Bike friendly car
#76
Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ercildoun, PA
Posts: 128
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Sportif One.0, 2011 Cannondale Synapse 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
Why no love for....
...Mazda2 or the Nissan Versa? I personally prefer the Mazda2--my bike can fit in, very cheap maintenance, tossable in corners, and has manual transmission. Imagine, I shift for myself whether I'm in my car or on my bike.
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,088
Bikes: ?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A JSW TDi is well under 30k OTD and comes with all maintenance picked up by VW for 3/36 (gets serviced every 10k).
Be warned, dealers are insanely expensive for maintenance once you have to pay for it if you don't do it yourself. Oil changes every 10k, fuel and cabin filters every 20k. Brake fluid every 30k. DSG transmission every 40k. Timing belt and water pump at 120k.
Oil changes are $80-100 at the dealer, about $50 if you DIY.
Fuel filter changes are also $80-100 at the dealer, about $15 if you DIY and have a VAG-COM tool to prime the filter.
The DSG transmission service is $4-500 at the dealer, about $100 DIY.
Be warned, dealers are insanely expensive for maintenance once you have to pay for it if you don't do it yourself. Oil changes every 10k, fuel and cabin filters every 20k. Brake fluid every 30k. DSG transmission every 40k. Timing belt and water pump at 120k.
Oil changes are $80-100 at the dealer, about $50 if you DIY.
Fuel filter changes are also $80-100 at the dealer, about $15 if you DIY and have a VAG-COM tool to prime the filter.
The DSG transmission service is $4-500 at the dealer, about $100 DIY.
Last edited by saratoga; 04-11-12 at 06:42 AM.
#78
The Weird Beard
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
My Chevy is less for oil at the dealer than if I DIY. All services mentioned (not picking on you, saratoga) are much less expensive. This leaves more money for bike stuff
#79
Maximus
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most people buy a vehicle for one of 3 reasons regardless of the criteria list their judgement tells them: either because it appeals to them emotionally and aesthetically, because it is a status symbol, or because of something it can potentially do but that you will never do in reality or hardly ever (do 170 MPH, carry stuff, extra room inside, tow stuff, go off road, etc). I don't drag race nor go above speed limits these days as much as once did, so going fast and 0-60 times are not an issue for me. I don't tow and hardly ever carry anything that does not fit in a compact car, but when I do need to I either borrow a friend's truck or rent a van for a couple of hours. I don't ride with an entourage, so fitting 12 people inside is not an issue, but 2 car seats and another adult in addition to my bike is. Cars don't do much for me aesthetically anymore, so looks is a mute point. I find a car to be a tremendously poor investment of money and simply a necessary evil, so I try to spend the least possible that will do the job. Plushie comfort is not an issue for me either as I see it as a mode of transportation and not a mobile spa.
Having said all that, I would recommend a Prius. Meets all your criteria points. On fitting the bike inside, you can either drop one rear seat and fit it in with both wheels on or you can take the front wheel off and fit it in between the from and rear seat. Lots of cargo space and more than plenty of space even for the average fat american. Reliably >50 mpg, comfortable enough, can be had for $21-24K, and plenty reliable.
Having said all that, I would recommend a Prius. Meets all your criteria points. On fitting the bike inside, you can either drop one rear seat and fit it in with both wheels on or you can take the front wheel off and fit it in between the from and rear seat. Lots of cargo space and more than plenty of space even for the average fat american. Reliably >50 mpg, comfortable enough, can be had for $21-24K, and plenty reliable.
#80
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,247
Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
After bunch of test drives,pulled the trigger on the Acura TSX Sport Wagon. So far so good, but haven't gotten a chance to use it for a bike trip yet. It's great to see over 33 MPG on the highway.
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 439
Bikes: Trek Pilot 5.9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I plan on looking at the 2013 Ford C-Max when it is released this fall:
https://www.ford.com/cars/cmax/2013/?...3794|116460358
https://www.ford.com/cars/cmax/2013/?...3794|116460358
#82
Senior Member
If your not in a hurry to get anywhere theres the Ford Transit. Its no uglier then the Element! and it's cheap!
#83
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Saw a post on the Honda Fit earlier. My wife drives the Fit and we've had nothing but good experiences with the car. 30+ mpg, easy to drive and park, fairly comfy, cheap, and I've managed to fit 3 56cm road bikes in the car with the rear seats folded down. When I raced cars I was able to fit 12 15" wheels and tires in the back of the car. Love the car. Only complaint is that it has no power. Throw a Rotrex supercharger on there and it would take care of that issue.
#85
Senior Member
#86
Live to ride ride to live
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Most people buy a vehicle for one of 3 reasons regardless of the criteria list their judgement tells them: either because it appeals to them emotionally and aesthetically, because it is a status symbol, or because of something it can potentially do but that you will never do in reality or hardly ever (do 170 MPH, carry stuff, extra room inside, tow stuff, go off road, etc). I don't drag race nor go above speed limits these days as much as once did, so going fast and 0-60 times are not an issue for me. I don't tow and hardly ever carry anything that does not fit in a compact car, but when I do need to I either borrow a friend's truck or rent a van for a couple of hours. I don't ride with an entourage, so fitting 12 people inside is not an issue, but 2 car seats and another adult in addition to my bike is. Cars don't do much for me aesthetically anymore, so looks is a mute point. I find a car to be a tremendously poor investment of money and simply a necessary evil, so I try to spend the least possible that will do the job. Plushie comfort is not an issue for me either as I see it as a mode of transportation and not a mobile spa.
Having said all that, I would recommend a Prius. Meets all your criteria points. On fitting the bike inside, you can either drop one rear seat and fit it in with both wheels on or you can take the front wheel off and fit it in between the from and rear seat. Lots of cargo space and more than plenty of space even for the average fat american. Reliably >50 mpg, comfortable enough, can be had for $21-24K, and plenty reliable.
Having said all that, I would recommend a Prius. Meets all your criteria points. On fitting the bike inside, you can either drop one rear seat and fit it in with both wheels on or you can take the front wheel off and fit it in between the from and rear seat. Lots of cargo space and more than plenty of space even for the average fat american. Reliably >50 mpg, comfortable enough, can be had for $21-24K, and plenty reliable.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just for the record, the rear driver's side seat is completely removed to squeeze my 63cm bike in there like that. It works well for me and the bike, not with the wife and baby though.
#88
Senior Member
You can get a GTI for about 23K. Still gets 25-30 mpg (at least mine does) and is a lot of fun to drive. Easily swallows two road bikes inside and probably 3 more on the roof.
#89
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24
Bikes: 2009 Quintana Roo Seduza
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, generally speaking, your not going to be able to find a high mpg car that you can fit a bike into without a crazy amount of disassembling or prep with taking seats out and trying to position it in that specific way that you can shut the door with. I like using a pickup truck to transport my bikes since zero disassembling is required but the mpg does suck. As far as 20 mpg goes, I think the nissan xterra just hits that mark (at least highway) and it has some of the most design considerations for active people of any vehicle I know.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#93
Old & Getting Older Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,343
Bikes: Bicycle Transportation: 2022 Hyundai Kona Electric, 2019 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
5 Posts
My bike fits nicely in my 2004 Prius with the seats folded down. With a little care, two bikes fit easily with room here and there for other gear. 135,000 trouble free miles, never had to change the brakes, average about 48 mpg. It remains, in my opinion, the true, no compromise, high mileage vehicle. If you want even more room, check out the new Prius V. I don't know why you think these cars are flimsy, although they're certainly not tanks. The VW Sportwagon would also make it to my short list.
I have never owned a Prius but I keep hearing from people that they are not fun to drive whatever that means. I also wonder how they are on long road trips going up hills. The VW TDI would have been on my short list until I read how much it can cost to fix one. A common problem in recent years has been the transmission and the fuel injection; plus, diesel is the most expensive fuel now.
I am a big time and long time car nut. In the 1980s to 1990s, I owned a string of sports cars and turbo sports sedans. If you want to "hot rod" around in a Prius, then yes, it's not a lot of fun. However, in my old age, I have a lot of fun modifying my driving technique to maximize gas mileage. It's safer fun too. Also, the Prius is not a total slug. Right off the line it's surprisingly good (at the expense of gas mileage) because the electric motors have constant, max torque throughout the rpm range.
The car handles predictably but you're not going to win any autocross events with it.
Most people buy a vehicle for one of 3 reasons regardless of the criteria list their judgement tells them: either because it appeals to them emotionally and aesthetically, because it is a status symbol, or because of something it can potentially do but that you will never do in reality or hardly ever (do 170 MPH, carry stuff, extra room inside, tow stuff, go off road, etc). I don't drag race nor go above speed limits these days as much as once did, so going fast and 0-60 times are not an issue for me. I don't tow and hardly ever carry anything that does not fit in a compact car, but when I do need to I either borrow a friend's truck or rent a van for a couple of hours. I don't ride with an entourage, so fitting 12 people inside is not an issue, but 2 car seats and another adult in addition to my bike is. Cars don't do much for me aesthetically anymore, so looks is a mute point. I find a car to be a tremendously poor investment of money and simply a necessary evil, so I try to spend the least possible that will do the job. Plushie comfort is not an issue for me either as I see it as a mode of transportation and not a mobile spa.
Having said all that, I would recommend a Prius. Meets all your criteria points. On fitting the bike inside, you can either drop one rear seat and fit it in with both wheels on or you can take the front wheel off and fit it in between the from and rear seat. Lots of cargo space and more than plenty of space even for the average fat american. Reliably >50 mpg, comfortable enough, can be had for $21-24K, and plenty reliable.
Having said all that, I would recommend a Prius. Meets all your criteria points. On fitting the bike inside, you can either drop one rear seat and fit it in with both wheels on or you can take the front wheel off and fit it in between the from and rear seat. Lots of cargo space and more than plenty of space even for the average fat american. Reliably >50 mpg, comfortable enough, can be had for $21-24K, and plenty reliable.
My budget is less than 30k, and less the better, obvioudly. The Jetta wagon TDI is looking promising and will give it a whirl this weekend. Test drove an Acura TSX wagon today and was impressed by the room and what you get out of the 4 cylinder engine, but wish it could do better than 22/30 mpg.
If the base model suits your needs, you should be able to get it for less than $30K out the door. BTW, I see more and more Prii at bike races these days. If anyone transports bikes a lot, it's racers.
__________________
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
#94
Senior Member
#95
Successful alcoholic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 981
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pretty much any car that has rear seats that fold flat can handle a bike. I just ordered a new Mercedes C class coupe, and it has no issues taking a bike. That being said, unless I am on my way to the track in the dead of winter, I much prefer a roof rack that holds the bike by its fork.
#96
Senior Member
I guess in general it comes down to the percentage of time spent transporting the bike vs. time spent doing other things. A perfect bike-friendly vehicle would be something like a full-sized minivan, where you just toss the whole bike in the back, maybe with some padding over it for protection, or a few simple tie-downs, and go. As a bonus the bike is protected from the elements and theft. From there you work you way down to various levels of disassembly of the bike, and reconfiguration of the vehicle (folding or removing seats, moving cargo around, etc.). And finally you get to external racks which work with just about anything on 4 wheels. So you have to balance convenience vs. what you're sacrificing for all the rest of the time that you're not carrying a bike.
So, if you're only transporting the bike once or twice a week, all the rest of the time you're still paying the "bike tax" in MPG and other factors, which is kind of ironic if you think about it. I took the Thule roof rack off my Camry because it was noisy and noticeably reduced my fuel mileage. It was convenient for the one time a week or so that I used it, but the other 6 days, including my LONG work commute, it was a burden. Plus if you thought a Camry couldn't get any uglier, you haven't seen one with a Thule rack . I now mostly just use a trunk rack, though it blocks my access to the trunk and has some problems rubbing on the seat tube. I'll probably try a hitch rack at some point, though it will have to be on my next car as the Camry is about ready for the junkyard and any new small car will probably have warranty issues with installing a trailer hitch.
So, if you're only transporting the bike once or twice a week, all the rest of the time you're still paying the "bike tax" in MPG and other factors, which is kind of ironic if you think about it. I took the Thule roof rack off my Camry because it was noisy and noticeably reduced my fuel mileage. It was convenient for the one time a week or so that I used it, but the other 6 days, including my LONG work commute, it was a burden. Plus if you thought a Camry couldn't get any uglier, you haven't seen one with a Thule rack . I now mostly just use a trunk rack, though it blocks my access to the trunk and has some problems rubbing on the seat tube. I'll probably try a hitch rack at some point, though it will have to be on my next car as the Camry is about ready for the junkyard and any new small car will probably have warranty issues with installing a trailer hitch.
#97
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,247
Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
So I pulled the trigger on an used Acura TSX Sport Wagon and had it for a few weeks now.
Pro: good driving dynamics, descent power for a 4-banger, good MPG (27 mixed, and over 35 on freeway), easy access to trunk space, fairly intuitive navigation system, good sound, bike fits in the trunk without having to take wheels off
Con: auto transmission a bit hesitant, trunk space not as big as it could be (the rear wheel wells made the space narrower), a bit noisy, back seats space is tight
All in all, I am pretty happy and could recommend this to any cyclists. BTW, I see BMC uses it as the team car during AToC.
Pro: good driving dynamics, descent power for a 4-banger, good MPG (27 mixed, and over 35 on freeway), easy access to trunk space, fairly intuitive navigation system, good sound, bike fits in the trunk without having to take wheels off
Con: auto transmission a bit hesitant, trunk space not as big as it could be (the rear wheel wells made the space narrower), a bit noisy, back seats space is tight
All in all, I am pretty happy and could recommend this to any cyclists. BTW, I see BMC uses it as the team car during AToC.
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 1,155
Bikes: Helix, HonkyTonk, NailTrail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Acura RSX/Integra.
Rear seats fold flat under hatch, pedal goes in groove between seat and hatch bed. Lays flat, peice of styrofoam on top for front wheel or second bike.
MPG+
Honda Reliable+
EDIT: didn't realize you necro'd with your pick. Sounds good
Rear seats fold flat under hatch, pedal goes in groove between seat and hatch bed. Lays flat, peice of styrofoam on top for front wheel or second bike.
MPG+
Honda Reliable+
EDIT: didn't realize you necro'd with your pick. Sounds good
#99
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,307
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 733 Times
in
375 Posts
new (991) Porsche 911S
Not in the car, but can easily carry multiple bikes with the factory rack.
Within measuring error: 28 mpg Highway, 23 combined. With automatic on/off, sail mode, regenerative braking, and electrical (not belt) accessories such as power steering it gets amazing gas mileage for a car that goes Zero to 60 in 3.6 seconds.
see pic above.
Ranked highly in initial quality, and reliability.
https://www.edmunds.com/porsche/911/2...liability.html
Good handling: 1.04 g on the skid pad, 71 mph through the slalom, 148 feet 70 mph to zero.
Ok, not a wagon, but it does have a back seat.
I think it meets almost all your listed criteria.
Within measuring error: 28 mpg Highway, 23 combined. With automatic on/off, sail mode, regenerative braking, and electrical (not belt) accessories such as power steering it gets amazing gas mileage for a car that goes Zero to 60 in 3.6 seconds.
Ranked highly in initial quality, and reliability.
https://www.edmunds.com/porsche/911/2...liability.html
I really like the idea of a good handling, fuel sipping (or diesel), wagon, but there aren't many choices out there. So far, I have looked at Acura TSX Sport Wagon (the front runner), Honda Element (not impressed with the MPG, Audi A3 (reliability issue?), VW Jetta Sportswagon (reliability?) Lexus ct200h (too tight and small), Prius V (flimsy).
Any ideas?
Any ideas?
Ok, not a wagon, but it does have a back seat.
I think it meets almost all your listed criteria.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#100
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
If I fold the back seat down and remove the front bike wheel, it fits easily in my 2001 Civic. Car gets 41mpg, costs almost nothing to drive and you can get one for the price of a low end carbon bike.