Rpm
06-27-05, 08:50 PM
#1
Jer. 29:11
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 205
Bikes: Gary Fisher Superfly, Bianchi Axis, Trek Madone 5.5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rpm
Stupid question #1:
Is it better to train for speed or RPM?
I'm trying to average 80 but I have to drop back a couple gears to do so and that often cuts my speed.
Somehow, that just dosen't seem right.
My bike blog
Is it better to train for speed or RPM?
I'm trying to average 80 but I have to drop back a couple gears to do so and that often cuts my speed.
Somehow, that just dosen't seem right.
My bike blog
06-27-05, 10:36 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,410
Bikes: Scapin EOS7 sloping, 10v Record, Ksyriums
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pcmike
Stupid question #1:
Is it better to train for speed or RPM?
I'm trying to average 80 but I have to drop back a couple gears to do so and that often cuts my speed.
Somehow, that just dosen't seem right.
My bike blog
Is it better to train for speed or RPM?
I'm trying to average 80 but I have to drop back a couple gears to do so and that often cuts my speed.
Somehow, that just dosen't seem right.
My bike blog
If you're a noob, train for cadence over speed. A smooth, fluid cadence will be invaluable as you gain strength and experience.
07-04-05, 08:43 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 2,646
Bikes: Trek 7700, C'dale R2000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Reading your Thread, I did a test on my machine.
I set the machine at 550 to 600 Calories per hour for my 195 LB weight and speed of 20 MPH approx. held constant.
I held 100 RPM cadence at a certain strain level.
Next I did 90 RPM at a 10% lower strain level. Same speed and calories.
So, the question is if one can do higher cadence for a long time or lower cadence but higher strain on muscles and joints. I do not know what is better.
I set the machine at 550 to 600 Calories per hour for my 195 LB weight and speed of 20 MPH approx. held constant.
I held 100 RPM cadence at a certain strain level.
Next I did 90 RPM at a 10% lower strain level. Same speed and calories.
So, the question is if one can do higher cadence for a long time or lower cadence but higher strain on muscles and joints. I do not know what is better.
07-05-05, 02:50 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 2,646
Bikes: Trek 7700, C'dale R2000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sorry, I should have said "Next I did 90 RPM at a 10% higher strain level"
