Trek 520 for off road....
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Trek 520 for off road....
Was looking at the Trek 920 and the new 1120 for some off road touring....
But now I am thinking 520 with some off road/cyclecross tires. Then new 520 has Disc brakes and stronger rims. Seems like it might be better suited for my travels which are bike paths, some road, and some trails but no serious trails. Mostly gravel roads and logging trails. What would be the cons of this bike. I have an older 520 not with rim breaks that I use for road touring already.
But now I am thinking 520 with some off road/cyclecross tires. Then new 520 has Disc brakes and stronger rims. Seems like it might be better suited for my travels which are bike paths, some road, and some trails but no serious trails. Mostly gravel roads and logging trails. What would be the cons of this bike. I have an older 520 not with rim breaks that I use for road touring already.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,215
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Dunno how big of tires you can fit under one, but I regularly ride 32mm tires on gravel roads. I have ridden them on forest/two track road, although probably not to the level of logging road (depending on the exact conditions, I imagine deeply rutted, muddy, etc). Wouldn't be my first choice, but if it was simply I was going to encounter them every once in a while in no great number, with the majority of riding on bike trails and road, I wouldn't hesitate to use one.
#3
Banned
Off road, like past the end of the paved , Un paved 'dual track'?
Con, your only interest?
neutral, tire damage can happen any how?
Can't ride as recklessly fast as a 29 by 2" wheeled bike?
....
Con, your only interest?
neutral, tire damage can happen any how?
Can't ride as recklessly fast as a 29 by 2" wheeled bike?
....
Last edited by fietsbob; 09-06-17 at 11:14 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Piratebike, Generally a touring bike does well on non technical unpaved surfaces. Tires and tire tread design won't make much difference. Extended mud, soft sand, and anything beyond a casually groomed path can require more aggressive tread designs, but again only for extensive distances. A good tire I have used gravel grinding was a Pasala.
Brad
Brad
#5
-
Was looking at the Trek 920 and the new 1120 for some off road touring....
But now I am thinking 520 with some off road/cyclecross tires. Then new 520 has Disc brakes and stronger rims. Seems like it might be better suited for my travels which are bike paths, some road, and some trails but no serious trails. Mostly gravel roads and logging trails. What would be the cons of this bike. I have an older 520 not with rim breaks that I use for road touring already.
But now I am thinking 520 with some off road/cyclecross tires. Then new 520 has Disc brakes and stronger rims. Seems like it might be better suited for my travels which are bike paths, some road, and some trails but no serious trails. Mostly gravel roads and logging trails. What would be the cons of this bike. I have an older 520 not with rim breaks that I use for road touring already.
#6
Full Member
I've taken my 520 over some moderately rugged terrain without any serious problems but that said, I would much rather ride a bike with a suspension fork for off road use. When I go from my Haro 29er to my 520, one of the first things I notice is how much more harsh the rigid front fork is on my shoulders when I'm riding on bumpy roads. I had 42mm Conti Top Contact II tires on my 520 (no fenders). I suppose newer disc 520's would be slightly better suited to off road use than older ones like mine. The 520 is never going to be a stump-jumping, rock-hopper but with sufficiently robust tires, wheels, brakes etc it should certainly be able to handle gravel roads, carriage roads, fire roads etc, even some single track trails as long as they're not too radical.
Last edited by hfbill; 09-11-17 at 08:26 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Have ridden my 520 over some pretty rough terrain, logging and gravel roads. Right now it is my winter bike with Schwalbe studded snow tires.
That said - I now have a mtn bike for rough terrain, logging and other types of paths.
That said - I now have a mtn bike for rough terrain, logging and other types of paths.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Loves Park, Illinois
Posts: 419
Bikes: 1897 Crescent Tandem, 1904 Rambler shaft drive, 1921 Schwinn Henderson, 1958 Schwinn Tiger, 1973 Raleigh International, 1982 Trek 420, 2010 Trek 720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just getting back on Bike Forums after a long abase.
I bought a 2017 920 on impulse last spring and I love it!!! The tires are little noisy and it's not really fast but I can stay on it all day. If you are still thinking about it I'd give you a nudge in that direction.
I bought a 2017 920 on impulse last spring and I love it!!! The tires are little noisy and it's not really fast but I can stay on it all day. If you are still thinking about it I'd give you a nudge in that direction.
#9
bicycle tourist
I've ridden my 2007 Trek 520 across Russia including ~1000+ kilometers of gravel road. Also ridden it down the Dalton Highway from Prudhoe Bay. It accepts 700x35 tires and does OK on that type of rougher roads.
In the "PRO" category would be that it rides across a wide range of roads. For example, a total distance of my Russia trip was over 12,000 kilometers and gravel was thus a small portion. If you were exclusively riding this off-road stuff, I might suggest a different bike.
In the "CON" category would be not much fender space if you want fenders. I left my fenders behind on a road sign after they repeatedly got clogged with mud.
In the "PRO" category would be that it rides across a wide range of roads. For example, a total distance of my Russia trip was over 12,000 kilometers and gravel was thus a small portion. If you were exclusively riding this off-road stuff, I might suggest a different bike.
In the "CON" category would be not much fender space if you want fenders. I left my fenders behind on a road sign after they repeatedly got clogged with mud.
