What is the ideal rim height and best wheel manufacturer?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What is the ideal rim height and best wheel manufacturer?
Hello all I am 14 weigh 125lbs 5 foot 8 ride in mildly hill areas occasionally go to whiteface mountain to trail I would like to use these rims mainly for races but also a bit in long training rides I don't want them to be heavy but I want aero benefits too I don't know what rim depth would be the best for me. Also I ride a 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra 6700 10 speed any input would help thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
This is a bit of a loaded question and there are tons of wheel threads to look through where people ask very similar questions.
I suggest you come up with a budget and scroll through the next 3-5 pages of this forum and click on every wheel thread you can find.
Not to be mean, but at age 14, I'm guessing you don't have $2000 to drop on wheels - thats ok, there are tons of options out there and if you do have 2g's to drop, then you have even more options.
I suggest you come up with a budget and scroll through the next 3-5 pages of this forum and click on every wheel thread you can find.
Not to be mean, but at age 14, I'm guessing you don't have $2000 to drop on wheels - thats ok, there are tons of options out there and if you do have 2g's to drop, then you have even more options.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 345
Bikes: 2012 BMC SLR01, 2012 Yeti ASR5, 2013 Trek Crockett
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think there is one ideal depth. Most wheel manufacturers make wheels with rims in a few general depth ranges. For example if you are looking at carbon rims Zipp has 32, 45, 58. Reynolds has 29, 41, 46, 58, 62. I would probably recommend something 50mm or shallower for a good balance of weight to aerodynamics. If you are looking at aluminum rims you can find some around 30mm deep.
If you commonly encounter strong cross winds I would consider rims on the shallower side of the range. If you do lots of climbing I would also look at the shallower rims. I have a set of reynolds that are 46mm deep that dont seem to get blown around too much by cross winds, but I also am also quite a bit heavier than you at around 180lbs. If its windy or I will be doing significant climbing I prefer my 32mm deep rims.
If you do alot of long descents that require extended braking I would consider an aluminum brake treack. If you want something deeper for aerodynamics there are quite a few aluminum rims with carbon fairings. I melted a carbon brake track going down an extended twisty descent. Reynolds replaced it under warranty for free, but I'd rather use aluminum brake tracks and avoid the problem all together.
As far as brands go any of the major brands should be fine, zipp, reynolds, shimano, HED, ENVE....There are alot of reputable wheel manufacturers.
If you commonly encounter strong cross winds I would consider rims on the shallower side of the range. If you do lots of climbing I would also look at the shallower rims. I have a set of reynolds that are 46mm deep that dont seem to get blown around too much by cross winds, but I also am also quite a bit heavier than you at around 180lbs. If its windy or I will be doing significant climbing I prefer my 32mm deep rims.
If you do alot of long descents that require extended braking I would consider an aluminum brake treack. If you want something deeper for aerodynamics there are quite a few aluminum rims with carbon fairings. I melted a carbon brake track going down an extended twisty descent. Reynolds replaced it under warranty for free, but I'd rather use aluminum brake tracks and avoid the problem all together.
As far as brands go any of the major brands should be fine, zipp, reynolds, shimano, HED, ENVE....There are alot of reputable wheel manufacturers.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is a bit of a loaded question and there are tons of wheel threads to look through where people ask very similar questions.
I suggest you come up with a budget and scroll through the next 3-5 pages of this forum and click on every wheel thread you can find.
Not to be mean, but at age 14, I'm guessing you don't have $2000 to drop on wheels - thats ok, there are tons of options out there and if you do have 2g's to drop, then you have even more options.
I suggest you come up with a budget and scroll through the next 3-5 pages of this forum and click on every wheel thread you can find.
Not to be mean, but at age 14, I'm guessing you don't have $2000 to drop on wheels - thats ok, there are tons of options out there and if you do have 2g's to drop, then you have even more options.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think there is one ideal depth. Most wheel manufacturers make wheels with rims in a few general depth ranges. For example if you are looking at carbon rims Zipp has 32, 45, 58. Reynolds has 29, 41, 46, 58, 62. I would probably recommend something 50mm or shallower for a good balance of weight to aerodynamics. If you are looking at aluminum rims you can find some around 30mm deep.
If you commonly encounter strong cross winds I would consider rims on the shallower side of the range. If you do lots of climbing I would also look at the shallower rims. I have a set of reynolds that are 46mm deep that dont seem to get blown around too much by cross winds, but I also am also quite a bit heavier than you at around 180lbs. If its windy or I will be doing significant climbing I prefer my 32mm deep rims.
If you do alot of long descents that require extended braking I would consider an aluminum brake treack. If you want something deeper for aerodynamics there are quite a few aluminum rims with carbon fairings. I melted a carbon brake track going down an extended twisty descent. Reynolds replaced it under warranty for free, but I'd rather use aluminum brake tracks and avoid the problem all together.
As far as brands go any of the major brands should be fine, zipp, reynolds, shimano, HED, ENVE....There are alot of reputable wheel manufacturers.
If you commonly encounter strong cross winds I would consider rims on the shallower side of the range. If you do lots of climbing I would also look at the shallower rims. I have a set of reynolds that are 46mm deep that dont seem to get blown around too much by cross winds, but I also am also quite a bit heavier than you at around 180lbs. If its windy or I will be doing significant climbing I prefer my 32mm deep rims.
If you do alot of long descents that require extended braking I would consider an aluminum brake treack. If you want something deeper for aerodynamics there are quite a few aluminum rims with carbon fairings. I melted a carbon brake track going down an extended twisty descent. Reynolds replaced it under warranty for free, but I'd rather use aluminum brake tracks and avoid the problem all together.
As far as brands go any of the major brands should be fine, zipp, reynolds, shimano, HED, ENVE....There are alot of reputable wheel manufacturers.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, Australia and sometimes Penang Malaysia
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Litespeed L1r, Litespeed Ghisallo 07, TCR Advanced Team SL 0 ISP, Giant TCR Advanced SL, Giant TCR Advanced Team - T-Mobile, Giant Propel Advanced SL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Reynolds make excellent wheels IMHO, they mostly use DT hub internals which are one of the top hub manufacturers, I would look at the 46 profile rims, find them the most versatile.
https://www.reynoldscycling.com/index...m&p_itm_pk=698
the tubular version are 1.2kg, but I guess you would be riding clinchers.
https://www.reynoldscycling.com/index...m&p_itm_pk=698
the tubular version are 1.2kg, but I guess you would be riding clinchers.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Reynolds make excellent wheels IMHO, they mostly use DT hub internals which are one of the top hub manufacturers, I would look at the 46 profile rims, find them the most versatile.
https://www.reynoldscycling.com/index...m&p_itm_pk=698
the tubular version are 1.2kg, but I guess you would be riding clinchers.
https://www.reynoldscycling.com/index...m&p_itm_pk=698
the tubular version are 1.2kg, but I guess you would be riding clinchers.
#8
Senior Member
Where does the alloy braking surface requirement come from? You, parents, school race oranizers?
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, Australia and sometimes Penang Malaysia
Posts: 1,916
Bikes: Litespeed L1r, Litespeed Ghisallo 07, TCR Advanced Team SL 0 ISP, Giant TCR Advanced SL, Giant TCR Advanced Team - T-Mobile, Giant Propel Advanced SL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Reynolds Cyro blue pads are excellent in most conditions except for super wet. but then most pads and rims under those conditions would also loose a lot of efficiency.
Have ridden carbon rims for 6 year without any braking problems.
Not to be a fan boy, but Reynolds do have some braking tech features
https://www.reynoldscycling.com/technology/braking/
Have ridden carbon rims for 6 year without any braking problems.
Not to be a fan boy, but Reynolds do have some braking tech features
https://www.reynoldscycling.com/technology/braking/
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 345
Bikes: 2012 BMC SLR01, 2012 Yeti ASR5, 2013 Trek Crockett
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I know there I not a ideal rim depth but what do you think I should get I would really like your opion it sounds like you know what your talking about. I MUST HAVE A ALUMINUM BREAKING SURFACE!!! so that nerows down the amount of options. What I was thinking is a Dura Ace C35 front wheel and Dura Ace C50 rear wheel. What are your thoughts about Reynolds wheels good or bad?
Carbon rims are fine under most conditions. They dont brake very well when wet, and I dont recommend them for long steep descents. The hill I damaged mine on was probably 3-4 miles long most of it was 10+% grade with a few sections close to 20%. I dont consider that normal condtions. I wouldn't hesitate to ride my carbon rims on 90% of my rides. But when I do alot of long descents I will not be riding them.
There are relatively few choices for deep rims with an aluminum braking surface. Look at the 3T Accelero 40, Shimano C35 or C50, and HED Jet4. Zipp has the 101 (30mm all aluminum), and the 60 but thats probably too deep for you. Sram (sram owns zipp) used to make the S40. They all seem pretty similar in weight (1600-1700 grams). I dont know too much about the 3T wheels, they are relatively new. I don't think you could go wrong with the shimano or HED offerings. Just pick the one that meets your budget and weight requirements. I think any rim under 50mm would probably suit your needs. A C35/C50 combo would work good. I have used my reynolds 32 front and 46 rear together and they worked good.
If you are willing to give up a little aerodynamics there are plenty of all aluminum rims that will be lighter in weight than the deeper aluminum/carbon rims. There are plenty of nice aluminum wheels in the 1400-1500g range. If you are considering this option there are many many options. My everyday wheelset is a set of HED Ardennes SL wheels.
Personally I prefer the ride quality of wider rims (23mm or wider) like the HED's, shimano C50, zipp firecrest... So if I was wheel shopping that would factor into my decision. I don't know the width of the C35's, but the C50's are supposed to be 23mm.
Last edited by xjustice09x; 11-27-13 at 06:03 PM.
#13
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
Lots of good things said here and other places about Dura Ace. You can't go wrong with them.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I know there I not a ideal rim depth but what do you think I should get I would really like your opion it sounds like you know what your talking about. I MUST HAVE A ALUMINUM BREAKING SURFACE!!! so that nerows down the amount of options. What I was thinking is a Dura Ace C35 front wheel and Dura Ace C50 rear wheel. What are your thoughts about Reynolds wheels good or bad?
Personally, I'd buy the Zipp 303's in the for sale section if you have the cash. @LowCel (the seller) is mod and good guy, he wouldn't screw you over. That's a decent price for those wheels. Take them to a shop and get them trued (or do it yourself) and you're set.
#16
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
#17
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
There is no right answer to your question.
#18
Throw the stick!!!!
Aluminum braking surfaces add weight (and look silly on deep aero wheels in my opinion.) If it's something your parents are demanding, than you might be SOL but a good set of carbon pads can be had for cheap if you buy them online and do a fine job with stopping. In the extreme wet, it'll take more time to stop but it's something you get used to quickly.
Personally, I'd buy the Zipp 303's in the for sale section if you have the cash. @LowCel (the seller) is mod and good guy, he wouldn't screw you over. That's a decent price for those wheels. Take them to a shop and get them trued (or do it yourself) and you're set.
Personally, I'd buy the Zipp 303's in the for sale section if you have the cash. @LowCel (the seller) is mod and good guy, he wouldn't screw you over. That's a decent price for those wheels. Take them to a shop and get them trued (or do it yourself) and you're set.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aluminum braking surfaces add weight (and look silly on deep aero wheels in my opinion.) If it's something your parents are demanding, than you might be SOL but a good set of carbon pads can be had for cheap if you buy them online and do a fine job with stopping. In the extreme wet, it'll take more time to stop but it's something you get used to quickly.
Personally, I'd buy the Zipp 303's in the for sale section if you have the cash. @LowCel (the seller) is mod and good guy, he wouldn't screw you over. That's a decent price for those wheels. Take them to a shop and get them trued (or do it yourself) and you're set.
Personally, I'd buy the Zipp 303's in the for sale section if you have the cash. @LowCel (the seller) is mod and good guy, he wouldn't screw you over. That's a decent price for those wheels. Take them to a shop and get them trued (or do it yourself) and you're set.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Caledon Ontario
Posts: 21
Bikes: 2013 Cervelo R3 Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#21
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
He's joking. Ideal height depends on a lot of factors but I agree Zipp 303s are a good all around choice. They are 45. I also have carbon and aluminum barking surfaces and notice very little difference except in the rain. Even then CF stops okay but you have to adjust some for stopping in advance
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Maybe check out Boyd (Boyd is also a board member here and lots of people run his wheels):
https://www.boydcycling.com/carbon-clinchers/
I have an older version of the Reynolds Assaults and love them:
https://www.performancebike.com/bikes...06950000023650
And then if you still want aluminum braking surfaces, there's the 3T wheels but they're kind of heavy. Reviews say they roll well though.
https://www.artscyclery.com/3T_Accele...FRSVfgodCHQA-A
https://www.boydcycling.com/carbon-clinchers/
I have an older version of the Reynolds Assaults and love them:
https://www.performancebike.com/bikes...06950000023650
And then if you still want aluminum braking surfaces, there's the 3T wheels but they're kind of heavy. Reviews say they roll well though.
https://www.artscyclery.com/3T_Accele...FRSVfgodCHQA-A
#24
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Deadmonton, AB
Posts: 20
Bikes: 2014 Giant Propel Advanced SL, 2012 CAAD 10-4, 2013 Norco Nitro, Custom Fixed Gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hey OP, if you debadge them, a set of Giant PSLR1 Aero wheels are about 1700grams, and are carbon with an aluminum brake track. They can also be found as new take-offs for about $800. I have ridden both the Dura Ace C50's and the Giant's. They are very similar, but I find the Giant's to be a bit stiffer (But I am 180 pounds). I run these wheels now with Gp4000s and latex tubes, they roll awesome and make that sweet whump whump sound when you hammer it! Good luck.
#25
Throw the stick!!!!
Problems? I've had five or six pairs of Zipps and never had the first problem. Keep in mind there are a lot of Zipps out there. I'm sure there are some negative reviews but any company with that many wheels out there will have some negative reviews.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
Last edited by LowCel; 11-28-13 at 01:47 PM.