Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

What is the purpose of a setback seatpost?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

What is the purpose of a setback seatpost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-12, 02:19 PM
  #1  
Portland, OR, USA
Thread Starter
 
pdxtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: portland
Posts: 1,626

Bikes: kona paddywagon, trek 2.1, lemond nevada city, gt zrx

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
What is the purpose of a setback seatpost?

I get it, to sit back, but why? Are they meant for people who wouldn't fit on their frame if they had a straight post? Is there a technical advantage I am missing, more weight over the wheel? Seems like if anything, you would want to be further forward for better power transfer, not back further.....

Last edited by pdxtex; 02-22-12 at 02:26 PM.
pdxtex is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 02:21 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
It's just fit.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 02:42 PM
  #3  
L-I-V-I-N
 
dtrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stafford, OR
Posts: 4,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Most riders need some set-back to acheive KOPS
__________________
"The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson

'14 carbon Synapse - '12 CAAD 10 5 - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur
dtrain is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 02:54 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Most road bike frames are designed to be used with setback seatposts. Not too long ago, all seatposts were setback. Be careful of using a straight seatpost that upsets your weight balance.
johnny99 is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 02:54 PM
  #5  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
OP...Its not a bandaid. Top riders pretty much all ride with a setback post and they don't ride $10K bandaids.
Its about weight distribution and fitting a larger rider to a smaller frame. Most top end bikes that come with proprietary seat posts which only fit that frame run about 20-25mm setback and it is part of the equation when being fitted for a given frame. On a smaller frame moving rider weight a bit rearward helps front back weight distribution because if you think about it...riding a smaller frame to achieve the necessary cockpit length for would have too much weight over the front wheel...not good for descending either. A smaller frame for a given rider size is both lighter with typically better standover and has a shorter wheelbase for quicker handling.

Last edited by Campag4life; 02-22-12 at 02:58 PM.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:07 PM
  #6  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by pdxtex
you would want to be further forward for better power transfer
and numb hands and aching knees
hairnet is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:19 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Because you need room for the wrench on a single-bolt seatpost. Not about fit at all... I mean, if it were, wouldn't bikes just come with slightly slacker seattubes? It was either a setback or a cutout, and cutouts are harder to manufacture. Or you can do the whole two-bolt thing like Thomson and Campy, but these are more expensive solutions as well.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:20 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Campag4life
OP...Its not a bandaid. Top riders pretty much all ride with a setback post and they don't ride $10K bandaids.
Its about weight distribution and fitting a larger rider to a smaller frame. Most top end bikes that come with proprietary seat posts which only fit that frame run about 20-25mm setback and it is part of the equation when being fitted for a given frame. On a smaller frame moving rider weight a bit rearward helps front back weight distribution because if you think about it...riding a smaller frame to achieve the necessary cockpit length for would have too much weight over the front wheel...not good for descending either. A smaller frame for a given rider size is both lighter with typically better standover and has a shorter wheelbase for quicker handling.
Yes, like Tom Danielson..oh wait, he rides a zero offset..with it slammed forward.


zigmeister is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:30 PM
  #9  
Gluteus Enormus
 
mmmdonuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,245

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Setback is yet another adjustment to get your pelvis in the best place relative to the cranks. Some need it and some don't. Since road frames range from 72*-74* STA it is easier and cheaper to use setback to compensate. A slacker STA may call for a longer chainstay, a no-no for some people.
mmmdonuts is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:35 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mmmdonuts
Setback is yet another adjustment to get your pelvis in the best place relative to the cranks. Some need it and some don't. Since road frames range from 72*-74* STA it is easier and cheaper to use setback to compensate. A slacker STA may call for a longer chainstay, a no-no for some people.
Chainstay would only increase 3-4mm if at all. And if this were the case, why not take the setback to a further extreme?
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 02-22-12 at 03:39 PM.
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:40 PM
  #11  
Gluteus Enormus
 
mmmdonuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,245

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Chainstay would only increase 3-4mm if at all.
Yeah, I know. Are you saying people won't fuss over 3-4mm?
mmmdonuts is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:42 PM
  #12  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
yikes, kops? no.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:42 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mmmdonuts
Yeah, I know. Are you saying people won't fuss over 3-4mm?
Yea, but they only start doing that if you change it. If I took your bike and increased the wheelbase a few mm, you might fuss. If you bought it that way, why would you think to complain? So why setback in the first place?
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:44 PM
  #14  
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Adirondacks
Posts: 335

Bikes: 2018 Diverge Comp, 2016 Specialized SL4 Comp,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times in 42 Posts
Some saddles require a different setback then others. I bought a light touring bike and put a Brooks saddle on it. Could not get the saddle back far enough (knee pain is an indicator for me). Brooks saddles don't slide back as much as others due to all of that laceing they put underneath. Changed the "radial" post out for a 2 bolt model with extended setback and life is good. I tend to ride smaller frames as my legs are long and torso is shorter and compressed due to age. So, I need a post/saddle combination that allows for me to adust fit.

