Is this site correct for tyre pressure?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Is this site correct for tyre pressure?
https://www.dorkypantsr.us/bike-tire-...alculator.html
I'm about 150 and bike is 16, so total weight of 166. That site gives me 76psi and 94psi for front/back. I usually ride with 100/110. I fill till that once a week, an it slowly gets less I suppose, but 75/95 looks very low doesn't it?
I'm about 150 and bike is 16, so total weight of 166. That site gives me 76psi and 94psi for front/back. I usually ride with 100/110. I fill till that once a week, an it slowly gets less I suppose, but 75/95 looks very low doesn't it?
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Bikes: 2007 Redline Proline 24" | 2013 Motobecane Trail Elite X4 | 2013 Trek Madone 2.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd say the calculations are bad. It tells me to run 147 lbs in the rear...uh no.
#3
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,464 Posts
Stick with 100/110. Most of those calculators are set up for touring bikes loaded with gear, wide tires, and going slow.
#4
Fred-ish
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
https://www.dorkypantsr.us/bike-tire-...alculator.html
I'm about 150 and bike is 16, so total weight of 166. That site gives me 76psi and 94psi for front/back. I usually ride with 100/110. I fill till that once a week, an it slowly gets less I suppose, but 75/95 looks very low doesn't it?
I'm about 150 and bike is 16, so total weight of 166. That site gives me 76psi and 94psi for front/back. I usually ride with 100/110. I fill till that once a week, an it slowly gets less I suppose, but 75/95 looks very low doesn't it?
Be sure to include the weight of your clothes, water and toolkit. Those can add up to 8#. Also, weigh your bike, don't trust published weights.
FWIW, if you now fill only once a week starting at 100/110, you're probably below 95 rear by the time that you refill. If you use the calculator, you should top off at least every other day with 23s until you get a feel of how much you lose between fills.
Last edited by rogerstg; 10-11-12 at 06:46 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It does SOUND low, but I've tried it briefly and it seems to work fine. FWIW, my 64-cm Atlantis and I weigh probably 275 pounds, and I'm using 32mm Paselas.
I think what this is really whispering to a lot of us is, "Use wider tires..."
I think what this is really whispering to a lot of us is, "Use wider tires..."
#7
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,045
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times
in
4,158 Posts
I think the Michelin Tire Chart (the bottom calculation) is a much better starting point but all these calculators are just guides and not absolute truth.
I would say that if you are running 23mm tires, oops tyres, you could probably get away with 90F and 100R.
I would also say that lots of newbie enthusiast cyclists (and even old ones) tend to OVERinflate their tires, often to the "max" on the tire which is unwise IMO. I know lots of guys in my club who weigh 150 pounds do inflate their tires to 115+ which is probably too much.
I would say that if you are running 23mm tires, oops tyres, you could probably get away with 90F and 100R.
I would also say that lots of newbie enthusiast cyclists (and even old ones) tend to OVERinflate their tires, often to the "max" on the tire which is unwise IMO. I know lots of guys in my club who weigh 150 pounds do inflate their tires to 115+ which is probably too much.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 300
Bikes: Colnago C50, Specialized TriCross Carbon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The calculator is right if you believe Jan Heine's premise that 15% tire deflection is optimum for rolling resistance and comfort. I have been using his formula for the last few yrs (hand calculations, didn't know there was an online option), and I have been happy.
Super high inflation pressures can really beat you up, and the higher frequency vibrations that come along with higher pressures may make you feel faster, but your really not! Of course thats only if you believe Jan Heine's premise.
Super high inflation pressures are still used for hardwood velodrome tracks, but are not beneficial for the road.
Super high inflation pressures can really beat you up, and the higher frequency vibrations that come along with higher pressures may make you feel faster, but your really not! Of course thats only if you believe Jan Heine's premise.
Super high inflation pressures are still used for hardwood velodrome tracks, but are not beneficial for the road.
Last edited by Hairy Hands; 10-11-12 at 08:01 AM.
#9
Do a barrel roll.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rockledge, FL
Posts: 201
Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
111/170 it says. I run 95/105 in my michelin p3r's with no flats in 1000 miles over pretty ugly terrain.
#10
Senior Member
when I was 150 I liked 90/90. If I run the front less its usually by 10 psi max differential. The only reason to have extremely different prussures is if you have extremely different tyres.
I can't wait till spring when I get out my cx bike with 32c all city tires running at 80-90 psi.
I can't wait till spring when I get out my cx bike with 32c all city tires running at 80-90 psi.