Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

The bike industry is killing itself with new "standards" that offer too few benefits

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

The bike industry is killing itself with new "standards" that offer too few benefits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-15, 01:10 PM
  #151  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
I couldn't care less about the gist of the argument. Dogmatic over-generalizations just rub me the wrong way, plus they're wrong. We got innocent, impressionable children reading this stuff here.
The horrors! Why should I care that someone's rhetorical overstatement "rubs you the wrong way"? Ride what you like! And do it proudly.

I believe you are the one off topic here given the OP. I'm reporting you to the moderator .
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:16 PM
  #152  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
No, you don't get it. I'm not arguing with you about the relative merits or faults of CF. I've got better things to do. You're so used to splitting hairs with your cohorts around here you think every post is an argument. It is not.

I'm saying you're flat out wrong to arrogantly imply that anyone who doesn't choose a CF bike doesn't know anything about modern day bikes. Period. All the proselytizing and chest-pumping aside, your statement is wrong.
OK. But you are suggesting I am wrong and why I responded. I am not wrong. I am right. I am on the side of the vast majority. The majority aren't wrong. They are right. Even those that know little about carbon bikes, take them around the block and know they are better than steel or aluminum. Lighter weight, greater driveline stiffness and maybe most overlooked, better handling due to stiffer front end. Conversation bleeds well beyond frame material. Same dynamic at play. The market dictates design direction of every component on the bike. Bad designs die. Best designs flourish. Pretty basic and of course its perfectly ok not to ride a carbon Colnago or drive a Porsche.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:21 PM
  #153  
Administrator
 
BillyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,001

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11967 Post(s)
Liked 6,637 Times in 3,480 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
Just saying, that's an unsupportable generalization if there ever was one.
This. Your original statement is all BillyD is talking about. That is all.

You and the cohorts can argue about the rest until the cows come home.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:35 PM
  #154  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
No, you don't get it. I'm not arguing with you about the relative merits or faults of CF. I've got better things to do. You're so used to splitting hairs with your cohorts around here you think every post is an argument. It is not.

I'm saying you're flat out wrong to arrogantly imply that anyone who doesn't choose a CF bike doesn't know anything about modern day bikes. Period. All the proselytizing and chest-pumping aside, your statement is wrong.
He is.
RJM is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:35 PM
  #155  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyD
Just saying, that's an unsupportable generalization if there ever was one.
But what I claim is supported is the point. It is supported by what sells. The market determines what designs are best.
It isn't a coincidence or luck that carbon is preferred. People ride it and prefer it..those that ride aggressively at least.
Same with 11 speed. If the majority preferred yesterday's 5 speed, 5 speed would be on all the top level bikes. Same with downtube friction shifters...single bolt serrated aluminum seat posts, leather saddles...loose ball versus cartridge bearings in wheelsets....stiffer deep V aerodynamic wheelsets with fewer spoke count....Garmin computers versus wired speed only computers, 31.8 handlebar clamp diameter versus 26mm to mitigate handlebar rotation during sprinting. A very long list of improvement to a drop bar racing bicycle in the last 20 years. Almost striking. Not 8 track to digital striking but a huge evolution.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:38 PM
  #156  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
McDonald's hamburgers are better than any other hamburgers because they sell more of them.
RJM is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:45 PM
  #157  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
McDonald's hamburgers are better than any other hamburgers because they sell more of them.
All hamburgers are made out of meat because people don't like the taste of steel or Al.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:45 PM
  #158  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
McDonald's hamburgers are better than any other hamburgers because they sell more of them.
food for thought.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:46 PM
  #159  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
All hamburgers are made out of meat because people don't like the taste of steel or Al.
Carbon based life forms.
RJM is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:47 PM
  #160  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
Carbon based life forms.
correct. Further support for the carbon mantra.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:49 PM
  #161  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by hueyhoolihan
food for thought.
Another straw man. Hamburger quality isn't the reason why McDonald's sells more burgers.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:54 PM
  #162  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
McDonald's hamburgers are better than any other hamburgers because they sell more of them.
Are you saying bikes have gotten dirt cheap and someone didn't tell me? Cuz that's how Micky-Ds does it. And now that companies like Five Guys are coming up with making relatively inexpensive food at a much better quality level, Micky-D is bleeding.

Consumers, if they can afford it, generally choose the highest value option. That people are not flocking to steel road bikes at any price and are instead choosing $2000 carbon fiber bikes means something. It's not like you can't get a quality steel or aluminum bike stocked with 20 year old technology anymore. I see you just got a new Rivendell, so you obviously know you can still buy 20 year old technology...
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 01:59 PM
  #163  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
But what I claim is supported is the point. It is supported by what sells. The market determines what designs are best.
It isn't a coincidence or luck that carbon is preferred. People ride it and prefer it..those that ride aggressively at least.
Same with 11 speed. If the majority preferred yesterday's 5 speed, 5 speed would be on all the top level bikes. Same with downtube friction shifters...single bolt serrated aluminum seat posts, leather saddles...loose ball versus cartridge bearings in wheelsets....stiffer deep V aerodynamic wheelsets with fewer spoke count....Garmin computers versus wired speed only computers, 31.8 handlebar clamp diameter versus 26mm to mitigate handlebar rotation during sprinting. A very long list of improvement to a drop bar racing bicycle in the last 20 years. Almost striking. Not 8 track to digital striking but a huge evolution.
Oh well, hell....here I thought we were talking about road bikes and not just drop bar racing bicycles. Carry on. The UCI rule book determines what is better for all you racers.
RJM is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 02:07 PM
  #164  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Are you saying bikes have gotten dirt cheap and someone didn't tell me? Cuz that's how Micky-Ds does it. And now that companies like Five Guys are coming up with making relatively inexpensive food at a much better quality level, Micky-D is bleeding.

Consumers, if they can afford it, generally choose the highest value option. That people are not flocking to steel road bikes at any price and are instead choosing $2000 carbon fiber bikes means something. It's not like you can't get a quality steel or aluminum bike stocked with 20 year old technology anymore. I see you just got a new Rivendell, so you obviously know you can still buy 20 year old technology...
And Euro who was banned from this forum a few years back and very knowledgeable about cycling always reminded the forum that you almost couldn't buy a steel road bike in Europe. Aluminum is vastly more popular as a cost effective alternative. US has moved this way as well over the past 15 years. More engineering has gone into improving Al because of greater manufacturing versatility to form tubes to achieve desired differential stiffness.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-27-15, 02:23 PM
  #165  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Yea, once you figure out how to weld it, Aluminum is much easier to work with than steel. Works better as a bike frame material too (unless you go around habitually dropping your frame on concrete curbs).
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.