Advertise on Bikeforums.net



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 37
  1. #1
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924

    Shimano chainrings different thicknesses - please mike your rings

    Apparently the following isn't boilerplate to keep you using Shimano parts:

    Quote Originally Posted by Service Instructions
    Be sure to use only the FC-xxxx chainrings. If any other type of chainrings are used, the distance between the chainrings will be incorrect...
    And the part numbers are different for what is apparently the same part:
    Y16T 9A420 - FC-6503 42T
    Y16X 98010 - FC-5504 42T
    Hmmm. I wonder why? Could it be the finish?

    It's more than that — Shimano chainrings are different thicknesses. I just miked two 42T rings: one is 1.13mm, the other is 0.80mm. That's quite a difference! The thickness of the ring determines where it is in relation to the other rings, so a thinner middle ring on a spider cut for a thicker one will be closer to the big ring and farther from the small, affecting shifting. A spacer corrects that, which is why some cranksets have spacers. Unfortunately, spacers are not available.

    The thing is, there is no indication on the ring as to what crankset it fits! If you're buying a replacement ring, you have no way to tell whether you've gotten the right part.

    --------------------------------------------------------------

    So I'd like to start a mini-project here on the BF Bicycle Mechanics forum. Let's find out what thicknesses Shimano uses for what cranksets. We'll put the results in a sticky, Mods willing. Please answer these questions:

    What is the original crankset or ring part number? E.g. FC-6503 or Y16T 9A420. If you're not sure, supply what info you can.

    What is the type/tooth count? E.g. A-42T. The type should be marked on the part, for instance "A-52-42-30".

    What is the date code? The date code is a small, two-letter (not number) code stamped near the other markings. For instance, "CF" (June 2004) or "YJ" (Oct 2000).

    What is the ring mounting thickness? E.g. 0.08mm. You may have to remove the ring to get this. Measure at the surface around the bolt hole. Inches or millimeters is okay.

    Is there a spacer between the ring and the spider? How thick?

    Does the ring have a counter-bore for the bolt or retainer shoulder?

    Describe the finish of the ring. That is, the color and texture of the surface. For instance, the 6503 ring is a nickel color, and textured. The 5500 ring is a silver (redder than the nickel) and smooth.

    Tell the BCD. Just to keep things straight. Here is how to measure.

    --------------------------------------------------------------

    Oh, and if you have a source for chainring spacers, please PM me.
    Last edited by DMF; 08-14-07 at 05:25 PM.

  2. #2
    So what did YOU do to it?
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    276
    And for those who are weight obessive.. the thinner ones are lighter.

  3. Support our Sponsors: 
    Want the BEST FOLDING BIKE? www.newfoldingbikes.com for the best folding bikes.
    Zinn & the Art of Road Bike Maintanance: Master bike tech Lennard Zinn covers it all, from fixing a flat to Di2, SRAM Red, and Campy 11-speed.

    Official Strida Website
    Shop JensonUSA.com for mountain bike parts, apparel, and accessories.
    Advertise on BikeForums.net. Email the sales department at sales@bikeforums.net for more details.
  4. #3
    Young and unconcerned Treefox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wash., DC / Midlands, UK
    Posts
    4,110
    Would this be the whole Type-A vs. Type-B thing?
    Die schokoladenseite des radfahrens.

  5. #4
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Quote Originally Posted by nerobro View Post
    And for those who are weight obessive.. the thinner ones are lighter.
    Maybe. Depends on the material.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  6. #5
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Quote Originally Posted by Treefox View Post
    Would this be the whole Type-A vs. Type-B thing?
    If you mean that A is thinner than B or vice versa, then no, it has nothing to do with that — that's about the ramp/pin setups. All I can tell this far is that thickness tracks the crankset model number.
    Last edited by DMF; 08-14-07 at 05:28 PM.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  7. #6
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Here are some chain ring spacers, though they are too thick for my particular need. Nice to see that Branford is back!

    Here are spacers and an application chart. They sell only to dealers.
    Last edited by DMF; 08-15-07 at 10:37 AM.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  8. #7
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Here's the accumulated results:
    Code:
    model     BCD   type     code     date   thick mm   spacer  c/bore?     finish
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dura-Ace
    FC-7900   130   A-53               interchangeable with FC-6700
              130   B-53
              130   B-52
              130   ?-42
              130   ?-39
    FC-7950   130   ?-50
              130   ?-34
    FC-7800   130   A-53   1F3 98040
              130   A-54   1F3 98250
              130   A-55   1F3 98260
              130   A-42   1F3 42000
    FC-7800   130   B-50   1F3 98010
              130   B-52   1F3 98020
              130   B-53   1F3 98030
              130   B-39   1F3 39000
    FC-7800   130   E-56   1F3 98270
              130   E-44   1F3 44000
    
    FC-7803   130   D-52   1G5 98140   interchangeable with FC-6603,4
              130   D-39   1G5 98130
               92   D-30   1G5 30000
    
    FC-7701   130   A-53   16P 9A530
              130   A-42   16P 42000
    FC-7701   130   B-53   16P 9B530    CH      1.55*       N       Y     matte nickel
              130   B-41   16P 41000
              130   B-39   16P 39000    CG      1.33*       N       Y     matte nickel
    FC-7701 Triathlon
              130   ?-54   16P 98030
              130   ?-55   16P 98040
              130   ?-56   16P 98050
              130   ?-42   16P 42020
              130   ?-44   16P 44000
              130   ?-45   16P 45000
    
    FC-7703   130   D-53   1EL 98030    CH      1.55*       N       Y     matte nickel
              130   D-39   1EL 98020    BL      2.10*       N       Y     matte nickel
               74   D-30   1EL 30000    BI      1.10      1.185     N     matte nickel
    Ultegra
    FC-6700   130   B-53              flagged interchangeable with FC-7900   
              130   B-52   
              130   B-39   
    FC-6703   130   ?-52   
              130   ?-39   
               92   ?-30   
    FC-6750   110   F-50   1LL 98010
              110   ?-34   1LL 34000
    FC-6600   130   B-53   1G3 98040
              130   B-52   1G3 98030
              130   B-39   1G3 39000
    FC-6601
    FC-6603   130   D-52   1G4 98030  flagged interchangeable with FC-7803
              130   ?-39   1G4 98020
               74   ?-30   1G4 30000
    FC-6604   130   D-52   1JP 98010  flagged interchangeable with FC-6603
              130   ?-39   1JP 98020
               74   ?-30   1JP 30000
    FC-6650   110   ?-50   1JR 98010  flagged interchangeable with FC-5650, FC-R600
              110   ?-34   1JR 34000  flagged interchangeable with FC-R600
    FC-6500   130   A-53   16T 98030
              130   A-42   16T 42000
    
    FC-6500   130   B-53   16T 98020    ZL      1.625       N       Y     textured nickel
              130   B-53                AG      1.625       N       Y     textured nickel
              130   B-52   16T 98010
              130   B-39   16T 39000    ZK      1.125       N       Y     textured nickel
              130   B-39                AH      1.125       N       Y     textured nickel
    
    FC-6503   130   A-52   16T 9A420    CH      1.625       N       Y     textured nickel
              130   A-42   16T 9A420    CF      1.125       N       Y     textured nickel
               74   A-30   16U 30000    CH      1.125       N       Y     textured nickel
    
    105
    FC-5600   130   B-53
              130   B-52
              130   B-50
              130   ?-39
    FC-5603   130   D-50
              130   ?-39
               74   ?-30
    FC-5650   110   F-50   1JL 98020    GD      2.87        N       N     black anodized? painted?
              110   F-34   1JL 34010    GE      2.86        N       N     black anodized? painted?
    FC-5500   130   
    FC-5501   130   A-53
              130   A-42
    FC-5501   130   B-53   1DG 98030    BD      2.84        N       Y     black anodized
              130   B-52
              130   B-50
              130   B-39   16V 39100    BC      2.00        N       N     black anodized
    FC-5502   130   same gearing      flagged interchangeable 'B' with FC-5500, FC-5501
    FC-5503   
    FC-5504   130   ?-52
              130   ?-42
               74   ?-30
    FC-5505         same gearing      flagged interchangeable 'B' with FC-5503, FC-5504
    
    Tiagra
    FC-4503   130   D-50   1HJ 98030    GA/FJ   2.70**      N       N     flat silver grey (alum material)
              130   D-39   1HJ 98020    GA/FJ   2.90        N       Y     flat aluminum    (alum material)
               74   D-30   1HJ 30000    FF2/FI  1.80        N       N     matte/gloss steel? (steel)
                                      interchangeable w/ Sora FC-3403
    Sora 
    FC-3403                           flagged interchangeable 'B','B','A' w/ Tiagra FC-4503
    
    2200
    FC-2200
    FC-2203
    
    A050
    FC-A050
    
    Non-Series
    FC-R700   110   ?-50   1H0 98050
              110   ?-34   1H0 34000
    FC-R600   110   F-50   1HS 98020    EJ      4.67        N       Y     brushed alum
              110   F-34   1HA 34000    EK      2.86        N       Y     brushed alum
                                      34T (only) flagged interchangeable 'A' w/ FC-4550
    FC-R550   130   B-53   1HZ 98030
              130   B-52   1HZ 98020
              130   B-50   1HZ 98010
              130   ?-39   1HZ 39000
    FC-R553   130   D-50   1J0 98020
              130   ?-39   1J0 98010
               74   ?-30   1J0 30000
    FC-R450   130   B-52   1JH 98020
              130   ?-39   1DM 39100
    FC-R453   130   D-50   1H9 98020    
              130   ?-39   1H9 98010    
               74   ?-30   1H7 30000    
    FC-4550   110   F-50   1HA 98040
              110   ?-34   1HA 34000
    
    unknown 
    "Shimano 9-spd SG"
              130   A-42                YJ      0.80        -       N     smooth silver
    SLX
    MC-660    104   AA-44  1KF 98060    ?/GB    2.90**      N       N     matte/semi black (alum material)
              104   AA-32  1KF 98040   FL1/GA1  1.90***     N       Y     nickel silver steel, matte black plastic front, shiny black plastic back
               64   AA-22  1KF 22000    GA/GC   1.90        N       N     semi black  (steel)
                                       flagged interchangeable with FC-M770,FC-M970
                                       32,22 also w/ FC-T661, 22 w/ FC-M810-2,FC-M815-2
    RX-100
    FC-A550  but all rings probably replacements
      Tracer   130   A-53               --      1.185       N       Y     brushed alum
      Tracer   130   A-39               --      1.185****   N       N     brushed alum
      Shimano   74   A-30               CF      1.125       N       Y     textured nickel
    
    unknown tandem left side
               110   38               QH/H0?    3.55        N       Y     polished alu
    
    * Measurements made on assembled crank.
    ** Teeth are offset outboard
    *** "teeth centered on about 2.00mm" =? offset inboard
    **** Teeth are offset 0.25mm inboard
    Last edited by DMF; 06-05-09 at 10:01 AM. Reason: Add 105, R600, tandem
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  9. #8
    Senior Member halfspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SE Minnesota
    Posts
    6,334
    Quote Originally Posted by DMF View Post
    Here are some chain ring spacers, though they are too thick for my particular need. Nice to see that Branford is back!

