Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62
  1. #26
    Senior Member rebel1916's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,826
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Only with the ladies...

  2. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    7,497
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bug Shield View Post
    A better question is, What are my strengths relative to the peloton and how do I capitalize on them? ;-)
    Yes, perfect.

    I'm short (5'2"), I don't feel like it's a disadvantage on the road. Sometimes its a disadvantage shopping, because some frames I'm interested in don't come in my size. There's enough choice, though. Other people may feel it's a disadvantage to THEM, since my draft is rather small.
    ...

  3. #28
    Senior Member Silvercivic27's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    My Bikes
    Scott addict, Colnago asso, Cervelo S5
    Posts
    1,459
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs. This may or may not correlate with overall height, as some people have short torso with long legs, etc.

  4. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The White Mountains of AZ
    Posts
    202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Silvercivic27 View Post
    People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs. This may or may not correlate with overall height, as some people have short torso with long legs, etc.
    While the longer cranks have more leverage on the chainrings it comes at the expense of pedaling larger circles (slower rpm) and yields no advantage that I am aware of. I'd argue that, on a geared bike, it's a wash.

    I think if there were a related advantage there it would related to a rev-limiter in the brain.

  5. #30
    Senior Member Jiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Somewhere in TX
    My Bikes
    CAAD 9
    Posts
    938
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gingers definitely have an advantage. Their lack of a soul gives them a high power to weight ratio; this is why Jan Ulrich could climb so well despite being a tall guy.

  6. #31
    Senior Member surgeonstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    South Bend IN
    My Bikes
    Merlin Lunaris
    Posts
    9,234
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes

  7. #32
    Senior Member rekon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    297
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jiggle View Post
    Gingers definitely have an advantage. Their lack of a soul gives them a high power to weight ratio; this is why Jan Ulrich could climb so well despite being a tall guy.
    ROFL!

    His: 2014 Giant Talon 27.5 5; 2013 Motobecane Fantom CX Outlaw; 2011 Cannondale CAAD 10
    Hers: 2013 Diamondback Airen 2; 2012 Sea Breeze Cruiser

  8. #33
    Senior Member rekon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    297
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Silvercivic27 View Post
    People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs. This may or may not correlate with overall height, as some people have short torso with long legs, etc.
    Assuming the bike fits....How does a shorter leg give you a mechanical disadvantage?
    His: 2014 Giant Talon 27.5 5; 2013 Motobecane Fantom CX Outlaw; 2011 Cannondale CAAD 10
    Hers: 2013 Diamondback Airen 2; 2012 Sea Breeze Cruiser

  9. #34
    Still can't climb
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Limey in Taiwan
    Posts
    21,080
    Mentioned
    432 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    i wish i were tall. I'm relieved i am not short.
    coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

    No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack

  10. #35
    Senior Member Nachoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Point Loma, CA
    My Bikes
    Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
    Posts
    12,982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i wish i were skinny. I'm relieved i am not fat.
    .
    .

    Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.

  11. #36
    Still can't climb
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Limey in Taiwan
    Posts
    21,080
    Mentioned
    432 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachoman View Post
    i wish i were skinny. I'm relieved i am not fat.
    you've even got the chaotic caPItalisation Right. nice Touch.
    coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

    No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack

  12. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Go Ducks!
    Posts
    1,386
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rekon View Post
    Height is a significant factor in many sports but I was wondering if cycling is one of them.

    Are there any studies and/or has it been proven that short cyclists (under 5'7) are at a disadvantage compared to tall cyclists?

    It seems as if the lighter and stronger you are - the better. So, if that's true height shouldn't matter - but what do I know.

    Thoughts?
    They just need to spin their wee little legs and their wee little bikes with the type of height-envy-driven gusto that the "little people" are known for, and they'll be fine.
    Every time that wheel turn 'round,
    Bound to cover just a little more ground!

  13. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Central Cali
    My Bikes
    One with square wheels
    Posts
    876
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 2702 View Post
    I normally don't respond to this kind of stuff but dude you must have 2 much time on your hands to find stuff like this and keep it in your photobucket.
    gc3.....He must be new to the internet

  14. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Central Cali
    My Bikes
    One with square wheels
    Posts
    876
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rekon View Post
    Assuming the bike fits....How does a shorter leg give you a mechanical disadvantage?
    Less leverage for your muscles, smaller muscles to do the same work, and a smaller pedal stroke.

  15. #40
    Senior Member gc3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    DC
    My Bikes
    Now I Got Two
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Team Sarcasm View Post
    gc3.....He must be new to the internet
    I figured he was just a "shorter gentleman" and didn't want to add insult to injury...
    "I tried being reasonable, I didn‘t like it."

    "I understand. I just don't care"

  16. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
    Posts
    2,440
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Silvercivic27 View Post
    People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs.
    Cycling being an aerobic sport I don't believe this is true unless we're talking about the extremes. What I read on ST is that the aerobic system tends to scale with height. So bigger/taller riders have larger motors without a corresponding increase in frontal area (drag.) Obviously it depends on *what* sort of riding we're talking about. For climbing it's all about watts/kilogram.

  17. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Newport Beach, CA
    My Bikes
    S works Tarmac, Felt TK2 track
    Posts
    807
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gregf83 View Post
    There is a chart which I can't locate showing the height and weight of pro cyclists. There are exceptions like Cadel Evans and others but my recollection was that most were over about 6'. Larger riders would tend to have larger cardiovascular systems and a higher absolute VO2Max. That won't help on climbs where power to weight is the critical factor but for general riding it's the Power to CdA ratio that is important so it depend on who can get into the most aerodynamic position so perhaps tall skinny riders with a smaller frontal area but still large heart and lungs have an advantage.
    Poxpower posted thus:

    "You can see a list of all the Tour de France winners here and if you click on their links they give you their height / weight:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...France_winners

    Lance Armstrong was/is 5'9.5 and 165 pounds, which gives him a ratio of 2.37
    Cadel Evans: 5'9, 150 , 2.17
    Alberto Contador: 5'9.5, 140, 2
    Carlos Sastre: 5'8, 130, 1,9
    Oscar Pereiro: 5'10, 150, 2.14
    Marco Pantani: 5'8, 130, 1,9"

    My recollection from many years ago 5'9" @ 143 lbs was the over all average but then
    my memory never was any good.

  18. #43
    RidingLikeCrazy! rangerdavid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Boone, North Carolina
    My Bikes
    2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6
    Posts
    5,032
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you're short, just grow a beard. you'll be fine.
    *********************************

    Rangerdavid

    2009 Cannondale CAAD 9-6
    2005 Raleigh M40


    Riding the mountains of North Carolina

    I do today what you don't , so I can do tomorrow what you can't

    "Absolutely imbecilic. But typical." ..... pcad

  19. #44
    2 Fat 2 Furious contango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    England
    My Bikes
    2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
    Posts
    3,997
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Caad08 View Post
    I'm around 6'2 and I noticed the power I put out leaves a lot of the shorter riders in the dust. Just my observation.
    I find the same, but then when the road turns upwards the short guys who weigh half what I do disappear and I never see them again.
    "For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"

  20. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    2,181
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fat-free weight scales roughly as height squared. VO2max scales slower than that, and CdA scales slower than VO2max.

    So, short and skinny guys have advantage in climbing and tall guys have advantage on flats.

    Minimum bike weight partially compensates for the advantage that short guys have in climbing, but does not cancel it completely.

    An event like TdF is going to have a mix of stages, some more advantageous to short riders, others more advantageous to tall riders. Overall it ends up pretty balanced.

    If you look at an event that is not so balanced, you'll see the height distribution skewed to one end. At the 2008 and 2012 Summer Olympics, 5 out 6 medalists in men's individual time trial were taller than 6'.

    It's not a huge advantage at either end, so a short guy with a peculiar body shape can still win time trials, and a tall guy can be good at climbing. All else equal, if you compare an average skinny 5'5" guy with an average equally skinny 6'3" guy, both riding 15 lb bikes, the short guy will be 7% faster uphill and the tall guy will be 3% faster in a flat time trial.

  21. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamster View Post
    All else equal, if you compare an average skinny 5'5" guy with an average equally skinny 6'3" guy
    How do you measure "equally" skinny?

  22. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    2,181
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RChung View Post
    How do you measure "equally" skinny?
    Equal BMI and equal body fat percentage. So, let's say, 5'5" / 132 lbs and 6'3" / 175 lbs.

  23. #48
    Senior Member Essex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northeast United States
    My Bikes
    Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid
    Posts
    1,053
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Caad08 View Post
    I'm around 6'2 and I noticed the power I put out leaves a lot of the shorter riders in the dust. Just my observation.
    The school playground is not the best test area to dust short riders. Just sayin' yo.

  24. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamster View Post
    Equal BMI and equal body fat percentage. So, let's say, 5'5" / 132 lbs and 6'3" / 175 lbs.

  25. #50
    Senior Member Jiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Somewhere in TX
    My Bikes
    CAAD 9
    Posts
    938
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bikes with 700c wheels look silly in sizes that fit people 6'4" and above. This is why tall people are discouraged from cycling.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •