Need womans input please.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hoschton, Ga.
Posts: 278
Bikes: 2011 Scott Addict
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Need womans input please.
My wife is wanting a new bike very soon. She currently rides a Giant Defy advance (mens) that is a size 47cm and she is 5'4". We are pretty sure the bike is too small. Is a woman specific geometry really worth it? Or is it a marketing ploy? Any of you ladies gone from a Mens bike to a Womans bike and it make a difference? Any recomendations? She's is interested in the Specialized Ruby or Scott CR1 womens.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 444
Bikes: IRO SS / Trek 2.1 / Trek 5.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My GF is 5'3" and says that going to a WSD frame made all the difference in the world. I guess everyone has individual fit issues...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 167
Bikes: CAAD10, Specialized Dolce
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride a women's CAAD10 (48-inch frame). Went with the WSD mainly because of the narrower handlebars (I'm 5'2" and pretty small of bone), and because they had that frame in stock, I sat on this bike and liked how it felt, but next time around I wouldn't shy away from getting a men's bike that fit, and perhaps just swapping out the handlebars. Several of my teammates ride unisex/men's bikes and have no complaints.
#7
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,889
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
138 Posts
My wife has two bikes with regular frames that I set up to fit her without problem. I would have guessed that a 47cm is too small for 5'4". Maybe a setback seatpost and a longer, higher angle stem would do the trick for not much money.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My GF rides a 47cm WSD Trek Lexa. It was the only frame that fit her and her 5'1" frame properly. She was not opposed to a men's frame but in the end nothing that we found/rode fit.
#9
Senior Member
My Wife switched to a wsd Trek and she said it made a huge difference. Not just because of the frame geometry, but also the gearing, bar width and wsd saddles.
I know the things that I mentioned can be purchased separately, but it is very convenient to just buy the bike that is already specced for a female.
I know the things that I mentioned can be purchased separately, but it is very convenient to just buy the bike that is already specced for a female.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hoschton, Ga.
Posts: 278
Bikes: 2011 Scott Addict
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies everyone. I think this weekend we'll start riding different bikes and just take it from there.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 210
Bikes: 2009 Felt B2 Pro, 2009 Trek 1.2, '80s Hercules beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My mother is a high-level athlete, and she used to ride a WSD Madone before it was stolen. She opted to replace it with a pair of custom Segal Magnesium frames - one road and one tri bike - but she liked that Madone quite a bit.
#13
Senior Member
#14
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
371 Posts
It's based on the assumption that women tend to have longer legs and shorter torso's than men of a similar height.
The data, however, doesn't confirm that on a broad population basis.
So if you have a short torso in relation to your overall height, a WSD bike may work well (whether you're male or female).
If you're a woman and don't have a comparitively short torso, then a WSD frame may not be the best fit for you.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#15
I like beans
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meffa, MA
Posts: 3,336
Bikes: Tarmac Pro, Bianchi Zurigo, Raleigh Gran Sport, Fuji Del Rey, Ironman Centurion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
as said by Munk69, there are some small geometry changes, but a lot of it is about convenience w/ regards to stem length, bar width, and the saddle.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 210
Bikes: 2009 Felt B2 Pro, 2009 Trek 1.2, '80s Hercules beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was even supposed to intern there, but the professionalism threw me off. I wanted basic framebuilding guidance, they wanted me to prep chainstays for 6 months! They have a single welder qualified to do the actual frames, and an intern who's literally been preparing chainstays (turning round tubing to oval with varying diameters) for the past six months until he's ready. Magnesium is tricky to weld, but the bikes are light. My mother's frames are competitive with mid-range carbon frames in terms of weight and stiffness - some of her racing peers recently ordered their own Mg frames.
#17
Senior Member
They have a single welder qualified to do the actual frames, and an intern who's literally been preparing chainstays (turning round tubing to oval with varying diameters) for the past six months until he's ready. Magnesium is tricky to weld, but the bikes are light. My mother's frames are competitive with mid-range carbon frames in terms of weight and stiffness - some of her racing peers recently ordered their own Mg frames.
Not to derail this thread (but I will because the OP seems somewhat satisfied), but I've been on magnesium frames for years. Three, with this one being the latest custom build.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 8,546
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I went from a Wylder (small mfr, now defunct) WSD frame to a Scott CR1 SL (not WSD) frame. (I'm 5'2" and riding the 47cm frame). I also ride a Trek 520 not-WSD in 17"
I think it depends on the person, whether you really need the short TT for the WSD frames. I also think the taller head tube bikes, "comfort" or "plush" models, tend to mimic that shorter Effective Top Tube with respect to the Head Tube, so those were on my list of bikes to try.
I did a total parts pick myself for the frame, and I knew what size bars, cranks & stem I needed. If you're trying to buy a complete/stock bike, you might have to change less of that stuff if you go WSD.
In the Scott line, the Contessa (Scott WSD) model is sort of in between the Addict and CR1 geometries, and I needed the taller head tube, and they also don't spec it in top of the line groups or carbon (grrrrrr!!!!) so I didn't even consider that one.
I did test ride the Ruby, which was nice but in my size they put too-short-for-me cranks on it, and I also test rode the Addict and the Cervelo R5. I loved the R5 but they just don't make is small enough for me, and they put 650 wheels on the XS RS, which is just a showstopper for me.
Anyway, not sure any of this helps even a little...
I think it depends on the person, whether you really need the short TT for the WSD frames. I also think the taller head tube bikes, "comfort" or "plush" models, tend to mimic that shorter Effective Top Tube with respect to the Head Tube, so those were on my list of bikes to try.
I did a total parts pick myself for the frame, and I knew what size bars, cranks & stem I needed. If you're trying to buy a complete/stock bike, you might have to change less of that stuff if you go WSD.
In the Scott line, the Contessa (Scott WSD) model is sort of in between the Addict and CR1 geometries, and I needed the taller head tube, and they also don't spec it in top of the line groups or carbon (grrrrrr!!!!) so I didn't even consider that one.
I did test ride the Ruby, which was nice but in my size they put too-short-for-me cranks on it, and I also test rode the Addict and the Cervelo R5. I loved the R5 but they just don't make is small enough for me, and they put 650 wheels on the XS RS, which is just a showstopper for me.
Anyway, not sure any of this helps even a little...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wishiwasabiker
Hybrid Bicycles
2
06-10-19 07:08 PM