Advertise on Bikeforums.net



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 33 of 33

Thread: Into the sun

  1. #26
    Speed Demon *roll eyes*
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    982
    Quote Originally Posted by sbhikes
    It's that time of year for me again. Both ways--on the way to and from work--I have to ride right into the sun. The sun is between 11 o'clock and 1 o'clock in my eyes and if the horizon is noon, about 1 o'clock higher than the horizon. Who can see anything under these conditions?

    Yesterday the pavement was wet so when the sun shone on it I was completely blinded. Today at least the pavement was dry, but the sun still shone off it like glass in a few places.

    What's a gal to do? Is there a light that can penetrate the glare (and got any pics into the sun to prove it)? I'm afraid nobody could see me even if they tried because I can't see anything at all. And no WAY am I taking the lane for "conspicuity" purposes. I wouldn't be able to see a bus if it was right in front of me.
    Did not read the thread, but to answer your question about being seen: check the commuting forum. This is a bigger issue with them than with us "safety weenies" and many people who post there have innovative solutions to lighting concerns.
    1998 Specialized S-works Hardtail - hotrodded
    2005 Kona Jake the Snake cyclocross

  2. #27
    Avatar out of order. MarkS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    North of the border, just
    Posts
    895
    Based on Diane's description of her situation, it sounds like the answer is a lightweight Nissan backpack thermos -- so she can go in early and have decent coffee.
    Cars kill 45,000 Americans every year.
    This is like losing a war every year, except without the parades.

  3. #28
    Software for Cyclists SSP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Redding, California
    Posts
    4,622
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    1. Driver slows down a bit, which can been seen and/or heard (the pitch emitted by turning tires and/or engine changes when a car slows down)
    2. Driver adjusts laterally, left. If another lane is available, often they'll change into it. Sometimes they just adjust left in their lane a bit, I adjust right, they adjust a bit more left... it's a dance and by the time they overtake me I've been in the bike lane for a while.
    3. They honk (very rarely).
    4. They flash their lights (even more rarely).
    5. Some combination of the above.
    As usual, you're FOS.

    In previous posts, you've said that you always move back to the right when the overtaking driver is about 10 seconds back. With a 40 mph closing rate (e.g., car at 55 mph, cyclist at 15 mph), that means the car is 587 feet behind you when you move over, and even further away when you presumably see that they "notice" you.

    There's no way you can detect a driver slowing down "a bit", or hear their change in engine speed, when they're over 600 feet away! That's 2 football fields, sports fans.

    Of course, if you're only employing your silly technique while toodling around your suburb, with its 25 mph speed limit, perhaps you have a point (however, it's simply irrelevant to most real world cycling scenarios).
    CycliStats.com - Software for Cyclists
    WeightWare.com - Weight Management Software

  4. #29
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    13,771
    Quote Originally Posted by SSP
    As usual, you're FOS.

    In previous posts, you've said that you always move back to the right when the overtaking driver is about 10 seconds back. With a 40 mph closing rate (e.g., car at 55 mph, cyclist at 15 mph), that means the car is 587 feet behind you when you move over, and even further away when you presumably see that they "notice" you.

    There's no way you can detect a driver slowing down "a bit", or hear their change in engine speed, when they're over 600 feet away! That's 2 football fields, sports fans.

    Of course, if you're only employing your silly technique while toodling around your suburb, with its 25 mph speed limit, perhaps you have a point (however, it's simply irrelevant to most real world cycling scenarios).
    I think HH has provided a bit more color and fancy to his descriptions of detecting slowing cars, but I can attest that in real world one does have cues - not as specific as HH makes out, but more subtle and hard to put into words. For me this is riding 20mph in 50mph traffic, so a 30mph delta or so. I will note that I have never found any sonic information to be useful. Its all based on visual.
    In the end it really doesn't matter if they see you or not as one will move over if safe. I think 10sec is a bit early to move over, 10sec is a long time in practice.
    Al
    Al

