Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    82
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Which Large/ XL frames look best?

    I know this is highly subjective, but I'm looking for people's opinions on the matter.

    This is in response to the comment another user made a few days ago about large frames looking funny. I'm guessing this is because of the longer head tubes and exaggerated spacing between the top tube and the down tube. So my question is, among the larger sized frames (57cm +), which ones look the least "funny"?

  2. #2
    bt
    bt is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,169
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    highly subjective.

  3. #3
    don't misunderestimate me BoSoxYacht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
    My Bikes
    07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
    Posts
    5,337
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kyoto now View Post
    I know this is highly subjective, but I'm looking for people's opinions on the matter.

    This is in response to the comment another user made a few days ago about large frames looking funny. I'm guessing this is because of the longer head tubes and exaggerated spacing between the top tube and the down tube. So my question is, among the larger sized frames (57cm +), which ones look the least "funny"?
    IMO, 58-62cm frames with level TTs look normal to me. Frames smaller than 55cm look like something that a dwarf would ride.

  4. #4
    SuperGimp TrojanHorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix
    Posts
    8,000
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whichever one I'm riding.

    make sure you color coordinate your cables & kit too.

  5. #5
    Thread Killer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht View Post
    IMO, 58-62cm frames with level TTs look normal to me. Frames smaller than 55cm look like something that a dwarf would ride.
    Yes, and short people also look funny on 700c road bikes, like they're suspended between the two wheels. Sad, really.
    Chaad--'95 DeKerf Team SL, '02 Lemond Buenos Aires, '05 Novara Buzz, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '06 Mountain Cycle Rumble, '09 Dahon Mariner D7, '12 Mercier Nano, '12 Breezer Venturi

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Bemidji, MN
    My Bikes
    Felt F5
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think anything with more of a race geometry look fine. I have a felt 58cm I think it looks fine. The bikes with the taller head tubes seem to get crazy looking the larger the frame size.

  7. #7
    Senior Member dvdslw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Apopka, Florida
    My Bikes
    CAAD10 Black Inc.
    Posts
    349
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 8086bruce View Post
    I think anything with more of a race geometry look fine. I have a felt 58cm I think it looks fine. The bikes with the taller head tubes seem to get crazy looking the larger the frame size.
    I second that!

    I have a CAAD10 in 60cm and I think it looks pretty good. When I was shopping for my new bike I had the shop put together a 2014 Roubaix in 61cm and it was just plain goofy looking. Other bikes "I" think look good in large sizes are (no particular order) Scott CR1, Scott Addict, Cannondale CAAD10, Cannondale SuperSix, Specialized Tarmac, Trek Madone, & Trek Domane.

  8. #8
    has a Large Member Campag4life's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,943
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The ones that look best are free. Just pick one and walk out the bike shop.

    I will add...a great basis to purchase a bike frame. Gotta love the 41.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Go Ducks!
    Posts
    1,367
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kyoto now View Post
    I know this is highly subjective, but I'm looking for people's opinions on the matter.

    This is in response to the comment another user made a few days ago about large frames looking funny. I'm guessing this is because of the longer head tubes and exaggerated spacing between the top tube and the down tube. So my question is, among the larger sized frames (57cm +), which ones look the least "funny"?
    Dont include 57/58's in there. They tend to look great. 61 on up is where the goof starts.
    Every time that wheel turn 'round,
    Bound to cover just a little more ground!

  10. #10
    Thread Killer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The KHS Flite 747 looks pretty good for being a huge 65cm frame. Smart design by L. Zinn:

    Chaad--'95 DeKerf Team SL, '02 Lemond Buenos Aires, '05 Novara Buzz, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '06 Mountain Cycle Rumble, '09 Dahon Mariner D7, '12 Mercier Nano, '12 Breezer Venturi

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •