Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Help me interpret this please

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Help me interpret this please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-04, 11:43 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Help me interpret this please

I did the on line sizing test just to have some idea of what size bike I should be looking for. Now I am totally confused. I was looking at 53 CM bikes and I thought that most bikes had very similar top tube and seat tube lengths. I thought a 53 cm bike meant that the seat tube measurement was roughly 53 as well as the top tube roughly 53. Anyway, below are my results of the sizing test. I have no clue where this points me as far as what size I need. I checked and double checked my measurements so they are bang on. Would I fit better into a 51 or 53 cm bike? Here are the results:

Comp fit Eddy fit French fit

Seat tube range c-c 50.2 -50.7 51.4 - 51.9 53.1 - 53.6
Seat tube range c-t 51.7 -52.2 52.9 - 53.4 54.6 - 55.1
Top tube length 56.3 - 56.7 56.3 - 56.7 57.5 - 57.9
Stem Length 11.2 - 11.8 10.1 - 10.7 10.3 - 10.9
BB-Saddle Position 69.8 - 71.8 69.0 - 71.0 67.3 - 69.3
Saddle-Handlebar 54.0 - 54.6 54.8 - 55.4 56.5 - 57.1
Saddle Setback 2.9 - 3.3 4.1 - 4.5 3.6 - 4.0
Seatpost Type NON-SETBACK NON-SETBACK SETBACK
Tommy Canuck is offline  
Old 11-03-04, 11:56 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
CycleFreakLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 663

Bikes: Litespeed, Medici, Gary Fisher

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tommy Canuck
Would I fit better into a 51 or 53 cm bike?
You do realize that not all manufacturers measure seat tube height the same. Some measure center to center, others center to top. A Trek 54 is like somebody else's 52. The only way you'll know is to go down to your LBS-s and try 'em all.

First I think you should decide what type of riding you want to do. Racing, scaling cliffs like a goat, (shudder) a TT, or just a your everyday roadie (maybe less aggressive than racing). Second, decide how much $$$ you're willing to part with. Third, visit a whole bunch of web sites and start making an Excel sheet of frames, materials, and estimated sizes. Then, go find an LBS and start trying 'em on.

Best.
CycleFreakLS is offline  
Old 11-04-04, 06:43 AM
  #3  
ex frame builder
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
I don’t know if you would find a frame with that seat and top tube combination. Also I don’t know what your measurements are, but this seems like a very long reach and I’m not sure this is what you need.

Go to my website; the link is below then Bicycles > Page 6 Bike Tech. There is a very simple to read chart. You may not find a frame with the exact same top tube length, so adjust the stem length accordingly. Also the chart is for a racing position so again chose a frame a centimeter bigger and the reach a centimeter shorter if you are looking for a more relaxed position.
__________________
History, photos and tech articles on "Dave's Bike Blog." 'dave moulton' Registry including a Picture Gallery https://www.davemoultonregistry.com/
Dave Moulton is offline  
Old 11-04-04, 07:47 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by CycleFreakLS
You do realize that not all manufacturers measure seat tube height the same. Some measure center to center, others center to top.
And some measure to the top of an extended seattube. Assuming adequate standover,worry more about TT length and the ability to have the bars at the proper position.
sydney is offline  
Old 11-04-04, 07:53 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tommy Canuck
I did the on line sizing test just to have some idea of what size bike I should be looking for. Now I am totally confused. I was looking at 53 CM bikes and I thought that most bikes had very similar top tube and seat tube lengths. I thought a 53 cm bike meant that the seat tube measurement was roughly 53 as well as the top tube roughly 53. Anyway, below are my results of the sizing test. I have no clue where this points me as far as what size I need. I checked and double checked my measurements so they are bang on. Would I fit better into a 51 or 53 cm bike? Here are the results:

Comp fit Eddy fit French fit

Seat tube range c-c 50.2 -50.7 51.4 - 51.9 53.1 - 53.6
Seat tube range c-t 51.7 -52.2 52.9 - 53.4 54.6 - 55.1
Top tube length 56.3 - 56.7 56.3 - 56.7 57.5 - 57.9
Stem Length 11.2 - 11.8 10.1 - 10.7 10.3 - 10.9
BB-Saddle Position 69.8 - 71.8 69.0 - 71.0 67.3 - 69.3
Saddle-Handlebar 54.0 - 54.6 54.8 - 55.4 56.5 - 57.1
Saddle Setback 2.9 - 3.3 4.1 - 4.5 3.6 - 4.0
Seatpost Type NON-SETBACK NON-SETBACK SETBACK
You aren't going to find traditional frames with that kind of seattube/toptube ratio.Standard geomety just does't come with toptubes that long for the given nominal sizes. Assuming your measurements and calculations are even correct, you need to be thinking custom.
sydney is offline  
Old 11-04-04, 11:59 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
There are some brands which are longer than other for any given size. You will have to check out the geometry charts, but take a look at Lemond for long frames.
These days, ST is less than critical; the fashion is for plenty of standover clearance. Size your frame by TT. You can get the same reach with differnt combos of TT and stem. There is no formula for picking the right one, but a medium stem 10-12cm will work for medium bikes.
Your riding style affects the reach you need. Most fit guides assume that you need a long, low aerodynamic position, but you may be happier with a more relaxed touring style. It is up to you.
MichaelW is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.