Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

No Front Brakes

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

No Front Brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-14, 10:21 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 6

Bikes: Giant Defy, Leder Excellence 3000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
It'll be fine, unless he needs to unexpectedly stop fast.
Well, it is certainly not ideal but can be ridden safely, in my opinion.
TheVakman is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 11:10 AM
  #27  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,177 Times in 1,468 Posts
Originally Posted by calgarc
they do it on fixies... although i would not recommend it...
A fixie stops very fast. It's easy to lock up the rear wheel. On the other hand a road bike with just a rear brake is dangerous.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 11:22 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I wish the OP explained exactly why he was without a front brake.
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 11:24 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
A fixie stops very fast. It's easy to lock up the rear wheel. On the other hand a road bike with just a rear brake is dangerous.
which is why i said i do not recommend it lol
calgarc is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 12:14 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 640
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by emveezee
A great many motorcyclists? Really? Never heard of one. Any motorcyclist who uses only the rear brake is an idiot and should not have a license.
but that does not mean they don't exist in large numbers...i have met many of them, so convinced that even laying their motorcycle down is a safer way to avoid hitting a car than using (both) their brakes as god intended them to be used.

i agree they should not have licenses, but that covers a large swath of the motorcyling community. it's gotten a lot better over the years, but still has a long way to go.

sorry for the off-topic mini rant.
motorthings is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 12:48 PM
  #31  
Speechless
 
RollCNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842

Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 16 Posts
Equating a coaster brake to a rear caliper brake is goofy, IMO:

1) Coaster brake is unaffected by weather and road conditions, as it is sealed and internal. Rim brakes lose effectiveness in the wet.
2) A coaster brake works on metal to metal contact, based on a much higher force applied through the chain.
3) Weight distribution is on the rear foot, more toward the rear wheel, when braking. Weight is more uniformly spread when using rim brakes.
4) A road bike usually has a much smaller contact patch than older single speeds, so it is far easier to brake the rear wheel into a skid.

All that said, I would not trust having only a single rim brake on the rear.
RollCNY is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 01:04 PM
  #32  
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveLeeNC
1) Country roads, lightly traveled
2) No group rides - strictly solo
3) Rolling terrain with no big climbs or descents of any note
Under those conditions, I would not hesitate to do it albeit cautiously and slowly.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 01:16 PM
  #33  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveLeeNC
It might be a couple days before I get my front brake calipers back in order. The question is would you ride this bike under these conditions.

1) Country roads, lightly traveled
2) No group rides - strictly solo
3) Rolling terrain with no big climbs or descents of any note

I'm facing this and am undecided.

Thanks.

dave
If it were me, I'd ride to the shop to pick up what I needed to fix the brakes and take care of things immediately.

But if I couldn't get to a shop for a couple days, I'd ride in the conditions you describe because you barely need your brakes. It's still not a great idea.
banerjek is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 01:24 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Didn't realize my parents were sending me out on such potential suicide missions when they cheerfully waved as I left to ride around town on my bicycle with only a rear coaster brake.

Rear brake effectiveness is about half that of the front brake - but given that Dave, the OP, is clearly aware of the reduced effectiveness and plans to ride cautiously I suspect that he's likely to overcompensate and therefore be even safer than usual on his rear-brake-only ride compared to his normal rides with both brakes but without the extra caution.
It's more like 30% of the effectiveness of the front brake. Please, if you want to disagree, do a quick search before doing so.

Still though, all you have to do to get around it is to ride somewhat easier - give more distance in front of you for stopping. My old road bike lost half it's braking capacity or more in the rain - but it worked fine because I adjusted how I ride.

The one serious issue is if there's any possibility that your rear brake could stop working while riding. Take a look at it, make sure it looks ok. If you lost the rear brake while riding that would be a rear problem with only 1 brake...
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 01:54 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
I tend to err on the side of caution, which in this case means "don't do it."

If you really can't go a few days without a bicycle, you might considering getting a 2nd one. One option is to pick up an old beater, and get it into decent working shape. Another is to get a new bike, and use your current bike as your backup.
FWIW, I already have a 'second' bike which is a spinner bike that I ride as much as my Bianchi. As luck would have it the BB gave out (IOW the squealing got so loud that I literally could not stand it) last week. New parts/instructions came in over the weekend and I am now trapped in 'remove the BB hell'. It isn't a place that I recommend to anyone.

But 3 bikes - that would have worked :-)

dave
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 02:02 PM
  #36  
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times in 396 Posts
Originally Posted by Nachoman
Under those conditions, I would not hesitate to do it albeit cautiously and slowly.
+1
Reynolds is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 02:07 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
It's more like 30% of the effectiveness of the front brake. Please, if you want to disagree, do a quick search before doing so.
The book "Bicycling Science" by Frank Whitt and David Wilson goes through a calculation in Chapter 8 ('Braking') concluding with the sentence: "Therefore, the stopping distance [for rear brake only] is about twice that for reasonably safe front-wheel braking."

Of course the exact ratio will depend on the specific geometry of the bike, the road conditions, and the skill of the rider. If the rider can move his weight back sufficiently to avoid a pitch-over then the front brake can be made more effective than usual. OTOH, poor road conditions make hard application of the front brake riskier and reduce the ratio.
prathmann is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 02:25 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RollCNY
Equating a coaster brake to a rear caliper brake is goofy, IMO:

1) Coaster brake is unaffected by weather and road conditions, as it is sealed and internal. Rim brakes lose effectiveness in the wet.
2) A coaster brake works on metal to metal contact, based on a much higher force applied through the chain.
3) Weight distribution is on the rear foot, more toward the rear wheel, when braking. Weight is more uniformly spread when using rim brakes.
4) A road bike usually has a much smaller contact patch than older single speeds, so it is far easier to brake the rear wheel into a skid.

All that said, I would not trust having only a single rim brake on the rear.
1&2) Both properly operating coaster brakes and decent rim brakes should be capable of making the rear wheel skid. However one generally has better modulation ability using good hand-operated brakes therefore allowing the user to brake at just under the level where skidding would start. Since static friction is higher than dynamic friction, this allows for faster deceleration.

3) Weight distribution is a function of how the rider's body is positioned on the bicycle - i.e. the position of his center of mass relative to the wheel contact points. That would be essentially independent of what type of brake he is operating (I can lean back to put more weight on the back tire equally well while operating a handbrake).

4) Size of contact patch has little effect on maximum braking power. The braking force is equal to the coefficient of friction of the tire rubber on the road surface times the normal force of gravity pulling down on the rider/bike and holding the rear tire in contact with the road.
prathmann is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 02:36 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
I wish the OP explained exactly why he was without a front brake.
For the life of me I cannot imagine why anyone cares about this. Regardless, see post #35 and #18 in this thread.

dave

ps. I wish someone would explain to me why they care about this question.


ps.
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 02:44 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveLeeNC
For the life of me I cannot imagine why anyone cares about this. Regardless, see post #35 and #18 in this thread.

dave

ps. I wish someone would explain to me why they care about this question.


ps.
i wondered what was wrong with your brakes so that we might be able to help you fix the problem.

BTW neither 18 or 35 say anything about what's wrong with your brakes, but at this point I don't give a damn.

Ride safe.
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 03:05 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
I <3 Robots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,657

Bikes: Cervelo S2, Workswell 062, Banshee Spitfire

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by gsa103
I saw a more impressive variant on this riding around my neighborhood.

Girl on a single-speed BMX bike, no brakes + freewheel. Her only option was Flintstoning. Fortunately, the bike seemed to be geared at about 1:1 ratio with 20" wheels, so even Lance would've had trouble going faster than a brisk jog.
I used to do that when I was a kid in the 80's. Rode with no brakes and used my right foot on the rear tire to slow me down. I stopped doing it when I realized how fast my shoe and rear tire was wearing. Lol...I had to put my rear brake back on.

The BMX kids still do that today. It would bald your tire and burn out your shoe fast.
I <3 Robots is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 03:16 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by I <3 Robots
I used to do that when I was a kid in the 80's. Rode with no brakes and used my right foot on the rear tire to slow me down. I stopped doing it when I realized how fast my shoe and rear tire was wearing. Lol...I had to put my rear brake back on.

The BMX kids still do that today. It would bald your tire and burn out your shoe fast.
Now that I look back it actually doesn't state the problem. FWIW, the nut-like thingey that holds the calipers on is gone (mid 90's Campy Chorus groupset). Despite my best measurements of 6mm, a 6mmx1 nut doesn't work. And that is pretty much my experience (VERY limited) in dealing with bicycle mechanics - as I said I am roughly clueless.

dave
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 03:18 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
The book "Bicycling Science" by Frank Whitt and David Wilson goes through a calculation in Chapter 8 ('Braking') concluding with the sentence: "Therefore, the stopping distance [for rear brake only] is about twice that for reasonably safe front-wheel braking."

Of course the exact ratio will depend on the specific geometry of the bike, the road conditions, and the skill of the rider. If the rider can move his weight back sufficiently to avoid a pitch-over then the front brake can be made more effective than usual. OTOH, poor road conditions make hard application of the front brake riskier and reduce the ratio.
Ah, sorry, I think I misunderstood what you were meaning. That sounds right.
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 04:16 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveLeeNC
Now that I look back it actually doesn't state the problem. FWIW, the nut-like thingey that holds the calipers on is gone (mid 90's Campy Chorus groupset). Despite my best measurements of 6mm, a 6mmx1 nut doesn't work.
Define "does not work". Too big, too small, or does not screw on because it does not mate with the thread on the bolt?

If it looks like you need a 6 mm nut but a 6 mm nut does not work, it may be that you somehow have a SAE bolt and therefore you need a 1/4" nut. Would be pretty strange to have SAE parts in an Italian groupset, but, if it went through the hands of a few American mechanics, anything is possible. Also, did you try to take the nut from the rear brake and put it in front?
hamster is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 04:27 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by hamster
Define "does not work". Too big, too small, or does not screw on because it does not mate with the thread on the bolt?

If it looks like you need a 6 mm nut but a 6 mm nut does not work, it may be that you somehow have a SAE bolt and therefore you need a 1/4" nut. Would be pretty strange to have SAE parts in an Italian groupset, but, if it went through the hands of a few American mechanics, anything is possible. Also, did you try to take the nut from the rear brake and put it in front?
My best judgement is the right diameter and wrong thread pitch (keeping in mind that I am not all that competent).

A half-brakeless ride tomorrow morning and off to my LBS. In the meantime my 'backup' (a spinner bike where I put in many hours) finally has the (I think) defective BB assembly removed. Damnation, that was hard to do. And I have no idea how the biking Gods managed to 'break' my brake calipers and the BB on my spinner bike within days. Must be living wrong.

In the meantime I hope this thing goes back together better than it did coming apart. The BB cups were tight beyond my personal belief of what is reasonable, so I am suspicious of another lurking problem of which I am unaware.

dave
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 04:47 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveLeeNC
My best judgement is the right diameter and wrong thread pitch (keeping in mind that I am not all that competent).
Well, there are two 6 mm metric thread standards, 1.0 and 0.75. However, M6-1.0 is by far the most common and I can't find any evidence in Google that your Campy calipers require anything different. Is it possible that the bolt is in fact M6-1.0, but the nut you're trying to put on it is SAE? A 1/4-20 nut would look very close (slightly wider than M6-1.0) but would not screw on because thread pitch is too far off.
hamster is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 04:56 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by hamster
Well, there are two 6 mm metric thread standards, 1.0 and 0.75. However, M6-1.0 is by far the most common and I can't find any evidence in Google that your Campy calipers require anything different. Is it possible that the bolt is in fact M6-1.0, but the nut you're trying to put on it is SAE? A 1/4-20 nut would look very close (slightly wider than M6-1.0) but would not screw on because thread pitch is too far off.
It came out of the M6-1.0 box in a hardware store (per the HW store guy anything else is quite unusual in that diameter). But I guess that there are no guarantees. Regardless the next stop is my LBS. All my bike repair energies at the moment are being spent on my spinner bike BB assembly replacement. Godzilla after a 4 month diet of 98 pizza's per day could have stomped on those cranks with no risk to loosening that BB assembly (which, BTW, I finally broke loose).

dave
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 09:18 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by calgarc
but thats not hipster enough
Ha-Ha! My track bike is 11 years old. I'm in my 50's and I get the hipster jibe from time to time from friends.
powbob is offline  
Old 08-20-14, 05:53 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinehurst, NC, US
Posts: 1,716

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 110 Posts
Ended up riding once (and a half - had to get home after the caliper feel off) without a front brake. LBS fixed the problem easy and I need to find just exactly what threading is required on that bolt.

But what a great way to reduce weight. Drop off a whole caliper and brifter and go to a downtube shifter (and once this catches on maybe they will build some CF dowtube shifters). Talk about a great grams reduced per dollar trade-off

I was not uncomfortable on the solo routes I rode with that single brake, but in a group or on some hills I recall riding back in the Bay Area - VERY different.

dave
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Old 08-20-14, 07:38 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsa103
I saw a more impressive variant on this riding around my neighborhood.

Girl on a single-speed BMX bike, no brakes + freewheel. Her only option was Flintstoning. Fortunately, the bike seemed to be geared at about 1:1 ratio with 20" wheels, so even Lance would've had trouble going faster than a brisk jog.
I work in a bike shop and apparently this is a trend in BMX. All the cool kids are riding brakeless now. My coworker who has been riding BMX for 18 years thinks this is probably one of the dumbest trends he's ever seen.
RoadMike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.