Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Study analyzing factors which affect utilitarian cycling

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Study analyzing factors which affect utilitarian cycling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-05, 04:52 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spandexwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Don't ask
Posts: 166

Bikes: Felt F80, Cannondale F400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, I know, another study. Ugh! This one does have some interesting information. For one thing it has a graphic which shows the time spent working to pay for one's mode of transit. This is juxtaposed against another graphic showing travel time. The end result is that you can see how much of your time your transit mode demands from you. These results are broken down by income brackets, as the less money you make, the more time you have to work to pay for transit. The VC advocates will love this statement made in the study:
However, the facility designs preferred by novice cyclists are sometimes disliked by experienced road cyclists. If changes in facilities end up worsening conditions for experienced cyclists who do the majority of travel by bicycle, the total amount of bicycle transportation may actually decrease.Many existing cyclists care more about the conditions they face on a day-to-day basis than the overall popularity of their travel mode. These cyclists may exhibit skepticism toward plans to make cycling more popular if it is not clear that such plans will preserve or improve conditions for their own cycling habits
I'm inclined to like that statement, too. If bike lanes meant my being banned from roads, I'd fight alongside Helmet Head to stop them.

Factors which Affect Utilitarian Cycling Study
spandexwarrior is offline  
Old 12-14-05, 04:58 PM
  #2  
Rides again
 
HiYoSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SW. Sacramento Region, aka, down river
Posts: 3,282

Bikes: Giant OCR T, Trek SC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Old study, but look at the table with the number of accidents. Most on this forum are super concerned about being rear ended, that is way down on accident frequency.
HiYoSilver is offline  
Old 12-14-05, 06:29 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by HiYoSilver
Old study, but look at the table with the number of accidents. Most on this forum are super concerned about being rear ended, that is way down on accident frequency.
But those numbers are not from the study, rather they are used in the paper and taken from Forster. Hardly convincing if one is unsure about V.C. (Not to say they are not right, just that they are far from free of the appearance of bias).
Keith99 is offline  
Old 12-14-05, 06:49 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696

Bikes: who cares?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
No, I agree, this study is just more VC spin, disguised as some sort of academic report, using old data from Forrester.
randya is offline  
Old 12-14-05, 08:32 PM
  #5  
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In case you didn't know, the author of that study is a participant of this forum.

If my time is worth what they pay me at work, and if you count all the money I've spent in the last year on bikes, riding my bike costs me way more than driving by a huge amount. But cost isn't a valid measure for me. I believe that if you enjoy something you should spend your money there rather than skimp and spend all your money on stuff you don't care about much. I don't care about driving, so I don't spend any time or money doing that if I can help it.
sbhikes is offline  
Old 12-14-05, 08:49 PM
  #6  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,969

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times in 1,043 Posts
Originally Posted by sbhikes
In case you didn't know, the author of that study is a participant of this forum.
And one of his favorite constructs is quoted by the OP:
"However, the facility designs preferred by novice cyclists are sometimes disliked by experienced road cyclists. If changes in facilities end up worsening conditions for experienced cyclists who do the majority of travel by bicycle, the total amount of bicycle transportation may actually decrease. Many existing cyclists care more about the conditions they face on a day-to-day basis than the overall popularity of their travel mode. These cyclists may exhibit skepticism toward plans to make cycling more popular if it is not clear that such plans will preserve or improve conditions for their own cycling habits"

Who are these "experienced cyclists", who measured their miles, and who says that any of it is for transportation/utility purposes? In fact who says that the "experienced road cyclists" cycle more on a day to day basis than the "inexperienced" day laborers, school children, college students, etc. who may find that the facilities improve their cycling experience.

I don't buy into his construct that road cyclists earn extra votes on transportation or recreational facility designs for their miles run up on the weekend on their club training rides and organized events.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 12-15-05, 05:41 AM
  #7  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,969

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times in 1,043 Posts
Originally Posted by randya
No, I agree, this study is just more VC spin, disguised as some sort of academic report, using old data from Forrester.
Quite True. Old so-called "data" from Forester, diced and sliced to fit his assumptions. It isn't just an "appearance" of bias.

The humantransport.org's manifesto (cited by OP) parroting of sophomic Forester analysis of Forester cherry picked data snippets diminishes the credibility of the manifesto. The authors' inability/unwillingness to distinguish dreck from data (when it supports the desired assumption) is obvious.

Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 12-15-05 at 10:43 AM.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 12-15-05, 07:40 AM
  #8  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike


Who are these "experienced cyclists", who measured their miles, and who says that any of it is for transportation/utility purposes? In fact who says that the "experienced road cyclists" cycle more on a day to day basis than the "inexperienced" day laborers, school children, college students, etc. who may find that the facilities improve their cycling experience.

I don't buy into his construct that road cyclists earn extra votes on transportation or recreational facility designs for their miles run up on the weekend on their club training rides and organized events.

Hear, hear.

VC spin dressed up as populist bike policy! What a distinctly ANTI-bicyclist stance.

Yesterday I spent about 3 hours on the bike, and saw about %90 utilitarian, 'disenfranchized' bicyclists, and only one or two clubbies in kit....and almost everyone wasn't wearing helmets!

I think the utilitarian and beginning bicyclist deserve greater accomodation than clubbies that hardly even ride. And in CA, I don't know that there's a law restricting a bicyclist to the bike lanes, is there?

I don't think Helmet Dude is fighting that fight, he uses a C.L.A.P.P.E.R. technique....

Center Lane Avoidance Positioning Preffered over Everything Real.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 12-15-05, 07:57 AM
  #9  
Sumanitu taka owaci
 
LittleBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sbhikes
If my time is worth what they pay me at work, and if you count all the money I've spent in the last year on bikes, riding my bike costs me way more than driving by a huge amount.
I don't understand? This must be for bike purchases way above and beyond what is necessary for commuting.

The last two bicycles I purchased (one of which gets me to work most days) cost me a total of $65, not including occasional maintenance. My wife and I recently bought a very nice (but economical) new car last year, a 2005 Toyota Corolla. We pay $400 a month in car payments, and about $100 a month in fuel costs. All I can say is I'm glad we aren't paying for two cars.

Sometimes I wonder if you ladies and gents aren't throwing the baby out with the bathwater. You seem to have a knee-jerk reaction by automatically rejecting anything that's said by a cyclist who you know has a predisposed anti-bike facility bent. It seems to me intellectually dishonest, even if those you disagree with might be posessed of the same difficulty.
__________________
No worries

Last edited by LittleBigMan; 12-15-05 at 08:02 AM.
LittleBigMan is offline  
Old 12-15-05, 09:08 AM
  #10  
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LittleBigMan
I don't understand? This must be for bike purchases way above and beyond what is necessary for commuting.

The last two bicycles I purchased (one of which gets me to work most days) cost me a total of $65, not including occasional maintenance. My wife and I recently bought a very nice (but economical) new car last year, a 2005 Toyota Corolla. We pay $400 a month in car payments, and about $100 a month in fuel costs. All I can say is I'm glad we aren't paying for two cars.

Sometimes I wonder if you ladies and gents aren't throwing the baby out with the bathwater. You seem to have a knee-jerk reaction by automatically rejecting anything that's said by a cyclist who you know has a predisposed anti-bike facility bent. It seems to me intellectually dishonest, even if those you disagree with might be posessed of the same difficulty.
I guess I should have included one of those smilies in my post.

In the last year or so I've bought two rather expensive bikes which I have used for commuting. Now I have a selection of 3 bikes (well, 2 bikes and one trike) to choose from each morning. For all the bikes in the past year or so I've bought all sorts of gadgets, clothes and accessories to enhance the commute. If you add all that up it's way more than I've spent on my old 1994, fully paid for truck that molders in the driveway totally ignored.

Also, it you consider that it takes me twice as long to ride to work as to drive, and my time is worth $x, then I'm spending more dollars on my bike commute.

Now, here's where the forum smiley should say to you: It's money well spent. I'm loving every minute of it. If I hadn't re-started bike commuting 2 years ago then I'd still have an old mountain bike hanging on a hook, I wouldn't have my trike and recumbent, I wouldn't have met all the nice recumbent riders all over the country (and world), I'd be buying more gasoline, and I wouldn't be starting and ending every workday with fun.

Worth every penny I tell ya.
sbhikes is offline  
Old 12-15-05, 09:45 AM
  #11  
Ride the Road
 
Daily Commute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,059

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sbhikes
I guess I should have included one of those smilies in my post.

In the last year or so I've bought two rather expensive bikes which I have used for commuting. Now I have a selection of 3 bikes (well, 2 bikes and one trike) to choose from each morning. For all the bikes in the past year or so I've bought all sorts of gadgets, clothes and accessories to enhance the commute. If you add all that up it's way more than I've spent on my old 1994, fully paid for truck that molders in the driveway totally ignored.

Also, it you consider that it takes me twice as long to ride to work as to drive, and my time is worth $x, then I'm spending more dollars on my bike commute.

Now, here's where the forum smiley should say to you: It's money well spent. I'm loving every minute of it. If I hadn't re-started bike commuting 2 years ago then I'd still have an old mountain bike hanging on a hook, I wouldn't have my trike and recumbent, I wouldn't have met all the nice recumbent riders all over the country (and world), I'd be buying more gasoline, and I wouldn't be starting and ending every workday with fun.

Worth every penny I tell ya.
I don't look at the commute as time spent. If I drove to work, I would have to find other time to exercise, so I my commute saves time by combining commute and exercise.
Daily Commute is offline  
Old 12-15-05, 10:04 AM
  #12  
Sumanitu taka owaci
 
LittleBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sbhikes
If you add all that up it's way more than I've spent on my old 1994, fully paid for truck that molders in the driveway totally ignored.
Now that's a cyclist after my own heart!

Maybe my knee is a little twitchy, these days...
__________________
No worries
LittleBigMan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.