Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Law Enforcement In A Future With More Cyclists

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Law Enforcement In A Future With More Cyclists

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-12 | 03:39 PM
  #151  
On your right
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: Southern California

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Elite

Originally Posted by myrridin
... Of course none of these ridiculous beliefs will prevent me from getting paceline groups from being banned because they violate Texas law...
Reading your posts, it sounds like you feel strongly that you have the law on your side and you also have an attorney who concurs. Now, you had mentioned that you'd be willing to contribute legal fees to a person who was injured by a paceline group. But it seems like you don't need to wait for an accident to occur to proceed to get pacelines banned (again, I'm taking care not to misstate your positions).

So how does that work? Can you just file a criminal complaint or get a restraining order? When do we start to see things start to happen?
Daves_Not_Here is offline  
Reply
Old 09-21-12 | 04:52 PM
  #152  
rebel1916's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 84
Originally Posted by myrridin
'inherrent danger' attoney
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Remember when you insulted my smarts? Spelling is not your strong suit huh, ace? Well, spelling and logic.
rebel1916 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-21-12 | 05:10 PM
  #153  
dougmc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada

Originally Posted by Daves_Not_Here
So how does that work? Can you just file a criminal complaint or get a restraining order? When do we start to see things start to happen?
A restraining order ordering the entire state to not break a given law? I don't think that's it.

A criminal complaint? No, the police don't normally issue minor moving violations just on somebody's word -- they generally have to see the violation themselves.

What he probably needs to do is convince the local police that pace-lines are 1) a violation of the "following too closely" law, and 2) a serious enough thing to be worth cracking down on.

Forrester is convinced that it's not a violation of the law, I'm not so sure, but ultimately what we think doesn't matter -- what matters is what he can convince the police and judges of. If he can't even convince them it's against the law, then this will all go nowhere.

Assuming that he can convince them that it's against the law, then he needs to convince them that it's worth enforcing. I imagine police generally currently think it's just a "cyclists being cyclists" thing -- it doesn't normally lead to serious injuries, cyclists do it all over, they've been doing it for decades and the police have never really cared ... why start now?

If he's really serious about this, probably the thing to do is to wait until there's a serious injury in a paceline. Preferably in the local area, as the closer the better. Then bring this to the police and/or mayor as a serious problem and see what happens.

(And if it does work (and maybe even if it doesn't), he needs to be ready for vilification by the local roadies and cycling organizations.)
dougmc is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 11:15 AM
  #154  
davestv's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (Burlington)
This discussion reminds me about those drivers who sit in the middle lane of a 3 lane highway, driving the speed limit with cars passing on both sides and cars in the middle lane slamming on their brakes to prevent a rear ender. The driver is legally in the right and if he did cause an accident he would not be at fault, but really, is being right about something so important you can go through life putting others at risk?
davestv is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 11:32 AM
  #155  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,974
Likes: 401
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by davestv
This discussion reminds me about those drivers who sit in the middle lane of a 3 lane highway, driving the speed limit with cars passing on both sides and cars in the middle lane slamming on their brakes to prevent a rear ender. The driver is legally in the right and if he did cause an accident he would not be at fault, but really, is being right about something so important you can go through life putting others at risk?
Technically their not in the legal right to do that. A cop could, and should, write tickets for impeding traffic to those morons. Back in the 70's when I was in drivers ed in high school we were told the far left lane was for passing and emergency vehicles only, but traffic congestion got so bad over the years that became impracticable, but still people should not be in that lane unless their passing others whenever possible and never go slow in that lane just because they can't exceed the speed limit by even 1 mph.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 12:01 PM
  #156  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dougmc
If he's really serious about this, probably the thing to do is to wait until there's a serious injury in a paceline. Preferably in the local area, as the closer the better. Then bring this to the police and/or mayor as a serious problem and see what happens.
They have recently killed one of their own while riding in a paceline, https://www.planobicycle.org/forum/vi...hp?f=38&t=3216


Originally Posted by dougmc
(And if it does work (and maybe even if it doesn't), he needs to be ready for vilification by the local roadies and cycling organizations.)
While I don't care what anyone thinks of me, they can only blame themselves for any problems arrising from this. As I have repeatedly mentioned, I tried contacting the leaders of the two groups that have caused me the problems that provided my incentive to pursue this issue. There responses would be right at home on this forum...
myrridin is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 12:02 PM
  #157  
dougmc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada

Originally Posted by rekmeyata
Back in the 70's when I was in drivers ed in high school we were told ...
In general, drivers ed has never been the best place to get accurate information about anything
dougmc is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 12:03 PM
  #158  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,239
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area, Calif.
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
"This discussion reminds me about those drivers who sit in the middle lane of a 3 lane highway, driving the speed limit with cars passing on both sides and cars in the middle lane slamming on their brakes to prevent a rear ender."

Technically their not in the legal right to do that. A cop could, and should, write tickets for impeding traffic to those morons. Back in the 70's when I was in drivers ed in high school we were told the far left lane was for passing and emergency vehicles only, but traffic congestion got so bad over the years that became impracticable, but still people should not be in that lane unless their passing others whenever possible and never go slow in that lane just because they can't exceed the speed limit by even 1 mph.
They couldn't very well be in the far left lane if traffic is passing them on both sides as described.
prathmann is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 12:05 PM
  #159  
Randomhead
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
apparently you don't even need to be a cyclist to waste hours on end on BF, who knew?
unterhausen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 01:22 PM
  #160  
CB HI's Avatar
Cycle Year Round
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,644
Likes: 92
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally Posted by myrridin
Maybe you should trying working on understanding written english. I said that my current practice is to proceed to the right and stop, after a group such as this begins passing... In short I pull off the road...
Again, read your own post. Nowhere in the quoted post does it say "my current practice is". You only now claim such after your contradicting post have been pointed out.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 01:55 PM
  #161  
davestv's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (Burlington)
[QUOTE=rekmeyata;14762500]Technically their not in the legal right to do that. A cop could, and should, write tickets for impeding traffic to those morons. Back in the 70's when I was in drivers ed in high school we were told the far left lane was for passing and emergency vehicles only, but traffic congestion got so bad over the years that became impracticable, but still people should not be in that lane unless their passing others whenever possible and never go slow in that lane just because they can't exceed the speed limit by even 1 mph.[/QUOT
I was talking about the middle lane on a 3 lane highway. I don't think it is illegal to drive in that lane even though the slower drivers should be in the far right hand lane. And yes, why the slower drivers sit in the passing lane, (far left), I will never understand. Myrridin just seems to be one of those people who would put others at risk just because he is in the right. (riding his bike "just right of centre and braking and pulling over to the right when being passed? Who is putting who at risk?) I understand why we have laws and rules, but is common sense not important too?
davestv is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 03:42 PM
  #162  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,974
Likes: 401
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by dougmc
In general, drivers ed has never been the best place to get accurate information about anything
Especially in today's world of special, err I mean drivers education. The school I went to actually taught us something called the Smith School of Driving, something I found out years later from a truck driver friend he was taught at the truck company he works for and he highly praises it.

But regardless, if you read your states code book the fact is that the far left lane is still for overtaking and emergency vehicles. And this is what N.J. is doing about it: https://articles.philly.com/2012-03-0...n-traffic-flow

The middle lane is a different story, though in Europe they never use that lane either unless overtaking, then faster cars overtake the middle laners by going to the left lane, and as soon as they pass they merge back into the middle then if open the R lane. Of course here in America like I mentioned before that's a bit difficult with traffic congestion, but if we practice that as much as possible there would be fewer problems on the road. Nothing worse then coming up behind a car in the fast lane who refuses to move over so you have to pass on the right, right passing is more dangerous.

Last edited by rekmeyata; 09-22-12 at 03:46 PM.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 03:49 PM
  #163  
Randomhead
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
New Jersey was one of the first to have a "left lane is for passing" laws, unfortunately accompanied by a law against passing to the right. Inexplicably, they were much more likely to nail you for passing in the right lane than lingering in the left. There is a hangover from that in Pennsylvania, you can almost guarantee if someone is sitting in the left slowing up traffic they are from New Jersey.
unterhausen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 03:51 PM
  #164  
rekmeyata's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,974
Likes: 401
From: NE Indiana

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Originally Posted by unterhausen
New Jersey was one of the first to have a "left lane is for passing" laws, unfortunately accompanied by a law against passing to the right. Inexplicably, they were much more likely to nail you for passing in the right lane than lingering in the left. There is a hangover from that in Pennsylvania, you can almost guarantee if someone is sitting in the left slowing up traffic they are from New Jersey.
Well that's not right! they should give the ticket to the driver impeding traffic. By the way, NJ is not the first state to have that law, ALL states have that law, NJ is simply the first state in a very long long time to re-inactivate the law with enforcement. Now if only they could enforce it correctly.
rekmeyata is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 06:49 PM
  #165  
Bekologist's Avatar
totally louche
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,023
Likes: 12
From: A land that time forgot

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Originally Posted by myrridin
They have recently killed one of their own while riding in a paceline, https://www.planobicycle.org/forum/vi...hp?f=38&t=3216




While I don't care what anyone thinks of me, they can only blame themselves for any problems arrising from this. As I have repeatedly mentioned, I tried contacting the leaders of the two groups that have caused me the problems that provided my incentive to pursue this issue. There responses would be right at home on this forum...
"they" have recently "killed one of their own".... (RIP, fellow rider)

wow, dude. you don't care, you want to meddle in a bicyclists' death, introducing a perverse ulterior machination to that man's family, friends, and loved ones in a most difficult circumstance.

and you want to try and stop people riding in close proximity in texas.


words cannot describe.....
Bekologist is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 07:17 PM
  #166  
rebel1916's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 84
Originally Posted by myrridin
They have recently killed one of their own while riding in a paceline, https://www.planobicycle.org/forum/vi...hp?f=38&t=3216




While I don't care what anyone thinks of me, they can only blame themselves for any problems arrising from this. As I have repeatedly mentioned, I tried contacting the leaders of the two groups that have caused me the problems that provided my incentive to pursue this issue. There responses would be right at home on this forum...
That's some pretty callous stuff right there. I sure hope nothing tragic ever happens to you on a ride. That would really be a shame.
rebel1916 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-12 | 10:28 PM
  #167  
enigmaT120's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 6
From: Falls City, OR

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Fargo 2, Rocky Mountain Fusion, circa '93

Originally Posted by myrridin
Of course none of these ridiculous beliefs will prevent me from getting paceline groups from being banned because they violate Texas law...
If they violate TX law then they are already banned. You just want them to stop because the idiots are buzzing you. I don't blame you, though I doubt I would go to any effort to try to do anything about it except maybe wander around in the lane more. If you did ride farther to the right, say in the right wheel track, would they still pass so close?
enigmaT120 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-24-12 | 03:33 PM
  #168  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by myrridin
As an operator of a vehicle I have no concern/responsibility for vehicles actions behind me, unless I intend to change travel lanes. .
This is an awful nice way to get killed, even if you're in a car.
manapua_man is offline  
Reply
Old 10-24-12 | 06:25 PM
  #169  
Dchiefransom's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,251
Likes: 4
From: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
myridin, if you are knocked down and miss work, have medical bills, etc, the cyclists will stop and fess up to who did it, which we know they will because cyclists are soooooo much better than drivers. Go to court and ensure they "make you whole", just like a car driver should. If they can't pay up, make sure you put a lien on any property they might own. After all, they are just as responsible as vehicle drivers for your injuries. Mandatory 3 foot passing laws should apply to cyclists, as well as vehicles.
Dchiefransom is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
volvo850t5
Advocacy & Safety
10
01-05-18 06:49 PM
frantik
Advocacy & Safety
378
01-10-13 11:48 PM
Pobble.808
Advocacy & Safety
1
01-31-12 03:43 PM
LoRoK
Advocacy & Safety
22
02-19-10 03:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.