#10
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,347
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1953 Post(s)
Liked 3,633 Times
in
1,670 Posts
the 520 is pretty much a prototypical touring bike and such bikes have been used forever on all kinds of roads. i personally would use your rim brake model if it were me. 35's and fenders is a nice way to tour lots of kind of roads.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
I've taken my 520 over some moderately rugged terrain without any serious problems but that said, I would much rather ride a bike with a suspension fork for off road use. When I go from my Haro 29er to my 520, one of the first things I notice is how much more harsh the rigid front fork is on my shoulders when I'm riding on bumpy roads. I had 42mm Conti Top Contact II tires on my 520 (no fenders). I suppose newer disc 520's would be slightly better suited to off road use than older ones like mine. The 520 is never going to be a stump-jumping, rock-hopper but with sufficiently robust tires, wheels, brakes etc it should certainly be able to handle gravel roads, carriage roads, fire roads etc, even some single track trails as long as they're not too radical.
Only suspension fork I've tried is a cheap version on Trek hybrid but even that really smooths out the bumps on local rides. Alu-frame MTB w/nice susp fork is about the same weight as a steel tourer. Susp fork can sometimes allow for narrower/faster tires since they reduce need for wide tire to absorb shocks.
#13
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 489
Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times
in
35 Posts
If you already have a 520, and are happy with it for "on-road" touring and everyday riding, then why would you buy an essentially updated version. HAve you tried your current 520 on the type of trail you are considering, even for just a few miles. That might help you decide whether a new 520 would work, or you want something stouter. Also, if you really want another bike, it would seem more practical to buy something a little more suited for what you are considering the bike for, rather than just a copy of what you already have.
#15
Senior Member
I had a Long Haul Trucker for a while. It seems to be the bike most often mentioned alongside the 520, although I personally don't know how they compare, but I will say that I switched from the LHT to a Troll for a number of reasons, one of which was a desire to tackle a wider variety of terrain. I took my touring bike off-road, but it was slow, rough going if I did anything more technical than rail-trail. Even with 38/40mm tires, I didn't love it's performance on gravel, although many are fine with it on even narrower tires. But some 2" tires on my Troll with a higher bottom bracket, and I'm riding over some of the same terrain that I walked the LHT through.
My feeling is that you can take your touring bike lots of places, and you can swap out your tires to improve the experience, but if your goal is to spend a significant amount of time off-road, a touring bike may not be the right choice.
My feeling is that you can take your touring bike lots of places, and you can swap out your tires to improve the experience, but if your goal is to spend a significant amount of time off-road, a touring bike may not be the right choice.
#16
Senior Member
I had a Long Haul Trucker for a while. It seems to be the bike most often mentioned alongside the 520, although I personally don't know how they compare, but I will say that I switched from the LHT to a Troll for a number of reasons, one of which was a desire to tackle a wider variety of terrain. I took my touring bike off-road, but it was slow, rough going if I did anything more technical than rail-trail. Even with 38/40mm tires, I didn't love it's performance on gravel, although many are fine with it on even narrower tires. But some 2" tires on my Troll with a higher bottom bracket, and I'm riding over some of the same terrain that I walked the LHT through.
My feeling is that you can take your touring bike lots of places, and you can swap out your tires to improve the experience, but if your goal is to spend a significant amount of time off-road, a touring bike may not be the right choice.
My feeling is that you can take your touring bike lots of places, and you can swap out your tires to improve the experience, but if your goal is to spend a significant amount of time off-road, a touring bike may not be the right choice.
Ive set my troll up as a dropbar bike, and it rides no different really from my other dropbar touring bikes on pavement, gearing and wider tires aside.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
IMHO serious touring bikes should give option for ThudBuster seatpost & ShockStop stem. Trek 520 now has a slanted top tube which should allow for ThudBuster or other suspension seatpost.
Haven't tried TRP brakes, AFAIK main benefit of dual-piston would be slightly less lever travel. Properly-adjusted BB7's have fairly low lever travel & today I tried out SwissStop pads which stop so effortlessly I'm not sure if hydraulics would work much better.
Haven't tried TRP brakes, AFAIK main benefit of dual-piston would be slightly less lever travel. Properly-adjusted BB7's have fairly low lever travel & today I tried out SwissStop pads which stop so effortlessly I'm not sure if hydraulics would work much better.
Last edited by DropBarFan; 10-04-17 at 11:55 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The banks of the River Charles
Posts: 2,020
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease, 2020 Seven Evergreen, 2019 Honey Allroads Ti, 2018 Seven Redsky XX, 2017 Trek Boon 7, 2014 Trek 520
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Liked 903 Times
in
486 Posts
I may be a little late to the party but; yesterday I had my 520 on a sandy crushed stone path with 35mm Marathon tires. It was pretty terrible. The tires were too narrow for the loose surface. I unclipped rather hastily a few times to catch myself. I rode on the grass next to the path most of the way. Anyhow it made me think of this thread.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,505
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5877 Post(s)
Liked 3,445 Times
in
2,066 Posts
I've been thinking of buying a new touring bike but one that is at home on rough stuff as well as roads. The salsa fargo, for example, can go offroad and would also make a reasonable touring bike. There are other bikes that can do that as well. I'm not so sure that the Trek 520 is your best bet though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
abraxian
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
20
02-02-17 12:14 PM
jzsoup
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
20
01-24-17 10:36 AM