Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    63
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Strava versus Garmin calories burned

    Questions for everyone, i am looking to lose some excess weight, i don't run a heart monitor as i have large pecs and i can't get the strap to lay right to record anything. When i use my Garmin for a 1.5 hour workout, it shows something like 1400 calories burned. When i upload the same file from the garmin to strava, it will show like 700-800 calories. I am assuming the Strava reading is more accurate. Why the difference, which one is really more accurate.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    448
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I put it just under my pecs...you may want to try that. No matter how big the man boobies (be it muscle or fat)...most of use have a flat spot just underneath them.

    As for the calories burned...I don't know. I've seen some goofy stuff with May My Ride and Strava...even with a HR monitor.

    I look at it this way, if my target HR is 150-180 and know (with proof from a HR monitor) that I'm staying in the zone giver or take the duration of my ride...I'm cool with that and I'm pretty darn sure I'm burning the calories...

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,806
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Strava's number is probably a better guess.

  4. #4
    Senior Member kv501's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    709
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    None of them are going to be correct; calorie burn is totally individual according to your genetics, metabolism, level of rest, etc. This is one of the metrics I wish fitness software wouldn't even try to calculate.

    What's important is consistency. Pick one (doesn't matter which), and stay with it. As long as you stay with the same source you can compare workouts against each other and track progress. If you want to be most accurate, pick the lowest one; most software grossly over-exaggerates calorie burn. What better way to convince people that they are burning lots of fat and get them to keep using your gadgets?

  5. #5
    Senior Member YOJiMBO20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    2010 Litespeed Icon, 1987 Nishiki Olympic 12
    Posts
    1,412
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ((Strava calories) - ((Garmin calories) - (Strava calories))) / (((Strava calories) + (Garmin calories)) /2)
    2010 Litespeed Icon, Rival
    1987 Nishiki Olympic 12, commuterized

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Roubaix SL4 Expert
    Posts
    2,162
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ignore the Garmin calorie estimate but do look at the "Work" kJ number and assume 1-to-1 ratio for calories burned if you want to be conservative. Strava's calorie burn estimate is about 5-10% higher than this number IME.

  7. #7
    Senior Member JasonCarp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    My Bikes
    Specialized Cross Trail
    Posts
    126
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You assume that the OP is a man? Maybe we should have some pics of her and her large "pecs" that prohibit a heart rate monitor. Just for the sake of assisting to get the heart rate monitor working.

  8. #8
    Senior Member robabeatle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    space
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Supersix, Ultegra, Psimet wheels. CAAD7, Ultegra, wheels
    Posts
    1,323
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    neither, they are near useless.

  9. #9
    Senior Member gc3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    DC
    My Bikes
    Now I Got Two
    Posts
    2,580
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Whichever says I burned the most has to be the most accurate, especially if I done been drope the hammer reel hard that ride...
    "I tried being reasonable, I didn‘t like it."

    "I understand. I just don't care"

  10. #10
    jmX
    jmX is offline
    Senior Member jmX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Orange, CA
    My Bikes
    Roubaix / Shiv
    Posts
    2,123
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you have a heartrate monitor the Garmin numbers are pretty good as they license a pretty nice algorithm for the calculation. When I got a powermeter, my reported calories for my workouts stayed nearly the same...that is, the HR based estimation nearly matched the actual work calculation from power meter data.

    If you don't have a HR strap, then I'd go with strava's numbers. They seem better at calculating work done, and thus, calorie burn.

  11. #11
    Arrogant Roadie Punk save10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,041
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    garmin alone will give me 1300 calories for my afterwork loop. garmin +hrm about 1100. garmin +hrm +quarq 900.

  12. #12
    Upgrading my engine DXchulo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    5,613
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't trust either one. The only real way to know is with a power meter. HRM is better than nothing, but has its own downfalls.

    If you can't afford a PM and want to lose weight I'd just slowly reduce your calories over time. You'll know when you've cut too far.
    centuryperweek.blogspot.com

  13. #13
    Senior Member George's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Katy Texas
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix - Look 566 - Jamis Coda Elite
    Posts
    5,254
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I usually figure between 30 to 35 calories a mile, depending on hard I'm riding.
    George

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    63
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonCarp View Post
    You assume that the OP is a man? Maybe we should have some pics of her and her large "pecs" that prohibit a heart rate monitor. Just for the sake of assisting to get the heart rate monitor working.
    I can get you pictures of my pecs, but they will be hairy and gross, I am for sure a man. Thanks for the advice guys, i downloaded the lose it app, to really get my weight down for racing. I put all my workouts in at 10-11mph under bike ride even though i am always towards the higher end, it gives me the lowest calorie rating, and it seems to always come around where starva is. We will see over the next month. Maybe a power meter next year if they come down in price.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •