Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Good Heart Rate Monitor for Under $100?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Good Heart Rate Monitor for Under $100?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-11, 06:53 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
dieseldogpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2010 Trek 1.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good Heart Rate Monitor for Under $100?

I am looking to get a decent heart rate monitor for under $100. It seems like a lot of monitors have connectivity and reliability issues. Just looking for everyone's input and experiences.
dieseldogpi is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 07:10 AM
  #2  
Pug
High Modulus
 
Pug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 663

Bikes: Cervelo R3, Ridley X-Night

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Polar has some models in your price range.
Pug is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 07:22 AM
  #3  
Faster than yesterday
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,510
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a Polar rs300x I got for about $90. Does pretty much anything you want a HR monitor to do, which includes time in user-definable zones.
tadawdy is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 07:26 AM
  #4  
Gluteus Enormus
 
mmmdonuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,245

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been happy with Polar and Timex.
mmmdonuts is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 07:35 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 18

Bikes: Giant FCR2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just bought 'Timex Personal Trainer' 5G971 as it was best rated by Consumer Reports. It got 93 points.
They measured Accuracy (against a highly accurate electrocardiograph) and Ease of use.
I have been trying to find recommendation online too, but I could not find any particular to stand out.

The rest of monitors from the test:
Timex Zone Trainer (92 points)
Sportline N5 (90),
Sportline Duo 1010 (88),
Omron HR-100C (88),
Acumen Ergo + (87),
Ekho E-15 (87),
Polar FT7 (86),
Bowflex Fit (86),
Mio (81),
Polar FT1 (75)
Lifespan (73)

You can get it for $42 at Amazon (down from $69) with free shipping.
nimailni is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 07:45 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
dieseldogpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2010 Trek 1.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nimailni
I just bought 'Timex Personal Trainer' 5G971 as it was best rated by Consumer Reports. It got 93 points.
They measured Accuracy (against a highly accurate electrocardiograph) and Ease of use.
I have been trying to find recommendation online too, but I could not find any particular to stand out.

The rest of monitors from the test:
Timex Zone Trainer (92 points)
Sportline N5 (90),
Sportline Duo 1010 (88),
Omron HR-100C (88),
Acumen Ergo + (87),
Ekho E-15 (87),
Polar FT7 (86),
Bowflex Fit (86),
Mio (81),
Polar FT1 (75)
Lifespan (73)

You can get it for $42 at Amazon (down from $69) with free shipping.
Just what I was looking for, thanks. Have you used the timex yet? Your initial thoughts?
dieseldogpi is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 08:41 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 18

Bikes: Giant FCR2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dieseldogpi
Just what I was looking for, thanks. Have you used the timex yet? Your initial thoughts?
No, I ordered it this morning. I was sick with waiting. It had better be good, too late for something else.
nimailni is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 09:09 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 167

Bikes: '10 C'Dale CAAD9 4, '09 S-Works Tricross, Gary Fisher Tassahara

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have that timex and have been very happy with it. When I first got it I would test accuracy by counting my bpm and it was always right on. I know have the watch mounted to my handlebars which is a little easier to read on the bike that way.
moralleper is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 09:13 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
bassplyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Middle, TN
Posts: 118

Bikes: Trek Domane, Specialized Secteur, Giant Roam 1, Trek 2.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have been using the Zephyr. It has BT connectivity and has been pretty reliable so far. I use it with Sportypal Pro. I think it was $99.
bassplyr is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 09:17 AM
  #10  
Gluteus Enormus
 
mmmdonuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,245

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've had a Timex T5J031 for over a year and it's been good so far. The chest strap batter has been replaced once. It had more features and better display for the price. I drove it thru heavy downpours on the bike and have ridden in the rain without any problems.
mmmdonuts is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 03:49 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
todayilearned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you can get a Polar FT4 for ~$60 then it's a great HRM. If you need one that connects to a PC then Polar FT7.

I've been using the FT4 for 6 months now and it's very solid. There are a few reviews that state issues with the transmitter connecting with the watch after a few weeks. I haven't had that issue yet. I'm wondering if those people attach the transmitter and then flood the entire strap with water. That might mess up the transmitter.

Cleaning the strap after every work out with water and washing it every 6 workouts.

https://www.amazon.com/Polar-FT4F-Hea.../dp/B0031ZK84E
todayilearned is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 04:01 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
For not much more you can get a very good gps+ hrm that allows downloads, which imo is very useful for analyzing your workouts. Garmin 305 for 129ish.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Old 10-21-11, 06:21 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
duckracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was thinking of getting a heart rate monitor, but do not know how you would use it. I currently use my computer and go by cadence. How do you guys use your heart rate monitor?
duckracer is offline  
Old 10-22-11, 05:31 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
To use a HRM properly for training/pacing, you really need to do a field test (TT type test) to determine HR zones for training, and then have a organized, targeted training plan based upon the HR. A powermeter complements the data - you look at both (although you generally target the power in training and just watch HR to make sure it's not too way off which would be a sign of bad zone data or overtraining/undertraining.)

The more casual way to use it is to just ride and then use a program like SportTracks to determine how long you've spent in each HR zone to estimate the quality of your workout, but that's nowhere near as good as using it on an organized training program.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Old 10-22-11, 10:04 AM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
dieseldogpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 38

Bikes: 2010 Trek 1.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
To use a HRM properly for training/pacing, you really need to do a field test (TT type test) to determine HR zones for training, and then have a organized, targeted training plan based upon the HR. A powermeter complements the data - you look at both (although you generally target the power in training and just watch HR to make sure it's not too way off which would be a sign of bad zone data or overtraining/undertraining.)

The more casual way to use it is to just ride and then use a program like SportTracks to determine how long you've spent in each HR zone to estimate the quality of your workout, but that's nowhere near as good as using it on an organized training program.
Yeah, I plan on using a hrm with my indoor spinerval training. My trainer (kinetic) came with a test dvd to determine hr zones. I bought a couple of other spinerval dvds I want to use the hr data with.
dieseldogpi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCochiller
Road Cycling
0
08-26-12 06:50 PM
clones2
Road Cycling
0
08-15-12 08:47 AM
Kind of Blued
Training & Nutrition
3
05-14-11 01:23 PM
Omega359
Road Cycling
253
09-11-10 08:01 PM
spingineer
Road Cycling
20
02-25-10 03:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.