Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    2014 TREK 2.1 VS 2011 Specialized Tarmac SL2

    Hello,

    Im ready to ditch my old 10 speed Schwinn for something much newer and faster.

    I was about ready to order a 2014 TREK 2.1 105 all round when I decided to check out a Specialized LBS, there they have a closeout 2011 Specialized Tarmac SL2 full carbon bike for the same price, $1300 USD. Both fit GREAT.

    The question is which one would you choose and why?

    2014 Trek 2.1 105 all around VS 2011 Specialized full carbon SRAM apex equipped.

    I wonder why a bike hasnt been sold in 3 years and also is SRAM apex any good?

    I tried searching for previous threads, but couldnt find any with these two bikes head to head. Thanks for your help and time.
    Last edited by brutus87; 05-20-14 at 01:17 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Caad08's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    60
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    105 is better than Apex I believe. I prefer Specialized over Trek, so I would probably go with the SL2.
    2007 Cannondale Caad08

  3. #3
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    523
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not sure why you're asking us since you've already test ridden both bikes.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    My Bikes
    Cannondale CAAD10 Team, Giant TCR
    Posts
    641
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Welcome to the forums.

    Quote Originally Posted by brutus87 View Post
    The question is which one would you choose and why?

    2014 Trek 2.1 105 all around VS 2011 Specialized full carbon SRAM apex equipped.
    Bike companies spec their bikes by mixing and matching components to achieve a certain price point for customers - a mid-level frame with a low-level group or vice versa. Having said that, I wouldn't consider either bike to be low-end or with is spec'd with low-end components.

    The Trek 2.1 is from the Madone series (Trek's top end) but is made from aluminum. The Specialized Tarmac Elite (also high-end in Specialized's line) is carbon.

    ... is SRAM apex any good?
    Apex is targeted mainly for sport riders, while 105 is a race-level group. Both groups are functionally good. There's no reason not to use Apex in a race aside from the weight.

    For me, I'd choose the better frame (Tarmac). You will be upgrading the components to (relatively) better ones as you move along. But that's just me.

    Choose the bike that speaks to you loudest - the one that makes you happy.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Essex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northeast United States
    My Bikes
    Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid
    Posts
    1,053
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You're probably going to get a little more value from the Spec. SL2 vs. the aluminum Trek. Personally, I think 1300 for a 2011 carbon frame with Apex is a tad high for something that hasn't moved in so many years. That said the carbon frame Tarmac is a pretty nice ride…if it fits you properly.

  6. #6
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,558
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Essex View Post
    You're probably going to get a little more value from the Spec. SL2 vs. the aluminum Trek. Personally, I think 1300 for a 2011 carbon frame with Apex is a tad high for something that hasn't moved in so many years. That said the carbon frame Tarmac is a pretty nice ride…if it fits you properly.
    Nothing has technologically changed with CF so dramatically since 2011, to drop this Tarmac out of contention. I think that $1300 is a great price. Of course, $1200 would be even better!
    Last edited by WestPablo; 05-20-14 at 07:46 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member 2702's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    My Bikes
    14 Specialized Sirrus Expert Disc, 15 Giant Fastroad SLR
    Posts
    350
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use to ride a 13 Trek 2.1. One ride on a CAAD 8 and I knew I was not going to keep the 2.1.
    Its just OK, but does not have that extra something to me.
    Never ridden a Tarmac.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SE PA USA
    Posts
    304
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Assuming the fit on both is equally acceptable I'd go with the Specialized without a doubt. The Specialized may be a 2011 and a tad overpriced for a 3 year old bike but it has a much better frame and the slight component advantage on the Trek does not come close to making up the difference.
    2012 Pinarello FP Due,2010 Scattante X-330(Cyclocross),1988 Fuji Sagres SP (Road Bike)

  9. #9
    Senior Member 2000Para853red's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    My Bikes
    Numerous Schwinns, Bianchi, BMC & Wilier
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tarmac

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    4,390
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by knobd View Post
    Assuming the fit on both is equally acceptable I'd go with the Specialized without a doubt. The Specialized may be a 2011 and a tad overpriced for a 3 year old bike but it has a much better frame and the slight component advantage on the Trek does not come close to making up the difference.
    Yeah, I'd go with the tarmac as well. Full carbon, better components, fit is the #1 priority but if they both fit equally well the Tarmac would definitely be better (imo).

  11. #11
    Senior Member IcySmooth52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Portland, ME
    My Bikes
    Lapierre Xelius, Marin Palisades Trail 29er, & Trek T1
    Posts
    1,094
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Without hesitation, I'd pick the Tarmac. Apex components are just as good as 105, it's just which shifters do you prefer? But the Tarmac has a frame 10x better than the 2 series.
    '15 Lapierre Xelius 200 "Layla" - '13 Marin Palisades Trail SE 29er "Matilda" - '11 Trek T1 "Voskhod"

  12. #12
    Senior Member snidely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    253
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tarmac

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    2,336
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tarmac. Apex is just a heavier version of the old red/force/rival with less titanium, carbon, and aluminium bits.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Antioch, IL
    My Bikes
    GT GTR Series 2
    Posts
    1,885
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Elvo View Post
    Tarmac. Apex is just a heavier version of the old red/force/rival with less titanium, carbon, and aluminium bits.
    which i believe is still ~150g lighter than 105
    "You should never point a loaded *** at anyone. This is not a hard and fast rule, however. A hard and fast rule is that you should never, ever, point an unloaded *** at anyone." --P.J. O'Rourke

  15. #15
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    523
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How are our opinions even relevant in his decision making? OP has ridden the bikes, knows how each bikes handles, and knows how well each component group works. There's no purpose to this thread.

    Except to ask: what do random internet dudes think is the cooler bike? And that shouldn't have any bearing on your decision, OP. You have to live with the bike, not us.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Ricanfred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Madison, WI
    My Bikes
    Yes, I ride an aluminum Trek!
    Posts
    491
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by roadandmountain View Post
    How are our opinions even relevant in his decision making? OP has ridden the bikes, knows how each bikes handles, and knows how well each component group works. There's no purpose to this thread.

    Except to ask: what do random internet dudes think is the cooler bike? And that shouldn't have any bearing on your decision, OP. You have to live with the bike, not us.
    It's funny how any aluminum frame for most people here, BUT the Caad 10, is disregarded as crap when compared to any carbon fiber frame. Comical really....
    2011 Trek 2.3

  17. #17
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the help, everyone.

    I really liked the Tarmac, but I'm scared that it hasn't been sold, and has been sitting for 3 years. Is that common in the LBS world? Im sorry if my questions are basic, I am new to this.

  18. #18
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    523
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by brutus87 View Post
    Thanks for the help, everyone.

    I really liked the Tarmac, but I'm scared that it hasn't been sold, and has been sitting for 3 years. Is that common in the LBS world? Im sorry if my questions are basic, I am new to this.
    Thanks for the clarification. I see where you're coming from.

    Shimano is considered the higher quality component group within each pricing tier: better shifting, better braking and generally smoother. SRAM works well enough, but is not quite as refined.

    The question is, what do you think of SRAM components? If you like it, you should buy.

    I would negotiate a better price if possible; you could offer, say, $1150 or $1200. You have a lot of leverage on a bike that's been unsold for close to 4 years now. I wouldn't be surprised if they were to sell if you offered $1K. You're probably doing them a favor at this point.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    4,390
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by roadandmountain View Post
    How are our opinions even relevant in his decision making? OP has ridden the bikes, knows how each bikes handles, and knows how well each component group works. There's no purpose to this thread.

    Except to ask: what do random internet dudes think is the cooler bike? And that shouldn't have any bearing on your decision, OP. You have to live with the bike, not us.
    Lol, you know, I kind feel like your post is pointless, but I know that right after I write that, the OP will probably be one of those people who for some reason posts online just acting like he's leaning towards Thing A, then when everyone says Thing A is great, announce to everyone that he's doing Thing B.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)
    Posts
    1,448
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by brutus87 View Post
    Thanks for the help, everyone.

    I really liked the Tarmac, but I'm scared that it hasn't been sold, and has been sitting for 3 years. Is that common in the LBS world? Im sorry if my questions are basic, I am new to this.
    Its pretty common for a shop to have a 2-3 yr old bike sitting there, that bike is definitely older than normal, but not unreasonable. Especially if its an odd size (very small or very large). If its a reputable shop they should be able to fix any unlikely issues you discover in the next few months.

    +1 for Tarmac

  21. #21
    Senior Member Essex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northeast United States
    My Bikes
    Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid
    Posts
    1,053
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulRivers View Post
    Lol, you know, I kind feel like your post is pointless, but I know that right after I write that, the OP will probably be one of those people who for some reason posts online just acting like he's leaning towards Thing A, then when everyone says Thing A is great, announce to everyone that he's doing Thing B.
    There is nothing more sacred than the practice of reverse psychology. To play "double" reverse psychology I now advocate a ally Trek vs. a carbon Spec.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    4,390
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Essex View Post
    There is nothing more sacred than the practice of reverse psychology. To play "double" reverse psychology I now advocate a ally Trek vs. a carbon Spec.
    lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •