Advertise on Bikeforums.net



Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    crash survivor tate65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    655

    B17 and a thudbuster, or B66

    Well I ended up getting my Fargo, and got the 2, which I didn't realize had a thudbuster. I ride a B17 on all my other bikes, but before I ordered the bike I got a great deal on a B66, so now I am not sure which way to go? I think a thudbuster and a b66 are a bit too much. Anyone try both before, and have an opinion? I've never done a thudbuster, or a sprung seat, but since I plan on mainly gravel or off road touring I thought one or the other would be a good idea.

  2. #2
    Long Distance Cyclist Machka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The Beautiful State of Victoria
    Posts
    33,622
    I ride a thudbuster and B17 on the tandem ... and I like that combination. I've never tried a B66 so can't comment on it.

  3. #3
    .
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,423
    I think the springs of a B66 are so firm that you'd never appreciate their benefit when combined with a CC TB.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Chris Pringle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Pearl of the Pacific, Mexico
    Posts
    931
    Thudbuster/B17 combo, IMHO. This will work better with the more aggressive set up of the Salsa Fargo w/ drop bars. The B66 is made and recommended with a more relaxed (upright) position on the saddle.
    Handcrafted panniers and bags for the discerning cyclist


  5. #5
    Senior Member iforgotmename's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    1,510
    I ran my thudbuster st with a sprung b 67 for a week while waiting for a seatpost to come in. I found it to be too much.

    I do run a b17 with my thudbuster st on my monstercross set up and it feels great.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •