View Poll Results: Number of spacers under stem...
I agree with the view
5
41.67%
I don't agree
7
58.33%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll
Spacers poll!
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Spacers poll!
In this article (bit.ly/2zLX8MZ) about bike fit, the author supports that
What is your opinion?
When you fit a bike perfectly there is
no need for headset spacers.
no need for headset spacers.
#2
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,531
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3887 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
I said I agree, but only in the case where the rider is fit enough to ride the bike. So I agree, and then the buyer needs to get fit enough to be comfortable in the designed condition. Too many people come here complaining about their bike fit, when it's their fitness that's the issue. The thing is, most folks who come to BF are riding bikes for fitness/health reasons. Yeah, so get with the program. And yeah, sometimes I just have no patience.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#4
Banned
Only applicable to race bikes, and flexible backbone riders.. probably all under 35.
and forks with carbon fiber steerers .. Minimize the leverage .. you are bent way over to reduce frontal area and thus air resistance.
Bike racing is about pain, if you can go faster in spite of the pain, you might win..
and forks with carbon fiber steerers .. Minimize the leverage .. you are bent way over to reduce frontal area and thus air resistance.
Bike racing is about pain, if you can go faster in spite of the pain, you might win..
Last edited by fietsbob; 12-31-17 at 08:40 PM.
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
In all seriousness, just to say "a well-fitting bike doesn't have any headset spacers" is ridiculous because you can achieve the exact same fit with a horizontal stem and spacers, or with an up-angled stem and no spacers. If their contention is that the right frame size would lead to a correct fit with a more-or-less horizontal stem and no spacers, well maybe but you're still at the mercy of what the frame makers are putting out.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,706
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5779 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
Yes, if you PERFECTLY fit the bike, you wouldn't need spacers, but that a dumb, meaningless analysis.
First of all there's no such thing as a perfect fit. Things change, and riders may want to adjust their riding position accordingly. Trimming a fork based on zero spacer stack, means no ability to readjust later.
Secondly, unless the frame is custom made, there's limited control of head height, so fitting the frame is a matter of getting to the right ball park, then finishing the job with stem length and angle, fine tuned with spacers.
First of all there's no such thing as a perfect fit. Things change, and riders may want to adjust their riding position accordingly. Trimming a fork based on zero spacer stack, means no ability to readjust later.
Secondly, unless the frame is custom made, there's limited control of head height, so fitting the frame is a matter of getting to the right ball park, then finishing the job with stem length and angle, fine tuned with spacers.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#8
Banned
My opinion is I don't ride so uncomfortably bent over any more .
one of my bikes Fork with steel steerer tube, not carbon..
one of my bikes Fork with steel steerer tube, not carbon..
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,823
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 614 Post(s)
Liked 565 Times
in
429 Posts
When you fit a bike perfectly there is
no need for headset spacers.
no need for headset spacers.
But over more than four decades of cycling I have yet to find any bike fit "perfectly" for me. There are always minor (sometimes major) misses in what the designer imagined for the geometry and what my specific body and riding style dictate. Usually, overcome with simple saddle/stem/bar changes, though occasionally impossible to the point of that specific frame being inappropriate for me.
I suppose that the old "ten speed" from the '70s fit sufficiently well, but then I was young and strong and it pretty much didn't matter that much to me that a fit wasn't "perfect." Its top tube was probably an inch and a half too long for me, more or less, and (for preference) I probably could have used drop bars with far less drop in them. But it was close enough to work well.
What seems to work best for me these days: reach of about ~350mm, stack of about ~550-570mm, bars with some rise/sweep, for a more-upright riding position and more-pedestrian pace than in past years. (Getting older has its pros/cons.) Not a lot of standard, off-the-shelf products meet those basic measurements. I've found on some frames putting a good inch or two of spacers beneath the stem is sufficient. On my current bike, I'm at the limit of the steerer tube already, so any significant adjustment upward (beyond the adjustable stem) would entail a longer steerer on a new fork, though keeping the same geometry of the current frame. Usually, I've ended up with a different stem, bar and saddle arrangement, and that's been sufficient. Works well for my own limb/torso length and riding style.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,047
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 1,555 Times
in
1,020 Posts
This is an absolutely crazy idea. Would you buy a bike with no ability to change seat height, or a helmet with strap length adjustment?
Buying a bike that requires no spacer is buying a bike that you can NEVER lower the bars, no matter what happens to your fitness and flexibility.
AND, some fork steerer failures came from not having a spacer to distribute flex between the headset and stem.
Ideally, a bike that is perfectly fit would have 10-20mm of spacers so you can still lower the stem and have some spacer for steerer health.
Buying a bike that requires no spacer is buying a bike that you can NEVER lower the bars, no matter what happens to your fitness and flexibility.
AND, some fork steerer failures came from not having a spacer to distribute flex between the headset and stem.
Ideally, a bike that is perfectly fit would have 10-20mm of spacers so you can still lower the stem and have some spacer for steerer health.
#11
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
I don't agree. Though there are some technicalities to the semantics of that sentence.
If the bike fits you perfectly, then why would you put spacers in the headset? Or why would you change anything?
But bikes typically don't fit perfectly. So they must be changes to suit the person riding them. Some might need headset spacers.
When you fit a bike perfectly there is
no need for headset spacers.
no need for headset spacers.
But bikes typically don't fit perfectly. So they must be changes to suit the person riding them. Some might need headset spacers.
#12
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,435
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3136 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
1,029 Posts
In all seriousness, just to say "a well-fitting bike doesn't have any headset spacers" is ridiculous because you can achieve the exact same fit with a horizontal stem and spacers, or with an up-angled stem and no spacers. If their contention is that the right frame size would lead to a correct fit with a more-or-less horizontal stem and no spacers, well maybe but you're still at the mercy of what the frame makers are putting out.
#13
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,435
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3136 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times
in
1,029 Posts
See this Parlee? How much head tube extension do you want?
#14
Banned
I would have had to be in the NL Factory in 2003, to slap the hand of the guy reaching for the hacksaw
before the fork steerer was cut off in the 1st place. Cutting it down to some formula they used to march the frame size,
before shipping it out into the world market place,, where the original owner bought it.. i was 3rd in line.
So I got a BBB BHP 21, internal stem raiser and shim spacer set to bring it up to where it would have been, generally 1/3 of a Meter.
Doubled up on stems, to have the bar bag, over the fork crown mounted headlight, under the bars,
You could not have found a more apples and oranges match , fancy road bike with bling wheels, vs a touring load carrying bike for touring the world..
They are both Fruit, both Bikes..
before the fork steerer was cut off in the 1st place. Cutting it down to some formula they used to march the frame size,
before shipping it out into the world market place,, where the original owner bought it.. i was 3rd in line.
So I got a BBB BHP 21, internal stem raiser and shim spacer set to bring it up to where it would have been, generally 1/3 of a Meter.
Doubled up on stems, to have the bar bag, over the fork crown mounted headlight, under the bars,
You could not have found a more apples and oranges match , fancy road bike with bling wheels, vs a touring load carrying bike for touring the world..
They are both Fruit, both Bikes..
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,047
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 1,555 Times
in
1,020 Posts
I would have had to be in the NL Factory in 2003, to slap the hand of the guy reaching for the hacksaw
before the fork steerer was cut off in the 1st place. Cutting it down to some formula they used to march the frame size,
before shipping it out into the world market place,, where the original owner bought it.. i was 3rd in line.
So I got a BBB BHP 21, internal stem raiser and shim spacer set to bring it up to where it would have been, generally 1/3 of a Meter.
Doubled up on stems, to have the bar bag, over the fork crown mounted headlight, under the bars,
You could not have found a more apples and oranges match , fancy road bike with bling wheels, vs a touring load carrying bike for touring the world..
They are both Fruit, both Bikes..
before the fork steerer was cut off in the 1st place. Cutting it down to some formula they used to march the frame size,
before shipping it out into the world market place,, where the original owner bought it.. i was 3rd in line.
So I got a BBB BHP 21, internal stem raiser and shim spacer set to bring it up to where it would have been, generally 1/3 of a Meter.
Doubled up on stems, to have the bar bag, over the fork crown mounted headlight, under the bars,
You could not have found a more apples and oranges match , fancy road bike with bling wheels, vs a touring load carrying bike for touring the world..
They are both Fruit, both Bikes..
#16
Banned
So? , it's My Bike , no Carbon fiber anywhere .. fit for purpose..
got it in 2008, Rohloff hub alone costs a good chunk of how much I paid for the whole thing..
By the way, you must have very tiny feet , it's barely over 6 inches tall .. stand over height, straddling flat footed, is just right.
...
got it in 2008, Rohloff hub alone costs a good chunk of how much I paid for the whole thing..
By the way, you must have very tiny feet , it's barely over 6 inches tall .. stand over height, straddling flat footed, is just right.
...
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,047
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 1,555 Times
in
1,020 Posts
So? , it's My Bike , no Carbon fiber anywhere .. fit for purpose..
got it in 2008, Rohloff hub alone costs a good chunk of how much I paid for the whole thing..
By the way, you must have very tiny feet , it's barely over 6 inches tall .. stand over height, straddling flat footed, is just right.
got it in 2008, Rohloff hub alone costs a good chunk of how much I paid for the whole thing..
By the way, you must have very tiny feet , it's barely over 6 inches tall .. stand over height, straddling flat footed, is just right.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,047
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 1,555 Times
in
1,020 Posts
#20
Banned
No it's 300mm from crown race, seat of a typical fork bought separately.. to the un cut top..
There is; both headset bearings 13 cm of head tube, then the original factory set up had 3 10 mm spacers under the ITM stem..
By Buying the Very Clever BBB BHP 21 stem raiser, I was able to resurrect my riding position as if ..
I were able to have made them leave the steel fork steerer tube as it was when the fork company made it..
Im 70 been working on my bikes and on others in shops for 60 ..
OP was talking about carbon fiber race bike forks after all .. sorry for the distraction..
...
There is; both headset bearings 13 cm of head tube, then the original factory set up had 3 10 mm spacers under the ITM stem..
By Buying the Very Clever BBB BHP 21 stem raiser, I was able to resurrect my riding position as if ..
I were able to have made them leave the steel fork steerer tube as it was when the fork company made it..
Im 70 been working on my bikes and on others in shops for 60 ..
OP was talking about carbon fiber race bike forks after all .. sorry for the distraction..
...
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,047
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4391 Post(s)
Liked 1,555 Times
in
1,020 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Ben (who makes it a point NOT to practice any of what I preached above.)