted away to the lower ring.
MNX1024 is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 01:17 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,247

Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by MNX1024
I have a few questions concerning the groupset.

First is, with the trimming being moved to the big ring, is it possible to use the big ring with the largest cog?

How can I tell the difference between the 2011 and 2010 model? (physically and the manufacturing package)

Is it worth it if I can get the Shifters, crankset(BB30), derailleurs, and ceramic bearings for $700?
$700 is a really good deal.
dalava is offline  
Old 05-06-11, 02:47 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by foresthill
whether your chain rubs on the big chainring in small-small is going to depend on your chainline and how long your chainstay is.
I ride a LARGE relaxed geo frame with LONG chainstays, and the chain rubs on ANY of the three smallest cogs when in the small chainring. What's your experience?
Kind of Blued is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danmc
Bicycle Mechanics
22
06-12-13 07:50 PM
ahson
Bicycle Mechanics
5
07-14-11 03:52 PM
djpfine
Road Cycling
5
06-11-11 08:56 PM
jgjulio
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
17
04-06-11 11:46 PM
3chnalava
Bicycle Mechanics
1
05-17-10 08:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.