Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

never go large cog

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

never go large cog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-14, 03:14 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
escarpment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: chicago
Posts: 781

Bikes: cannondale crit 3.0, specialized allez, old giant mtb/hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
never go large cog

I feel like I have been seeing a fair amount of rear derailleur goes into wheel threads lately. Am I the only one who never goes into the large cog on the cassette?
I know that a properly tuned derailleur shouldn't ever over-shift, but I always get the feeling that I am a bump away from disaster. I cant be the only one.
escarpment is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 03:49 AM
  #2  
Not a rocket suergon.
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20

Bikes: Lynskey

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by escarpment
I feel like I have been seeing a fair amount of rear derailleur goes into wheel threads lately. Am I the only one who never goes into the large cog on the cassette?
I know that a properly tuned derailleur shouldn't ever over-shift, but I always get the feeling that I am a bump away from disaster. I cant be the only one.
Yes, you are the "only one". Seriously, a properly set up bike will not have this failure. Keep in mind that if the hanger gets bent that also increases the chance of shifting into the spokes. The bent hanger is most often what happens. The drivetrain was fine then the derailuer got tagged and the next time, whamo! Distruction!
Tihsepa is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 05:01 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
I go to the large cog several times on every ride, when the pavement turns upward I'm usually on both the large cog in the rear and the big ring up front with an occasional jump down to the small ring up front when I'm tired or conserving energy.
dvdslw is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 05:08 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035

Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by dvdslw
I go to the large cog several times on every ride, when the pavement turns upward I'm usually on both the large cog in the rear and the big ring up front with an occasional jump down to the small ring up front when I'm tired or conserving energy.
Well cross-chaining like that is also weird.

But yeah, the big sprocket is there for a reason. If you're (the OP) strong enough to ride in your neighbourhood without it, more power to you, but I'd never survive without mine, and to be honest I probably need something bigger for some of the climbs around here.
Leinster is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 05:15 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Leinster
Well cross-chaining like that is also weird.

But yeah, the big sprocket is there for a reason. If you're (the OP) strong enough to ride in your neighborhood without it, more power to you, but I'd never survive without mine, and to be honest I probably need something bigger for some of the climbs around here.
I don't see a problem with "cross-chaining", never had an issue from doing it and I'm cranking pretty hard uphill at 225lbs on the two big rings. As for climbs, we don't have many here in Central Florida but there's some pretty good rolling hills to deal with.
dvdslw is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 05:24 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Silvercivic27's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435

Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Just put the dork disc back on. It'll be fine.
Silvercivic27 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 05:41 AM
  #7  
Speechless
 
RollCNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842

Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 16 Posts
Never use your large cog, but not for the reason you list.

Using your easiest gear is giving up: the hill has beaten you. It now knows that if it can muster up some additional grade, it can beat you. You being all in shows your cards to the terrain.

So you want to always keep one or two in reserve. This way, the hill will think that you are doing repeats, or that you are just toying with it. Often, it will simply flatten itself out and give up, preferring to save its topography to hurl at some lady on a hybrid.

For this very reason, I primarily ride a single speed. The bulk of Central NY terrain is confused and alarmed by me, and does its impression of south Florida when I roll out of the garage. Honest.
RollCNY is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 06:05 AM
  #8  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,038

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22583 Post(s)
Liked 8,923 Times in 4,156 Posts
Originally Posted by RollCNY
Never use your large cog, but not for the reason you list.

Using your easiest gear is giving up: the hill has beaten you. It now knows that if it can muster up some additional grade, it can beat you. You being all in shows your cards to the terrain.

So you want to always keep one or two in reserve. This way, the hill will think that you are doing repeats, or that you are just toying with it. Often, it will simply flatten itself out and give up, preferring to save its topography to hurl at some lady on a hybrid.

For this very reason, I primarily ride a single speed. The bulk of Central NY terrain is confused and alarmed by me, and does its impression of south Florida when I roll out of the garage. Honest.
I disagree. My "bailout" gear is 39/23. I do break it out once in awhile.

Otoh if I had a 34/28 I might actually agree.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 06:14 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Posts: 2,835

Bikes: Nothing amazing... cheap old 21 speed mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I like my 34 when in combo with the 26 up front on a steep hill with a touring load. In fact I would say theres no way I'd get up without it some days. Or, I may just be on a night ride and not feel like stressing my knees. As I get older I find that while my cardio and muscles are fine, my knees are not. Muscle up a hill and I'll pay for it for days.
krobinson103 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 08:19 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
I use it more cross chained in combo with my large chain ring so I can get up some hills without shifting the front derailleur. But with hills/mountains around here I do occasionally need my lowest which is 34/25. I maintain my own bike and spent a lot of time dialing in my derailleurs and I'm pretty confident my limits are set where it is impossible to overshift
rms13 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 08:27 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 925 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Well that's just plain stupid. Adjust your derailleur, learn how to shift and use all.
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 08:28 AM
  #12  
Just Plain Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,026

Bikes: Lynskey R230

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I'm 230 lbs and get to climb some of the mountain roads used in Tour of California. No ego here. I need every bit of my 28. Living in Chicago may be a different story.

Or, I guess i could put a 12-30 on there, never use the 30 and essentially make my bike into a 9 speed with crappy spacing.
PhotoJoe is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 08:36 AM
  #13  
*
 
idk416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 98
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I love these threads. They bring out the macho men
Really though, you're supposed to keep you cadence consistent...so unless its just a short little hill (just power over), you should be using easier gears and keeping the cadence similar to on the flats. Of course, if you're just riding 25k or something, it matters less. It's not like the average rider loses speed if you're in the right gear as opposed slowly grinding a big gear up the hill.

Last edited by idk416; 09-21-14 at 01:02 PM.
idk416 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 08:39 AM
  #14  
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,931
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 119 Posts
Originally Posted by escarpment
. Am I the only one who never goes into the large cog on the cassette?
I know that a properly tuned derailleur shouldn't ever over-shift.
1) Yes you are.

B) You are geared improperly.
Your low/low should be the bottom of your Low Range required to get up the stiffest local climb w/o undue stress.
Buy a tighter cassette.

iii) The bottom cog is not a cruel joke perpetrated by a vengeful design deity, it has a purpose: see B).
A properly adjusted and maintained rear derail cannot overshift into the spokes.
Get a good mechanic and worry about other impeding dooms.

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 08:42 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Why has @Velo Vol not posted in this thread yet? I'm pretty sure that his largest cog is encased in glass with a "break in the event of an emergency" sticker.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 09:03 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern NY...Brownville
Posts: 2,571

Bikes: Specialized Aethos, Specialized Diverge Comp E5

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 240 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 264 Posts
If you're worried about it don't use that gear...
If you're properly geared for your terrain and abilities you may never need it anyway as it usually a bail out gear.
Cross chaining for long periods of time or over a long time will wear the chain rings and cogs much more than better aligned gear choices but sometimes you don't have a choice so you ride the gear you have.

A big problem with big ring cross chaining is you are severely limited in gears when you generally most need them and if you do try to shift to a small chain ring you risk breaking the chain, throwing the chain off the rings, etc. as well as losing significant placing in the group of riders, being dramatically dropped, causing those behind you to curse you rightfully, etc.

Better to be aware and use the better gear.
Kai Winters is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 09:15 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
For some reason (maybe just convenience) there is a category of riders who just refuse to use the small front ring. Even if it means cross chaining. I have a friend who rides the big ring on our moderate paced, flat Houston rides. I'm on my 39 front and 19, 17, 15 and 14 rear riding at speeds up to 22 mph. Cadence about 90-100. I am in the middle of the cassette and have plenty of room to shift either up or down for whatever change in conditions might occur. Under those conditions, why would he be on his big ring? Either his cadence is only about 70-80 or he is crowded way over to the 26, 23, 21 cogs, neither of which is especially desirable. I dont' get it, but all I can say is different strokes.... And it may surprise just about everyone here, but I have kept my mouth shut and not said a word to him about it. Ta-da!
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...

Last edited by rpenmanparker; 09-21-14 at 09:20 AM.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 09:23 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,400

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 754 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 77 Posts
Using the largest cog is the best way to prevent derailuer into spokes damage. By regularly shifting over you can detect improperly set limits before they get way out. Just don't make the first shift at high speed or load. And yes, I put a derailuer into the spokes. It was my wife's bike, and I was testing after a crash. Everything thing was fine except the hanger which was already bent.
gsa103 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 09:59 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by PhotoJoe
I'm 230 lbs and get to climb some of the mountain roads used in Tour of California. No ego here. I need every bit of my 28. Living in Chicago may be a different story.

Or, I guess i could put a 12-30 on there, never use the 30 and essentially make my bike into a 9 speed with crappy spacing.
12-30 is basically an 11-28 without the 11 and a 30 added to the back. There is no difference in spacing from a practical point of view.
fstshrk is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 10:12 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by fstshrk
12-30 is basically an 11-28 without the 11 and a 30 added to the back. There is no difference in spacing from a practical point of view.
Doesn't the 12-30 have other different gears than the 11-28. Like 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 24, 27, 30 instead of 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 22, 25, 28? The differences may be negligible. Just saying it is not quite as similar as you think.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 10:35 AM
  #21  
he said member
 
ls01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: is everything
Posts: 13,802

Bikes: yes please

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2789 Post(s)
Liked 1,951 Times in 1,207 Posts
R600DurAce would be so disappointed in you all.
ls01 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 10:40 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 648

Bikes: Canyon, Bowman & Colnago

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 20 Posts
I never use the largest cog, either, but not for the same reason as the OP. I run a triple crankset, so if the hills get gnarly (and they do in SF) I'll just drop down to the smallest chainring.

Having said that, I do not have any concerns about my chain being thrown into the spokes. I check the rear derailleur limits quite often to make sure everything is shifting as it should.
mrblue is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 11:29 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,400

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 754 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 77 Posts
If the RD hanger is straight, you can put the chain into the spokes before the RD. I had a mountain bike with a bad limit that would consistently do that. Think about how the spoke angles work. As you go further away from the hub, the spokes move away from the RD giving you a bit more clearance. The scenarios with putting the RD into the spokes almost always involve a pre-bent hanger.

As a side note, running an 11-speed wheelset with 10-speed cassette gives you an extra 1.8mm of clearance.
gsa103 is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 11:39 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
I never have figured out why people don't like shifting the front derailleur.
seypat is offline  
Old 09-21-14, 12:23 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
I use every cog on the cassette when riding in our area. If the limit screw is set correctly you wont have any thoughts of it.
OldsCOOL is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.