Ramsay's Weird TT Bike
#26
Senior Member
However, it's the saddle set back and bar extension measurements that really seperate a UCI position from tri positions. In this instance, Gordon could probably comply with the UCI TT regulations, as he really isn't taking advantage of the forward rotation that tri's lack of regulation allows.
The consequence to UCI legal TT positions is that you'll see saddles further aft than the same rider might use for tri, with bars that are also set further aft, making it more difficult for some to achieve a low and flat back.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
Last edited by bigfred; 12-26-13 at 07:50 PM.
#27
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As already mentioned by others, weight isn't as great a concern as it would be on road race climbing stages. Deep frame and wheel sections, in addition to drinking systems ensure that tri bikes aren't too threatening to the 6.8kg limit. But, yes, to the best of my knowledge there isn't a weight limit for tri bikes. The 3:1 frame element ration also doesn't apply to tri bikes. Hence the Tri-Shiv vs TT-Shiv from Specialized.
However, it's the saddle set back and bar extension measurements that really seperate a UCI position from tri positions. In this instance, Gordon could probably comply with the UCI TT regulations, as he really isn't taking advantage of the forward rotation that tri's lack of regulation allows.
The consequence to UCI legal TT positions is that you'll see saddles further aft than the same rider might use for tri, with bars that are also set further aft, making it more difficult for some to achieve a low and flat back.
However, it's the saddle set back and bar extension measurements that really seperate a UCI position from tri positions. In this instance, Gordon could probably comply with the UCI TT regulations, as he really isn't taking advantage of the forward rotation that tri's lack of regulation allows.
The consequence to UCI legal TT positions is that you'll see saddles further aft than the same rider might use for tri, with bars that are also set further aft, making it more difficult for some to achieve a low and flat back.
I think as you said, the TT regulations of UCI are more concentrated on bar positions and saddle angle. I was watching the World Championships this year and a UCI guy was telling the TV reporters that the saddle angle must be within +/- 3 degree range. I suppose the rules try to avoid the so called "superman" position.
#28
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BTW some guy managed to build a proper TT bike just under 13 lbs.
https://www.tririg.com/articles.php?i...htest_Tri_Bike
But he did it with a chinese carbon frame so let's blame him for counterfeiting, cheap labor, human rights and stuff...
https://www.tririg.com/articles.php?i...htest_Tri_Bike
But he did it with a chinese carbon frame so let's blame him for counterfeiting, cheap labor, human rights and stuff...
#29
Senior Member
That "UCI guy" would have been incorrect. It's a 5cm window measured aft from plumb with the bb center. Keep your saddle nose at least 5cm set back from bb center and you could take advantage of a morphological exemption that allowed your bar extensions to extend 85cm forward from the bb center. Run with less than 5cm of saddle setback and your bar extensions could extend no further than 80cm from bb center. Your correct in supposing that their aim was to disallow the superman position. But, what they did with the arbitrary measures was, create a situation where different sized riders have different fit options available to them. There isn't a great solution to the situation. If they were to apply either frame angels or physiological angels the consequence would be people simply fitting onto their bikes in strane ways. Either to pass pre-race inspection or while actually riding.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
#30
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
Where is his sleeveless jersey?
#31
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here it is:
https://youtu.be/mLCgbcOn-t4?t=2m45s
They actually do have a spirit level and the guy mentions it quite clearly...
https://youtu.be/mLCgbcOn-t4?t=2m45s
They actually do have a spirit level and the guy mentions it quite clearly...
#32
Middle-Aged Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276
Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride a Cervelo P5-6...comes in around 8.2kg with Zipp 404 wheels and ultegra mechanical. It's not mountain goat...but with my position, which yields a 20 degree back angle, once I get some power through the Rotor QXL standard crank on a 11/25 cassette....that thing really flies. The extra weight actually helps me keep momentum under most conditions. Obviously pay a heavy price on the climbs (both the weight and the different hand hold on the bull horn affect this.
On the same Strava segments, under different conditions obviously, my heart rate will be 10-20BPM lower and my speed about 5% faster than my times on the same segments riding my Scott Foil Team Issue in the drops.
One of the most important aspects of tri bike fit is the hip angle and how your bike fit changes your run speed. Most guys will be faster with a less efficient but more comfortable bike position because they will be able to run faster than if they are slammed low and tighten their hip flexors and then try to run.
All that said...it is a weird looking bike...but it helped him to an amazing achievement that none of us can take from him! Go Ironman Ramsay! You are an Ironman!
#34
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
I guess I'm supposed to know who Gordon Ramsay is ? Good thing I can search the interwebz
Edit: ... oh, he's some chef guy.
Edit: ... oh, he's some chef guy.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,617
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times
in
502 Posts
At 63yo, I completed my IMFL last month in 13:31:48 but it is by far a less demanding event compared to Kona. My tri bike is my road bike, a 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3 so it is UCI legal but set up for the comfort I need. I also have a slightly larger than needed frame like Ramsay does and yes it plays into a slower ride but I'm not going for Gold, rather just to finish.
Plan to be under 13 hours in next year's IMFL.
Plan to be under 13 hours in next year's IMFL.
#37
Senior Member
Here it is:
https://youtu.be/mLCgbcOn-t4?t=2m45s
They actually do have a spirit level and the guy mentions it quite clearly...
https://youtu.be/mLCgbcOn-t4?t=2m45s
They actually do have a spirit level and the guy mentions it quite clearly...
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
#38
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
At 63yo, I completed my IMFL last month in 13:31:48 but it is by far a less demanding event compared to Kona. My tri bike is my road bike, a 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3 so it is UCI legal but set up for the comfort I need. I also have a slightly larger than needed frame like Ramsay does and yes it plays into a slower ride but I'm not going for Gold, rather just to finish.
Plan to be under 13 hours in next year's IMFL.
Plan to be under 13 hours in next year's IMFL.
I've heard it's quite hard to get your name on the list for Kona but aside from that a 140.6 IM should be a 140.6 IM am I wrong?
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,617
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1068 Post(s)
Liked 780 Times
in
502 Posts
Can you explain why Kona is more demanding than any other Ironman triathlon? Is it more challenging in a psychological way or any difference in the course?
I've heard it's quite hard to get your name on the list for Kona but aside from that a 140.6 IM should be a 140.6 IM am I wrong?
I've heard it's quite hard to get your name on the list for Kona but aside from that a 140.6 IM should be a 140.6 IM am I wrong?
BTW, my seat is dead nuts on, bubble centered
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Explain something to me. OP commented about the unusual appearance of a bicycle and was interested partly due to the celebrity status of the cyclist. He cast no aspersions on the cyclist, his abilities, or effort in any particular race. He did not actually criticize the bike as unsuitable; he only mentioned how unusual it is. His whole post was about the interesting characteristics of the bike. Actually he started a good conversation about bike design. You came back with an attack on OP and suggested he is not qualified to talk about this bicycle, because he has never completed an IM and likely rides slower than the subject cyclist. On what planet is that reasonable, and more to the point: what is your problem?
#41
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Can you explain why Kona is more demanding than any other Ironman triathlon? Is it more challenging in a psychological way or any difference in the course?
I've heard it's quite hard to get your name on the list for Kona but aside from that a 140.6 IM should be a 140.6 IM am I wrong?
I've heard it's quite hard to get your name on the list for Kona but aside from that a 140.6 IM should be a 140.6 IM am I wrong?
#42
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#44
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
Explain something to me. OP commented about the unusual appearance of a bicycle and was interested partly due to the celebrity status of the cyclist. He cast no aspersions on the cyclist, his abilities, or effort in any particular race. He did not actually criticize the bike as unsuitable; he only mentioned how unusual it is. His whole post was about the interesting characteristics of the bike. Actually he started a good conversation about bike design. You came back with an attack on OP and suggested he is not qualified to talk about this bicycle, because he has never completed an IM and likely rides slower than the subject cyclist. On what planet is that reasonable, and more to the point: what is your problem?
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Technically, "Ironman" is a trademarked name by World Triathlon Corporation , which is different than the International Triathlon Union (ITU). WTC is a commercial group primarily out to make money, whereas ITU is more of a competitive triathlon organization focused on world-class Olympic-distance racing. (Much, much shorter than an Ironman, but typically on elite athletes or budding elites participate in their big races.)
Kona, however, is the world championship for the long Ironman race, and you can either qualify for it by winning a slot in another IM race prior to it, or trying to get a lottery spot (of which there are very few.) Ramsey is a celeb, and there are a few special reserved spots for celebs who can bring particular media attention to the race, so he doesn't have to qualify.
Qualifying for Kona today typically means you're amongst the top 5 amateur triathletes who race iron-distance in your state, maybe top 20 in a large state like CA. It's hard - these guys typically beat a handful of professional triathletes in races (pro triathletes have to meet certain time standards, so it's not as easy as calling yourself pro.)
#46
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, if you finish any triathlon with the distance of the Kona race, you can call yourself an Ironman.
Technically, "Ironman" is a trademarked name by World Triathlon Corporation , which is different than the International Triathlon Union (ITU). WTC is a commercial group primarily out to make money, whereas ITU is more of a competitive triathlon organization focused on world-class Olympic-distance racing. (Much, much shorter than an Ironman, but typically on elite athletes or budding elites participate in their big races.)
Kona, however, is the world championship for the long Ironman race, and you can either qualify for it by winning a slot in another IM race prior to it, or trying to get a lottery spot (of which there are very few.) Ramsey is a celeb, and there are a few special reserved spots for celebs who can bring particular media attention to the race, so he doesn't have to qualify.
Qualifying for Kona today typically means you're amongst the top 5 amateur triathletes who race iron-distance in your state, maybe top 20 in a large state like CA. It's hard - these guys typically beat a handful of professional triathletes in races (pro triathletes have to meet certain time standards, so it's not as easy as calling yourself pro.)
Technically, "Ironman" is a trademarked name by World Triathlon Corporation , which is different than the International Triathlon Union (ITU). WTC is a commercial group primarily out to make money, whereas ITU is more of a competitive triathlon organization focused on world-class Olympic-distance racing. (Much, much shorter than an Ironman, but typically on elite athletes or budding elites participate in their big races.)
Kona, however, is the world championship for the long Ironman race, and you can either qualify for it by winning a slot in another IM race prior to it, or trying to get a lottery spot (of which there are very few.) Ramsey is a celeb, and there are a few special reserved spots for celebs who can bring particular media attention to the race, so he doesn't have to qualify.
Qualifying for Kona today typically means you're amongst the top 5 amateur triathletes who race iron-distance in your state, maybe top 20 in a large state like CA. It's hard - these guys typically beat a handful of professional triathletes in races (pro triathletes have to meet certain time standards, so it's not as easy as calling yourself pro.)
Ironmans are cool but I think as you stated it is a little bit of a commercial product. Although I do respect the efforts of the participants, I don't think they are feasible in a biomechanical way. I don't think the human body is suitable to whit stand 10 hours of aerobic activity.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The human body is actually built for ultrarunning, at least that's the main accepted theory on evolution (published in Nature 2 years ago, which is one of the premier science journals.) We do best on megadistance runs - humans ably compete with and beat horses at 100 mile races.
#48
Squeaky Bottom Bracket
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lake Como, Italy
Posts: 164
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2 // 70's Olmo Gentleman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The human body is actually built for ultrarunning, at least that's the main accepted theory on evolution (published in Nature 2 years ago, which is one of the premier science journals.) We do best on megadistance runs - humans ably compete with and beat horses at 100 mile races.
For what I've known, human beings suck pretty much at every athletic aspect. That is why we have a developed front brain and learned how to search for shelter, make tools and weapons to turn our physical disadvantage to our favour. Dolphins for example are considered to be almost as smart as humans but their athletic ability provides them enough agility to hunt for themselves and out-swim any threat. Our intelligence and dominance is also well respected in nature as no wild animal (except polar bears) hunts humans.
I'm not saying what you are saying is wrong but I see no evolutionary advantage in being able to outrun a horse in a 100 miles race.
#49
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
How could he not know who I am ?? I won a criterium in an industrial park once !
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I would like to check that article, if you could provide a link that'll be great.
For what I've known, human beings suck pretty much at every athletic aspect. That is why we have a developed front brain and learned how to search for shelter, make tools and weapons to turn our physical disadvantage to our favour. Dolphins for example are considered to be almost as smart as humans but their athletic ability provides them enough agility to hunt for themselves and out-swim any threat. Our intelligence and dominance is also well respected in nature as no wild animal (except polar bears) hunts humans.
I'm not saying what you are saying is wrong but I see no evolutionary advantage in being able to outrun a horse in a 100 miles race.
For what I've known, human beings suck pretty much at every athletic aspect. That is why we have a developed front brain and learned how to search for shelter, make tools and weapons to turn our physical disadvantage to our favour. Dolphins for example are considered to be almost as smart as humans but their athletic ability provides them enough agility to hunt for themselves and out-swim any threat. Our intelligence and dominance is also well respected in nature as no wild animal (except polar bears) hunts humans.
I'm not saying what you are saying is wrong but I see no evolutionary advantage in being able to outrun a horse in a 100 miles race.