BTW, whats up with those radial posts? Really couldn't stand the one that came on my Salsa Casserole. The whole saddle tilt versus setback was much too finicky for me.
Champlaincycler is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 03:49 PM
  #15  
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 4,034

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
I'm no expert on fit, but here's what I did and it feels pretty good. While coasting or sitting on a trainer, put all your weight on your feet in the pedals. Try to lift your butt and hands off the seat and bars so you are balanced on the pedals - kind of like when you are about to go over a bumpy section of road and you lift your weight off the seat and bars. In my case, this meant that I had to slide my butt back to keep from falling forward. A setback seatpost with my saddle puts the seat where my butt wants to be when I'm balanced on the pedals.

On my other bike, which has a Brooks, when I do this, my butt hangs off the back of the seat a little. That bike has a straight seatpost.
pallen is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 04:02 PM
  #16  
Gluteus Enormus
 
mmmdonuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,245

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Yea, but they only start doing that if you change it. If I took your bike and increased the wheelbase a few mm, you might fuss. If you bought it that way, why would you think to complain? So why setback in the first place?
It serves more than one purpose. Your reason was a good one but only covers one aspect. Others have mentioned fit, saddle rail length, and STA. I wish more performance oriented road frames came with 72*-72.5* STA's but people want what the pro's ride. So we get tight short wheelbase frames that need a setback post to fit most of us.
mmmdonuts is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 04:42 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by adriano
yikes, kops? no.
Kops yes.
Looigi is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 04:49 PM
  #18  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by zigmeister
Yes, like Tom Danielson..oh wait, he rides a zero offset..with it slammed forward.


never heard of him.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 05:02 PM
  #19  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by zigmeister
Yes, like Tom Danielson..oh wait, he rides a zero offset..with it slammed forward.


slammed forward with a fairly relaxed seat tube angle and the saddle with the longest tail legally allowed.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 05:22 PM
  #20  
Semper Fidelis
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,000

Bikes: Tiemeyer Road Bike & Ridley Domicles

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
besides weight distribution to be centered on your frame you need to take in account your femur length
HAMMER MAN is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 06:15 PM
  #21  
Portland, OR, USA
Thread Starter
 
pdxtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: portland
Posts: 1,626

Bikes: kona paddywagon, trek 2.1, lemond nevada city, gt zrx

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
and the answer is?? just fit? if so, then i can see that. ive never used a setback post, and tend to ride pretty big frames with traditional/ish geometry. maybe if i were riding something compact id see the benefit. so for the record, is a seatpost with cradle that curves back slightly (not centered with the seat post, and seat tube) considered a set back post? or are we talking major set back like those bendy thomson posts?
pdxtex is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 06:42 PM
  #22  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
kops, no. kbps.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 07:30 PM
  #23  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by adriano
kops, no. kbps.
<3
hairnet is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 08:42 PM
  #24  
Super Modest
 
Trsnrtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466

Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times in 2,123 Posts
I have long thighs though you would never know it by looking at me. Regardless, I can barely get my seat back far enough on most frames and could use another mm or so. Personally, I'd prefer to have the seat centered in the rails both for looks and I would assume the stress on the rails would be less with them centered on the post. Thus, a setback seat post would seem to make sense to me.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!







Trsnrtr is offline  
Old 02-22-12, 10:39 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 276
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by adriano
slammed forward with a fairly relaxed seat tube angle and the saddle with the longest tail legally allowed.
The Arione sits you at least a cm further back than any other saddle I know. He's pushing the seat forward to compensate. Probably has short femur as well.

But yes, length of femur has a lot to do with it. I ride a 72 deg STA and can just get my saddle where it feels best. Knee is a couple of mm behind pedal spindle. Could never get there with a 73 deg STA.

Old school frames, I believe, had slacker STA and longer chainstays. Modern trend is steeper STA and short chainstays. Giant advanced M/L is one of the few bikes that had 72 STA, also had a well designed seatpost where you could reverse the clamps for more or less setback. They may have steepened STA this year though.
carlosflanders is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.