Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Do Short Cyclists Have A Disadvantage?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Do Short Cyclists Have A Disadvantage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-14, 08:26 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times in 44 Posts
Only with the ladies...
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 05-24-14, 10:36 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 8,546
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bug Shield
A better question is, What are my strengths relative to the peloton and how do I capitalize on them? ;-)
Yes, perfect.

I'm short (5'2"), I don't feel like it's a disadvantage on the road. Sometimes its a disadvantage shopping, because some frames I'm interested in don't come in my size. There's enough choice, though. Other people may feel it's a disadvantage to THEM, since my draft is rather small.
valygrl is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:20 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Silvercivic27's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435

Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs. This may or may not correlate with overall height, as some people have short torso with long legs, etc.
Silvercivic27 is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 07:30 AM
  #29  
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The White Mountains of AZ
Posts: 288
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Silvercivic27
People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs. This may or may not correlate with overall height, as some people have short torso with long legs, etc.
While the longer cranks have more leverage on the chainrings it comes at the expense of pedaling larger circles (slower rpm) and yields no advantage that I am aware of. I'd argue that, on a geared bike, it's a wash.

I think if there were a related advantage there it would related to a rev-limiter in the brain.
Bug Shield is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 07:46 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Jiggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gingers definitely have an advantage. Their lack of a soul gives them a high power to weight ratio; this is why Jan Ulrich could climb so well despite being a tall guy.
Jiggle is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 08:14 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 925 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Yes
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 10:36 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rekon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jiggle
Gingers definitely have an advantage. Their lack of a soul gives them a high power to weight ratio; this is why Jan Ulrich could climb so well despite being a tall guy.
ROFL!

rekon is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 10:38 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rekon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Silvercivic27
People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs. This may or may not correlate with overall height, as some people have short torso with long legs, etc.
Assuming the bike fits....How does a shorter leg give you a mechanical disadvantage?
rekon is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 11:27 AM
  #34  
Still can't climb
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
i wish i were tall. I'm relieved i am not short.
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 12:11 PM
  #35  
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
i wish i were skinny. I'm relieved i am not fat.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 12:28 PM
  #36  
Still can't climb
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Nachoman
i wish i were skinny. I'm relieved i am not fat.
you've even got the chaotic caPItalisation Right. nice Touch.
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer

No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 12:57 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Go Ducks!
Posts: 1,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rekon
Height is a significant factor in many sports but I was wondering if cycling is one of them.

Are there any studies and/or has it been proven that short cyclists (under 5'7) are at a disadvantage compared to tall cyclists?

It seems as if the lighter and stronger you are - the better. So, if that's true height shouldn't matter - but what do I know.

Thoughts?
They just need to spin their wee little legs and their wee little bikes with the type of height-envy-driven gusto that the "little people" are known for, and they'll be fine.
Long Tom is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 12:58 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 974

Bikes: One with square wheels

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2702
I normally don't respond to this kind of stuff but dude you must have 2 much time on your hands to find stuff like this and keep it in your photobucket.
gc3.....He must be new to the internet
Team Sarcasm is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 01:01 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 974

Bikes: One with square wheels

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rekon
Assuming the bike fits....How does a shorter leg give you a mechanical disadvantage?
Less leverage for your muscles, smaller muscles to do the same work, and a smaller pedal stroke.
Team Sarcasm is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 01:54 PM
  #40  
gc3
Falls Downalot
 
gc3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,103

Bikes: Now I Got Two

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Team Sarcasm
gc3.....He must be new to the internet
I figured he was just a "shorter gentleman" and didn't want to add insult to injury...
gc3 is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 02:11 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078

Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Silvercivic27
People with shorter legs have a mechanical disadvantage compared to people with longer legs.
Cycling being an aerobic sport I don't believe this is true unless we're talking about the extremes. What I read on ST is that the aerobic system tends to scale with height. So bigger/taller riders have larger motors without a corresponding increase in frontal area (drag.) Obviously it depends on *what* sort of riding we're talking about. For climbing it's all about watts/kilogram.
Dunbar is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 03:35 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 1,935

Bikes: S works Tarmac, Felt TK2 track

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 179 Times in 111 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
There is a chart which I can't locate showing the height and weight of pro cyclists. There are exceptions like Cadel Evans and others but my recollection was that most were over about 6'. Larger riders would tend to have larger cardiovascular systems and a higher absolute VO2Max. That won't help on climbs where power to weight is the critical factor but for general riding it's the Power to CdA ratio that is important so it depend on who can get into the most aerodynamic position so perhaps tall skinny riders with a smaller frontal area but still large heart and lungs have an advantage.
Poxpower posted thus:

"You can see a list of all the Tour de France winners here and if you click on their links they give you their height / weight:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...France_winners

Lance Armstrong was/is 5'9.5 and 165 pounds, which gives him a ratio of 2.37
Cadel Evans: 5'9, 150 , 2.17
Alberto Contador: 5'9.5, 140, 2
Carlos Sastre: 5'8, 130, 1,9
Oscar Pereiro: 5'10, 150, 2.14
Marco Pantani: 5'8, 130, 1,9"

My recollection from many years ago 5'9" @ 143 lbs was the over all average but then
my memory never was any good.
popeye is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 03:57 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you're short, just grow a beard. you'll be fine.
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:02 PM
  #44  
2 Fat 2 Furious
 
contango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: England
Posts: 3,996

Bikes: 2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport RIP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Caad08
I'm around 6'2 and I noticed the power I put out leaves a lot of the shorter riders in the dust. Just my observation.
I find the same, but then when the road turns upwards the short guys who weigh half what I do disappear and I never see them again.
__________________
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
contango is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:08 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fat-free weight scales roughly as height squared. VO2max scales slower than that, and CdA scales slower than VO2max.

So, short and skinny guys have advantage in climbing and tall guys have advantage on flats.

Minimum bike weight partially compensates for the advantage that short guys have in climbing, but does not cancel it completely.

An event like TdF is going to have a mix of stages, some more advantageous to short riders, others more advantageous to tall riders. Overall it ends up pretty balanced.

If you look at an event that is not so balanced, you'll see the height distribution skewed to one end. At the 2008 and 2012 Summer Olympics, 5 out 6 medalists in men's individual time trial were taller than 6'.

It's not a huge advantage at either end, so a short guy with a peculiar body shape can still win time trials, and a tall guy can be good at climbing. All else equal, if you compare an average skinny 5'5" guy with an average equally skinny 6'3" guy, both riding 15 lb bikes, the short guy will be 7% faster uphill and the tall guy will be 3% faster in a flat time trial.
hamster is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:28 PM
  #46  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,414
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,138 Times in 489 Posts
Originally Posted by hamster
All else equal, if you compare an average skinny 5'5" guy with an average equally skinny 6'3" guy
How do you measure "equally" skinny?
RChung is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:38 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
How do you measure "equally" skinny?
Equal BMI and equal body fat percentage. So, let's say, 5'5" / 132 lbs and 6'3" / 175 lbs.
hamster is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:52 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Essex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Northeast United States
Posts: 1,147

Bikes: Tarmac, Focus Urban 8, Giant Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Caad08
I'm around 6'2 and I noticed the power I put out leaves a lot of the shorter riders in the dust. Just my observation.
The school playground is not the best test area to dust short riders. Just sayin' yo.
Essex is offline  
Old 05-25-14, 04:58 PM
  #49  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,414
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 915 Post(s)
Liked 1,138 Times in 489 Posts
Originally Posted by hamster
Equal BMI and equal body fat percentage. So, let's say, 5'5" / 132 lbs and 6'3" / 175 lbs.
RChung is offline  
Old 05-26-14, 07:44 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Jiggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,266

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Bikes with 700c wheels look silly in sizes that fit people 6'4" and above. This is why tall people are discouraged from cycling.
Jiggle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.