Pros riding Steel
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Pros riding Steel
So why are there no Pros riding steel frames? It's not really a weight issue anymore because you can put together a steel bike that is right at the 15 pound UCI limit. So why no steel?
#2
@ Checkmate Cycling
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,617
Bikes: CAAD 8 - Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think there are still a couple... Primarily it is because the companies that sponsor teams give their riders the top-of-the-line framset. For the larger companies that can sponsor teams, these frames are primarily carbon, with some Al and Mg alloys mixed in.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 5,049
Bikes: Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Santana Noventa Tandem, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
what's given is ridden by the peloton..
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A lot of traditionalists will keep making excuses - but the fact of the matter is this...
professionals care about performance. One of the variables that they look into is stiffness, the other is weight savings. Comfort comes later.
Steel doesn't offer an advantage in weight to stiffness performance - it can be made stiffer than composites, but it'll be heavier. It can be made light, but it wouldn't be as stiff. Composites can also be more refined in design - you can't really engineer steel to be more flexly in the vertical axis while being stiff in the horizontal. With composites - the designers can be more selective about that sorta thing...
since the balance between stiffness/comfort, stiffness/weight, reliability/weight is usually hard enough to define and varies with individual's butts - composites make the design process easier because you can control just a bit more of the construction... instead of a relatively homogenious material that you can only affect the diameter, wall thickness and other structural dimensions...
professionals care about performance. One of the variables that they look into is stiffness, the other is weight savings. Comfort comes later.
Steel doesn't offer an advantage in weight to stiffness performance - it can be made stiffer than composites, but it'll be heavier. It can be made light, but it wouldn't be as stiff. Composites can also be more refined in design - you can't really engineer steel to be more flexly in the vertical axis while being stiff in the horizontal. With composites - the designers can be more selective about that sorta thing...
since the balance between stiffness/comfort, stiffness/weight, reliability/weight is usually hard enough to define and varies with individual's butts - composites make the design process easier because you can control just a bit more of the construction... instead of a relatively homogenious material that you can only affect the diameter, wall thickness and other structural dimensions...
#8
Metaphorically speaking
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 807
Bikes: Cannondale R600 ultegra spec
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
****((((because steel ain't real???))))******
ducks for cover again
ducks for cover again
#9
Industry Maven
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wherever good bikes are sold
Posts: 2,936
Bikes: Thylacines...only Thylacines.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Pro's requirements and circumstances has nothing to do with what you or I require.
#10
sundy hopeful
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,068
Bikes: Connondale MTB, Malvern Star (historic) Orbea, GT (newest)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If CF was any good they'd make steel out of it. Real men ride steel!
#11
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by jitteringjr
It's not really a weight issue anymore because you can put together a steel bike that is right at the 15 pound UCI limit.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Making a 15 lbs steel bike is possible (usually in a smaller size), but is takes a lot more skilled labour than making the same out of carbon or Al. Production frames do not have this level of workmanship.
Top steel makers are mostly small workshops or one-man bands and simply cannot supply a big team with the 100 frames they need for a season of racing.
Top steel makers are mostly small workshops or one-man bands and simply cannot supply a big team with the 100 frames they need for a season of racing.
#13
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Call me Mr. Cynical, but I think a lot of it has to do with marketing and the "Bling" factor. Along the same lines, if unobtanium worked better for the pros, but the manufacturers couldn't get enough of it to mass produce bikes, the sponsored pros wouldn't be racing on it.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by velocipedio
really? is there one in production? who makes it?
For the cobblestone races they ride this time of year, I would think that steel would be a good choice.
#15
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Towson, MD
Posts: 4,020
Bikes: 2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The pros ride mostly production frames - or next year's production frame - supplied by the team. Most R & D is in CF. A steel frame as light as a CF frame would be not be stiff enough and would have to be supplied by a specialty frame fabricator and re-badged.
So why bother?
So why bother?
#16
Evil Genius
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Posts: 1,529
Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because steel has limits despite having the same basic strength to weight ratio as aluminium and titanium and a very similer modulus of elastisity(stiffness). It's denser so it would need thinner walled tubing for a given tube diameter which would dent easier, a perfect pop can can hold over 100 pounds but one little ding and the walls collapse.
they don't use pig iron for much anymore because steel replaced it, less brittle stronger and more workable.
Steel is a much cheaper matierial per pound than any of the others at 1/4 the price of aluminium
I have two steel bikes btw
they don't use pig iron for much anymore because steel replaced it, less brittle stronger and more workable.
Steel is a much cheaper matierial per pound than any of the others at 1/4 the price of aluminium
I have two steel bikes btw
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by jitteringjr
So why are there no Pros riding steel frames? It's not really a weight issue anymore because you can put together a steel bike that is right at the 15 pound UCI limit. So why no steel?
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by capsicum
Because steel has limits despite having ................. and a very similer modulus of elastisity(stiffness). I
#19
Aluminium Crusader :-)
this is just my opinion, but....
I'd say it's mostly marketing and "show biz", but I'd figure flex would have something to do with it.
These were the last steel bikes ridden in the Euro pro peloton (only in some of the classics), and I think Scapin sponsored Team Saturn a couple of years ago
https://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?...GW/bike_ch1825
I'd say it's mostly marketing and "show biz", but I'd figure flex would have something to do with it.
These were the last steel bikes ridden in the Euro pro peloton (only in some of the classics), and I think Scapin sponsored Team Saturn a couple of years ago
https://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?...GW/bike_ch1825
Last edited by 531Aussie; 04-18-05 at 07:14 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by 531Aussie
this is just my opinion, but....
I'd say it's mostly marketing and "show biz", but I'd figure flex would have something to do with it.
These were the last steel bikes ridden in the Euro pro peleton (only in some of the classics), and I think Scapin sponsored Team Saturn a couple of years ago
https://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?...GW/bike_ch1825
I'd say it's mostly marketing and "show biz", but I'd figure flex would have something to do with it.
These were the last steel bikes ridden in the Euro pro peleton (only in some of the classics), and I think Scapin sponsored Team Saturn a couple of years ago
https://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?...GW/bike_ch1825
I wanted the Super Prodidy, but Cervelo discontinued it and the LBS didn't have my size.
#22
Aluminium Crusader :-)
Originally Posted by suntreader
Hmmm... I wonder what Eddy Merckx was riding when he set the one hour record in 1972?
he was riding a:
bike..........Windsor-Colnago (ITA)
Builder.......Ernesto Colnago (ITA)
weight.......5.75 kilos
design.......diamond pista
material.....Reynolds and Columbus PL steel tubing
wheels.......Nisi rims (200 grams) 28/32-spoke
Tyres.........Clement #0 tubulars (90/200 grams)
https://www.bikecult.com/bikecultbook...cordsHour.html
#23
Lance Hater
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 531Aussie
Don't get me started
he was riding a:
bike..........Windsor-Colnago (ITA)
Builder.......Ernesto Colnago (ITA)
weight.......5.75 kilos
design.......diamond pista
material.....Reynolds and Columbus PL steel tubing
wheels.......Nisi rims (200 grams) 28/32-spoke
Tyres.........Clement #0 tubulars (90/200 grams)
he was riding a:
bike..........Windsor-Colnago (ITA)
Builder.......Ernesto Colnago (ITA)
weight.......5.75 kilos
design.......diamond pista
material.....Reynolds and Columbus PL steel tubing
wheels.......Nisi rims (200 grams) 28/32-spoke
Tyres.........Clement #0 tubulars (90/200 grams)
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by 531Aussie
Don't get me started
he was riding a:
bike..........Windsor-Colnago (ITA)
Builder.......Ernesto Colnago (ITA)
weight.......5.75 kilos
design.......diamond pista
material.....Reynolds and Columbus PL steel tubing
wheels.......Nisi rims (200 grams) 28/32-spoke
Tyres.........Clement #0 tubulars (90/200 grams)
https://www.bikecult.com/bikecultbook...cordsHour.html
he was riding a:
bike..........Windsor-Colnago (ITA)
Builder.......Ernesto Colnago (ITA)
weight.......5.75 kilos
design.......diamond pista
material.....Reynolds and Columbus PL steel tubing
wheels.......Nisi rims (200 grams) 28/32-spoke
Tyres.........Clement #0 tubulars (90/200 grams)
https://www.bikecult.com/bikecultbook...cordsHour.html
Most of the fastest times on that link are using steel with only a few CF frames and I am not talking about the 1972 times.
#25
Aluminium Crusader :-)
Originally Posted by jitteringjr
Most of the fastest times on that link are using steel with only a few CF frames and I am not talking about the 1972 times.