Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Smaller frame w/ longer stem vs larger frame w/ shorter stem

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Smaller frame w/ longer stem vs larger frame w/ shorter stem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-12, 08:08 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smaller frame w/ longer stem vs larger frame w/ shorter stem

Hi all,

I'm torn between a 56 and 58, and I really can't tell which one to get. The 56cm had about a 2" saddle/bar drop and my back hurt a little after 30 mins, but I do think that's due to it being so aggressive. I loved the handling, although sprinting was a little harder to control. The 58 also had a similar drop, was easier to manage while sprinting, but felt kind of like I was draped over the bike if that makes sense.

I was thinking about getting the 56 but with less of a drop and maybe a longer stem, but I'm not sure if that's the way to go. Any suggestions? I'm a collegiate road racer.

Thanks!
jcll2002 is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 08:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,181

Bikes: 2017 Specilized Roubaix, 2012 Scott CR1 Team, Felt Z85

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I had a big frame with a short 90 stem and I was still stretched out and the bike was already borderline "twitchy". An 80, I believe would have made it too twitchy. IMHO going small and building large is a better opinion.
Mike F is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
on the fence between sizes? I've always heard to go with the smaller one, unless you're young and you'll grow into it. It's easier to fit a smaller frame a bit larger than to make a larger frame fit smaller. Plus, the small frame weighs less, that's why the pros frequently ride smaller(ish) frames.
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 09:07 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smaller frame. Lighter, maybe even stiffer, and shorter wheelbase for better handling.
1Echo is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 09:07 PM
  #5  
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,494
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
This is not a situation where one should imitate the pros.

The shop should have a good enough fitter to at least get you in the right size for that brand. If they can't, you should probably check with a fitter to get the right size.
Bacciagalupe is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 09:12 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerdavid
on the fence between sizes? I've always heard to go with the smaller one, unless you're young and you'll grow into it. It's easier to fit a smaller frame a bit larger than to make a larger frame fit smaller. Plus, the small frame weighs less, that's why the pros frequently ride smaller(ish) frames.
Hmmm. I thought it was to get the saddle to bar drop. Since it's not hard to get a pro level bike below the UCI weight limit I wouldn't think a few grams of frame weight would matter much. And and if you had to use a longer stem and/or seat post some that weight get put back on anyway.
canam73 is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 09:43 PM
  #7  
jmX
Senior Member
 
jmX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201

Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I'm 6'1" and have a 56 and a 58. When they're setup with same bar/saddle/crank relationship the difference is pretty negligible, and the 56 gives me the option for extra drop if I want it (which it turns out I did, as I now have it slammed with a -17 degree stem).

During sprints, the 56 does come off the ground more than my 58. That's the only downside I've noticed so far, and it could be due to it being 3lbs lighter and me having an easier time yanking it upwards. That seems more like a technique issue than a problem with the bike though.
jmX is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 09:58 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
scotjonscot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle north (Mpls)
Posts: 216

Bikes: some

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by canam73
Hmmm. I thought it was to get the saddle to bar drop. Since it's not hard to get a pro level bike below the UCI weight limit I wouldn't think a few grams of frame weight would matter much. And and if you had to use a longer stem and/or seat post some that weight get put back on anyway.
My bike is a 58, and wish it was a 57 or 56 for this reason. My stem can't go any lower, and my shortish leg/longish torso combo won't let me raise the saddle any higher. I do like a longer top tube though.
scotjonscot is offline  
Old 09-06-12, 11:57 PM
  #9  
Member
 
SGV_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Gabriel , CA
Posts: 44

Bikes: Orbea Orca SLT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I will go for smaller size
SGV_rider is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 03:25 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,780

Bikes: Felt AR1, Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I'm in the same boat as you - a 57.
I'm comfortable on both sizes, but for racing get the 56 with a longer stem.
Inertianinja is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 09:42 AM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
will adding spacers make it less stiff?
jcll2002 is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 09:47 AM
  #12  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 27

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am also between sizes (52 & 54) .. i went with 52 and I did have to go with a longer stem after getting professionally fitted
tsw910 is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 10:26 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
A 2-inch or 5cm saddle to bar drop is not aggressive at all, particularly for a collegiate racer. If you're just getting on a bike that's not setup for you, then your test impressions are meaningless.

In general, the head tube length and saddle to bar drop will change by about 20mm between sizes, but it could be as little as 10mm or as great as 30mm. The reach could also vary from as little as 5mm to as much as 15mm.

You really need to read the geometry charts, so you know exactly what changes are needed to make the frames fit the SAME. You should never buy a frame and feel forced to adopt a fit, based on the frame's dimensions.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 10:30 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589

Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jcll2002
Hi all,

I'm torn between a 56 and 58, and I really can't tell which one to get. The 56cm had about a 2" saddle/bar drop and my back hurt a little after 30 mins, but I do think that's due to it being so aggressive. I loved the handling, although sprinting was a little harder to control. The 58 also had a similar drop, was easier to manage while sprinting, but felt kind of like I was draped over the bike if that makes sense.

I was thinking about getting the 56 but with less of a drop and maybe a longer stem, but I'm not sure if that's the way to go. Any suggestions? I'm a collegiate road racer.

Thanks!
I would think that someone needs to look at you on the bikes -be it your coach or the shop that's selling you the bike.
longbeachgary is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 10:40 AM
  #15  
Maximus
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SGV_rider
I will go for smaller size
+1.
Gluteus is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 11:25 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
topflightpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,570
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by jcll2002
will adding spacers make it less stiff?
Yes, adding spacers will reduce stiffness. Additionally, there is a limit to the number of spacers you can add - generally, 40mm is the maximum No. of spacers.

DaveSSS was spot on with his assessment. You really need to consider how the two bikes will fit you. The smaller frame is likely to create greater saddle-to-bar drop, and as DaveSSS noted, 2 inches, or 5 cm, really isn't much.

Do not just listen to the argument that a smaller frame is better. Pros ride smaller frames because they are very flexible and can handle lots of saddle-to-bar drop.
topflightpro is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 11:28 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by jcll2002
... The 58 also had a similar drop, was easier to manage while sprinting, but felt kind of like I was draped over the bike if that makes sense.
Bigger can be set up more relaxed, more comfortable for easy riding.

Originally Posted by jcll2002
I'm a collegiate road racer. Thanks!
Go smaller for more drop!
wphamilton is offline  
Old 09-07-12, 11:28 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Small frame, long stem.
fstshrk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trek330
Fifty Plus (50+)
33
06-04-19 07:26 PM
kirkaptain
General Cycling Discussion
44
07-11-14 01:09 PM
bikebreak
Road Cycling
16
07-02-13 01:01 PM
roburrito
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
7
07-18-11 08:56 PM
therearegoats
Road Cycling
25
04-11-11 02:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.