I was happy with my 26.0 bar
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 2,620
Bikes: Orbea Orca Trek 5500 Trek Equinox
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was happy with my 26.0 bar
I miss it. The reduced frontal area, the lightness, the svelte lines, the smaller stem face..... I held out as long as I could, but alas, 31.8 has been shoved down our throats, possibly due to "the Italians lack of butting and swaggin technology in the 1990's." I used to hold onto my faith that 31.8 was just a fad, and took comfort in Morgan Nicol's words,
"For mountain bike it makes some sense and it looks good - going 25 kph. For road bikes it is a bad idea. For TT/triathlon bikes it is really ridiculous…. Oversized: Fatter, Heavier, Slower! (Good tag line, huh?). ......The teams know with good quality, triple butted alloy or carbon fiber bars there is no performance reason to choose oversized bars. There IS a penalty however when you add 20% more frontal area and 10% to the weight. This performance factor will grow and grow as more teams realize aerodynamics is more important for road stages than TT stages. Backstedt is 6'4”and weighs over 200lbs and is their cobbled classics specialist and he's going 26.0."
But it was not to be. Now, it's a challenge to find new, light bars in 26.0, so I gave up. I already have a 31.8 bar in my garage, ready for my next build.
"For mountain bike it makes some sense and it looks good - going 25 kph. For road bikes it is a bad idea. For TT/triathlon bikes it is really ridiculous…. Oversized: Fatter, Heavier, Slower! (Good tag line, huh?). ......The teams know with good quality, triple butted alloy or carbon fiber bars there is no performance reason to choose oversized bars. There IS a penalty however when you add 20% more frontal area and 10% to the weight. This performance factor will grow and grow as more teams realize aerodynamics is more important for road stages than TT stages. Backstedt is 6'4”and weighs over 200lbs and is their cobbled classics specialist and he's going 26.0."
But it was not to be. Now, it's a challenge to find new, light bars in 26.0, so I gave up. I already have a 31.8 bar in my garage, ready for my next build.
#3
cycle-dog spot
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Look, Niner, Ellsworth, Norco, Litespeed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I felt the same way about 10-speed and BB30.
Resistance is futile...
- Z
Resistance is futile...
- Z
#5
Live to ride ride to live
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When I bought my bike it has 26.0 bars and stem on it, but the bars had a crack and didn't fit my hands anyone so I upgraded. I wanted a ergo shaped wing style bar and they were only available in 31.8. It has been on the bike for 5 years now and I am happy with it.
The same thing happened with 1" forks. They are still around but hard to find now.
The same thing happened with 1" forks. They are still around but hard to find now.
#6
Portland, OR, USA
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: portland
Posts: 1,626
Bikes: kona paddywagon, trek 2.1, lemond nevada city, gt zrx
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
me too but i fell in love with a deda zero stem so i bought a 26mm to 31.8 shim!! old trusty handle bars meet new stem hotness. 9 bucks. works great!
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...ls.php?id=7414
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...ls.php?id=7414
Last edited by pdxtex; 05-11-11 at 04:14 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pennsyl-tuckey
Posts: 684
Bikes: '86 Cannondale SR400, '86 Pugeot PX10, '92 Bianchi Axis, '95 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, '00 Fondriest X-Status, '08 Specialized Roubaix, '13 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It was even better before this whole "wheel" thing took over. Walking or riding a horse/camel was much more relaxing. And what about all this "pneumatic tire" stuff...clearly a mere fashion.
Luddites unite!
Luddites unite!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
What??? You can still find plenty of good bars in 26.0. ITM, 3ttt, Ritchey.....
#9
Extra Medium Member
The absolute funniest thing about this post...............is that it's on the internet.
__________________
Droping the hamer since '86
Droping the hamer since '86
#10
The bus, Gus
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 976
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I couldn't seem to find compact bars in 26.0 so I ended up making the switch to the 31.8 FSA Omega bar a while ago. I haven't noticed any functional difference between the two sizes.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Well I just did a 30 second search on Universal Cycles and turned up 16 different 26.0 drop bars and 15 different 26.0 threadless stems. Doesn't seem to be a shortage of either.
Lawrence
Lawrence
#12
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
I am in the opposite camp.
I find the 31.8 bars more comfortable on 4+ hour rides. I also like the flat tops that the newer carbon bars have.
Part of the reason to switch to 31.8 is that they look more proportional on all the new frames with larger dia tubing. There are also structural and manufacturing considerations that favour 31.8.
Basing any buying decision on what pros use is not always a good idea as you have no idea what motivated that decision. It could be personal preference, sponsor related or superstition. Ride what works for you and makes you want to ride more.
Me? 31.8 all the way, baby!
I find the 31.8 bars more comfortable on 4+ hour rides. I also like the flat tops that the newer carbon bars have.
Part of the reason to switch to 31.8 is that they look more proportional on all the new frames with larger dia tubing. There are also structural and manufacturing considerations that favour 31.8.
Basing any buying decision on what pros use is not always a good idea as you have no idea what motivated that decision. It could be personal preference, sponsor related or superstition. Ride what works for you and makes you want to ride more.
Me? 31.8 all the way, baby!
#13
Senior Member
I like both. the bigger the stiffer obviously and less chance of creaks since I am a sprinter. The smaller for touring.
#14
Underwhelming
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Mississippi
Posts: 1,263
Bikes: Lynskey R330 Ti, Dean El Vado Ti, Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There IS a penalty however when you add 20% more frontal area and 10% to the weight. This performance factor will grow and grow as more teams realize aerodynamics is more important for road stages than TT stages. Backstedt is 6'4”and weighs over 200lbs and is their cobbled classics specialist and he's going 26.0."(
#15
Senior Member
what I really like is the ease of adjustment of the quill stem, perhaps I will start a thread on that to keep the spirit of "i was perfectly happy with" threads alive.
#17
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
I'm used to the larger ones. I have an old bike with 26 I took on vacation and it wasn't comfortable- like grabbing on to a pencil.
#18
shut up legs
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mokum
Posts: 1,413
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#19
Senior Member
It seems some of you don't realize that 26 or 31.8 only refers to the clamping area. It doesn't effect the thickness or shape where you hold them and doesn't make them more or less comfortable.
#20
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
Many 31.8 bars continue that dimension where you do hold them (on the tops) or flatten out somewhat whereas the 26.0 or 26.4 bars do not. That does make them different.
#21
Senior Member