Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2004 Cannondale R600 CAAD5
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Craigslist Trek Road Bike

    Hi all,

    Long time lurker, first time poster. Please be gentle!
    I'm looking at 2 bikes on Craigslist and am about to pull the trigger on one.
    Which one would you choose and would you say the asking prices are reasonable?

    https://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/bik/4372113148.html

    https://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/bid/4372652002.html

    Thanks for all the help.

    -Tony

  2. #2
    L-I-V-I-N dtrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, OR
    Posts
    2,978
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I kinda like the Trek that is black with some red.





    The private party one is the better bike...but I'm trying to decide how much value to place on buying from a shop that has tuned it up, etc.
    "The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson

    '11 Fuji SL - '04 Bianchi Imola - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur

  3. #3
    Senior Member RIRview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    My Bikes
    Trek Domane 6.2 Project One
    Posts
    323
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ultegra vs. Tigra and Sora components is no comparison. Go for bike #2 .

  4. #4
    L-I-V-I-N dtrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, OR
    Posts
    2,978
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RIRview View Post
    Ultegra vs. Tigra and Sora components is no comparison. Go for bike #2 .
    That's pretty old Ultegra though...and an Octalink triple, Alex wheels, and a threaded headset/fork.

    The Sora (RD at least) is the latest 9-speed 3500.
    "The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson

    '11 Fuji SL - '04 Bianchi Imola - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    981
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First trek seems like a 2011 2.1 to me. Had one of those but with 105, works fine. Stock saddle is terrible, ride is a tad harsh. This one's fork is replaced as stated and wheels are not stock.
    Last edited by CenturionIM; 03-14-14 at 02:06 PM.
    65% of all statistics are made up on the spot. - DD

  6. #6
    Senior Member Tim_Iowa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    My Bikes
    1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1997 Giordana XL-Eco (gofast), 2005 Cannondale F400 (MTB), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel grinder)
    Posts
    331
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dtrain View Post
    That's pretty old Ultegra though...and an Octalink triple, Alex wheels, and a threaded headset/fork.

    The Sora (RD at least) is the latest 9-speed 3500.
    What dtrain said. The Trek 2300 is a 2000 year model (or so), and the 2.1 is a 2010 model (or so). That's a huge difference; my 2000 Ultegra isn't the same as 2010 Ultegra. So it's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison here.

    Also, the newer trek doesn't have full Sora, just the derailers. The shifers are Tiagra, a bit better. I had a 2010ish Trek 1.2 with full Sora, and it was fine.

    Both are ok deals for a used Trek. Ride them both and buy the one that feels best.

  7. #7
    Senior Member mprelaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cape Cod, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,853
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the first one fits, I'd go with that for the newer frame and the better wheels, for a $25 difference. New Sora front and rear mech kind of trumps 14 year old Ultegra anyway. If you don't like the thumb button on 2010 Tiagra shifters, new Sora shifters did away with it, and it won't be an expensive swap.

  8. #8
    L-I-V-I-N dtrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, OR
    Posts
    2,978
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mprelaw View Post
    If you don't like the thumb button on 2010 Tiagra shifters, new Sora shifters did away with it, and it won't be an expensive swap.
    There's no thumb button on Tiagra...just on older Sora and lower (2200/2300).
    Last edited by dtrain; 03-14-14 at 02:57 PM.
    "The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson

    '11 Fuji SL - '04 Bianchi Imola - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur

  9. #9
    Texas Tornado copswithguns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Texas
    My Bikes
    '14 Specialized Roubaix SL 4 Full Ultegra 6800
    Posts
    278
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Personally, I would buy the 1st one 6 days out of the week and twice on Sunday. Seems like a solid deal. The older bike has Ultegra, but it's pretty old. Go with the newer.
    "Speed never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary...Now that's what gets you." -Jeremy Clarkson

  10. #10
    Senior Member link0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    '11 Merlin Extralight, '98 Dean Castanza, '89 Schwinn Prologue
    Posts
    428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would definitely go with the newer Trek 2.1. It's in far better condition.

  11. #11
    Senior Member clydeosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Central PA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Six5, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR & old Hard Rock
    Posts
    500
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, the new one.I'd say components are a level playing field between the two.

  12. #12
    Senior Member fstshrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    1,646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bike #1 has my vote.

    The second one looks really old.
    Help me cure canine cancer
    http://www.wearethecure.org/friends/skipper

  13. #13
    Senior Member fstshrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    1,646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mprelaw View Post
    If the first one fits, I'd go with that for the newer frame and the better wheels, for a $25 difference. New Sora front and rear mech kind of trumps 14 year old Ultegra anyway. If you don't like the thumb button on 2010 Tiagra shifters, new Sora shifters did away with it, and it won't be an expensive swap.
    You have this wrong. Tiagra 4500 (9 speed) and the Tiagra 4600 (10 speed) never had a thumb button. Sora 8 speed did. The new Sora 9 speed does not.

    In Shimano Line up, it goes 105 better than Tiagra better than Sora.
    Help me cure canine cancer
    http://www.wearethecure.org/friends/skipper

  14. #14
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2004 Cannondale R600 CAAD5
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you all very much, I really appreciate it. I think I'll be going with the first one.

  15. #15
    Newbie?
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Grenoble, France
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Definitely the first one... no comparison..

    For future reference: Tiagra 4400 (9spd, octalink v2, hood shape) is functionally equivalent to Ultegra 6500 (2nd bike)... Tiagra 4500 (1st bike) is actually better than 6500 (external BB, hood shape), it's basically 5600/6600 with one less speed (not necessarily a bad thing)..

    Then there's the carbon fork, better construction, better aesthetics (for me), compact crank, etc.

    Note: I do have lots of miles on all these groups...



    Now here's the catch: if I was looking for a rugged 2nd bike to commute on, I would take the 2nd one (no carbon, "serious" wheels, etc.), but I have a ridiculous amount of spare parts

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Go Ducks!
    Posts
    1,341
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tiagra shifters from that era are quite nice. That's what's on my winter bike. Works just fine.
    Every time that wheel turn 'round,
    Bound to cover just a little more ground!

  17. #17
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2004 Cannondale R600 CAAD5
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, I really had my heart set on the first one, but the seller never responded. Found out that the friend of a friend had a 2004 Cannondale R600 CAAD5 for sale. Picked that up for $250, so I can't complain. Currently at the shop getting a tune up with some free tubes .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •