Oakley Radarlock Path vs. Racing Jacket
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oakley Radarlock Path vs. Racing Jacket
First, I know many of you will think $220 for sunglasses is too much. I don't care. I'm not interested in "this other brand that is jut as good for less money".
I'm interested in getting either the Oakley Radarlock path or the racing jacket. I've tried on the radarlocks and liked them, but I'm interested in thoughts of the racing jackets, which I haven't tried on yet. I think they look a little less "cycle specific" which is a good thing even though I will never wear these for anything but cycling/running.
Thoughts?
I'm interested in getting either the Oakley Radarlock path or the racing jacket. I've tried on the radarlocks and liked them, but I'm interested in thoughts of the racing jackets, which I haven't tried on yet. I think they look a little less "cycle specific" which is a good thing even though I will never wear these for anything but cycling/running.
Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
First, I know many of you will think $220 for sunglasses is too much. I don't care. I'm not interested in "this other brand that is jut as good for less money".
I'm interested in getting either the Oakley Radarlock path or the racing jacket. I've tried on the radarlocks and liked them, but I'm interested in thoughts of the racing jackets, which I haven't tried on yet. I think they look a little less "cycle specific" which is a good thing even though I will never wear these for anything but cycling/running.
Thoughts?
I'm interested in getting either the Oakley Radarlock path or the racing jacket. I've tried on the radarlocks and liked them, but I'm interested in thoughts of the racing jackets, which I haven't tried on yet. I think they look a little less "cycle specific" which is a good thing even though I will never wear these for anything but cycling/running.
Thoughts?
Loved the coverage that the Radar provided, especially above the nose level. Since road riding makes your upper body lean over, I figured the extra coverage would come in handy. I loved the fact that the Radars are half-framed. You tend not to notice it on your face. It just disappears when I'm riding.
Tried the Jawbone (Racing Jacket), didn't like the full coverage, felt I was wearing a mask. My cheek kept rubbing onto the bottom part of the frame. Just a minor annoyance.
#3
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I own both models, and find the Radarlock Path to be the superior one for road cycling.
It's easier to wipe sweat from your eyes with Radarlocks, and there's no blind spot when turning to check for traffic. Radarlocks are also easier to clean while riding.
It's easier to wipe sweat from your eyes with Radarlocks, and there's no blind spot when turning to check for traffic. Radarlocks are also easier to clean while riding.
#4
Sqrl
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I love my racing jackets, but have never tried the radars.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 548
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ignoring the fact that I own "replica" models, here's my review. I first had a pair similar to the Radarlock (idk if that's the model I bought but they look the same). After riding them for about a year, I bought some Jawbones (same as Racing Jacket?). My first week of riding with them, I regretted buying them. Everything was fine build and material wise, but they were not what I expected. They had a huge blind spot on the bottom side of the glasses which I was not used to. With my other glasses, looking back even slightly was easy and could see everything. With the new ones, I have to make an extra effort to turn my head even further just to see directly behind me. Apart from that blind spot was also looking down at my GPS. Never really paid much attention to how little I tilted my head down until I bought the Jawbones. Again, it's an extra effort and have to tilt my head down further because of the thick bottom rim. After about 2 weeks though, I got used to them and really do like them. I like how they look and even though I've only changed them once, the quick lens thing is a plus. Great looking glasses, but you just have to get used to the thick bottom rim.
#7
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Ignoring the fact that I own "replica" models, here's my review. I first had a pair similar to the Radarlock (idk if that's the model I bought but they look the same). After riding them for about a year, I bought some Jawbones (same as Racing Jacket?). My first week of riding with them, I regretted buying them. Everything was fine build and material wise, but they were not what I expected. They had a huge blind spot on the bottom side of the glasses which I was not used to. With my other glasses, looking back even slightly was easy and could see everything. With the new ones, I have to make an extra effort to turn my head even further just to see directly behind me. Apart from that blind spot was also looking down at my GPS. Never really paid much attention to how little I tilted my head down until I bought the Jawbones. Again, it's an extra effort and have to tilt my head down further because of the thick bottom rim. After about 2 weeks though, I got used to them and really do like them. I like how they look and even though I've only changed them once, the quick lens thing is a plus. Great looking glasses, but you just have to get used to the thick bottom rim.
Last edited by BoSoxYacht; 05-15-13 at 04:03 PM.
#8
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Racing jackets and Jawbones use the same lenses, but the frames were changed slightly when Oakley was forced to change the name due to copyright infringement.
#9
Sqrl
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have very low cheekbones, and I find they fir my face perfectly. Try both on. See if one gives you blind spots.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 548
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know actually..... I haven't tried to see. And just checked and they are the Radars. They don't have the little ridges or gaps on the lenses like the Radarlocks. I think they do because my friend owns a genuine pair and fake pair of Jawbones and he told me he switches the lenses between them.
#11
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't know actually..... I haven't tried to see. And just checked and they are the Radars. They don't have the little ridges or gaps on the lenses like the Radarlocks. I think they do because my friend owns a genuine pair and fake pair of Jawbones and he told me he switches the lenses between them.
I have seen counterfeit Radars, but not Radarlocks.
#12
tsniu
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have both the radar and the jackets. The frameless lower half of the radar is fantastic for cycling, but the jackets seem to have better visibility at the top when in the drops.
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6
Bikes: Felt B12 Tri Bike; Trek Madone 5.9 (DI2)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I went with the Radarlocks--they seem to fit my head better (they seem to grip better; I don't feel like they will ever slip off my head).
#19
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Oakley just discontinued a few Radarlock color combos, so Oakley Vaults(outlet stores) are discounting them to $179. White with jade iridium & blood orange with fire iridium are the ones I remember off the top of my head.
I like the jade iridium lens, but the fire iridium seems to have a strange gradient tint that bothers me.
I like the jade iridium lens, but the fire iridium seems to have a strange gradient tint that bothers me.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you find that you use the fact that the lenses are easier to change out? I'm assuming I'd use the dark lenses about 80+ percent during April - October. Nov - March I'm guessing it would be more likely that I would use something like the persimmon, but honestly, I'm not sure.
I guess my point is that I see myself changing the lenses, but I'm not sure how often I would change them. Perhaps with it being really easy, I'd change more often. Do you change them a lot?
I guess my point is that I see myself changing the lenses, but I'm not sure how often I would change them. Perhaps with it being really easy, I'd change more often. Do you change them a lot?
#21
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I use ice iridium(10% light transmission) most days, but I use a clear lens for night riding. If I only had one pair of glasses, I'd be changing the lens twice a day.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 767
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For Radarlock Path owners:
Can I buy aftermarket inserts and use them? Or does Oakley have their own inserts?
I know Oakley does prescription on those glasses but they embed them onto the glasses itself...and they also cost too much.
Can I buy aftermarket inserts and use them? Or does Oakley have their own inserts?
I know Oakley does prescription on those glasses but they embed them onto the glasses itself...and they also cost too much.
#24
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281
Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not that I'm aware off. I would look into Rudy Project sunglasses,