    Here are spacers and an application chart. They sell only to dealers.
    As always, loose screws has this kind of thing:
    http://www.loosescrews.com/index.cgi...d=668929319232

  10. #9
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Dura-Ace added to chart.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  11. #10
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Surely someone has calipers and a few spare moments.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  12. #11
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    28,368
    Quote Originally Posted by DMF View Post
    Surely someone has calipers and a few spare moments.
    I work in a shop - which other rings do you want thicknesses for?
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  13. #12
    In beaurocratic limbo urbanknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    22,491
    Did you measure the thickness where they are bolted or under the teeth? Many chainrings have recesses which may affect your calculations as to where the ring will sit.
    "Well, I guess you can cut the arts as much as you want... Sooner or later, these kids aren't going to have anything to read or write about." (Richard Dreyfus as Glenn Holland)

  14. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wilmington, DE
    Posts
    8,284
    Can you post a picture of where you are taking your measurements from? I don't have any Shimano-brand chainrings to check but the chainrings I have measured seem to be much thicker than what you've measured. They all seem to taper down in thickness near the teeth and the teeth measurements I have taken range from 1.9 to 2mm.

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,459
    Why would a difference in thickness make any difference? I have an 80s vintage Sugino crankset that shifts perfectly with a 105 brifter and front der.
    Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

    1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
    1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
    1988 Ducati 750 F1

  16. #15
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Quote Originally Posted by operator View Post
    I work in a shop - which other rings do you want thicknesses for?
    I'd like 9-speed 105 and Tiagra, and at least one of the low-end road cranks. Might as well get 10-speed DA and Ultegra, too. I was surprised at the differences between the double and triple DA rings.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  17. #16
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Quote Originally Posted by urbanknight View Post
    Did you measure the thickness where they are bolted or under the teeth? Many chainrings have recesses which may affect your calculations as to where the ring will sit.
    I measure them across the bolt holes. Measure 3-4 of those flanges and do a rough average in my head. Hundredth of a mm is more than precise enough.

    It is possible that the teeth might be offset, but we don't have the gear to measure that accurately so we'll have to assume that the teeth are centered.

    It's more important to get the caliper square to the surface than to worry about jaw orientation (something you don't have to worry about if you use a micrometer).
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  18. #17
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Quote Originally Posted by San Rensho View Post
    Why would a difference in thickness make any difference?
    Quote Originally Posted by DMF View Post
    The thickness of the ring determines where it is in relation to the other rings, so a thinner middle ring on a spider cut for a thicker one will be closer to the big ring and farther from the small, affecting shifting

    ....

    [also] there is no indication on the ring as to what crankset it fits! If you're buying a replacement ring, you have no way to tell whether you've gotten the right part.
    Likewise if you're trying to ID a loose one.




    Quote Originally Posted by San Rensho View Post
    I have an 80s vintage Sugino crankset that shifts perfectly with a 105 brifter and front der.
    Uhhh... That's nice.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  19. #18
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    28,368
    Quote Originally Posted by DMF View Post

    Likewise if you're trying to ID a loose one.






    Uhhh... That's nice.
    Probably better to assume he meant the original chainrings on that crankset as otherwise it's meaningless.
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  20. #19
    Bottecchia fan
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    3,346
    Quote Originally Posted by DMF View Post
    Surely someone has calipers and a few spare moments.
    Yes and yes but no Shimano rings. Sorry

  21. #20
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Well, I just started with Shimano, but no reason we can't expand the project. (No point in including proprietary mounting systems like an asymmetrical spider or weird BCD.)

    Waddya got?
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  22. #21
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Something else occurs to me. It would be nice to know if rings are interchangeable between different "speed" versions of the same group. For instance, are Ultegra triple rings interchangeable between 6503 and 6603? The type codes are the same (A).
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

  23. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    39
    I'd like a definitive reply on this issue too. It would be helpful to know if these Ultegra family chainrings are interchangeable.

  24. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Denver, Co.
    Posts
    630
    Is a 7400 DA double from the 80's something you want???
    Bud

  25. #24
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    I Want Everything!

    PLEASE


    Look at it this way. I probably won't try to use a 7400 ring on my 7700. But some poor sod with a 7400 might like to know if he can use an (available) 7700 ring when his wears out.

    I'm frankly surprised that no one has done this investigation before.

    Don't worry if your input data isn't complete. Every little bit helps.
    Last edited by DMF; 10-20-07 at 09:04 PM.

  26. #25
    Elitist Troglodyte DMF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    6,924
    Back to the top! for those that haven't seen it.
    Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?

    - Will Rogers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •