Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Any of you 'rollers NOT trainer' people doing it on regular rollers (not e-motions?)

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Any of you 'rollers NOT trainer' people doing it on regular rollers (not e-motions?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-13, 03:19 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ghoundz
As another question, did you get the folding option on your Tru Trainer Rollers?
Did you get the optional platform?
(NOTE: I don't have enough posts to personal message.)
I did get the folding option & I'm glad I did. In the spring/summer/fall I fold up the rollers and they hide away really easily. It was worth it to me and it works quite well.

I did not get the platform & don't regret it. I don't see that it would be useful if I lost my balance while riding as you're likely to end up anywhere but on the platform with your foot. And starting/stopping with your foot on the rail is quite easy. So I don't find it necessary or desirable. At least with the platform you can change your mind & add it later whereas the folding option must be decided up front.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 04:02 PM
  #52  
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry to ask yet another question to DaveWC, but, did you get the resistance bar?
I think this is a new feature that is available.
If you have it, do you use it?
Again, sorry to ask this in this thread. I think this is my last question related to these rollers.
Thanks,
ghoundz
ghoundz is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 04:22 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
No, it wasn't available at that time.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 04:43 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
tanguy frame's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR metro area
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've heard you can fold up a towell and put it under the rear roller for resistance.
Also magnets.
Or the headwind unit.
tanguy frame is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 06:31 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times in 1,803 Posts
Originally Posted by Wesley36
Just in case you were interested, this does not come with resistance, but you could always add resistance later if you wanted...



https://spinzonecycling.com/product/s...roller-630.htm
Thanks, I'll look into it.

Originally Posted by tanguy frame
I've heard you can fold up a towell and put it under the rear roller for resistance.
Also magnets.
Or the headwind unit.
I've heard about the magnet thing, but aren't most rollers PVC or aluminum? If so, it seems like magnets wouldn't do a whole lot.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 07:01 PM
  #56  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
Thanks, I'll look into it.



I've heard about the magnet thing, but aren't most rollers PVC or aluminum? If so, it seems like magnets wouldn't do a whole lot.
It's called an "eddy current brake" which works with aluminum, and would probably work about the same with a copper alloy:
https://girogeek.blogspot.com/2009/11...gain-some.html
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 08:43 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times in 1,803 Posts
huh, that's cool.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 11-20-13, 10:14 PM
  #58  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times in 2,509 Posts
I can get a pretty good workout on my rollers, which I got in 1975. I keep thinking about using the eddy current trick to add more resistance, although just shifting to a higher gear is good enough for me right now. I had a small fan I used to add resistance for a while, managed to lose it in a move. I realized later that it would be pretty easy to lower the resistance of the fan by blocking the amount of air at the inlet
unterhausen is offline  
Old 11-21-13, 03:11 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
tanguy frame's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR metro area
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
here are some pix, pertty self explanatory.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
headwind.jpg (35.1 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg
platform.jpg (32.2 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg
roller.jpg (36.9 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg
wheel.jpg (23.6 KB, 38 views)
tanguy frame is offline  
Old 11-21-13, 05:14 PM
  #60  
Roadie
 
brian416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Old thread, but I do all my intervals on E-motions. You can kind of sprint, but you have to be fairly smooth. The bars/bumpers help keep you on the rollers for when you're pushing really hard and go to far to the edge. The magnetic resistance works great, you can do recovery rides all the way to Z5 work.
brian416 is offline  
Old 11-21-13, 05:35 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
E-motions are wonderful. I can pretty much do anything on them including getting out of the saddle. Power output wise, I have seen 500+ watts indicated. You can go easily to a much harder resistance level but I am not strong enough to generate 1000 watts.
fstshrk is offline  
Old 11-23-13, 08:38 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times in 1,803 Posts
Originally Posted by Wesley36
I am on Sportcrafters rollers as well. There was definitely a steep learning curve for me, but I am now comfortable riding in a variety of positions and intensities (ie in the drops, on the hoods with forearms parallel to the ground, etc), getting out of the saddle, getting my water bottle out of the cage, drinking, and replacing it, and pulling food out of my pockets to eat. I have definitely learned a lot about the finer points of balance on my bike riding the rollers - in fact, I am finding it really helpful in terms of tweaking my fit.

I just started using the progressive resistance drum on it - if you have Cycle-Ops or Sportscrafters rollers the resistance unit is contained in the rear roller, and you just swap it out. My nominal wheelspeed went from about 45-50km/h without resistance, to 25-27km/h without, at around 170 watts (a reasonable Z2 for me). Awesome, but it is like I am having to re-learn rollers. Yesterday I pulled the bottle from the cage, drank, and ended up tossing the bottle onto the floor because I was getting wobbly. It is starting to feel stable again, getting out of the saddle is no problem, but the eating and drinking thing needs work.
So you like the resistance unit? I've been looking at the ones that come with that. I like the simplicity of it, of course it is new so there aren't used ones like you can get with the older adjustable magnetic resistance. I would like it if it is truly progressive though.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 11-23-13, 08:40 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times in 1,803 Posts
Originally Posted by tanguy frame
Disclaimer - YMMV.
There are lots of people on thie board who may want to post the facepalm picture after reading this. To those people, I suggest you skip this post, or douse yourself with your sense of humor.

I deleted all my pix, so sad.

The rollers, and the headwind unit have rectangular hollow legs, so it was easy to fashion wooden pegs out of a 1x1 piece of lumber that fit snuggly inside the legs. I have good carpentry tools so getting the lengths even was not a problem. I used wooden shims where necessary to get a snug fit.

I drilled an axle hole into each of the pegs (6 for the rollers, 2 for the headwind unit) to accomodate a 5/8 diameter bolt.

I poked the wooden pegs into the legs of the roller with the axle holes properly oriented.

I bought off ebay a set of 10 skate board wheels and a matching set of bearings.
At the hardware store, I bough a bunch of 5/8 bolts of the proper length, and a bunch of washers, also, nuts.

I poked a bolt through the axle hole in the peg, set up some washers to engage the skateboard bearing, added the skateboard wheel. applied more washers, and then the nut. Repeat for 5 other legs.

Took two long shelves and one short one.
created an H pattern so that the rollers run on the long shelves, and they are connected in the center with the short shelf. Standard hardware for attachments.

Screwed eye hooks into the fore and aft edges of the center shelf. Got 2 old innertubes and routed them thru the eye hooks and around the roller legs to create for and aft tension. I may have used some string for the attachments to the eye hooks.

The headwind unit took some additional creativity to get everything lined up and rolling, but the same idea. I used a single axle for both feet, and stacked the axle with a wheel, 1 foot, a spacer, a center wheel, more spacers, another foot, and a third wheel. overkill, but hey -I got 3 wheels!

Let me know if that makes no sense whatsoever. I'll can take pix later if you ask for them.

By the way, I also made a removable post for leaning on:
2 2x4's screwed together, a frame unit attached to the ceiling to accomodate the post, and a slab on the floor with wedges to put the system in compression. It's removable by removing the wedges. There's a small shelf for TV remote volume control, glasses, and a water bottle. I also made a stool with a floor and a hollow interior to store my shoes, and as an aid for mounting and dismounting, since the entire system is elevated beyond my ability to straddle the frame with my feet on the floor.

This is my longest post ever! >celebration<
Originally Posted by tanguy frame
here are some pix, pertty self explanatory.
That is a really cool setup. I think if I go that route mine will have to be much simpler as I'm not a wood-worker, but I'd have to do something regardless because my basement is all carpeted.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 11-23-13, 08:52 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by nhluhr
Emotion and other floating rollers defeat the purpose of rollers. By accomodating your lack of smoothness, they don't force you to correct it. Rollers are all about improving form (and yes, you can get enough resistance with various models to get plenty of a workout).
Rollers are highly unnatural, and while I like rollers and think they have value for working on balance, I've used them mostly as a training tool. After all, even non-floating rollers are psychologically gentler than a stationary trainer. The "smoothness" that rollers teach you is of questionable value in the real world, where your bike does move underneath you and that is not a bad thing! Good bike handlers are not static over their bikes.

Hmm. I haven't had a set of rollers in four years. Maybe I should correct that.
grolby is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 04:14 AM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
Wesley36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
So you like the resistance unit? I've been looking at the ones that come with that. I like the simplicity of it, of course it is new so there aren't used ones like you can get with the older adjustable magnetic resistance. I would like it if it is truly progressive though.
I have not been able to push it to test the higher end (need to get stronger!), but from what I can tell, it does seem to be progressive. The guy who made this chart would say so (his testimonial and analysis is published on the Sportscrafters website):

https://sportcrafters.com/blog/testim...ve-pro-rollers
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
graphtest.jpg (33.4 KB, 30 views)
Wesley36 is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 10:33 AM
  #66  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by Wesley36
I am on Sportcrafters rollers as well. There was definitely a steep learning curve for me, but I am now comfortable riding in a variety of positions and intensities (ie in the drops, on the hoods with forearms parallel to the ground, etc), getting out of the saddle, getting my water bottle out of the cage, drinking, and replacing it, and pulling food out of my pockets to eat. I have definitely learned a lot about the finer points of balance on my bike riding the rollers - in fact, I am finding it really helpful in terms of tweaking my fit.

I just started using the progressive resistance drum on it - if you have Cycle-Ops or Sportscrafters rollers the resistance unit is contained in the rear roller, and you just swap it out. My nominal wheelspeed went from about 45-50km/h without resistance, to 25-27km/h without, at around 170 watts (a reasonable Z2 for me). Awesome, but it is like I am having to re-learn rollers. Yesterday I pulled the bottle from the cage, drank, and ended up tossing the bottle onto the floor because I was getting wobbly. It is starting to feel stable again, getting out of the saddle is no problem, but the eating and drinking thing needs work.
Hey Wesley, what's the inside distance between the frame members on your Sportcrafters? I have an old set of rollers with poly drums on which I've mostly worn out the fluid resistance unit - I must have cooked the fluid. I'd like to swap in that resistance drum.

Yeah, more speed always makes the bike more stable, and they are great for getting your fit and form just right. I try to concentrate on my position, my form: back, hands, elbows, knees, feet, head, neck, shoulders, abs. And of course on my pedaling form: exactly where I push on the pedals with which muscles. Steady hummmm. Since you go slower with resistance, your rollers and wheels have less inertia, so the hummm thing becomes more pronounced. This training does translate to the road.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 10:50 AM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times in 156 Posts
Fwiw just ordered a set of taxc galaxia's I'll post a note once received!
robbyville is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 11:01 AM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
Rollers are highly unnatural, and while I like rollers and think they have value for working on balance, I've used them mostly as a training tool. After all, even non-floating rollers are psychologically gentler than a stationary trainer. The "smoothness" that rollers teach you is of questionable value in the real world, where your bike does move underneath you and that is not a bad thing! Good bike handlers are not static over their bikes.

Hmm. I haven't had a set of rollers in four years. Maybe I should correct that.
On the contrary, I have noticed my "real-world" bike handling improve quite a bit since I started using rollers. The ability to hold bike upright using core muscles on the rollers translates to much better control in the real world. The smoothness also helps with being able to maintain a higher cadence outdoors.
fstshrk is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 11:36 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times in 1,803 Posts
Originally Posted by Wesley36
I have not been able to push it to test the higher end (need to get stronger!), but from what I can tell, it does seem to be progressive. The guy who made this chart would say so (his testimonial and analysis is published on the Sportscrafters website):

https://sportcrafters.com/blog/testim...ve-pro-rollers
Have you tried the older magnetic resistance? I see a few out there of those available used. Just trying to figure out if it's worth the cost difference to get a new one with the progressive resistance drum (and warranty) vs a used one with the magnetic resistance.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 02:07 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by fstshrk
On the contrary, I have noticed my "real-world" bike handling improve quite a bit since I started using rollers. The ability to hold bike upright using core muscles on the rollers translates to much better control in the real world. The smoothness also helps with being able to maintain a higher cadence outdoors.
I didn't say there's no benefit, but I have to disagree with a couple things, first of all that your core muscles are somehow deeply involved in balance and are strengthened by trainer work (nope), and second that "smoothness" on rollers is cadence training. One trains the ability to maintain a high cadence by practicing spinning at a high cadence. Preventing a bike from popping off the rollers when you stand up isn't really the same thing. Like I said, I like rollers, but the ways in which they are different from riding on the road aren't beneficial.
grolby is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 04:08 PM
  #71  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Western Montana
Posts: 39

Bikes: Eddy Merckx road bike, Ross track bike (Tom Kellogg signature, ser# 001 :stolen

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
Also curious - how much roller time (or days per week) are you guys doing your roller work, and how hard? Just surprised that there are actually some folks who are doing real quality work on the regular rollers without e-motions.
I try to get on the rollers for at least 1 hour a day (5 to 6 am). I have a pair of Cinelli rollers. I do group training every Monday night (1 hr.) and at least 3 times a week I ride 2-3 hours first hour steady just warm up work on form, second hour, every 4th. song I attack / sprint for the entire length of the song (no matter what) I know this sounds stupid, but not knowing (listen to Pandora) really does work for me..on the days I add an extra hour, I push big gear for as long as possible, longer than previous session ...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (100.8 KB, 43 views)
Orvis is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 04:28 PM
  #72  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Western Montana
Posts: 39

Bikes: Eddy Merckx road bike, Ross track bike (Tom Kellogg signature, ser# 001 :stolen

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
Curious - of all you roller-loving indoor training folks out there who find it preferable over a trainer - any of you using non-float regular rollers? Nearly all the thumbs up roller comments I see come from e-motion roller users, so curious of some people are actually doing a lot of quality work on rollers, more than just spins for technique.
Cinelli rollers, and I love them
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (104.1 KB, 24 views)
Orvis is offline  
Old 11-24-13, 05:14 PM
  #73  
You blink and it's gone.
 
rbart4506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundas, Ontario
Posts: 4,436

Bikes: Race bike, training bike, go fast bike and a trainer slave.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsteinb
sigh. the purpose of any training aid is to improve. the idea that one needs to spend a lot of time getting 'smoother' is erroneous, at best. What emotion do is allow you to train long and hard without being locked into a rigid frame. It's a much more natural way of riding, and as a result in general one can typically ride longer with less mental and physical discomfort. The float allows one to change positions, stand, sprint, etc while riding more naturally.

I've got two sets of them, and have ridden 100s and 100s of hours on them.

And no, I couldn't get enough resistance from regular rollers to do what I just got done doing.
And once again you are so right!

I've ridden standard rollers before and all i could really do was steady state stuff and it was a chore. They were not fun, I actually preferred the trainer since I could really make myself suffer...

Got some e-motion rollers and they are awesome. I ride them just like I'm riding outdoors, form on the bike is the same and it's about as close you can get I'd say. I've only had them for a short time, but there's been no issues doing 2+ hr training sessions on them and boredom is never an issue. Now that the weather has really turned I know putting in 3+ hr on them will not be a problem. Even with the e-motion you are forced to work on technique or you're bouncing all over the place. No matter what it's a much better option then a stationary trainer.

Yes they are pricey, but next to my power meter I'd say they are the best investment I have made in training equipment to improve my cycling performance.

Forgot to add that I'm basically on the bike 6 days a week and considering I live in Canada, where it snows, that means I may be on the rollers upwards of 6 days a week. The goal is always indoors during the week and outdoor on weekends, but mother nature usually intervenes with that plan.

Last edited by rbart4506; 11-24-13 at 05:25 PM.
rbart4506 is offline  
Old 11-25-13, 07:29 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Wesley36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
Hey Wesley, what's the inside distance between the frame members on your Sportcrafters? I have an old set of rollers with poly drums on which I've mostly worn out the fluid resistance unit - I must have cooked the fluid. I'd like to swap in that resistance drum.

Yeah, more speed always makes the bike more stable, and they are great for getting your fit and form just right. I try to concentrate on my position, my form: back, hands, elbows, knees, feet, head, neck, shoulders, abs. And of course on my pedaling form: exactly where I push on the pedals with which muscles. Steady hummmm. Since you go slower with resistance, your rollers and wheels have less inertia, so the hummm thing becomes more pronounced. This training does translate to the road.
I have a sleeping toddler strapped to my chest at the moment, but this is from the Excel sports webpage:

This roller upgrade is a single drum that allows you to add quality resistance to SportCrafters and bi-fold CycleOps rollers. Other rollers can be retrofit as long as you have at least 16-3/4 inches of available width between your existing rails (the difference can be made up with washers), and no greater than 18-1/2 inches wide on the outside of the rails (to allow for 1/2 inch of exposed axle to be able to install a nut), and the axle hole is either 3/8 inch or can be opened up to 3/8 inch with a drill (and you're willing to do that).
And himespau, I am afraid that I do not have any experience with any other rollers, or other resistance units on rollers.
Wesley36 is offline  
Old 11-25-13, 07:44 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
I didn't say there's no benefit, but I have to disagree with a couple things, first of all that your core muscles are somehow deeply involved in balance and are strengthened by trainer work (nope), and second that "smoothness" on rollers is cadence training. One trains the ability to maintain a high cadence by practicing spinning at a high cadence. Preventing a bike from popping off the rollers when you stand up isn't really the same thing. Like I said, I like rollers, but the ways in which they are different from riding on the road aren't beneficial.
You are wrong. Being able to spin smoothly helps on the road and as far as core muscles go, it is a lot harder to balance a bike on the rollers than on the road. Otherwise, people would not be asking questions about how to ride rollers.
fstshrk is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.