Converting Bike to Triple... How Much Headache?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,744
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
The one thing I can't really figure out at this point is: what's the overall weight and functional difference between the 105 10 speed triple group and the ultegra 10 speed triple group, in terms of total weight/durability/function, to justify (or not) the nearly $400 difference between the two that I'm seeing in the only places that have both online.
Decide on what chain ring you want for the outer and take it from there. The Ultegra crank is a bit noisy in the 39t ring in some of the smaller cogs. It's been the case for both my 170mm and 172.5mm cranks. Others have posted regarding it as well.
#27
Senior Member
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
53-39-26 x 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-25 has essentially the same range but only has a problem with the 17 to 19 jump.
Sounds expensive.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Give me a triple every time! With a compact you have to use every cog with both rings to get the gearing you want. But with the triple you can ride in ranges and keep that chain relatively in line. Plus, I don't mind shifting the FD. And, you still get to ride a standard double. You just have the granny in case you need it.
#30
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
seypat I'm with you.
I have bad news, though... Shimano says we're both stupid.
So, grab the bits while you can and accept that 10 speeds on the rear is all the lord is ever going to allow us apostates.
I'm content with the idea that everyone will think I'm fat and weak... I will reflect on it as I am not walking up things in a variety of places.
I have bad news, though... Shimano says we're both stupid.
So, grab the bits while you can and accept that 10 speeds on the rear is all the lord is ever going to allow us apostates.
I'm content with the idea that everyone will think I'm fat and weak... I will reflect on it as I am not walking up things in a variety of places.
#31
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,464 Posts
I've got Dura Ace with 30,000 miles and replaced cables and repacked hubs twice with a bearing change once. I had Sora on a cross bike that became "junk" after 7,000 miles. Obviously I don't agree.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Minneapols, Minnesota
Posts: 538
Bikes: 89 Raleigh Technium PRE, 92 SP 1000 ti, '09 Team Pro, 72 International, 63 Hercules 3-spd, '81 Vitus 979, 2 Kabuki Submariners, 2 C. Itoh Submariners, Gary Fisher Big Sur, Skyway 3-spd, Robin Hood w/ S-A IGH 5 speed.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have converted two of my bikes to triples and the original derailleurs worked fine with a bit of adjusting. The only part changed was the crankset! I have since changed one of them to a triple derailleur when I put on Sora STI shifters. I know the difference between double and triple derailleurs but don't think it absolutely necessary to change them while converting.
#33
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
Note that 105 was mentioned - as being the most durable, not Sora. Nowhere was it said that Dura-Ace is less reliable than Sora, but compared to 105.
#34
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,464 Posts
But I do agree that 105 is a good choice for most people considering everything.
#35
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
Sora has steel chainrings, so they surely haven't been worn in 7000 miles. Shifters, brakes - I see people riding them year after year. Not sure what happened to your Sora, or what does "junk" exactly mean. Components ceasing to work, needed tuning too often?
#36
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How much weight are we talking about here? I know I like the finish and aesthetics of the ultegra better, and if I'm going for a once-in-fifteen-years steel bike build, I'm not going to go silly and save $300 just because 105 is "perfectly fine" unless the weight is a minimal issue. For my part, I have a bike that was tiagra and has had parts turn into 9 speed ultegra as things have failed or been less than ideal for ergonomics. It does look better, and there's a sort of placebo-like factor to nicer gear... also, for a steel bike that's not 12 pounds, a few hundred grams here and there still adds up.
#37
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
How much weight are we talking about here? I know I like the finish and aesthetics of the ultegra better, and if I'm going for a once-in-fifteen-years steel bike build, I'm not going to go silly and save $300 just because 105 is "perfectly fine" unless the weight is a minimal issue. For my part, I have a bike that was tiagra and has had parts turn into 9 speed ultegra as things have failed or been less than ideal for ergonomics. It does look better, and there's a sort of placebo-like factor to nicer gear... also, for a steel bike that's not 12 pounds, a few hundred grams here and there still adds up.