Will I even notice a difference???
#1
squatchy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 428
Bikes: S-works Roubaix, S-works Tarmac, Gary Fisher Promethius, Tommasini Competion, Eddy Merckx Corsa 01
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Will I even notice a difference???
I want to replace my standard crank to a compact. I now use 175's and was wondering if I would even be able to tell if I bought one with 172.5 crank arms?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern Ontario
Posts: 3,659
Bikes: Colnago Master XL, Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Marinoni Fango
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When I went to a smaller crank arm length, I did not notice it except that I found I can spin better.
#4
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,027
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22572 Post(s)
Liked 8,918 Times
in
4,152 Posts
You may be mixing up terms. Compact crank means the gears are 50 and 34 tooth, versus standard 53/39.
Obviously that is a significant difference.
OTOH if you mean a shorter crank, I doubt you will notice a difference of 2.5 mm.
Obviously that is a significant difference.
OTOH if you mean a shorter crank, I doubt you will notice a difference of 2.5 mm.
#5
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I can feel a 2.5mm crank arm length difference FWIW. 2.5mm = 5mm diameter difference and the distance your feet travel in a circle is Pi * D.
BTW I ride 175mm cranks and love them.
BTW I ride 175mm cranks and love them.
#6
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,505
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3654 Post(s)
Liked 5,392 Times
in
2,737 Posts
I have two bikes with similar Ultegra cranks. One is 175 and the other is 172.5. I cannot tell one from the other.
#7
___________
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am 6'2" with long legs and a shorter torso. The added range of motion when I went to 175s was slight, but immediately noticeable. For me, it was a big improvement. I've considered trying 180s but I already have knee problems from work, and no money to put into the bike right now.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I feel that I am in the minority, but at only 5'10", the move from 172.5 to 175 was VERY noticeable, in a very good way. I can't ride bikes with 172.5 anymore. I actually needed to bring my cadence down from 120 though, now I am closer to 110-115 in the flats, and I also have that little bit of extra torque when standing. Makes me curious about 177.5's...
#9
Tour De French Fries
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,251
Bikes: 2010 Cervelo R3 SL & 2013 Airborne Goblin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i went from 172.5 to 175, and i could tell a difference. Of course that may have just been mental
#10
Iconoclast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,176
Bikes: Colnago Super, Fuji Opus III, Specialized Rockhopper, Specialized Sirrus (road)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I notice a difference in crank arm lengths. I feel most natural with 170s. 172.5s are okay. Currently, that is what I have on all my bikes. But 175s don't feel quite right, and occasionally, I feel it in my knees. Note that these differences are subtle, and only manifest themselves over an extended period of time.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 548
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When I got my new bike, I went from a 172.5 compact to 170 standard. My old bike was a 56 and went down to a 54. I wanted to get a 172.5, but really didn't know the difference besides the physical size. First ride out, apart for my new found love for standard cranks, I realized I was spinning faster at the same effort. As in, what I felt at 95 cadence would be what I was now feeling at a little over 100 cadence. Could be mental, but that's my experience.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745
Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have one bike with 172.5 cranks and the rest with 175. I wouldn't be able to tell the difference in a double blind test.
I think that I self-select a marginally higher cadence with the marginally smaller cranks though.
I think that I self-select a marginally higher cadence with the marginally smaller cranks though.
#13
Descends like a rock
Some people claim to be sensitive to it. I have bought 172.5 and 175 cranks in the past. I couldnt tell you what is on which bike right now. I dont remember and they all feel basically the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oneidabow1
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
55
03-19-15 05:33 PM
grndslm
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
40
12-15-11 08:26 AM