Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Zipp 101's vs. standard carbon clincher

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Zipp 101's vs. standard carbon clincher

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-12, 03:59 PM
  #26  
jmX
Senior Member
 
jmX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201

Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by whitemax
A powermeter can detect the aero qualities of a rim?
To a certain extent, yes. Do some googling for "virtual elevation".
jmX is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 04:11 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
pgjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 70 Posts
OP, what do you hope to get from a pair of $1000 aluminum wheels?
pgjackson is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 04:12 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Mansram01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,344

Bikes: '17 Trek Emonda, '16 Yeti ASR5, '14 Cdale F29 '08 Orbea Orca.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jmX
I wouldn't buy "off" brand carbon clinchers if you live in SoCal and ride the mountains we have here. Doing the 4 mile descent down the switchbacks of Mt Baldy on Boyds or Williams (or almost every other carbon clincher) would be risky to me. It's *hard* on the brakes for a couple miles there. Only carbon rims I'd take to the top of Mt baldy are Zipp Firecrests or rims with an aluminum brake track.

If you're not doing twisty descents, I say go for whatever is more aerodynamic. Zipp posted some tests for the 101's against the competition, maybe check out slowtwitch or zipp.com for those results.
I did that 4-mile descent from the Mt. Baldy Lifts about 2 weeks ago. I would agree with your statement on not using "off" brand names. I'm currently using Reynolds Attack carbon clinchers with NO aluminum brake track and have had no braking or heating issues despite the steep switchbacks. If I wanted an aluminum brake track for climbing/descending, I'd go with the very light Shimano DA WH-7900 carbon laminated clinchers. I don't think you're getting much aero benefits if this is for climbing and descending.
Mansram01 is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 04:49 PM
  #29  
abandoning
 
fly:yes/land:no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i know this is a bit passé for the 41, but would you consider going with a powertap training wheelset instead?
fly:yes/land:no is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 09:04 PM
  #30  
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fly:yes/land:no
i know this is a bit passé for the 41, but would you consider going with a powertap training wheelset instead?
+infinity

A power meter will benefit many, many riders incomparably more than a modestly aero wheel. Excellent point!

I didn't mention this before because my wheelset budget didn't allow for a power meter and garmin. But $1000 is getting there, especially used.
ColinL is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 09:18 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
I do find it funny, though, that you're trying to educate me while suggesting that a powermeter, even under ideal conditions, might be a means of demonstrating how aero a rim is.
I don't understand the humour. It's certainly possible to quantify the difference in drag between different wheels but requires careful procedures.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 09:29 PM
  #32  
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903

Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
I don't understand the humour. It's certainly possible to quantify the difference in drag between different wheels but requires careful procedures.
Outdoors would be impossible most of the time because of the changes in wind. Even small changes would significantly color the results.

Indoors it would be feasible at a velodrome. Certainly a windtunnel is a good test.
ColinL is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 09:54 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by ColinL
Outdoors would be impossible most of the time because of the changes in wind. Even small changes would significantly color the results.

Indoors it would be feasible at a velodrome. Certainly a windtunnel is a good test.
I didn't say it was easy. You need to do it early in the morning before the wind picks up. It has been done successfully outdoors.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 04:57 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
I didn't say it was easy. You need to do it early in the morning before the wind picks up. It has been done successfully outdoors.
Ha ha - the jokes just keep comin' with you.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 07:15 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
to be honest i don't "NEED" anything or "hope to gain" anything. I just appreciate a good riding, somewhat lightweight wheelset. The idea of a wider rim is also appealing. Sure I could do just fine with my stock R500's, but where's the motivation, where's the fun?

The main thing reasoning for me going with something like the zipps is that I really would like to purchase through my LBS. It's nice to have the peace of mind and convenience of just bringing my bike/wheels in should anything go wrong or if something is out of true. They look at it, do whatever needs to be done, and I walk away happy with not a cent extra paid. They've treated me well ever since the new bike buying experience and I'd like to continue that relationship. I just can't imagine walking in with some brand "X" wheelset I bought, expecting them to help me when I downright purchased online simply to save a few bucks. That being said, shimano RS80's, mavic ksyrium SL's or similar are going to cost me upwards of 900-1100 bucks retail. At that pricepoint, I'd rather spend a little more and get the Zipps.
sosojeffcc is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 07:18 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sosojeffcc
to be honest i don't "NEED" anything or "hope to gain" anything. I just appreciate a good riding, somewhat lightweight wheelset. The idea of a wider rim is also appealing. Sure I could do just fine with my stock R500's, but where's the motivation, where's the fun?

The main thing reasoning for me going with something like the zipps is that I really would like to purchase through my LBS. It's nice to have the peace of mind and convenience of just bringing my bike/wheels in should anything go wrong or if something is out of true. They look at it, do whatever needs to be done, and I walk away happy with not a cent extra paid. They've treated me well ever since the new bike buying experience and I'd like to continue that relationship. I just can't imagine walking in with some brand "X" wheelset I bought, expecting them to help me when I downright purchased online simply to save a few bucks. That being said, shimano RS80's, mavic ksyrium SL's or similar are going to cost me upwards of 900-1100 bucks retail. At that pricepoint, I'd rather spend a little more and get the Zipps.
Stop being reasonable. You'll kill the witty banter.
canam73 is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 07:27 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by sosojeffcc
to be honest i don't "NEED" anything or "hope to gain" anything. I just appreciate a good riding, somewhat lightweight wheelset. The idea of a wider rim is also appealing. Sure I could do just fine with my stock R500's, but where's the motivation, where's the fun?

The main thing reasoning for me going with something like the zipps is that I really would like to purchase through my LBS. It's nice to have the peace of mind and convenience of just bringing my bike/wheels in should anything go wrong or if something is out of true. They look at it, do whatever needs to be done, and I walk away happy with not a cent extra paid. They've treated me well ever since the new bike buying experience and I'd like to continue that relationship. I just can't imagine walking in with some brand "X" wheelset I bought, expecting them to help me when I downright purchased online simply to save a few bucks. That being said, shimano RS80's, mavic ksyrium SL's or similar are going to cost me upwards of 900-1100 bucks retail. At that pricepoint, I'd rather spend a little more and get the Zipps.
Then they should also have access to the HED Ardennes line - not quite as deep as the 101s, but similar in philosophy (Zipp and HED worked/jointly held patent on wide rim/toroidal stuff) and more options as far as trim/price point.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 07:39 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by canam73
Stop being reasonable. You'll kill the witty banter.
HAH...my bad.
sosojeffcc is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 07:41 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Then they should also have access to the HED Ardennes line - not quite as deep as the 101s, but similar in philosophy (Zipp and HED worked/jointly held patent on wide rim/toroidal stuff) and more options as far as trim/price point.
Good point. The HED Ardennes's look very atractive as well.
sosojeffcc is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 08:11 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Ha ha - the jokes just keep comin' with you.
For the non-luddites who are interested, aerolab is an effective tool for estimating CdA.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 08:44 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
For the non-luddites who are interested, aerolab is an effective tool for estimating CdA.
Ha ha ha, ho ho ho - nothing like using estimates for three or more variables to "determine" how aero something is. Very scientifical.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 09:12 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
pgjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by sosojeffcc
to be honest i don't "NEED" anything or "hope to gain" anything. I just appreciate a good riding, somewhat lightweight wheelset. The idea of a wider rim is also appealing. Sure I could do just fine with my stock R500's, but where's the motivation, where's the fun?

The main thing reasoning for me going with something like the zipps is that I really would like to purchase through my LBS. It's nice to have the peace of mind and convenience of just bringing my bike/wheels in should anything go wrong or if something is out of true. They look at it, do whatever needs to be done, and I walk away happy with not a cent extra paid. They've treated me well ever since the new bike buying experience and I'd like to continue that relationship. I just can't imagine walking in with some brand "X" wheelset I bought, expecting them to help me when I downright purchased online simply to save a few bucks. That being said, shimano RS80's, mavic ksyrium SL's or similar are going to cost me upwards of 900-1100 bucks retail. At that pricepoint, I'd rather spend a little more and get the Zipps.
Is your LBS giving you a smoking deal on the Zipps? If not, save your $$ and buy elsewhere. Your LBS should be willing to help you with anything, regardless of where you bought it. I don't get the whole "my LBS will be mad at me if I don't buy from them" deal.
pgjackson is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 10:52 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by pgjackson
Is your LBS giving you a smoking deal on the Zipps? If not, save your $$ and buy elsewhere. Your LBS should be willing to help you with anything, regardless of where you bought it. I don't get the whole "my LBS will be mad at me if I don't buy from them" deal.
You seem to be taking this guy's wheel purchase rather personally. Any reason for that?
canam73 is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 10:52 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
Ha ha ha, ho ho ho - nothing like using estimates for three or more variables to "determine" how aero something is. Very scientifical.
I suppose you're one of those who doesn't believe in evolution either. Scientists are often required to make intelligent conclusions with incomplete information. Powermeters also measure power based on estimates of multiple variables.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 11:11 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times in 4,668 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
I suppose you're one of those who doesn't believe in evolution either. Scientists are often required to make intelligent conclusions with incomplete information. Powermeters also measure power based on estimates of multiple variables.
Do scientists often make intelligent conclusions in back-asswards ways that rely heavily upon guesses when more much more straightforward ways are possible? I thought that the scientific method included minimizing variables, or did I remember that 7th grade lecture incorrectly?

Dude, give it up - meaningfully assessing the aero properties of a single component based upon power meter data is ridiculous.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 11:22 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
pgjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by canam73
You seem to be taking this guy's wheel purchase rather personally. Any reason for that?

Where do you get that from?
pgjackson is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 11:33 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,519
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times in 264 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
I thought that the scientific method included minimizing variables, or did I remember that 7th grade lecture incorrectly?
yes (to the latter)

Originally Posted by WhyFi
... meaningfully assessing the aero properties of a single component based upon power meter data is ridiculous.
You might have some credibility except for the myriad cases where people have done exactly that, e.g., https://www.trainingandracingwithapow...r-javelin.html
asgelle is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 11:37 AM
  #48  
Boyd Cycling owner
 
coachboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 412
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
You can actually get very good data from virtual elevation and aerolab. It has some limitations but can produce great results. It's so funny that people are so quick to dismiss outdoor testing when we all ride outdoors. Yet wind tunnel testing is considered to be gold even though it's a very controlled situation trying to predict what will happen in the relative chaos of outside weather.
coachboyd is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 11:39 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 114

Bikes: 2013 Look 675 Ultegra, 2013 Cervelo S5 Ultegra Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NaOH
I recently got the 101s on ebay for about 899 dollars. They are stiff, and handle REALLY well due to the width. I took it up kings mtn last weekend and loved them on the ascents and descents. Plus the hub noise is zipptastic. I can't say that I've tried boyds or other bang for buck wheels, but I don't think I'll ever need another alum or carbon set based on my experiences in the past few months.
Lol, I got my 101's a few weeks back and went up kings last weekend too. I like the ride of the wider rim. Other than that, I "feel" faster but probably am not any faster.
arok is offline  
Old 05-09-12, 11:41 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,519
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times in 264 Posts
Originally Posted by coachboyd
Yet wind tunnel testing is considered to be gold even though it's a very controlled situation trying to predict what will happen in the relative chaos of outside weather.
To me the purpose of tunnel testing is not to predict what will happen outdoors, but to define the coefficients for the accepted model that then can be used as a predictive tool. It is the gold standard for getting the data to determine the coefficients. The middle step tunnel->parameters->model is important.
asgelle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.