Power versus Heart Rate Training...
#52
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,442
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3143 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Because of the surgery issue at the start of training, it's hard to say what the growth has been, not only because I was riding with pain, but because I had been off the bike for a couple of months on the injured list. Still, I know that I would not have tested anywhere near 300 had I not been injured, so I'm sure the gains are pretty substantial.
My regular 60min training rides typically average about 250w, with Level 6 peaks around 360-400w, unless I'm doing sprint training (peak power for which is quite a bit higher).
Last edited by chaadster; 05-15-14 at 12:11 PM.
#53
Voice of the Industry
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
RChung,
OK...you aren't alone in just training with power only you never even look at HR...HR is implicit in your sense of RPE and no doubt you learned the latter correlation through previous training with a HRM. This somewhat corresponds to Kopsis only he uses a HRM for some work outs and likely most use a HRM as an adjunct as discussed.
So the million dollar question and I believe this is the magic to all of training...how do you train with PM since you believe that many...and you are likely correct...use it more as a HRM than optimizing its specific role.
See below basic tenants of training with a PM:
Calculating Training Zones...Allen and Coggan define 7 levels for power-based training. Chris Carmichael, Joe Friel, and any other coach will have a similar set of training levels based on percentages of a fitness test number.
We're going to stick with Allen and Coggan to keep this simple. To determine each of the 7 levels, you need to take a percentage of the FTP number you determine.
Again, take the FTP number you've tested and determined through your 20-minute time trial effort and apply these percentages. Write them down. These are your TRAINING ZONES. Our hypothetical rider should know for instance that if doing longer tempo intervals at say, 20 minutes each...they should be holding their wattage in a range of: 177 watts to 210 watts.
As you can probably see, figuring out your FTP is pretty straightforward stuff.
But the tough question and I would ask you RChung...how do you determine how and when to train to each of these zones to maximize your potential and to properly prepare for specific events since you believe most do not employ a PM correctly to train?
Thanks
OK...you aren't alone in just training with power only you never even look at HR...HR is implicit in your sense of RPE and no doubt you learned the latter correlation through previous training with a HRM. This somewhat corresponds to Kopsis only he uses a HRM for some work outs and likely most use a HRM as an adjunct as discussed.
So the million dollar question and I believe this is the magic to all of training...how do you train with PM since you believe that many...and you are likely correct...use it more as a HRM than optimizing its specific role.
See below basic tenants of training with a PM:
Calculating Training Zones...Allen and Coggan define 7 levels for power-based training. Chris Carmichael, Joe Friel, and any other coach will have a similar set of training levels based on percentages of a fitness test number.
We're going to stick with Allen and Coggan to keep this simple. To determine each of the 7 levels, you need to take a percentage of the FTP number you determine.
- Level 1 Active Recovery = < 55% of LT
- Level 2 Endurance = 56-75% of LT
- Level 3 Tempo = 76-90% of LT
- Level 4 Lactate Threshold = 91-105% of LT
- Level 5 VO2 Max = 106-120% of LT
- Level 6 Anaerobic Capacity = 121-150% of LT
- Level 7 Neuromuscular Power = maximum effort
Again, take the FTP number you've tested and determined through your 20-minute time trial effort and apply these percentages. Write them down. These are your TRAINING ZONES. Our hypothetical rider should know for instance that if doing longer tempo intervals at say, 20 minutes each...they should be holding their wattage in a range of: 177 watts to 210 watts.
As you can probably see, figuring out your FTP is pretty straightforward stuff.
But the tough question and I would ask you RChung...how do you determine how and when to train to each of these zones to maximize your potential and to properly prepare for specific events since you believe most do not employ a PM correctly to train?
Thanks
Last edited by Campag4life; 05-15-14 at 12:28 PM.
#54
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
One of the reasons I showed that plot way up above was because it illustrates that different races have different kinds of demands. If you saw a QA plot for each race that would emphasize it more. If you looked at surges and durations of surges, and gear usage, you'd get a fuller picture still. Motor pacing or HIIT train different things than long rides at Level 2, but everything will end up having some training effect. FTP is an important thing -- it's the rising tide that lifts all boats -- but it's still just one thing. If all you're interested in is FTP (and that's most people), almost anything you do to increase either volume or intensity will work, and you don't need to ride in a specific level or zone to do that. And, of course, a HRM doesn't help you tune aero or rolling drag -- but not many people do that, either. If you don't want or need to do those specific, arcane, kinds of things and you have the time to ride a HRM (or a wristwatch and a speedometer) are fine.
#55
Voice of the Industry
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
One of the reasons I showed that plot way up above was because it illustrates that different races have different kinds of demands. If you saw a QA plot for each race that would emphasize it more. If you looked at surges and durations of surges, and gear usage, you'd get a fuller picture still. Motor pacing or HIIT train different things than long rides at Level 2, but everything will end up having some training effect. FTP is an important thing -- it's the rising tide that lifts all boats -- but it's still just one thing. If all you're interested in is FTP (and that's most people), almost anything you do to increase either volume or intensity will work, and you don't need to ride in a specific level or zone to do that. And, of course, a HRM doesn't help you tune aero or rolling drag -- but not many people do that, either. If you don't want or need to do those specific, arcane, kinds of things and you have the time to ride a HRM (or a wristwatch and a speedometer) are fine.
