Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

New photos of my '90 Trek 330 with racing saddle

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

New photos of my '90 Trek 330 with racing saddle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-11, 04:50 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Drummerboy1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,367

Bikes: '81 Fuji Royale/ '96 Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
New photos of my '90 Trek 330 with racing saddle

I cleaned my Trek up a bit and took some pics of it with it's new Selle San Marco racing saddle I added to it.

What do y'all think
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
DSC00956.jpg (101.5 KB, 164 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC00953.jpg (99.5 KB, 70 views)
Drummerboy1975 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 04:54 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Capecodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Looks like the saddle needs to be tilted up, and the bike is too small for you......
Capecodder is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 04:56 PM
  #3  
Constant tinkerer
 
FastJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,954
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Capecodder
Looks like the saddle needs to be tilted up, and the bike is too small for you......
+1

We have remarkably similar bikes though. Selle Italia saddle, Continental tires...

FastJake is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 05:07 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Drummerboy1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,367

Bikes: '81 Fuji Royale/ '96 Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Capecodder
Looks like the saddle needs to be tilted up, and the bike is too small for you......
The seat feels perfect at that angle and I'm 5'8". How do you figure it's too small for me?
Drummerboy1975 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 05:19 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Capecodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
The seat feels perfect at that angle and I'm 5'8". How do you figure it's too small for me?

I know it's too small cause the seat post is too far out. This is why you need to have the seat tilted down, or the nose of the saddle would (well you know)....

I'm not being a smart a$$ either... That bike looks to be around 49-50cm and at 5'8" you probably need a 54cm frame or better, but that depends on a lot of things.

Last edited by Capecodder; 09-24-11 at 05:25 PM.
Capecodder is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 06:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Drummerboy1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,367

Bikes: '81 Fuji Royale/ '96 Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Capecodder
I know it's too small cause the seat post is too far out. This is why you need to have the seat tilted down, or the nose of the saddle would (well you know)....

I'm not being a smart a$$ either... That bike looks to be around 49-50cm and at 5'8" you probably need a 54cm frame or better, but that depends on a lot of things.
Well, when I stand over the bike, the top tube has about 1/2-1/4 inch between it and my crotch.
Drummerboy1975 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 06:23 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
U need a new frame man. U are at least 4 sizes off and be carefull the stem is almost off the steering tube, is not even straight that means is just hangin' out the wedge. Nice bike tho.

Take care.



Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
The seat feels perfect at that angle and I'm 5'8". How do you figure it's too small for me?
ultraman6970 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 06:56 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Drummerboy1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,367

Bikes: '81 Fuji Royale/ '96 Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
So I guess this needs to go into the This Frame Doesn't Fit thread?

WTF.
Drummerboy1975 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:01 PM
  #9  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Snohomish, WA.
Posts: 2,866
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 469 Post(s)
Liked 2,443 Times in 646 Posts
You could post it in this thread..

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...smaller-frames
Roger M is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:12 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
tugrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 2,190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
Well, when I stand over the bike, the top tube has about 1/2-1/4 inch between it and my crotch.
If that were true, it seems unlikely you could reach the pedal at the bottom of the stroke from where the saddle is, unless you have enormous feet.
tugrul is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:21 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Chris Chicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: near north side
Posts: 1,335
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times in 20 Posts
nice bike! i was looking through the old trek catalogs and noticed at some point around 1990 they made everything with the modern (unicrown?) fork, but looks like you got one of the last of the cool ones before the switch.
Chris Chicago is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:30 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 812
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
You can tell by my handle I have some experience with Trek 330s.Absolutely adored mine.I'm also 5'8" and mine was a 56cm.Tad big for me.Great riding bike!!
trek330 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:32 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Drummerboy1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,367

Bikes: '81 Fuji Royale/ '96 Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by tugrul
If that were true, it seems unlikely you could reach the pedal at the bottom of the stroke from where the saddle is, unless you have enormous feet.
Nope, fits perfect.

Look folks, here's the deal. I'm 5'8", but not everyone thats my height is built the same, hell, no two people are built the same! Ever think about that? I have short legs and a long torso, so the bike not only fits me but it's set up for me. It's comfy and I love and I don't care what anyone thinks.

I'll quote something from one of my earlier post......

"You can have your saddle at whatever angle makes you happy."

"Your handlebars can be lower than your saddle, even with your saddle, or higher than your saddle. Whichever way you like it is right."


"If you think your bike looks good, it does."
https://surlybikes.com/blog/post/some..._ive_ever_read
Drummerboy1975 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:36 PM
  #14  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Angle the saddle however you like but the poster who mentioned the stem is right. Unless that's a freakishly long stem like a Nitto Technomic you're probably above the minimum insert line, which is bad bad bad.

You should carefully examine the stem and find the minimum insert line...and respect it.
khatfull is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:39 PM
  #15  
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
This frame size thing is largely a matter of both individual physique and personal preference, but it's certain that you're quite a way off the top of the bell curve with that bike. I'm off the other direction - 5'-10" with 32 pants inseam, and I have several 63 cm (CtT) bikes. I don't care about standing over with both feet on the ground and bike upright; if I can clear when stopped with the bike tilted a little toward my curb-side leg (on the ground), and rest my butt cheek on the top tube, I'm happy. I do still have a decent amount of seat post showing, and I think that's because I like my leg more straightened, and toes more down, than most people do when pedaling. Also, I hardly ever stand and crank, while I see a lot of people with smaller frames who spend a large proportion of time out of the saddle.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:39 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Drummerboy1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,367

Bikes: '81 Fuji Royale/ '96 Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by khatfull
Angle the saddle however you like but the poster who mentioned the stem is right. Unless that's a freakishly long stem like a Nitto Technomic you're probably above the minimum insert line, which is bad bad bad.

You should carefully examine the stem and find the minimum insert line...and respect it.
Yes your right, I am a tad above it. So should I get a longer stem or a bigger bike?
Drummerboy1975 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 07:42 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
Nope, fits perfect.

"You can have your saddle at whatever angle makes you happy."
Yeah, if you're happy with numb hands from having to much weight leaning forward.
m015094 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 08:36 PM
  #18  
Constant tinkerer
 
FastJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,954
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
Yes your right, I am a tad above it. So should I get a longer stem or a bigger bike?
First, lower the stem to the minimum insertion point. Then see how comfortable your saddle angle/bike feels on a long ride. 30-40 miles, something like that. Long rides will point out the places the bike doesn't fit you.

Although you don't trust any of us that the bike is way too small for you, a long ride will prove it one way or the other. There's a reason you don't see anyone who puts on lots of miles with a saddle angle/fit like that.
FastJake is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 10:25 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
TugaDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,504
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 586 Post(s)
Liked 612 Times in 447 Posts
Totally agree on the stem. Also, in regards to standover height, I think it is more important to judge how the bike fits when you are moving. Of course it can't be so tall that you can't keep it upright when stopped at lights, etc., but the suggestion that you should have 1-1/2" to 2" of standover clearance is hogwash. If that were true, none of my bikes would "fit", but they actually fit perfectly.

BTW, when a saddle is tilted forward, there is no way you can rest enough weight on your sit bones. That puts a lot of pressure on your arms and hands. Saddles as a rule should be either level or slightly nose up as is the case with some Brooks models.
TugaDude is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 10:27 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
tugrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 2,190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
Nope, fits perfect.
I'm not arguing fit, I just don't see the numbers where you can barely clear the top tube yet have that much seat post showing. Foot extension adds some to the distance, but that much?

Maybe the small size of the bike is making me think there is more seat post than there actually is.
tugrul is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 10:52 PM
  #21  
incazzare.
 
lostarchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6,970

Bikes: See sig

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 38 Posts
Holy stem & seatpost, Batman!

__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
lostarchitect is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 10:59 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
mapleleafs-13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,763

Bikes: Pinarello Veneto, Pinarello Montello, Bianchi Celeste

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
if you're 5'8 you should probably be riding around a 53-54 cm frame, that bike looks like a 47 cm frame, it looks tiny.

You don't feel tight on that bike? have you ridden 53-54 cm bikes? you'll probably be more comfortable..... we're just trying to give you advice so don't take anything offensive...

i'm 5'11, 6'0 after i've had my wheaties.... i feel really comfy on a 56-57 frame. I know not all people are alike, but i'd say people around my height that i know are within the same range, maybe a 58 frame or so, but the differences are +/- a cm or 2, your bike on the other hand is tiny for your height... just my opinion....

the reason everyone is telling you this is because of your seat angle, seat post height and stem height...

you don't want to look like a bear on a tricycle.....


Last edited by mapleleafs-13; 09-24-11 at 11:05 PM.
mapleleafs-13 is offline  
Old 09-24-11, 11:14 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Soma Roark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 378

Bikes: Trek 600 Series, Miyata 610, Palo Alto Touring, Schwinn Paramountain

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Very nice bike, I'm definitely a fan of those early Treks =). I think there has been really good advice given, especially fixing the stem and leveling the saddle for safety, but if you're happy just continue riding! Just note that our bodies can cram and flex to fit many setups but it may not necessarily be ideal. So how about when the opportunity presents itself (nice vintage Trek on CL or something) try it out and see how you like it.
Soma Roark is offline  
Old 09-25-11, 12:12 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
vuduchyld5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Charlottesville Va.
Posts: 158

Bikes: 2011 Trek Madone 5.2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
What do y'all think
Originally Posted by Drummerboy1975
It's comfy and I love and I don't care what anyone thinks.
Why'd you ask what us "What do y'all think" if you didn't care what we thought?
vuduchyld5 is offline  
Old 09-25-11, 05:05 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Capecodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I didn't start this to be a jerk as you might think, I did because the way you have your bike set up makes it unsafe, and uncomfortable. Take a look at this chart to get a better idea. I would have use Rivendell but the site is down till tonight for maintenance.

https://bicycling.about.com/od/howtor...ike_sizing.htm
Capecodder is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.