Does it make sense for me to upgrade?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: campbellsport,WI
Posts: 62
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does it make sense for me to upgrade?
I just started riding late last year on a 2008 Trek 2.3 that I bought used for $800. I've ridden about 1200 miles and really enjoy it. My bike is now 5 model years old and I am thinking about upgrading while I can still get close to what I paid for it. It has 105 on it and I have had no problems or complaints.
I am thinking about either a Caad10 with ultegra or 105, or a Raleigh Revenio Carbon with ultegra or 105. My biggest question is weather or not carbon would be a more comfortable ride, and if ultegra performs better than 105?
Sorry if there is too many questions in one thread but I'm new to biking and I want to upgrade at the right time.
I am thinking about either a Caad10 with ultegra or 105, or a Raleigh Revenio Carbon with ultegra or 105. My biggest question is weather or not carbon would be a more comfortable ride, and if ultegra performs better than 105?
Sorry if there is too many questions in one thread but I'm new to biking and I want to upgrade at the right time.
#2
Senior Member
Is there something wrong with your old bike? If not, I would spend some money on a new set of wheels and a carbon seatpost.
#3
Live to ride ride to live
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I did something similar. I bought a used bike and upgraded it a year later but it did it because the bike didn't fit correctly.
I do prefer carbon but, you should test ride a few bikes and see if you like them better. As for the group. I use Campy so I don't really know much about Shimano but I believe the big difference is weight.
I do prefer carbon but, you should test ride a few bikes and see if you like them better. As for the group. I use Campy so I don't really know much about Shimano but I believe the big difference is weight.
#4
shedding fat
Does it make sense for me to upgrade?
No
__________________
Arguing with ignorant people is an exercise in futility. They will bring you down to their level and once there they will beat you with their overwhelming experience.
Arguing with ignorant people is an exercise in futility. They will bring you down to their level and once there they will beat you with their overwhelming experience.
#5
Professional Fuss-Budget
Bicycles are not like computers. The new stuff isn't faster than the old stuff.
That said, if you're riding regularly (let's say 100+ miles a week), it may make sense to have two bikes. Use the older bike for bad weather, backup, commuting, errands and so forth.
That said, if you're riding regularly (let's say 100+ miles a week), it may make sense to have two bikes. Use the older bike for bad weather, backup, commuting, errands and so forth.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: campbellsport,WI
Posts: 62
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nothing is wrong with my current bike. It has a carbon seat post, fork, and seat stays. It also has Bontrager Race wheels. I'm not very concerened about weight.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968
Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
QUOTE=Bacciagalupe;14560969]Bicycles are not like computers. The new stuff isn't faster than the old stuff.
That said, if you're riding regularly (let's say 100+ miles a week), it may make sense to have two bikes. Use the older bike for bad weather, backup, commuting, errands and so forth.[/QUOTE]
+1. Actually n+1 !
That said, if you're riding regularly (let's say 100+ miles a week), it may make sense to have two bikes. Use the older bike for bad weather, backup, commuting, errands and so forth.[/QUOTE]
+1. Actually n+1 !
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.
Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.
Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
#8
Senior Member
The biggest difference with Ultegra, functionally speaking, will be durability. It'll work well for longer.
It's lighter and probably a bit better in construction but I certainly wouldn't notice if it was a 105 or Ultegra rear derailleur until it started to get a bit old. I used to use RX100 (sub-105) and 105 parts on my bikes for a while, sometimes Ultegra. There is a difference in bearing quality but that won't show up until things get worn.
On the other hand a fresh drivetrain (chain, chainrings, cassette) will ride and shift very crisply. The new Ultegra rings should be very stiff, helping make the bike feel more responsive when going hard or when out of the saddle (climbing or sprinting).
Before you get too focused on material make sure whatever bike you have or want to get will fit you. If you're still developing as a rider then you'll need to do a bit of guessing on how you'll fit in a year (and therefore maybe wait to upgrade?) but a properly fit bike will do wonders for overall comfort. Generally speaking carbon will be softer than aluminum but I know that I've ridden full carbon, half carbon half aluminum, and full aluminum frames on the same 6+ hour ride, and the one that was most comfortable and fun was the custom fit full aluminum frame.
It's lighter and probably a bit better in construction but I certainly wouldn't notice if it was a 105 or Ultegra rear derailleur until it started to get a bit old. I used to use RX100 (sub-105) and 105 parts on my bikes for a while, sometimes Ultegra. There is a difference in bearing quality but that won't show up until things get worn.
On the other hand a fresh drivetrain (chain, chainrings, cassette) will ride and shift very crisply. The new Ultegra rings should be very stiff, helping make the bike feel more responsive when going hard or when out of the saddle (climbing or sprinting).
Before you get too focused on material make sure whatever bike you have or want to get will fit you. If you're still developing as a rider then you'll need to do a bit of guessing on how you'll fit in a year (and therefore maybe wait to upgrade?) but a properly fit bike will do wonders for overall comfort. Generally speaking carbon will be softer than aluminum but I know that I've ridden full carbon, half carbon half aluminum, and full aluminum frames on the same 6+ hour ride, and the one that was most comfortable and fun was the custom fit full aluminum frame.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: campbellsport,WI
Posts: 62
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am riding about 300 miles a month. I had my bike professionally fit last year. I think my bike has around 3000 miles on it now.
#11
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
upgrading the bike won't make you faster. but if it gets you out more often ...
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
IFWM I'd add to my collection - not sell a bike to get another one.
#13
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,297
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1442 Post(s)
Liked 711 Times
in
365 Posts
Shiny new bikes are alwaays nice. Sounds like you will use the bike, so if you can afford it, go for it.
What I wouldn't do is sell myself short. Your Trek is a nice bike. If you get another bike that's not a big step up, you may end up still wanting another upgrade before long.
Thus, I'd either keep riding the Trek, or go to something at least at the Ultegra level.
If you keep the Trek, you might be surprised how much it will ride like a new bike with a tune up, new chain, and new cassette.
What I wouldn't do is sell myself short. Your Trek is a nice bike. If you get another bike that's not a big step up, you may end up still wanting another upgrade before long.
Thus, I'd either keep riding the Trek, or go to something at least at the Ultegra level.
If you keep the Trek, you might be surprised how much it will ride like a new bike with a tune up, new chain, and new cassette.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#14
Throw the stick!!!!
Upgrading rarely ever makes me faster. With that said, I rarely have a bike over a year or so and I'm always happy on a new toy.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Shiny new bikes are alwaays nice. Sounds like you will use the bike, so if you can afford it, go for it.
What I wouldn't do is sell myself short. Your Trek is a nice bike. If you get another bike that's not a big step up, you may end up still wanting another upgrade before long.
Thus, I'd either keep riding the Trek, or go to something at least at the Ultegra level.
If you keep the Trek, you might be surprised how much it will ride like a new bike with a tune up, new chain, and new cassette.
What I wouldn't do is sell myself short. Your Trek is a nice bike. If you get another bike that's not a big step up, you may end up still wanting another upgrade before long.
Thus, I'd either keep riding the Trek, or go to something at least at the Ultegra level.
If you keep the Trek, you might be surprised how much it will ride like a new bike with a tune up, new chain, and new cassette.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,739
Bikes: 2009 BMC SLX01/2016 Santa Cruz Bronson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
Inm dying to buy a new bike, I have two great road bikes already. If you can afford it buy it, the one you fall in love with.
#18
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,029
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22573 Post(s)
Liked 8,919 Times
in
4,153 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Antioch, IL
Posts: 2,330
Bikes: 2013 Synapse 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Shiny new bikes are alwaays nice. Sounds like you will use the bike, so if you can afford it, go for it.
What I wouldn't do is sell myself short. Your Trek is a nice bike. If you get another bike that's not a big step up, you may end up still wanting another upgrade before long.
Thus, I'd either keep riding the Trek, or go to something at least at the Ultegra level.
If you keep the Trek, you might be surprised how much it will ride like a new bike with a tune up, new chain, and new cassette.
What I wouldn't do is sell myself short. Your Trek is a nice bike. If you get another bike that's not a big step up, you may end up still wanting another upgrade before long.
Thus, I'd either keep riding the Trek, or go to something at least at the Ultegra level.
If you keep the Trek, you might be surprised how much it will ride like a new bike with a tune up, new chain, and new cassette.
#20
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1349 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
Get a new bike..It will inspire you to ride more...Keep the old one.
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#21
Tour De French Fries
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,251
Bikes: 2010 Cervelo R3 SL & 2013 Airborne Goblin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i did same thing as you. Bought a used bike to see if i liked the sport, then upgraded. I didn't need to upgrade, but i wanted a newer bike. I'm glad i did, b/c i enjoy riding my CAAD10 more. Also it fits better. Carbon vs alloy is a whole new can of beans, but i love my aluminum bike.
That being said, your old bike is much nicer than my original older bike.
That being said, your old bike is much nicer than my original older bike.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
My biggest question is weather or not carbon would be a more comfortable ride, and if ultegra performs better than 105?
No, Ultegra does not perform that much better than 105 and there is never any particular urgency for that. carpediemracing knows what he's talking about. Taken together with my inference I'd say the answer to your biggest question is no, not worth it.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times
in
1,803 Posts
Nah, just get yourself some new tires, and other consumables and go ride.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#24
blah blah blah
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not an upgrade, just diversifying your portfolio!
#25
Senior Member
Many years ago I went through a phase where all I did was upgrade, or think about it. It seemed like I had replaced the discipline of riding with trying to find the bike that would be perfect and fast. It was, in effect, an excuse not to ride. With time I learned to use what I had and enjoy it, to ride more and more, and with this attitude, found that what I had was enough. This kept me on the same bike for over 30 wonderful years.
Then I decided it was time to see what cycling had evolved to and to try a new modern bike. Now I have another wonderful bike that will hopefully keep going for another 30 years. The first bike....I still have it and my two sons now enjoy it.
Then I decided it was time to see what cycling had evolved to and to try a new modern bike. Now I have another wonderful bike that will hopefully keep going for another 30 years. The first bike....I still have it and my two sons now enjoy it.