Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Bareknuckle Vs. Raleigh Rush Hour Frame geometry

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Bareknuckle Vs. Raleigh Rush Hour Frame geometry

Old 04-26-06, 02:40 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
biciclectic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the sticks, CA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bareknuckle Vs. Raleigh Rush Hour Frame geometry

I am thinking about purchasing a bareknuckle frame via internet, but I need some help with the sizing. I am 5'4" and currently ride a 50 cm raleigh rush hour. According to the some threads posted on here earlier the bareknuckle frames run larger than most of their other bikes. I asked someone from trackstarnyc and the guy said that the frames are similar. Can anyone validate this? Anyones help is appreciated!
biciclectic is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 02:57 PM
  #2  
bought a new car
 
$0.00/Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,346

Bikes: 01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've never ridden a rushhour but I've been on 2 bareknuckles within the last week and both felt awesome.
$0.00/Gal is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 03:07 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just picked up a bare knuckle frame+fork yesterday, 50cm IM 5'6" and normally ride a 54cm on road bike geometry, the stand over on the BK barely touches my nads, dont know if this helps you any, but, anyhoo...
ScottMC is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 03:15 PM
  #4  
WTF?
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: livin' the dream
Posts: 462

Bikes: trek cross, gt mtb, khs track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^^^what's your inseam?

bareknuckle frames at business cycles.
rush hour geometry

all the sizes of the rush hour have the same bb height but the cranks get longer, isn't that weird?

Last edited by mrbertfixy; 04-26-06 at 03:38 PM.
mrbertfixy is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 03:29 PM
  #5  
Poseur
 
Comatose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, definitely order a size smaller (bareknuckle). I usually ride a 54/56cm, but after I've read the threads about the sizing, I purchased a 52cm and couldn't be happier.
Comatose is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 03:39 PM
  #6  
WTF?
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: livin' the dream
Posts: 462

Bikes: trek cross, gt mtb, khs track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
anyone care to share standover height of their bareknuckle? and include the what width tires you're using too.
mrbertfixy is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 03:39 PM
  #7  
bought a new car
 
$0.00/Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,346

Bikes: 01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I usually ride a 54cm and a 50cm bareknuckle fit me.
$0.00/Gal is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 05:39 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
biciclectic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the sticks, CA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have about a 29.5 inseam. I think the consensus says to size down, now i just gotta find someone who carries the yellow in a 48cm. Thanks everyone!
biciclectic is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 08:09 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
biciclectic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the sticks, CA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScottMC
I just picked up a bare knuckle frame+fork yesterday, 50cm IM 5'6" and normally ride a 54cm on road bike geometry, the stand over on the BK barely touches my nads, dont know if this helps you any, but, anyhoo...
yes this does help I i'm 5'4, the 50 cm just might work for me, but i guess that depends on how low your nads hang.
biciclectic is offline  
Old 04-26-06, 08:58 PM
  #10  
TN!
Senior Member
 
TN!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i'm 5 10 and my 54 bareknuckle fits like a glove
TN! is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 03:05 AM
  #11  
Happy Cycling
 
HexagonSun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SF
Posts: 417

Bikes: bareknuckle, bomber pro, 3Rensho SR, nagasawa special

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i'm 5'10" and i ride a 52 and it fits great. one of the things you should know about the bareknuckle is that the seat tube is sized center-to-center, so my 52cm is more like 53.5 center to top of seat tube measurement. the 52 also has a 54.5cm top tube, which is why i think many people find the frames to run large for their size. going by the seat tube measurement alone, you may find yourself stretched out too far on the bars because as the frames get smaller, the top tube lengths tend to be proportionally longer. i would suggest a 48. that would give you a 52cm top tube. compare that to your rush hour and determine whether you feel you need a longer or shorter reach to your bars. the seat tube size is less relevant because your seat post is easier to adjust than a stem/steerer tube length.
HexagonSun is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 05:11 AM
  #12  
Poseur
 
Comatose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrbertfixy
anyone care to share standover height of their bareknuckle? and include the what width tires you're using too.
31.5" with 23c tires on my 52cm bareknuckle.
Comatose is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 05:30 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Terror_in_pink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,047

Bikes: Custom Holland Ti road bike, Custom track bike I traded a painting for.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i dont know if you have yet, but consider overlap. my friend rides a 49-50cm bareknuckle and complains of massive overlap.
__________________
Ode to the after work nap ( ride your bike instead)

Ode to the nap
The evil, evil nap
It lures
you succumb
But only with good intent
Shortly I will rise
But you do not.
Do not succumb
To the evil, evil nap
Terror_in_pink is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 06:53 AM
  #14  
Me talk pretty one day.
 
eyefloater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey, TiP:

The fourth line of your sig is almost completely cut off and unreadable (using Firefox here).
eyefloater is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 07:10 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 577
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eyefloater
Hey, TiP:

The fourth line of your sig is almost completely cut off and unreadable (using Firefox here).
Hit control - (That's control and the minus key).
gorn is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 10:24 AM
  #16  
Shadow Member
 
simple312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: brooklyn (chicago until july07)
Posts: 189

Bikes: bareknuckle fixed, cannondale track, nishiki conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i cant compair the bareknuckle vs the rush, but vs my 03 khs flite100...

bareknuckle is stiffer, slightly lighter. im 6', my khs was a 57cm, my bareknuckle is a 54cm and fits me great. i think i have read that they are sized 3cm shorther than most other frames. so a if you normally ride a 57 get a 54, if you ride a 54 get a 51/50 or what ever sizes they come in.

i think the khs might have has a slightly higher top tube but i could be wrong. toe overlap is about the same on both, but geometry is diffrent. I had to shorten my chain when moving parts over to the bareknucle to keep it from being at the very end of the drop outs (or what ever track ends are properly called.)

if price is an issue, the bareknuckle frame is same price as the off the shelf rush hour.
simple312 is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 02:28 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
biciclectic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the sticks, CA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terror_in_pink
i dont know if you have yet, but consider overlap. my friend rides a 49-50cm bareknuckle and complains of massive overlap.
i have not considered it, i think the bareknuckle comes in a 48 and 50 only. do you know which size he/she rides for sure? and how tall is this person? I already expericing some overlap with my 50 cm.
biciclectic is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 04:19 PM
  #18  
this bike is an aqueduct
 
Matthew A Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,073

Bikes: Villin custom touring, Medici Pro Pista, KHS Alite1000, Windsor fixed commuter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I have massive toe overlap on my bike (it'd almost be pedal overlap on a smaller frame), but I don't think it's something worth complaining about, exactly. Track bikes are going to have pretty short wheelbases, it's gotta come from somewhere. Such is the territory...
__________________
Villin custom touring | Raleigh XXIX | Medici Pro Pista | 1978 Schwinn Stingray
Matthew A Brown is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 07:12 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
biciclectic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the sticks, CA
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HexagonSun
i'm 5'10" and i ride a 52 and it fits great. one of the things you should know about the bareknuckle is that the seat tube is sized center-to-center, so my 52cm is more like 53.5 center to top of seat tube measurement. the 52 also has a 54.5cm top tube, which is why i think many people find the frames to run large for their size. going by the seat tube measurement alone, you may find yourself stretched out too far on the bars because as the frames get smaller, the top tube lengths tend to be proportionally longer. i would suggest a 48. that would give you a 52cm top tube. compare that to your rush hour and determine whether you feel you need a longer or shorter reach to your bars. the seat tube size is less relevant because your seat post is easier to adjust than a stem/steerer tube length.
I think the top tube for the bareknuckle is 53 and the top tube on my bike is a 52.5 and i feel slightly cramped already.
biciclectic is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 08:03 PM
  #20  
knucklehead
 
roscoenyc57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Village, NYC
Posts: 520

Bikes: Rocky MT Track, Vivalo, Pista Concept, De Bernardi Track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biciclectic
I think the top tube for the bareknuckle is 53 and the top tube on my bike is a 52.5 and i feel slightly cramped already.
in your original post you were talkin' about buying one of these frames from the internet....

you may want to make a field trip into town to a place that actually has some of these frames in stock.
where the can put some wheels in the dropouts and you can stand over the frame. It would probably be worth the day trip.

I usually ride a 56. I rode a friend's 54 and it was what I would describe as big.......
__________________
bikes

Studio
roscoenyc57 is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 09:54 PM
  #21  
TN!
Senior Member
 
TN!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I do agree that bareknuckles run big, but i honestly dont think they run THAT big. as stated above, im 5 10 and my 54 fits great, and i always though i had fairly short legs. eh
TN! is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 10:21 PM
  #22  
Me talk pretty one day.
 
eyefloater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gorn
Hit control - (That's control and the minus key).
*head smack*
eyefloater is offline  
Old 04-27-06, 11:22 PM
  #23  
like, really sloppy
 
sloppy robot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: calipornia
Posts: 2,285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
am i the only one who kinda likes toe overlap?
sloppy robot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.