#56
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
My bread-and-butter training is for FTP. Depending on what my schedule is (actually, what my wife and kids and job say my schedule is) I can do that with long rides at low intensity or shorter rides of higher intensity. I don't just do one thing. For me, the greater precision and accuracy of a power meter helps me to know when I can trade-off one type of training for another and when I can't. I do try to match my training to the demands of my goals but that's over a longer period of time, over a block of training, not for any particular single training session.
[Edited to add] Also, I have a distinct advantage at the moment, which is that I'm satisfied simply not to suck. So I got that going for me, which is nice.
[Edited to add] Also, I have a distinct advantage at the moment, which is that I'm satisfied simply not to suck. So I got that going for me, which is nice.
Last edited by RChung; 05-15-14 at 01:01 PM.
#57
Voice of the Industry
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
My bread-and-butter training is for FTP. Depending on what my schedule is (actually, what my wife and kids and job say my schedule is) I can do that with long rides at low intensity or shorter rides of higher intensity. I don't just do one thing. For me, the greater precision and accuracy of a power meter helps me to know when I can trade-off one type of training for another and when I can't. I do try to match my training to the demands of my goals but that's over a longer period of time, over a block of training, not for any particular single training session.
[Edited to add] Also, I have a distinct advantage at the moment, which is that I'm satisfied simply not to suck. So I got that going for me, which is nice.
[Edited to add] Also, I have a distinct advantage at the moment, which is that I'm satisfied simply not to suck. So I got that going for me, which is nice.
thanks
#58
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
I do some TT'ing but nowadays I spend most of my summers in France so my "races" are mostly the normal kinds of cut-throat rides with friends and club mates, with an occasional cyclosportif tossed in. As I said, my main goal at the moment is simply not to suck.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4234 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
I'm interested in the OP's question as well in thinking whether or not trying to get a used powermeter is worth it for me to just not suck so much riding and get faster (not a racer). Probably the answer, like in all things, is more time on the road/trainer, but family obligations limit availability. Hopefully, I can figure out how to use an HRM to train as efficiently as possible.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#60
Voice of the Industry
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Your investment doesn't seem to line up with goals...of course raising a family is a much more important goal and priority.
#61
Voice of the Industry
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I'm interested in the OP's question as well in thinking whether or not trying to get a used powermeter is worth it for me to just not suck so much riding and get faster (not a racer). Probably the answer, like in all things, is more time on the road/trainer, but family obligations limit availability. Hopefully, I can figure out how to use an HRM to train as efficiently as possible.
For the avid recreational fitness cyclist...I fall in this camp as well....training with a HRM is adequate and not nearly as cost prohibitive. I believe the important thing for all of us...is to train aka ride with regularity...which takes making riding a priority over life's other demands. Not always easy.
#62
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
People often think that if someone is fast then they must know a lot about training; people often think if you're slow then you can't. I'm personally slow but I'm faster than I would have been without learning painful lessons, and I've been fortunate to work with genetically talented riders who have become faster than they otherwise would have. One of the things I do in my day job is looking at "value-added" in health care and education. Harvard and Stanford and MIT turn out good students, but they also started with good students. Sometimes a hospital will have poor patient outcomes but it took in the sickest patients. I try to look at things that make riders faster, whether they end up slow or fast. Because I'm not genetically gifted, I've had to learn some stuff about training to not suck as much as I otherwise would. Not sucking isn't always such a low bar.
#63
Voice of the Industry
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
People often think that if someone is fast then they must know a lot about training; people often think if you're slow then you can't. I'm personally slow but I'm faster than I would have been without learning painful lessons, and I've been fortunate to work with genetically talented riders who have become faster than they otherwise would have. One of the things I do in my day job is looking at "value-added" in health care and education. Harvard and Stanford and MIT turn out good students, but they also started with good students. Sometimes a hospital will have poor patient outcomes but it took in the sickest patients. I try to look at things that make riders faster, whether they end up slow or fast. Because I'm not genetically gifted, I've had to learn some stuff about training to not suck as much as I otherwise would. Not sucking isn't always such a low bar.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Also note that when I do power based training, I also monitor HR. I don't adjust my targets in real-time based on the HR data, but I may adjust what I do for my next session based on what I see in the after ride analysis.
I've toyed with the idea of getting a true power meter, but I know I would not use it to its full potential (as RChung rightly points out). Nor do I need to at this stage of development. I have enough room for improvement that maximizing the efficiency of my training really won't make that much difference in terms of my gains.
#65
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,442
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3143 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times
in
1,031 Posts
I don't know for a fact that Pwr training is faster, but it seems like it should be.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nemeseri
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
17
11-28-15 04:30 PM