will i get better riding aluminum?
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Bikes: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
will i get better riding aluminum?
if i ride my aluminum framed bike, when i eventually switch to carbon, will i be that much better? or should i just try to get a carbon bike asap? especially for hill climbing and sprinting, is there some incentive for me to stay on the aluminum?
#2
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
no. you will get better by riding.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Yes.
Frame material doesn't make you better; riding makes you better. If you want hill climbing and sprinting, do hill repeats and sprintervals.
Frame material doesn't make you better; riding makes you better. If you want hill climbing and sprinting, do hill repeats and sprintervals.
#4
Artificial Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,158
Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6766 Post(s)
Liked 5,478 Times
in
3,223 Posts
I think it's only by riding that you get better. Frame material is not all that important for improving as a cyclist. Miles and miles make the difference.
As far as "bike" performance goes geometry is more important than material. Proper fit is more important than geometry.
As far as "bike" performance goes geometry is more important than material. Proper fit is more important than geometry.
__________________
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 359
Bikes: Orbea Onix TLT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No but you may get a fraction of a minute faster. Of course you could save money and just ride more to get faster.......
#6
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,222
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,245 Times
in
623 Posts
Go ahead and get the carbon bike......You are allowed to have more than one bike.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#7
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Bikes: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah for sure, i'm down for riding duh. but if two identical people rode a carbon bike and an aluminum bike the same amount, would the person riding aluminum be any stronger since he or she was 'carrying' more weight?
#8
Artificial Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,158
Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6766 Post(s)
Liked 5,478 Times
in
3,223 Posts
No.
__________________
#9
CAADdict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BF Heaven
Posts: 6,756
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
(tags: asplode, it's not about the bike, troll, crash, [and once again] asplode)
Last edited by 2ndGen; 02-22-12 at 05:23 PM.
#10
Artificial Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,158
Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6766 Post(s)
Liked 5,478 Times
in
3,223 Posts
#12
CAADdict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BF Heaven
Posts: 6,756
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
This one deserves something better than the typical BF eating popcorn emoticon.
OP has asked a question never before asked regarding carbon vs aluminum
without asking which is better! Well done!
OP, this is not in anyway mocking you, but this is going to be a thread of epic proportions!
(and, imo, it is about the bike...carbon better for longer rides)
OP has asked a question never before asked regarding carbon vs aluminum
without asking which is better! Well done!
OP, this is not in anyway mocking you, but this is going to be a thread of epic proportions!
(and, imo, it is about the bike...carbon better for longer rides)
Last edited by 2ndGen; 02-22-12 at 05:30 PM.
#13
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
Real men ride steel Get something that weighs 30+ pounds and you'll have to get new jeans just to fit your quads.
Really though, it's not what your ride as much as how hard you ride and how well designed your training program is. Try high intensity intervals if you want to gain climbing and sprinting power and speed.
Really though, it's not what your ride as much as how hard you ride and how well designed your training program is. Try high intensity intervals if you want to gain climbing and sprinting power and speed.
Last edited by Myosmith; 02-22-12 at 05:37 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Plano, Texxas
Posts: 517
Bikes: '10 Specialized Allez, '09 Cervelo S1, '93 Trek T200 (tandem), Rocky Mountain Metro 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Buy a recumbent!
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast United States
Posts: 1,147
Bikes: Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a aluminum frame hybrid and a carbon road bike. I am noticeably faster on the carbon which is definitely lighter than the aluminum and the geometry is better on the carbon for climbing hills. The aluminum is simply dreadful on the hills around here, but when I have to ride crappy roads - I like taking the aluminum because it has beefier wheels, wider tires and I don't care if I ding it up. Whereas with the carbon bike - I tend to treat it with a bit more kindness and care.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 6,404
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Funny you should ask. I have a 2007 Aluminum BMC road racer. It has been through hell and back and in between I've had, and have numerous carbon bikes and one Titanium bike. Carbon bikes and aluminum bikes are easily damaged and scratched. Titanium bikes not as much, and scratches are easily buffed out. Bottom line, forget Aluminum and carbon and go Ti. They are as fast as you, or 95% of the Fredlies here will ever need, and much more durable and easy to update with new decals and components.....Anyone who says otherwise, is LYING....
#17
Portland Fred
The weight difference is too small to make a significant difference. BTW, weighing yourself down enough to make a difference won't make you stronger either (but it will slow you down). You need to spend a lot of time using effective training methods if you want to get stronger. If you're still building your base, simply riding more will help.
#18
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Bikes: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This one deserves something better than the typical BF eating popcorn emoticon.
OP has asked a question never before asked regarding carbon vs aluminum
without asking which is better! Well done!
OP, this is not in anyway mocking you, but this is going to be a thread of epic proportions!
(and, imo, it is about the bike...carbon better for longer rides)
OP has asked a question never before asked regarding carbon vs aluminum
without asking which is better! Well done!
OP, this is not in anyway mocking you, but this is going to be a thread of epic proportions!
(and, imo, it is about the bike...carbon better for longer rides)
i had my first outdoor ride today, it was great. I ran into 2 sponsored cyclists in full gear. they didn't say much just looked at my bike- fair. but now i'm just curious if i should care about going carbon right now (financially feasible, but not wise) because I have this weird thing where I want to ride faster and climb better than everyone i see.
edit: first outdoor ride this season. been riding for about 2 years.
Last edited by UMassAm; 02-22-12 at 05:50 PM.
#19
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Bikes: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nope.
The weight difference is too small to make a significant difference. BTW, weighing yourself down enough to make a difference won't make you stronger either (but it will slow you down). You need to spend a lot of time using effective training methods if you want to get stronger. If you're still building your base, simply riding more will help.
The weight difference is too small to make a significant difference. BTW, weighing yourself down enough to make a difference won't make you stronger either (but it will slow you down). You need to spend a lot of time using effective training methods if you want to get stronger. If you're still building your base, simply riding more will help.
#20
Portland Fred
i appreciate the positivity.
i had my first outdoor ride today, it was great. I ran into 2 sponsored cyclists in full gear. they didn't say much just looked at my bike- fair. but now i'm just curious if i should care about going carbon right now (financially feasible, but not wise) because I have this weird thing where I want to ride faster and climb better than everyone i see.
i had my first outdoor ride today, it was great. I ran into 2 sponsored cyclists in full gear. they didn't say much just looked at my bike- fair. but now i'm just curious if i should care about going carbon right now (financially feasible, but not wise) because I have this weird thing where I want to ride faster and climb better than everyone i see.
The frame material on your bike is not holding you back. Improve your conditioning and you can feel smug about dropping guys on better bikes. Then buy the carbon. It still won't make you much faster but you'll already be dropping people so you can imagine that it's the bike that's making the difference.
#21
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Bikes: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If that's what you want, definitely wait before getting the carbon. My guess is that if you got a carbon bike now in the hopes of being faster, you might get depressed when women and guys 20 years older than you drop you like a rock.
The frame material on your bike is not holding you back. Improve your conditioning and you can feel smug about dropping guys on better bikes. Then buy the carbon. It still won't make you much faster but you'll already be dropping people so you can imagine that it's the bike that's making the difference.
The frame material on your bike is not holding you back. Improve your conditioning and you can feel smug about dropping guys on better bikes. Then buy the carbon. It still won't make you much faster but you'll already be dropping people so you can imagine that it's the bike that's making the difference.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
i appreciate the positivity.
i had my first outdoor ride today, it was great. I ran into 2 sponsored cyclists in full gear. they didn't say much just looked at my bike- fair. but now i'm just curious if i should care about going carbon right now (financially feasible, but not wise) because I have this weird thing where I want to ride faster and climb better than everyone i see.
edit: first outdoor ride this season. been riding for about 2 years.
i had my first outdoor ride today, it was great. I ran into 2 sponsored cyclists in full gear. they didn't say much just looked at my bike- fair. but now i'm just curious if i should care about going carbon right now (financially feasible, but not wise) because I have this weird thing where I want to ride faster and climb better than everyone i see.
edit: first outdoor ride this season. been riding for about 2 years.
A wise man once said "Don't upgrade your bike, ride your bike up grades." Can I get an a merckx?
#23
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 248
Bikes: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The difference in weight a carbon bike can get you might save 3 seconds on a 40 km course, if it's all up hill. If you want to be the fastest person going up hills on a bike ... do hill repeats. Seriously. Most cyclists say "yeah, riding more makes you stronger, I get it, now show me that aero skin suit" and skip the hill repeats; the few people who actually ride up lots of hills clean their clocks, time and again.
A wise man once said "Don't upgrade your bike, ride your bike up grades." Can I get an a merckx?
A wise man once said "Don't upgrade your bike, ride your bike up grades." Can I get an a merckx?