Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Favorite Intervals

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Favorite Intervals

Old 04-04-14, 08:25 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by TexMac
Let me see. I do (30 sec on 30 sec off, 20 sec on 10 sec off, pyramid intervals, 1 minute intervals, hill standing intervals at 70 rpm, sufferfest intervals) but this one seems to be what I choose if I'm not motivated/ don't feel like pushing myself/ just want to get something easy. I think misunderstanding here is since it's my favorite intervals, its the only interval I do.
Technically, you could call any riding on the bike an interval. 4 hrs riding in Zone 2 is a long easy interval.

The reason you're getting some pushback is most people associate intervals with shorter efforts of higher intensity which stress the system in order to generate an adaptation/improvement. If you were a runner you could call walking to the post office an easy interval but it is unlikely to make you faster.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 04-04-14, 08:51 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968

Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TexMac
My favorite is 8 x (3+1). 3 being at 250 watts and 1 being 170 watts
Originally Posted by TexMac
Makes no sense?
Why can't you express intervals in terms of watts? Don't people train using power?
Uh, no, not everyone trains using power. I'm still in the dark ages where watts is for light bulbs. Why not train with watt-hours. Seems that would be a better measurement of energy over time. But then that's just me. And I have not idea how to relate 250 watts to anything mechanical, including me.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline  
Old 04-04-14, 10:25 PM
  #53  
More Speed = More Work
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 79

Bikes: Wilier Zero7, Litespeed Tuscany, Santa Cruz Superlight

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Carmichael Power Fade Power Intervals. You go out at 100%, and whenever you feel like you're on top of it and get to relax at all - you push harder. Then you do it again. And again. And again... 3x (3x2), with two minutes between intervals, and six minutes between sets.

These suck. And they teach your body to go hard, then recover immediately, then go again and again.

Cheers

Last edited by Zero7; 04-04-14 at 10:29 PM.
Zero7 is offline  
Old 04-04-14, 10:48 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero7
Carmichael Power Fade Power Intervals. You go out at 100%, and whenever you feel like you're on top of it and get to relax at all - you push harder. Then you do it again. And again. And again... 3x (3x2), with two minutes between intervals, and six minutes between sets.

These suck. And they teach your body to go hard, then recover immediately, then go again and again.

Cheers
100% of what?
caloso is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 06:22 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
clausen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern Ontario
Posts: 3,659

Bikes: Colnago Master XL, Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Marinoni Fango

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TexMac
do you always push yourself?
If I am doing intervals, then I will do them at the intensity they are supposed to be done at. Proper intensity is the trick to intervals. If you want to go out and just ride that is fine, but if your going to put the effort into doing intervals you might as well do them properly.
clausen is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 06:32 AM
  #56  
More Speed = More Work
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 79

Bikes: Wilier Zero7, Litespeed Tuscany, Santa Cruz Superlight

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
100% of what?
Oh, looks like they're called "Peak & Fade Power Intervals".

Anyway, they're supposed to be max watts, but these are pretty easy to do without a power meter. You just accelerate as hard as you can, then try to maintain. That's why they suck, because there's no "get to this level and sustain it." Instead it's "if you can go any faster, GO FASTER." Your power (speed) will fall after the first 40 - 60 seconds, but you keep pushing. And keep your cadence over 90.

Here's the actual description from the book, The Time Crunched Athlete: These intervals start with a big acceleration rather than a gradual increase in intensity. I want you to go all-out right from the beginning and keep your power output as high as possible as the interval progresses. Because of the hard acceleration, your power output will gradually fall after the first 40 - 60 seconds of the effort. That's expected and perfectly normal; just keep pushing.

Cheers

Last edited by Zero7; 04-05-14 at 06:46 AM.
Zero7 is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 06:45 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 1,430

Bikes: 2010 S1, 2011 F75X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by gregf83
Doesn't seem possible unless your 20min power is over 16% higher than your FTP. That would be very unusual.

135/95 is probably a more realistic ratio of work/rest.
https://www.trainerroad.com/cycling/w...s/1392-Wheeler
simonaway427 is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 06:53 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by simonaway427
Not sure what you posted here but the link doesn't work for me.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 07:59 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 1,430

Bikes: 2010 S1, 2011 F75X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wheeler - TrainerRoad.com

Just a trainer road profile that explains the interval session that I mentioned....
simonaway427 is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 06:27 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TexMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602

Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadTire
Uh, no, not everyone trains using power. I'm still in the dark ages where watts is for light bulbs. Why not train with watt-hours. Seems that would be a better measurement of energy over time. But then that's just me. And I have not idea how to relate 250 watts to anything mechanical, including me.
Sorry you have other problems..
TexMac is offline  
Old 04-05-14, 06:37 PM
  #61  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero7
Carmichael
….
These suck. And they teach your body to go hard, then recover immediately, then go again and again.
These only work with EPO
znomit is offline  
Old 04-06-14, 01:12 AM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 189
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am all about the bicycling "fat burning" 5 week plan. I Think the goal should always be to push hard a couple days and to ride easy the others.
momo15 is offline  
Old 04-06-14, 02:32 AM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968

Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TexMac
Sorry you have other problems..
Uh, yeh....heh.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline  
Old 04-06-14, 05:18 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TexMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602

Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by simonaway427
Wheeler - TrainerRoad.com

Just a trainer road profile that explains the interval session that I mentioned....
is that your personal data?
TexMac is offline  
Old 04-06-14, 05:20 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TexMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602

Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero7
Oh, looks like they're called "Peak & Fade Power Intervals".

Anyway, they're supposed to be max watts, but these are pretty easy to do without a power meter. You just accelerate as hard as you can, then try to maintain. That's why they suck, because there's no "get to this level and sustain it." Instead it's "if you can go any faster, GO FASTER." Your power (speed) will fall after the first 40 - 60 seconds, but you keep pushing. And keep your cadence over 90.

Here's the actual description from the book, The Time Crunched Athlete: These intervals start with a big acceleration rather than a gradual increase in intensity. I want you to go all-out right from the beginning and keep your power output as high as possible as the interval progresses. Because of the hard acceleration, your power output will gradually fall after the first 40 - 60 seconds of the effort. That's expected and perfectly normal; just keep pushing.

Cheers
I like this kind of interval where your body will decide when to stop and the clock. Will try this next week when I start commuting to work.
TexMac is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 12:16 PM
  #66  
bf is my facebook.
 
ljrichar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Doesn't seem possible unless your 20min power is over 16% higher than your FTP. That would be very unusual.

135/95 is probably a more realistic ratio of work/rest.
Don't know how you draw that conclusion. My 1' is 200% of ftp so that interval would be taxing but not impossible. You'd need a couple of minutes rest after each one though.
ljrichar is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 01:46 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by ljrichar
Don't know how you draw that conclusion. My 1' is 200% of ftp so that interval would be taxing but not impossible. You'd need a couple of minutes rest after each one though.
The interval mentioned specified 1'@150% followed by 3'@105%. That's not much recovery and averages out to 116% of FTP which would be impossible for most people to keep up for 20' unless you had 100% fast twitch muscles.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 02:32 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 1,430

Bikes: 2010 S1, 2011 F75X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by TexMac
is that your personal data?
Yes... When my ftpwas 301. I'm up to 315 now
simonaway427 is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 02:38 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TexMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602

Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by simonaway427
Yes... When my ftpwas 301. I'm up to 315 now
very nice. How long did it take you from 301-315?
TexMac is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 02:40 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 1,430

Bikes: 2010 S1, 2011 F75X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by TexMac
very nice. How long did it take you from 301-315?
About 6 weeks with Trainer Road and lots of fat biking.
simonaway427 is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 03:42 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadTire
Uh, no, not everyone trains using power. I'm still in the dark ages where watts is for light bulbs. Why not train with watt-hours. Seems that would be a better measurement of energy over time.
Because

1. Research shows that training impact on your body goes up with the square of power output. Except when it comes to boosting power output and fit issues an hour at 100% has similar impact to four hours at 50%.

2. It's easier to compare results and work with generalized training plans when the effort is normalized for the athlete's fitness level.

The most popular training stress tracking schemes are essentially the product of time and the square of the quotient of weighted average power divided by what an athlete should be able to sustain for one hour, scaled so that 100 points = a maximum effort 1 hour time trial.

Ex: with a 235W critical power, if I ride a 1 hour time trial at a steady 230W I get 96 points.

But then that's just me. And I have not idea how to relate 250 watts to anything mechanical, including me.
About 20-24 MPH riding a road bike on flat ground depending on aerodynamics and rolling resistance.

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 04-08-14 at 12:16 PM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 05:00 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968

Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero7
Here's the actual description from the book, The Time Crunched Athlete:
Hey, I've got that book. Used it 2 seasons ago just to get my fitness level up a little, knowing I have limited time to bike. I'll have to go back at it again, especially now with a HRM and cadence on my bike computer.

Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
Because ....

About 20-24 MPH riding a road bike on flat ground depending on aerodynamics and rolling resistance.
Wow Drew, I didn't see that (the whole 3 points of your post) coming. Actually a good answer, getting me to think a little. Oh and the extra tip of 20-24 mph, thanks! It's a nice reference point.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 05:55 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
aaronmcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 3,462

Bikes: Cervelo S5, Marin Gestalt X11

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Because it doesn't make any sense to anyone else. 250 for one person is going to be an easy endurance pace, for another it's going to be V02 max, and for another an all out 30 second effort.

Also, it has to change for you as your FTP changes, or you won't being hitting your Zones correctly.

If you're going to do 3 minute intervals, you want them at 105%-110% of your V02max power or about 120% of FTP. Saying at 250 watts only makes sense if that is 120% of FTP.
Not if it's on 1' rest. It looks like a threshold workout to me.
aaronmcd is offline  
Old 04-07-14, 06:17 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
aaronmcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 3,462

Bikes: Cervelo S5, Marin Gestalt X11

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times in 45 Posts
Ah, I didn't see the 85% comment. Yeah 3' intervals at 85% are fine if you are in base and riding for several hours. Generally intervals are interpreted to be above FTP though.

I just calculated and I do think 85% is hard. But just because it is kinda hard doesn't mean much. 85% for me is 276 watts. My last race I averaged 278 for an hour, with NP almost = FTP. And I planned on doing 2 races that day. 8x3' at 85% kinda adds up to junk miles for training.
aaronmcd is offline  
Old 04-08-14, 07:58 AM
  #75  
bf is my facebook.
 
ljrichar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
The interval mentioned specified 1'@150% followed by 3'@105%. That's not much recovery and averages out to 116% of FTP which would be impossible for most people to keep up for 20' unless you had 100% fast twitch muscles.
You can't average like that. Like I said, I can do 200% of ftp for only 1' but I can do 100% for an hour. Hell, I can do 400% but for only 5". It doesn't average the way you're thinking.

Originally Posted by aaronmcd
8x3' at 85% kinda adds up to junk miles for training.
My point exactly. It's not a real interval.
ljrichar is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.