  5. #30
    Senior Member mechBgon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    6,981
    Quote Originally Posted by noisebeam
    I think HH has provided a bit more color and fancy to his descriptions of detecting slowing cars, but I can attest that in real world one does have cues - not as specific as HH makes out, but more subtle and hard to put into words. For me this is riding 20mph in 50mph traffic, so a 30mph delta or so. I will note that I have never found any sonic information to be useful. Its all based on visual.
    In the end it really doesn't matter if they see you or not as one will move over if safe. I think 10sec is a bit early to move over, 10sec is a long time in practice.
    Al
    Al
    I'd recommend at least doubling that to 20 seconds if you notice a semi or other heavy vehicle coming up behind you, because they have to plan ahead for the possibility that the cyclist 10 seconds ahead of them may not give up the lane, and braking or changing lanes can be, dare I say, a weighty matter for them

  6. #31
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    13,771
    Quote Originally Posted by mechBgon
    I'd recommend at least doubling that to 20 seconds if you notice a semi or other heavy vehicle coming up behind you, because they have to plan ahead for the possibility that the cyclist 10 seconds ahead of them may not give up the lane, and braking or changing lanes can be, dare I say, a weighty matter for them
    Sure out of courtesy, no question, point about less than 10s is that even then that is plenty to move right and be clear if the driver doesn't see you. But they also need to be prepared to slow as there is not always the option for me to move right. Specifically this often occurs when riding in NOL with no shoulder and high curb - in fact a near daily occurance for me as the road I ride like this going home from work parallels a freeway and when the freeway gets clogged the overflow goes on this road, including semis. When i see a large truck approach in these cases I give the slow signal and don't move right, so they knoiw they have to slow. None seem to have any issue slowing to 20 from 45 or so, and with this speed differential in 20sec I cover quite a bit a distance between first seeing the truck, more distance before I give slow signal and even more until they are behind me. Someone else can chime in with the math, but 20 sec is a decent distance to cover in the 45/20 scenario. The nice thing about semis is that drivers are proffesional and seem to know how to merge right before slowing to 20 and being on my tail unlike 80% of other drivers who make it difficult on themselves my first getting right on my tail before then trying to merge (all this is in NOL case, in WOL I will have moved over before they have a chance to be on tail)

    Al

  7. #32
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Quote Originally Posted by noisebeam
    I think HH has provided a bit more color and fancy to his descriptions of detecting slowing cars, but I can attest that in real world one does have cues - not as specific as HH makes out, but more subtle and hard to put into words. For me this is riding 20mph in 50mph traffic, so a 30mph delta or so. I will note that I have never found any sonic information to be useful. Its all based on visual.
    In the end it really doesn't matter if they see you or not as one will move over if safe. I think 10sec is a bit early to move over, 10sec is a long time in practice.
    Al
    Of course. ALL the number are just estimates, really guesses.

    The point is, when you're out there, it works, without any issues. Frankly, I don't really know exactly how long I wait each time. It's not like I'm out there with a stop watch. Every instance is different and unique. My speed, their speed, light conditions, road conditions, traffic loads, etc. etc.

    Most times motorists might slow down as they're approaching me, not all the way down to my speed, but some. As soon as they start slowing down, that decreases the closing speed and increases the closing time. If you try to incorporate that into the calculations, it gets extremely hairy. But, again, the point is it works. Nobody's screeching tires, or honking or swerving or doing anything whacky. It's all smooth and civil. When I have evidence that they've noticed me, or, if they're too close for comfort, I move aside, and they usually accelerate as they pass me. Time after time it more or less works that way. If you want exact numbers, go time it yourself.

  8. #33
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    13,771
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    The point is, when you're out there, it works, without any issues.
    Exactly. Its so simple and natural once one tries it. I suspect most of the disagreement comes from those who haven't tried it. What do folks do when riding in NOL?

    Anyway this is not the ddDLIPSLCIK or what ever thread, its the sun thread. Sorry.

    Al

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •