Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-11, 05:16 AM   #1
thehammerdog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Posts: 2,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Innovantion vs. Fads?

I am not sure how much aero plays a roll in a basic bike frame but some of those that know more than I are pushing the envelope on developing the aero/roadie all arounder. Seems that it would be a waste of $ if they did not think it worked...
Here is an article that talks about Innovation......interesting to see who they compare the new bike to....and who is missing.

http://velonews.competitor.com/2011/...promise_187939
thehammerdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 05:52 AM   #2
Bikeisdusty
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have been wondering about the lack of real innovation in bikes, but came to realize that the reason for the lack there of is due to UCI rules. Since you can't make a race bike not look like a bike from 1911, you can't make a bike look like 2011. With the material science we have today, the shape of bikes should be much different. These Aero bikes push these rules to the limit, but for some reason, the engineers have made the bikes stiffer than riding in the back of a pickup. Which I find strange as the sales pitch is that the Aero bikes will take less energy to get there, but if they beat you into fatigue, then what is the point?

The other thing that makes me laugh, is the quoted savings of time and such. Why then is it that the riders on these bikes are not 3 minutes ahead on each stage of the TDF? Ummm, over rated maybe.
Bikeisdusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 06:43 AM   #3
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Posts: 20,030
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikeisdusty View Post
The other thing that makes me laugh, is the quoted savings of time and such. Why then is it that the riders on these bikes are not 3 minutes ahead on each stage of the TDF? Ummm, over rated maybe.
In time trials, maybe they are.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike

Last edited by Homebrew01; 08-15-11 at 07:33 AM.
Homebrew01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 06:54 AM   #4
alexvpaq
Senior Member
 
alexvpaq's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Qc,Canada
Bikes: A trek
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikeisdusty View Post
The other thing that makes me laugh, is the quoted savings of time and such. Why then is it that the riders on these bikes are not 3 minutes ahead on each stage of the TDF? Ummm, over rated maybe.
Or they all have the same fkn equipment or pretty similar.

Ummm, under reasoning maybe?
alexvpaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 07:43 AM   #5
wphamilton
rugged individualist
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 10,391
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 432 Post(s)
Why do they restrict themselves to UCI standards? Is the market for these frames exclusively for cyclists entering UCI events? Chopping the back off an airfoil is valid aerodynamically but very much a compromise. As is the 3:1 length/width ratio to begin with. For real gains it should be 5:1 or 6:1 at least.
wphamilton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 08:09 AM   #6
hao
Senior Member
 
hao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehammerdog View Post
Seems that it would be a waste of $ if they did not think they could market and sell it...
fixed.
hao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 08:14 AM   #7
guadzilla
Dropped again
 
guadzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: A small tropical island
Bikes: Damocles, Shiv, Lynskey, X-Fire, LHT, +
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehammerdog View Post
Here is an article that talks about Innovation......interesting to see who they compare the new bike to....and who is missing.
And you will note that the Brand That is Missing had implemented the same concept as the Foil earlier in the Speed Concept bikes.
guadzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 08:34 AM   #8
Andy Somnifac
Annoyed.
 
Andy Somnifac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Bikes: Siegler CCR, Lynskey R210 Custom, Felt S22 TT, Raleigh RX 2.0 CX, GT Helion Elite
Posts: 1,062
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
Why do they restrict themselves to UCI standards?
Because a lot of riders see a bike under a pro and want to ride the same thing. There have been manufacturers that have made and sold bikes that were not approved by the UCI, but those models didn't last long. The Y-Foil from Trek comes to mind. I know 3 people that own and ride them regularly and swear they are the most comfortable bike they've ever ridden. It was given awards I believe. But it didn't last long.

Andy Somnifac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 09:12 AM   #9
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 7,470
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehammerdog View Post
Here is an article that talks about Innovation......interesting to see who they compare the new bike to....and who is missing.
Are you still going on about Trek? You realize that a CEO's job is not to make innovative bikes. Their job is to make money.
gregf83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 09:46 AM   #10
Runner 1
Cookies!
 
Runner 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes: Red Huffy, CAAD10 Rival
Posts: 629
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikeisdusty View Post
I have been wondering about the lack of real innovation in bikes, but came to realize that the reason for the lack there of is due to UCI rules. Since you can't make a race bike not look like a bike from 1911, you can't make a bike look like 2011. With the material science we have today, the shape of bikes should be much different. These Aero bikes push these rules to the limit, but for some reason, the engineers have made the bikes stiffer than riding in the back of a pickup. Which I find strange as the sales pitch is that the Aero bikes will take less energy to get there, but if they beat you into fatigue, then what is the point?

The other thing that makes me laugh, is the quoted savings of time and such. Why then is it that the riders on these bikes are not 3 minutes ahead on each stage of the TDF? Ummm, over rated maybe.
Yeah, I suppose you have to have rules at some point. Otherwise everyone in the TdF would be racing HPV's at 50-80 mph and ... wait a second ... that might make it more interesting actually.
Runner 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 10:25 AM   #11
ColinL
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Posts: 4,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
Why do they restrict themselves to UCI standards? Is the market for these frames exclusively for cyclists entering UCI events?
Because the development costs of building non-UCI frames are too high to make a viable product that can by definition only be sold to cyclists who are not entering UCI events.

The top-tier teams are on newer stuff than you can get in the dealership at least half the time. But the development costs of that tech is paid by people buying from the dealerships, even if there's an additional 1-2 years of lag.
ColinL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 10:32 AM   #12
Vicelord
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Downtown Phoenix
Bikes: BMC RoadRacer SL01, Kona Kula FrankensteinDeluxe, Schwinn Powerglide.
Posts: 1,824
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Fad:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg 477413591_bcee49d14e.jpg (43.2 KB, 103 views)
Vicelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 11:28 AM   #13
thehammerdog
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Posts: 2,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregf83 View Post
Are you still going on about Trek? You realize that a CEO's job is not to make innovative bikes. Their job is to make money.
Not at all but man you either work for Trek or own stock or something........do tell?
thehammerdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 11:31 AM   #14
Vicelord
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Downtown Phoenix
Bikes: BMC RoadRacer SL01, Kona Kula FrankensteinDeluxe, Schwinn Powerglide.
Posts: 1,824
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehammerdog View Post
Not at all but man you either work for Trek or own stock or something........do tell?
Actually, he is absolutely right.

A company that large is operated for one reason, to make their investors happy and continue to see company profits and growth. There is no "lets make a cool bike and see if it works or makes any money" at that level. At least, not anymore.
Vicelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 11:33 AM   #15
wphamilton
rugged individualist
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 10,391
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 432 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColinL View Post
Because the development costs of building non-UCI frames are too high to make a viable product that can by definition only be sold to cyclists who are not entering UCI events.
That sounds reasonable, provided the development cost of a new design is high, and the proportion of cyclists not entering UCI events is fairly low. Do you have a ballpark estimate for those two figures?
wphamilton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 01:36 PM   #16
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColinL View Post
Because the development costs of building non-UCI frames are too high to make a viable product that can by definition only be sold to cyclists who are not entering UCI events.
Yeah, I'm not sure I buy that.

There are lots of bikes offered by the big manufacturers that have nothing to do with UCI regs, and huge swaths of cyclists barely even know that bike races exist.

In terms of costs, I don't see it as a huge issue. Tri bikes have far fewer regulations, and it's relatively easy to migrate relevant knowledge road bikes; e.g. it wouldn't require a ton of research to set up tubes with a 4:1 ratio if they're already doing it for their tri bikes. Big swaths of road lineups aren't intended for racing (plush bikes, flat-bar hybrids), yet still get development and testing resources.

We are also seeing quite a bit of innovation within UCI regs, including aero bikes that borrow from tris (e.g. Cervelo S5), Di2, SRAM road groupsets, tubeless tires, carbon everything....

Some folks, by the way, aren't interested in changes, regardless of the UCI regs. Quite a few roadies are repulsed by the idea of disc brakes on road bikes; Di2 still invokes lots of "why the heck do I need that."

So really, I don't see the UCI holding back much, even for the relatively small number of riders who do race.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 02:07 PM   #17
ColinL
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Posts: 4,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The UCI is definitely holding back race bikes from major aero features like nose/tail cones, and from eliminating or significantly redesigning frame structural members. Everyone would bail on seatstays if they could. Seatpost tube, probably most would keep, but the Trek linked earlier in the thread shows what is possible.

Development of comfort bikes is regarding style and utility and I daresay these features are easier and faster to design around than a race bike.


I do like the UCI in that maintaining these restrictions lowers costs and makes it unlikely that any one bike will pull out a significant advantage. The major races are won by the best riders, not the best bikes because they're all pretty damn good. More importantly, they're good enough for a powerful rider to win.
ColinL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 08:03 PM   #18
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 7,470
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehammerdog View Post
Not at all but man you either work for Trek or own stock or something........do tell?
I don't think Trek is public, however, principle stands for all public companies.
gregf83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 09:49 PM   #19
Runner 1
Cookies!
 
Runner 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes: Red Huffy, CAAD10 Rival
Posts: 629
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColinL View Post
Everyone would bail on seatstays if they could.
I think seatstays are almost aesthetic at this point. Have you seen them on the EVO?
Runner 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-11, 10:21 PM   #20
Fox Farm
Senior Member
 
Fox Farm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Bikes: Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.
Posts: 2,400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
How about the Kestrel seat tube-less frame from 20 years ago!
Fox Farm is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 12:08 AM   #21
jrhii
Señor Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Franken Strada
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe View Post
Quite a few roadies are repulsed by the idea of disc brakes on road bikes; Di2 still invokes lots of "why the heck do I need that."

Here is one. I see Di2 the same way I saw Gibson's Robot Guitar that came out. It was a guitar with small motors in it that tuned the strings automatically. Sure it is kinda cool, but it is entirely unnecessary, with a cost that is not worth the benefit. For the uniformed, tuning your strings on a guitar is something you do nearly every time you pick it up, it is as regular s switching gears on a bike. Disclaimer, I am not a racer, and I still use a friction shifter.


Also, if you want to look for innovation, Runner1 pointed us in the right direction. Look at any HPV team. I was in the robotics team in college, and we shared a work area with the HPV team. They hand make recumbents with a little material as possible and make a custom carbon fairing. They have a speed trial one that is longer and has maxed out somewhere around 63-64MPH, and the regular one they race in ASME challenges.

http://humanpowered.mst.edu/photos/2010/west/12.jpg

That was from 2010, when they won every ASME category for both east and west coast competitions. (Design, Male Sprint, Female Sprint, Endurance, and Overall)
jrhii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 01:22 AM   #22
kabex
Senior Member
 
kabex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Mexico
Bikes:
Posts: 616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
^ show me that thing climbing the alp d'huez and descending Mt. Ventoux.
kabex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 04:16 AM   #23
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Bikes: 2013 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict, 2015 Scott Scale 700SL MTB
Posts: 59,579
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 201 Post(s)
Innovantion. You've invented a new term that combines invention and innovation.

Brilliant.
patentcad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 04:18 AM   #24
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Bikes: 2013 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict, 2015 Scott Scale 700SL MTB
Posts: 59,579
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 201 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikeisdusty View Post
I have been wondering about the lack of real innovation in bikes,
It is because NOBODY CARES.
patentcad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 06:11 AM   #25
hyhuu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NoVA
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sport
Posts: 1,382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrhii View Post
Here is one. I see Di2 the same way I saw Gibson's Robot Guitar that came out. It was a guitar with small motors in it that tuned the strings automatically. Sure it is kinda cool, but it is entirely unnecessary, with a cost that is not worth the benefit. For the uniformed, tuning your strings on a guitar is something you do nearly every time you pick it up, it is as regular s switching gears on a bike. Disclaimer, I am not a racer, and I still use a friction shifter.


Also, if you want to look for innovation, Runner1 pointed us in the right direction. Look at any HPV team. I was in the robotics team in college, and we shared a work area with the HPV team. They hand make recumbents with a little material as possible and make a custom carbon fairing. They have a speed trial one that is longer and has maxed out somewhere around 63-64MPH, and the regular one they race in ASME challenges.

http://humanpowered.mst.edu/photos/2010/west/12.jpg

That was from 2010, when they won every ASME category for both east and west coast competitions. (Design, Male Sprint, Female Sprint, Endurance, and Overall)

I like to see someone riding that in a crosswind.
hyhuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 AM.